/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.2015236]

Anyone have the most recent revised version of this?

[Anonymous No.2015253]

>>2015236
galileo is not low, top-mid

[Anonymous No.2015254]

CARL SAGAN IN LOW TIER MAKES THIS BOARD RAGE

[Anonymous No.2015258]

You forgot marie curie, at least god tier.
Even sexists acknowledge her, stop pretending, she is directly competing with einstein.

[Anonymous No.2015259]

>>2015254
Actually as much i love Sagan he *IS* low tier.
Look at his achievements, nothing really important.
Only famous cause of his series.

Also Tyron(nigger)
Is BELOW SHIT TIER.
HE didn't do ANYTHING.
Just appering in shows.
He's an attention whore.

[Anonymous No.2015260]

>>2015253
Galileo thought that the idea that the moon caused the tides was pure superstition.

[Anonymous No.2015264]

Like I said in /new/, Planck not in God tier, nope.

[Anonymous No.2015266]

wtf.
Who is the Low tier faaaaaaaaaaar right.
The young dude.

[Anonymous No.2015270]

>implying dawkins isn't troll-tier

[Anonymous No.2015273]

mfw i dont know ANY of the TOP tier row.

Anyone care to put names on everyone?
Plssss ;o

[Anonymous No.2015275]

>>2015266
He's a CERN physicist who does a lot to popularize physics and is on tv sometimes. Brian Cox.

[Anonymous No.2015276]

Who is that Top-right. I always get my marble busts mixed up.

[Anonymous No.2015285]

Why is OP putting Edison and Tesla in with scientists? If you're doing inventors, you're missing a lot of important ones.

[Anonymous No.2015290]

Add names please.

[Anonymous No.2015292]

>>2015276
Aristotle. He's the only marble bust who did anything that is comparable to modern science.

[Anonymous No.2015301]

mfw when tesla

[Anonymous No.2015303]

>>2015273
3rd and 2nd to right are Planck and Feynman. 3rd to left might be that asswipe Crick, but I'm not good with faces.

[Anonymous No.2015305]

>Leibniz, Galilei
>low tier

>rage

[None !!n1dRzAtkX5f No.2015306]

I raged at this, how the FUCK can you say this is legitimate?

[Anonymous No.2015310]

mfw when no Maxwell. GTFO OP.

[None !!n1dRzAtkX5f No.2015312]

Hey OP, obviously you don't know WHAT CALCULUS IS, and obviously you are a faggot

[Anonymous No.2015315]

mfw when mendell

[Anonymous No.2015319]

>>2015259

Correct, Sagan had no mind blowing discoveries. He's important for other reasons presumably not used in the ranking of this chart.

[Anonymous No.2015321]

mfw when tesla > mendell


OP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

[Anonymous No.2015322]

>>2015260
Galileo Galilei(1564-1642)
Isaac Newton(1643-1727)

Galileo didn't even know about gravity which causes the tides so it makes sense that he will reject that theory.
If you still don't agree then newton should be in a less tier because he believed in god.

[Anonymous No.2015323]

>>2015319

correct sir, it should be noted that on another chart he is god-tier

[Anonymous No.2015324]

I don't see Gell-Mann either. Who's that fucker next to Aristotle? At first I thought he was Gell-Mann, but his hair is too flat.

[Anonymous No.2015328]

>>2015305
With Newton in the highest tier, what did you expect? It's obvious he's a Newtonfag.

[Anonymous No.2015329]

OP

WHAT

THE

FUCK

WERE

YOU


THINKING

WHEN

YOU

MADE

THIS

CHART

OMG

PLEASE

GET

THE

FUCK

OFF

AND

AN

HERO

[Anonymous No.2015332]

>>2015323


The fact that he's sharing a tier with Degrasse is down right insulting though.

[Anonymous No.2015334]

>>2015292
Eratosthenes. How does degrees of a circle work?

[Anonymous No.2015336]

>>2015319
sagan just did some tv series and some alien fanfic we don't even know if the target audience will like

[Anonymous No.2015341]

I am appalled OP, I am truly TRULY appalled!

[Anonymous No.2015344]

Having Feynman on, but no Dirac?

Meh ..

[Anonymous No.2015345]

>>2015322
Galileo believed in God and was almost as religious as Newton.

Every scientist who doesn't believe in God should automatically be Mid-Tier or lower. I might make an exception for Feynman, because though he was agnostic, he had a lot of respect for the contributions of religion to the ethics of society.

[Anonymous No.2015348]

OP, I find your choice of placement on more than one occasion to be revolting, please proceed to the nearest bridge and jump off

[Anonymous No.2015351]

>>2015336

Sagan was a "pop-Scientist"

He brought science to the layman and made children interested. He was brilliant in this respect.

Degrasse and Kaku are the same thing but their target audiences are in the 8th grade.

[Anonymous No.2015352]

>>2015345


>>implying religion should not be condemned

Wait....you best be trollin', right?

[Anonymous No.2015354]

>>2015334
Math=/=Science.
If we were doing a math chart, it would look completely different and have numerous marble busts. Aristotle published a work on physics which defined how western civilization viewed physics for over a thousand years. It was pretty severely wrong, but still...

[Anonymous No.2015356]

>>2015345
>and was almost as religious as Newton

Hardly. Newton was an occult freak and thought he'd become famous because of his books on interpreting the Bible.

[Anonymous No.2015358]

>>2015352
>enjoy your adolescence.

[Anonymous No.2015360]

mfw people in the year 2010 debate whether or not Newton was religous and imply that it makes any difference

[Anonymous No.2015363]

>>2015345
Why they should be mid tier?
Most scientist doesn't believe in god but are panteist or agnostics

[Anonymous No.2015365]

>>2015356
Galileo also wrote biblical interpretations. These are what got him in trouble with the Pope -- not the science behind heliocentrism, but telling people how to interpret the bible to be consistent with it.

[Anonymous No.2015366]

>>2015358


This is you, amirite?>>2015358

[Anonymous No.2015374]

>>2015363
That's the fad with modern science. But a mind that can into religion And into science, like Newton, Aristotle or Maxwell (though the latter didn't write much about it) is a God-tier mind.

[Anonymous No.2015375]

>>2015345

0/10

Nothing to see here, carry on.

[Anonymous No.2015378]

>>2015374


trolls are that way >>/b/

[Anonymous No.2015380]

Who's the cowboy?

[Anonymous No.2015381]

am going to watch bourne ultinatum.
When i get back i expect this faggotry to be fixed.
or else.

[Anonymous No.2015382]

mfw OP posts on /sci/ and trolls us all

[Anonymous No.2015383]

>>2015378
Why are you so threatened by people who take religion seriously? You must hate the fact of Newton's existence.

[Anonymous No.2015386]

and who's the guy who looks like an old hippie?

[Anonymous No.2015390]

>>2015383

because people who take religion seriously are in possession of a mindset that has single handily been responsible for more pain & suffering than any of us care to every see or hear about

that is why

[Anonymous No.2015391]

>>2015380
indiana jones

[Anonymous No.2015394]

>>2015390
wow. you're an idiot.

[Anonymous No.2015395]

>>2015391

i lol'd

[Anonymous No.2015398]

>>2015390
>implying science cares about suffering

[Anonymous No.2015399]

>>2015322
>implying Galileo didn't believe in God.
girlslaughing.pcx

[Anonymous No.2015400]

>>2015394

How the fuck can you honestly say that what I said was idiotic!?

PROVE TO ME THAT RELIGION IS BENEFICIAL TO HUMANITY

[Anonymous No.2015403]

>>2015400

[Anonymous No.2015406]

>>2015400

It slowed down technological growth.

[Anonymous No.2015407]

>>2015400
Maybe you should learn some actual history of thought in western civilization. Or read Feynman's lecture on religion and science.

[Anonymous No.2015409]

>>2015399
But galileo didn't try to find a secret code in the bible made with the distance betwen the letters

[Anonymous No.2015411]

>>2015406
It sped it up by 100x. Europe would not have invented modern science without it.

[Anonymous No.2015414]

>>2015406
and that is benefical?

[Anonymous No.2015416]

>>2015409
I've read Newton's religious writings and I didn't see anything like that. You're thinking of the "Bible Code", which is pure 20th century nuttery. Newton's biblical interpretations weren't based on anything that nonsensical.

[Anonymous No.2015421]

Why is slow down the technological growth good?

Because of the environment? Thats no technology's fault, it's because human doesn't care about it enough to destroy it and get a little money.

[Anonymous No.2015426]

>>2015416
Maybe you're right, in that case im sorry because i didn't know that.

[Anonymous No.2015427]

>>2015421
slowed down the construction of the bomb allowing humans to remain alive for a few more centuries

[Anonymous No.2015434]

>>2015427

mfw


Oh please!

>>implying humand will blow themselves up

>>implying cynicism is the way to look at history

>>implying you are correct

[Anonymous No.2015474]

>>2015434
>implying we need all the humanity consent to blow ourselves up
>implying it's not enough with a few retards in the wrong places

[Anonymous No.2015489]

Ok, stop bitchin about religion.

[Anonymous No.2015494]

All of those should be god-tier, expect those in troll-tier, of course.

[Anonymous No.2015537]

>>2015494
no

[Anonymous No.2015554]

>>2015292

Aristotle was a fucking faggot.

You mean to say Euclid or Pythagoras

[Anonymous No.2015558]

>>2015554
Euclid and Pythagoras were both god-tier mathematicians. They didn't do science though.

[Anonymous No.2015561]

>Kepler is shit tier
What are you doing you fool

[Anonymous No.2015564]

Needs more Hooke

[Anonymous No.2015566]

>>2015561
This.
The goddamn list is still shit. Having Sagan on a higher tier than Kepler?

[Anonymous No.2015567]

mfw no Schrodinger

[Anonymous No.2015568]

>>2015567
mfw you have no face

[Anonymous No.2015579]

>>2015568
mf

[Anonymous No.2015590]

>>2015266
Brian Cox isn't that young btw, 42 years old if I recall correctly.

[Anonymous No.2015703]

>>2015344
This. At least as far as physics goes, the chart needs Dirac and Landau. Once you include Dirac, he'll HAVE to go on the top tier, and Feynman will HAVE to move below him.

Watson and/or Crick should go on the Low Tier. You also need Mendel and Mendeleev (I don't recognize them).

I love Dawkins but he should CLEARLY be on the troll tier. He doesn't do research!

[Anonymous No.2015728]

I would rearrange that a bit lol

[Anonymous No.2015735]

>>2015400
Religion = Literacy

[Anonymous No.2015745]

WTF is Aristotle doing in God Tier? All his "observations" about the world were wrong. Give me Democritus, OP.

[Anonymous No.2015836]

Tesla doesn't deserve to be above feynman, Heisenberg, etc etc... (because these people revolutionized our understanding of the physical universe. Tesla was an engineer with a great understanding of Electricity and Magnetism. He didn't discover the laws nof E and M!)

[Anonymous No.2015847]

>>2015236
Karl Sagan should be low tier. Or no tier. There is no logic to this list.

[Anonymous No.2015894]

Don't see Nila Gaede

[Anonymous No.2015913]

What the fuck. Aristotle? WHy?

[Anonymous No.2015916]

>darwin on god tier
>nope

[Anonymous No.2015919]

Can someone tell me all the names of the people in the list?

[Anonymous No.2015921]

>>2015919
If you can't already name them all ( except for retards like Hovind ) then you need to open books and read Science magazines more often.

[Anonymous No.2015924]

>>2015745
>Democritus
>The dude who thought the earth was flat, and had no system of science.

[Anonymous No.2015928]

>>2015921
>mfw your science books are picture books.

[Anonymous No.2015930]

>>2015913
Maybe because he invented science?

[Anonymous No.2015934]

>>2015836
This is obviously the same adolescent who made the last supper pic and has a hardon for inventors

[Anonymous No.2015936]

SURE IS EUROPEAN IGNORANCE OF ISLAMIC, INDIAN, AND CHINESE CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE SCIENCES AROUND HERE...

[Anonymous No.2015940]

>>2015930
Are you kidding me? Democritus was much more scientific than he and Plato ever pretended to be.

[Anonymous No.2015944]

>>2015940
lolno

[Anonymous No.2015945]

>>2015390
>>2015390
>>2015390
>implying communism wasn't atheistic

[Anonymous No.2015947]

>>2015928

>mfw I have read every issue of national geographic and scientific american published since 1999.

[Anonymous No.2015949]

>>2015936
Those places aren't even real.

[Anonymous No.2015952]

>>2015944
Name one contribution to science made by Aristotle. I guess you might say taxonomy, but his taxonomy failed hard.

[Anonymous No.2015974]

>>2015952
Not that poster but:

Combining empiricism and rationalism. (The first scientific method)
Axioms

[Anonymous No.2015990]

>>2015974
Maybe you're right, but I have a very hard time believing that Aristotle was in any way original when he decided empiricism was useful and rational. That just seems so obvious.

[Anonymous No.2016111]

personally i think Archimedes should take newton's place on God tier.

He did so much more at this time.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XdIxX_58C_U&feature=related

Also have now idea why Leibniz is so far down in rank. I enjoy using his notation whenever i can.

yea, and Kaku is right were he should be

[Anonymous No.2016116]

What is this thread about?

[Anonymous No.2016126]

hivemind, celebrity worship

nature frelint

[Anonymous No.2016167]

>Gene Kelly
>not GOD TIER

Nice troll, OP.

[Anonymous No.2016170]

>Descartes
>Shit tier
No credibility.

[Anonymous No.2016181]

>>2015990
>>2015990
>>2015990
>>2015990

The hardest things lie invisible in plain site.

[Anonymous No.2016195]

Someone should make a philosophy list.

Pic related, it's a God tier philosopher

[Anonymous No.2016196]

Stephen Hawking is mid tier?
Harsh dude
He deserves atleast top tier
Also Mendel...
Well his contributions did change the field of biology. But it was simpler so I guess mid tier is fine.

[Anonymous No.2016213]

>>2016195
>God tier philosopher
only for the criminally insane

[Anonymous No.2016229]

No.
Ancient Greeks must have their own tier.
When they were being scientific,mathematical,philosophical etc other people (like today's nordic people) were in caves bashing eachothers skulls.

Shame on you to even compare Einstein with the ancients, Einstein had everything in his table.
Only Newton is barely comparable.

Ancient Greek Tier
God Tier
Top Tier
etc

inb4 why greeks suck today?
Because they are no greeks today.

Just countries from europe+asia =Todays Greece

Greek was conquered by romans bout 2k years, and became again a country 400 years ago.

In 1600 years all kind of sandniggers and europefags went to greece took a crap and left.

The tiny little number of original greeks got mixed with all the other countries.

Not a Greekfag.

But i acknowledge Ancient Greece as the greatest civilization/time.

And it doesnt exist now, only ppl that live in the same place they did.

All hail the ancient times.jpg

[Anonymous No.2016233]

>>2016195
>ayn rand
>god tier philosopher
Pick one.

Also
>philosopher
>god tier
Pick one again.

[Anonymous No.2016236]

>>2016229
>became a country ~200 ago.
Fix'd

[Anonymous No.2016241]

>heisenberg mid tier

sure why not, he was just one of the main characters (along with bohr, planck, schrodinger) responsible for the development of quantum mechanics and start of a scientific revolution in the beginning of the century that changed mankind's view of the Universe and made technological advancements such as the computer you're using or the internet which you're connected possible.

sure, why not?

[Anonymous No.2016245]

>>2016195
I assume troll, but...
Rand is about as God tier of a philosopher as a 13 year white rich old boy that read his first book on political ideologies.

pic related

[Anonymous No.2016247]

>Kepler and Descartes shit tier

>Sagan didnt make anything other than smoke pot and recite beautiful things about the universe and is on low tier.

Yeah, no.

[Anonymous No.2016249]

>>2016247
because sagan fanboys.

[Anonymous No.2016251]

>>2016229
Ancient Greece 'stole' a lot from Ancient Egypt though, who were even earlier with stuff as mathematics, technology, medicine etc.

[Axel the Possum No.2016267]

>>2016245

Question: Ever read Atlas Shrugged? Because that author didn't.

The "Shruggers" really did till the soil. They, by and large, became farmers. A judge, for example, raised pigs, and a former car factory owner made tractors more or less by hand. A man who owned an entire series of copper mines worked mined and smelted on the small scale himself, with the assistance of a few other dedicated men.

Seriously, if you're gonna try mocking Rand, do it right...

[Anonymous No.2016269]

what are stephen hawking and leonard suskind doing in mid tier?

[Anonymous No.2016274]

>>2016269
Yeah, it's preposterous that they're in the same tier as Heisenberg, they should be lower.

[Anonymous No.2016289]

>>2016274
stephen hawking and heisenburg should be higher and suskind should be lower

[Anonymous No.2016295]

Is that darwin next to einstein?
If yes, take him down from god tier god dammit

[Anonymous No.2016300]

>>2016267
Considering the quality of her masturbatory ramblings i see no reason why you should need to provide any quality when arguing against her.

The society she so dearly wanted would degenerate rapidly, it would take approximately 20 minutes before you have a military dictatorship and 20 minutes more for all technology and knowhow to be lost. By the end of the week mankind would have reverted to a nomadic lifestyle.

[Anonymous No.2016304]

> Descartes
> Shit tier
Go fuck yourself?

[Anonymous No.2016310]

you think einstein > planck?
oh man...
and where is Wittgenstein?

[Anonymous No.2016313]

Descartes introduced the method of skepticism

then used it to try to prove God's existence

[Anonymous No.2016320]

>>2016313
He only did the god thing because all the cool kids were doing it.
Nobody is perfect.

[Axel the Possum No.2016322]

>>2016300

That's a statement you're going to have to defend. Why would a society with limited government and a strong defense of human rights collapse overnight, hm?

[Anonymous No.2016328]

>>2016320
3/4 of discourse on method is proving God's existence and talking about God's essence

[Anonymous No.2016338]

I'm in Low tier?

[Anonymous No.2016340]

>>2016328
Precisely.

[Anonymous No.2016516]

>descartes
>shit tier

I guess you like eating shit for breakfast.

[Anonymous No.2016538]

Why is Darwin God-tier? He wasn't even a very good scientist.

[Anonymous No.2016540]

>>2015554
Aristotle invented evolution.

[Anonymous No.2016561]

>>2016516
Descartes, believed in dualism...... Not even Cartesian coordinates make up for that.

[Anonymous No.2016562]

>>2016267
>implying the Randroids would till the land.
>implying that privatizing everything doesn't result in military dictatorship and the aristocracy that we were fighting against in th first place.

Your idea of limited government means that the government wouldn't have the power to enforce contracts, or the power to stop other individuals from infringing on your rights, or the power to ensure the free market. I can keep going. Basically, the regulation and taxes your are shitting on, is the main thing that is keeping people from taking your money.

[Anonymous No.2016570]

>>2016562
>implying aristocracy is bad

[Anonymous No.2016582]

>>2015236

Huge problem, what the fuck?

Why are there no mathematicians? Where in fucks name is Georg Cantor? or Godel? Gauss? Where's Euler?

Why is tesla god tier?

At first I thought, oh this must be only physicists, but then I randomly see in god tier...

[Anonymous No.2016585]

>>2016582

*randomly see darwin in god tier.

[Anonymous No.2016593]

WHO IS SECOND FROM RIGHT IN LOW TIER?

[Anonymous No.2016612]

>>2016593
Leibniz

[Anonymous No.2016622]

>>2016582
They're supposed to be scientists, you fucking retard. /sci/ thinks tesla was a scientist, because /sci/ is full of homosex.

[Anonymous No.2016623]

/sci/ you're so dumb

this thread made my day

[Anonymous No.2016659]

>>2016570
>Implying there is a such thing as invention in aristocracy.
Given, if it were an achieved aristocracy, that's fine. But without regulation, it would be inherited elitism.
If you know anything about the history of these scientists and engineers on OPs tier sheet, a good number of them were born into poverty.

[Anonymous No.2016842]

>>2016582
>Why is tesla god tier?
Gee I don't know
It probably has to do with the fact that he created the 20th century and all
You know alternative currents, xrays, radio, radars, etc...
He also created a frictionless actuator that could make a hold building shake by amplifying the metal bar's resonance, the death ray and towers that transmitted electricity wireless.
In fact the government started HAARP because according to Tesla we could modify the weather by lifting the ionosphere by sending millions of watts into it creating a budge in the atmosphere that would make air currents change trajectory.
In fact they have been using it successfully for the past 5 years to create a high pressure point in the east coast of Florida to fend off hurricanes.
They deem it just "weather research" though, because if the general public were to know the government could not wage covert damage to enemy nations through the manipulation of weather.

[Anonymous No.2016901]

>>2016842

[Anonymous No.2017093]

>>2016842