[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 28 KB, 1211x112, Capture.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2098619 No.2098619 [Reply] [Original]

Lets see how long it takes /sci/ to solve this!
Answer doesn't need to be exact and can/should contain radicals

>> No.2098621

bump!!!!!

>> No.2098622

give me a minute

>> No.2098627

its a race between /sci/ and /b/ lol i wonder who will win

>> No.2098629

if /b/ wins i am going to bed.

>> No.2098633

smaller length = 5.7 (approx)
larger length = 8.7 (approx)

>> No.2098636

>>2098633
lol. cant use calculator. Answer has to be in radical from this is a algebra question

>> No.2098639

>>2098633

my bad misread the question
smaller length = 1.34 (approx)
larger length = 5.68 (approx)

>> No.2098643

>>2098639
Errrrr........
you misread it once again....

>> No.2098649

>>2098636

dude that's 14 year old maths.

fucking pain to type out.

smaller length = (-12 + 2sqrt[161])/10

longer length is 2*that + 3, i can't be fucked

seriously i did this shit when i was 14

>> No.2098657

>>2098643

er, no i didn't. despite the question being fucking stupidly worded, you let one piece = x and the other piece = 2x + 3

x^2 + (2x + 3)^2 = 109

and solve from there

>> No.2098668

>>2098657
i cant believe /b/ won.... guys im sorry if i worded it wrong but its not a question where you solve for the exact answer.... answer MUST include radicals...

>> No.2098674

>>2098668

protip dude, radicals (otherwise and better known as surds) are for 12 year old middle-schoolers.

your shitty homework's already been done, make sure to pack your lunchbox for school tomorrow

>> No.2098676

>>2098674
U mad because you lost?

>> No.2098677

>>2098674
u mad?

>> No.2098683

>>2098674
U mad brah

>> No.2098684

>>2098674
hey /sci/fag, the rules were clearly posted by OP ( who is a faggot as always) . Sorry you probably wasted 20 minutes doing something thats for 12 year olds and still couldnt get it right.....

- /b/

>> No.2098686

Here you go:

x = <span class="math">\displaystyle \frac{12 + \sqrt{2144}}{10}[/spoiler]
y = <span class="math">\displaystyle \frac{24 + 2\sqrt{2144}}{10} - 3[/spoiler]

>> No.2098689
File: 2 KB, 99x126, 1289371128850s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2098689

>>2098686
wrong fag is still wrongfag....

>> No.2098690

>>2098674


i think he mad

>> No.2098693

>>2098686
Try asking /b/, i hear they are good at that stuff

>> No.2098694
File: 49 KB, 604x436, 1289977570850.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2098694

>>2098674

>> No.2098697

>>2098693
Yeah man, not ten minutes ago they solved a question within ten minutes that /sci/ couldn't get right after half an hour.

>> No.2098698

(1175+109sqrt(47515))/11885

(545+2sqrt(47515))/11885

>> No.2098701
File: 2 KB, 126x89, 1289371091770s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2098701

>>2098698
and still can't get......

>> No.2098702

>>2098697
Yup.

>> No.2098704

Maybe someone should link the /b/ thread, so these poor guys can learn something about maths.

Really I don't know why OP went to /sci/ first, this is just middle school stuff and the /sci/entists are really struggling.

>> No.2098705

Ok here:

x = <span class="math">\displaystyle \frac{-12 + \sqrt{2144}}{10}[/spoiler]
y = <span class="math">\displaystyle \frac{-24 + 2\sqrt{2144}}{10} + 3[/spoiler]

>> No.2098706
File: 5 KB, 130x190, 1289983995468.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2098706

>>2098674

solve this /sci/

x > /sci/

>> No.2098711

x² + y² = 109

x = (y*2) + 3


there you go, /sci/fags

>> No.2098713

>>2098705
dude seriously..... stop using calculators.... its ALGEBRA. If you were to do that without a calculator you would get it.

And>>2098706
that was an easy one: /b/

>> No.2098714

(2sqrt(134)-6)/5 and (4sqrt(134)+3)/5
What do I win?

>> No.2098715

>>2098713

ARP DERP ALGEBRA

>still in grade 9 at school

tell me this bro, what's the square root of -2?

>> No.2098719

>>2098713
>calculator
>algebra
>calculator
>numeric
>calculator
>algebra
>symbolic
>numeric
>calculator
>not symbolic

My brain is full of fuck.

>> No.2098720

>>2098715
SQRT(2) * i.

No need to thank me, I'm just happy to help you /sci/fags out. I know this is complicated stuff to you.

>> No.2098722

>>2098713
err I did not use a calculator. If I used a calculator I would have written:

3.430334761
and
9.860669522

>> No.2098723

>>2098715
1.414i

rounded down

>> No.2098728

iSQRT(2)

>> No.2098733

>>2098720
>>2098723
>>2098728
>>2098711
>>2098706
Go back to your cp/ gore/ baww threads now and thanks for your help.

>> No.2098734

<span class="math">\sqrt{2}i[/spoiler]


because /b/tards can't TeX

>> No.2098736

>>2098733
>please leave, you're hurting our sense of superiority :(:(

>> No.2098738
File: 12 KB, 240x175, 1289985278301.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2098738

>>2098734
because using tex makes you soooooo special and sophisticated

>> No.2098741
File: 93 KB, 500x375, 1290115164492.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2098741

>>2098736

>> No.2098751

>>2098741
u mad, broski?