[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 49 KB, 469x428, troll face.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2030429 No.2030429 [Reply] [Original]

If there are no changes in the oxidation state of the reactants or products of a particular reaction, that reaction is not a redox reaction.

>> No.2030445

No chem fags on tonight to upset?

I am disappoint!

>> No.2030454
File: 6 KB, 219x251, serious.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2030454

OP I......

>> No.2030469
File: 196 KB, 1800x1200, colourtrollgentleman.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2030469

mfw no chem fags are on /sci/ and someone will take this faggot OP's post as fact and miss it on an exam

mfw lol

>> No.2030488

OP please explain to me why this would upset chemfags, as I am an antichemfag.

>> No.2030519

>>2030488
Chemists classify chemical reactions in various ways. Often a major classification is based on whether or not the reaction involves oxidation-reduction. A reaction may be classified as redox in which oxidation and reduction occur or nonredox in which there is no oxidation and reduction occurring.

It is essentially supposed to make a chem fag question them self, try to find errors in their thinking and then realise that they were right all along and a troll that was trolling with a general accepted fact was successful because the chem fag questioned them-self.

Not OP, but that is the only logical reason someone would post that on /sci/ with a "coolface" as its picture attachment.

tl;dr OP is a fag and a counter troll?

>> No.2030534

>>2030519
Oh thanks, I get it. I vaguely remember the words "redox reaction" from chemistry in my sophomore year in high school, didn't bother to remember anything from that though.