Important Things

[Anonymous No.1979846]

* People need to learn the difference between impossible and infinitely improbable.
* People often think of time in a backwards way. Time is the future flowing into the present. The present is where all possible outcomes to our actions come to fruition, and the past is the results of these things.
* The only realistic application of philosophy is ethics.
* There is no pre-destination. Any action has a number of reactions, and those reaction have a limited number of reactions, and so on. Because of this, there IS a sort of destiny.
* Time flows on forever in both directions.
* Logic has very few realistic applications. Sometimes the best answer to a problem are the ones that don't make sense.
* The worst possible crime someone can commit is caring too much.
* Weird people outnumber normal people by an uncountable amount.
* Dwelling on things like creationism or the big bang theory is silly.
* Predicting the future is easy, knowing which future you predicted is the hard part.
* Everything is cyclical. EVERYTHING.

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1979853]

Everything is CUBIC.
If you like, I'll prove it right now.

[Anonymous No.1979862]

>realistic application of philosophy

You completely missed the point.

[Anonymous No.1979868]

>>1979846
>The only realistic application of philosophy is ethics.
>philosophy
>realistic application

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1979873]

[Anonymous No.1979878]

>* Time flows on forever in both directions.
That's arguable from modern physics.

[Anonymous No.1979885]

>>1979853
>CUBIC
oh_here_we_go_again.jpg
Name me a single novel prediction of this CUBIC bullshit, and I won't call it bullshit anymore. Anything.

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1979888]

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1979892]

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1979897]

[Anonymous No.1979899]

>>1979853
>>1979873
>>1979888
>>1979892

Haha, oh wow...here we go again!

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1979905]

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1979907]

>>1979905
It doesn't predict, it tells.

[Anonymous No.1979908]

>>1979888
>cubic logic
Timecube?

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1979912]

uguysobviouslymad.jpg

[Anonymous No.1979913]

>>1979908

Pretty much.

[Anonymous No.1979914]

>* People often think of time in a backwards way. Time is the future flowing into the present. The present is where all possible outcomes to our actions come to fruition, and the past is the results of these things.
That's philosophy, not science.
>* Logic has very few realistic applications. Sometimes the best answer to a problem are the ones that don't make sense.
Sometimes the best answers are the ones that at first appear not to make sense, but they're always logical.
>* Everything is cyclical. EVERYTHING.
Possible but unproven.

[Anonymous No.1979919]

>>1979846


Opinions with no rational support, opinions with no rational support everywhere

[Anonymous No.1979927]

>>1979846
you sound like a pretentious faggot

[Anonymous No.1979945]

>>1979907
It doesn't have (falsifiable) predictions? It's also not math? Then get the hell off my science board.

[Anonymous No.1979949]

>>1979846
dude you posted this last night, and someone already told you why everything in it is bullshit,

and it is clear you don't understand many things, you sound like one of those kids in my philosophy or biology class, who has read all the work, but understands none of it, your nickname isn't dandan is it?

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1979954]

>>1979945
It's already predicted. It's the theory of everything. Get your science off of humanity's planet.

[Anonymous No.1979965]

>>1979954
Name me a single prediction it makes that I can go test which can have a clear false result. Otherwise it's not science.

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1979980]

>>1979965
It's predicted everything. It's the theory of everything. I just told you that. Your logic belief is nihilist, you make predictions under the idea that everything isn't structured, but rather random and infinite, which is impossible, go ahead and read what the pics say, you irrelevant, annoying, dumb little textbook fucker.

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1979987]

>>1979965
I have a text you can do. Look in the mirror, notice your TOP and BOTTOM duality, your LEFT and RIGHT duality and your FRONT and BACK duality.

Then remember what your science says, "that you're 1 thing"

Then examine the number 1.
One = I
Top Bottom Left Right Front Back = cube

[Anonymous No.1979996]

>>1979965
actually I'm pretty sure theories that have evidence, but cannot be tested still fall under science

[Anonymous No.1979997]

>>1979980
You don't seem to understand the definition of science. Scientific statements are not self evident. They cannot be. Scientific statements must be falsifiable, and they must be based on inductive reasoning, on evidence, of the natural world.

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1979999]

"We're all made out of cube stuff."
-Carl Sagan

[Anonymous No.1980003]

>>1979996
Yes... not seeing how this contradicts anything I just said.

[Anonymous No.1980007]

>>1979987
That's not a falsifiable prediction. Where is a falsifiable prediction?

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980010]

>>1979997
Then how can you call yourself a Scientist? That's nihilism, 'meaninglessness' existence.

[Anonymous No.1980013]

>>1979987
If he weren't trolling, the thing about the mirror would make me rage.

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980021]

>>1980007
It's not falsifiable? Because it's true.
It's like saying,
"The colour green exists."
To which you'd reply,
"No, that's not falsifiable"

pulked guantanamo

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980033]

>>1980013
Shut up, kid, go look in your mirror and use a chizel to scape all the cheese of your teeth and ache off your crusty face.

[Anonymous No.1980036]

>>1980021
Correct. "The color green exists" is not a scientific statement. It does not provide a falsifiable prediction.

Discussing the existence of the color green is more metaphysics, like talking about Platonic ideals. Questions about Platonic ideals are not scientific because they do not exist in the natural world, so there can be no evidence about them.

[Anonymous No.1980037]

>Billions are not countable
>It's for the best if we turn humanitarians into sociopathic rapists and spree killers
>Everything is cyclical. EVERYTHING.

[Anonymous No.1980038]

>>1980010
If that's what you want to call it, ok. That's the definition of science. Where is a falsifiable prediction? Otherwise get off the science board.

[Anonymous No.1980045]

>>1979980
>>1979997
>>1979996
>>1979965
>>1979949

Guys, brotip. Don't bother arguing with Ego/Aether/Noctis. You'll get nowhere. Just report and ignore, then move on. Sage if you absolutely have to post.

Don't feed the animals in the zoo, if you know what I mean. He bumps his own threads enough as it is.

Note to Noctis: don't bother calling me out, I don't give a shit. Thanks.

[Anonymous No.1980047]

>>1980003
you just said test it or it ain't science, i said it doesn't necessarily need to be tested to be science, you said yes how does that contradict me???

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980050]

>>1980036
So If I'm showing truths about the universe that cannot be falsified, and your science ignores these truths, then you are doing it wrong, against the will of what's true, by your own fabricated rules, not taking into account the people. You're not a scientist then, you're a nihilist. This is truth, it can't be falsified, it's not nihilist science, but we're not on a nihilist science board. We're on a science board, and I think real science is welcomed.

Also, what I posted was proving OP wrong, so also on-topic. Try harder buttmad faggot.

[Anonymous No.1980057]

>>1980047
Ok. I misunderstood. I apologize. It must be testable to be science. You do not need a controlled experiment, but you must have at least some falsifiable predictions. You can't have a controlled experiment in Geology, but Geology still makes falsifiable predictions.

[Anonymous No.1980060]

>>1980036
what about things that are testable, just not by us now?
like macro evolution which would take millions of years to properly test?

[Anonymous No.1980063]

>>1980050
Science doesn't ignore them. If you have no evidence or falsifiable predictions, then science is completely agnostic about them.

Either way, take your non-science off the science board please.

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980069]

>>1980036
Did you really say that the colour green does not exist in the natural world?

[Anonymous No.1980070]

>>1980050
>truths about the universe that cannot be falsified
Truth about the universe can always be falsified, including this statement.

[Anonymous No.1980071]

>>1980060
Testable does not mean a controlled experiment. It does mean falsifiable predictions. Evolution by natural selection makes a plethora of falsifiable predictions. The most famous such prediction is "There shall be no fossilized rabbits in the Pre-Cambrian."

[Anonymous No.1980077]

>>1980060
>like macro evolution which would take millions of years to properly test?
>implying we haven't been doing this with cell cultures for years
It's only the animals that rarely breed that evolve slowly.

[Anonymous No.1980082]

>>1980069
I'm saying the existence or the non-existence of the color green is more philosophy than science. If you define the color green as a certain set of wavelengths, or the color of an exemplar object, or the well agreed upon cultural definition, then we can start talking. Then we need to more formally define what it means for a color to exist. Yes objects of that color exist. Yes light of that color exists. I don't know what it means for a color to exist. Such a statement is a statement about Platonic ideals and not science.

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980083]

>>1980063
Of course you ignore them. Since when were you teaching the cubic nature of the universe in your science classes? Or basic logic for humans? You don't, you lie and you teach nihilistic science. This is truth, so why persist trying to save your false sense of intelligence. We live in a universe of opposites, fact. There are two routes a scientist can take, the Nihilistic one and then the Meaningful one. You're taking the nihilistic one, this is fact. I'm taking the meaningful one, it's real science.

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980092]

>>1980082
Are you saying that science doesn't take into account the philosophical side of things? Doesn't think about the past and only focuses on the future? Then you're not a scientist, so stop claiming you are.

[Anonymous No.1980093]

>>1980083
Your welcome to your ideas. However, your ideals are not science. Please stop redefining the terms because you don't like them. Science requires falsifiable predictions based on evidence in the natural world.

[Anonymous No.1980095]

>>1980092
>Are you saying that science doesn't take into account the philosophical side of things?
Correct.

>Doesn't think about the past and only focuses on the future?
I don't see how this relates at all. You can make scientific statements about the present, past, and future.

>Then you're not a scientist, so stop claiming you are.
Please stop redefining the word science because you don't like it.

[Anonymous No.1980099]

>>1980083
False, you believe in nihilistic science, but you are unaware of your nihilism as the plebian you are.
The real path is the path of the spheroid, the meaningful science.

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980101]

>>1980093
These ideas are truths, I thought we came to that agreement before. Now they're just ideas? What if I prove them to be true, what then? What if these truths can trace back to evolution? Or other factors of creation? Wouldn't that make your science dumber than mine? Wouldn't that make my science more superior? Then why do we still use yours? Kill yourself nihilist faggot, you put your paycheck / grade before the people.

[Anonymous No.1980112]

>>1980101
>What if?
This is not possible. Only glorious Spherizoid science can trace itself back to the truth.

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980113]

You're misguided and extremely dumb. Your science is not real science, it doesn't take into account truths, it assumes there is none. You admitted that about 10 times already. If there are no 'truths' then we are 'meaningless'.

[Anonymous No.1980114]

>>1980095
what about accepted truths of logic that have no evidence whatsoever and are untestable, yet all of science is based apon them

[Anonymous No.1980120]

>>1980101
>These ideas are truths, I thought we came to that agreement before.
I never agreed they were truths. In fact I called them bullshit.

>What if I prove them to be true, what then?
Prove how? Prove through evidence in the natural world? Then I'd be curious, and then it might be science.

>What if these truths can trace back to evolution? Or other factors of creation? Wouldn't that make your science dumber than mine? Wouldn't that make my science more superior? Then why do we still use yours?
I don't know what you're trying to say. Are you trying to say that evolution is provable from CUBIC? Or are you saying that CUBIC is provable from evolution?

Either way, I have no been discussing which is superior or not. I have been saying that CUBIC is not science. However, since I called it bullshit, it's pretty clear that I think science is superior to bullshit.

Also, I see you not using your trip here:>>1980099
Same-fagging it up perhaps?

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980121]

I mean, you guys sit in day in day out doing what you consider to be science. You fabricate the definition to your own needs, you don't want to re-define it to follow truths, instead, alike a slave, you stick to its definition. If you can't notice and fix your mistakes, you're not a scientists.

[Anonymous No.1980126]

>>1980120
>implying the glorious sphere master race can even be compared to lowly cubicians

[Anonymous No.1980127]

>>1980113
Protip: The desirability of a fact is entirely independent of whether that fact is true. Let me demonstrate. "Murder is evil. It would be so bad if there was murder in the world. Thus there is no murder." See how that makes no logical sense. See how you just used that kind of argument?

Also, please stop redefining the word "science" just because you don't like it.

[Anonymous No.1980130]

>>1980121
Scientists admit when they are incorrect. For example, Newtonian physics is not entirely correct. We discovered Relativistic physics, which replaces the incorrect Newtonian physics (at large scale). However, we didn't redefine Newtonian physics to mean something else.

Science has a definition. Whether that makes science stupid or not stupid does not change its definition.

[Anonymous No.1980147]

>>1980114
All belief systems are based on unprovable axioms, or they're inconsistent, or they're tautological. Science is no exception. Science is based on the axioms of inductive reasoning, the rules of the past are the same as the present (and future), and a couple other things.

Is that what you're talking about?

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980153]

I explained to you valid truths, time and time again. You ignore them, this means you're ignorant. You ignore them because they aren't following the rules of science, but science isn't following the rules of the universe, therefore, it's not science. Ergo, you're a nihilist scientist. You play the science game, but you don't play it the meaningful way, you play it the meaningless way.

[Anonymous No.1980159]

>>1980153
Science is not the only source of knowledge. CUBIC is another source of knowledge. That does not make science incorrect or un-useful. Still, CUBIC is not science, and this is the science board, so fuck off.

[Anonymous No.1980163]

>>1980147
what i'm saying is it aint science, according to you as it isn't testable, yet science depends on it to exist

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980167]

If you can't compute things outside of your little science realm, or accept them to be checked over, then you are ignorant, and therefore, putting yourselves before the people. You don't consider something because it's not in number form or on a sheet of paper with drawings. This explains the whole universe, and a two-year-old can learn it; your science tells people they have to spend years in education to reach a point where they still dont know shit.

[Anonymous No.1980169]

>>1980163
Yes, and? Is there a problem?

[Anonymous No.1980178]

>>1980167
No no. I do think about things using belief systems other than science. However, this is the science board, CUBIC is not science, so fuck off.

Go the philosophy board or religion board of random board. CUBIC is on topic there. It is not on topic on the science board.

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980191]

As I said before. What if, by different means than your (nihilist) science the universe could be explained? And because of its 'difference' it is not accepted by your (nihilist) science. Then you're ignorant, and not accepting you've made mistakes and not attempting to correct them. If you live by the book, then you're not a scientist. True scientists have no rules, just common sense.

[Anonymous No.1980192]

>>1980153
Hey faggot, you have no real opinions. That's right.
Your mind is so clouded with fail that you have no ability to tell what you actually believe. Case and point, 90% of your posts say nothing other than either obvious rewordings of truthful statements to sound insulting when they're clearly compliments or absolute horseshit that is poorly reasoned, makes no sense and could never be transformed into an explicit argument.
You are the lowest of the low, only attempting to bring other people down with you to feel better about how horrible your life has turned out. You spend more time on /sci/, a board filled with people you hate that discusses topics that have nothing to do with your bullshit beliefs, than anyone else, and in doing so have gotten nothing done in your life.
Get a job.

[Anonymous No.1980195]

>>1980169
no just developing a better understanding of what your thinking

[Anonymous No.1980204]

>>1980163
There needs to be a distinction made between the rules of science itself and actions conducted as science.
You cannot rewrite the rules, as this faggot is trying to do, especially in a manner that lacks actual description.

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980209]

I rarely read what you have to say, because you talk as if you're a disciplined trained dog. "NO! YOUZ BREAKING RULES!" Am I? Really? I thought it was a shortcut. It's more science than yours is, I just changed the semantics of the word to better humanity and our future.

[Anonymous No.1980212]

>>1980191
No, actually, scientists have some hard rules, and common sense isn't one of them. A hard rule of a scientist is to follow science, and that implies that we require evidence when someone makes a claim about the natural world.

As far as I can tell, CUBIC makes no such claims about the natural world, so science doesn't care.

Finally, we have different ideas of what "explain" means. For example, people often fall prey to the bad argument that just because they can't comprehend how something happens, a wizard must have done it. They would argue that by invoking an un-named wizard, they have explained something. However, the scientist would say that they know nothing interesting after the wizard explanation. They cannot make any new predictions - they've gained no useful insight, so it's not much of an explanation. Your CUBIC is like the wizard in this regard - it offers no useful information as far as I can tell.

Does CUBIC tell me that I shouldn't murder my neighbor? Does it tell me how the speed of light is affected when passing through certain materials? Does it tell me anything useful at all?

[Anonymous No.1980221]

>>1980209
Actually, you aren't, because you aren't doing anything.
You behave under the appearance of approaching with some new idea, but you never actually present such ideas.
When you have presented ideas, they have been filled with gaps and are unrecognizable as logical constructs.
Hence, you do not make arguments and essentially you say nothing other than whiny, accusatory statements.

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980223]

You said before that you're not ignorant and you're just following rules, but you thought my claims were not true. Then read the pictures I put, explain which ones aren't true and tell me how they aren't true in your own words. (you can't), They're true then. So, evidently, you are doing it wrong, and it's not science you're doing.

If science was so sound, why is there pseudo-science? Lol. Why does there have to be a out-of-science section, when it explores just as much as your nihilist science. You're a fucking idiot group of individuals you know that.

[Anonymous No.1980228]

>>1980195
Ok. Yep.

I believe in science without evidence. One might even call this belief faith, but that would be very confusing and some might claim that that makes science a religion, which would be a gross misrepresentation to most people.

In a sense, the axioms of science are the opposite of insanity as defined by Einstein: "Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." The axioms of science is simply not being insane.

Once one accepts those axioms (which come without proof), then we can practice science which requires evidence and falsifiable predictions.

[Anonymous No.1980238]

>>1980209
>semantics
You think you know what that word means, but you don't.

[Anonymous No.1980240]

>>1980238
"I don't think you mean what you think you mean."
Lol.

[Anonymous No.1980241]

>>1980223
You have the assumption that a belief system must be complete to be correct. Many religious people also have this idea. Frankly, I'm not sure where it comes from. A truth can exist in isolation. To know a particular truth does not require knowing all truths. Science is a way of ascertaining a lot of different kinds of truths, but not all truths. That doesn't make science any less correct.

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980253]

Let's take into account the fact that you have a face with 3 pairs of dualities, top bottom. left right. front back. existing as dualities.

1 this side and 1 this side
or 1 above, and 1 below.
1 front, 1 behind etc.

The mathematical construct of '1' is equal to, in line form: I <--- this.

If you're saying a human is 1 thing, then you're lying, disobeying truths and assuming there is none. But a human DOES have these dualities, so in this context, '1' would be a cube. Strictly speaking, on terms of 'science' if you were to explain it, 'scientifically', then you would call it a cube, and not 1.

This TRUTH is real. So it also shows that the TRUTHS you ignore are also real. So stop crying and do something about it or get laughed at by me every post you make and I ignore.

[Anonymous No.1980256]

>>1980223
>Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. Ideas must be distinct before reason can act upon them; and no man ever had a distinct idea of the trinity. It is the mere Abracadabra of the mountebanks calling themselves the priests of Jesus."
-Thomas Jefferson, letter to Francis Adrian Van der Kemp, 30 July, 1816

Your ideas are unintelligible. They appear to make no statements about morality, and they appear to make no statements about the natural world. I'm not sure what they are trying to say. As such, the only weapon I have is ridicule.

[Anonymous No.1980277]

>>1980256
To continue, please state a simple result of CUBIC in the area of morality, such as "one should not do X because CUBIC". Or please state a simple result of CUBIC in the area of the natural world, such as a simple falsifiable prediction. Examples include: "If I drop a hammer, it will fall." "There are no fossilized rabbits in the Pre-Cambrian."

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980278]

Wait, I didn't refresh or check what you said, or maybe you didn't say anything, but if you did, I bet it was ignorant, didn't explain anything, and ignored the point totally, retaliating with your 'scientific rules'. You're disgusting and retarded, why not kill yourselves? No-one cares about you, and soon you'll be dead. Timecube predicts how you get slaughtered, so really it's your own fault.

[Anonymous No.1980284]

>>1979846
>Logic has very few realistic applications.
GUY I THINK I'VE JUST BEEN TROLLED

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980288]

Where are you scientific rules now? You just got raped by an English and Computing Major. How ya felling, nihilists? I'd be pretty mad if I was as ignorant as you. Wait till you see my smile.

[Anonymous No.1980293]

>>1980288
>computing major
Don't make me laugh. You wouldn't even know the first thing about type theory, static vs dynamic binding, strict vs "lazy" evaluation, and so on.

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980295]

;)

[Anonymous No.1980298]

>>1980238
Let's break down an Aether post!

>If you're saying a human is 1 thing, then you're lying, disobeying truths and assuming there is none. But a human DOES have these dualities, so in this context, '1' would be a cube. Strictly speaking, on terms of 'science' if you were to explain it, 'scientifically', then you would call it a cube, and not 1.


>If you're saying a human is 1 thing, then you're lying,
Well, that really depends on what you mean by a thing, you know? Humans are pretty close to a single body, so that's kind of a thing.
>disobeying truths and assuming there is none.
Well, you clearly haven't established that humans are 1 thing. Also, even if I ignore one truth, that doesn't mean I ignore all of them.
>But a human DOES have these dualities,
Only if you look at a human form in cartesian geometry. Even then, "duality" is an inappropriate word for this being these two things at once can be easily overridden by using a different origin. Also, what does that even mean in this context?
>so in this context, '1' would be a cube.
Well, you just said humans weren't '1' so I guess they aren't cubes either, which you didn't really explain what you meant by cubes...
>Strictly speaking, on terms of 'science' if you were to explain it, 'scientifically', then you would call it a cube, and not 1.
Well, those aren't scientific terms. Also, you just said cubes are always 1, so you're kinda contradicting yourself here.

[Anonymous No.1980300]

>>1980288
Actually, I think I'm the clear winner here. You have yet to present any falsifiable predictions from CUBIC, which means it's not science, which means I win the debate.

[Anonymous No.1980301]

>>1980192
I just lold so fucking hard... that was beautiful, thank you

[blibus !!uaJD4WCa5V/ No.1980302]

>>1979853

Last time we argued this you refused to actually argue.

Your pictures are wrong, and you are wrong. The only thing you ever do is go "DUDE JUST GO TO CUBICAO ZOMG ITS ALL THERE EVEN THOUGH I CAN'T TALK ABOUT IT.

[Anonymous No.1980304]

>>1980298
Please see:
>>1980256

The only effective recourse for incoherent ideas is ridicule. Perhaps if he presents something and specific, then we can talk about whether it's right or wrong.

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980309]

That emote was real, had meaning, it represents the feeling I have right now. I'm happy, and proud. I look down on you like your my sons; I enjoy fixing people, whilst you enjoy destroying them.

[Anonymous No.1980319]

>>1980309
The wise father looks up to his children.

[Anonymous No.1980324]

>>1980309
>enjoy destroying them
That's a pretty big leap there boy. Last I checked, I don't murder people, I give to charity, and so on.

Also, admitting defeat on this whole "CUBIC isn't science" thing? Just dodging the issue through a good ad hominem?

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980325]

To continue, this lesson proves that time is cubic. If you guys would just stop bickering with each other like chimps you might learn something. What's wrong? You mad cause your IQ score means sweet fuck all? LOL

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980335]

I do look up to my children, the problem is, my children are below me, looking up would be looking away.

[Anonymous No.1980338]

>>1980325
Again. I'm ready to learn. Please walk me through your theory to a useful claim, such as "I should not murder people", or "Light will travel 1% slower through water (or whatever the exact number is)", or any other claim like that. All I've seen thus far is tautological claims, claims that are true because you've defined them to be true.

[blibus !!uaJD4WCa5V/ No.1980339]

>>1979987

#1 six sides =/= a cube.
#2 Our body has more than six sides.

[Anonymous No.1980343]

>>1980325
Actually, it states its cubic. There's no proof in there at all.

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980354]

I forgot to add, all this information can be found in the bible, if you play around with the semantics until they're back in the original state before the nihilist scientists edited it.

'One day'
LOL
But four days occur at once. This is truth.

[Anonymous No.1980357]

>I forgot to add, all this information can be found in the bible, if you play around with the semantics until they're back in the original state before the nihilist scientists edited it.
>scientists edited the bible
No.

[Anonymous No.1980359]

>>1980354
>can all be found in the bible
Oh, it's on now!

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980362]

Again, I'll quote myself.

Let's take into account the fact that you have a face with 3 pairs of dualities, top bottom. left right. front back. existing as dualities.

1 this side and 1 this side
or 1 above, and 1 below.
1 front, 1 behind etc.

The mathematical construct of '1' is equal to, in line form: I <--- this.

If you're saying a human is 1 thing, then you're lying, disobeying truths and assuming there is none. But a human DOES have these dualities, so in this context, '1' would be a cube. Strictly speaking, on terms of 'science' if you were to explain it, 'scientifically', then you would call it a cube, and not 1.

This TRUTH is real. So it also shows that the TRUTHS you ignore are also real. So stop crying and do something about it or get laughed at by me every post you make and I ignore.

[Anonymous No.1980371]

>>1980293
Go ahead, I'm waiting. Give me an example of a programming language with non-strict evaluation, and explain to me what that means.

Or explain to me what static vs dynamic binding means.

Hell, try to explain to me what "P != NP" means.

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980374]

No, really, it can be found in the bible.

1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. 2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.

If you delete all semantics, and just have lexis, then what do you think this means?

Remember, each word has no meaning, it's just a WORD, but you can see they are different. So what does each word really represent?

[Anonymous No.1980376]

>>1980338
Still waiting.

[Anonymous No.1980379]

>>1980362
Say one thing that isn't tautological.
No one will care about what you have to say unless you say some implications of your bullshit.

[Anonymous No.1980385]

>>1980374
You know the bible was originally written in Hebrew and/or Greek, not English, right?

[blibus !!uaJD4WCa5V/ No.1980387]

>>1980354

As I stated last time, saying that there are four days in every day is a completely pointless statement, as you are simply overlaying a cube on the Earth. You can overlay a shape with any number of sides and say there are that my days in a day.

Pic is an example, there are now three days in every day.

[Anonymous No.1980388]

>Weird people outnumber normal people by an uncountable amount.
Well, no. Normal implies that they are the majority. Weird, the exception.

[Anonymous No.1980395]

>>1980354
dude they have pumped vanilla ices lyrics into the bible and found out that it predicted the twin towers getting planed... you can predict anything from the bible. (logic tip, you can 'prove' anything with a fallacy)

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980405]

>>1980371
I'll have a go at P! = NP.

Let's say, a black hole evidently spins, then rather than saying; gravity, gravitons, blah blah blah. You would say, it just spins. And I'm not that far into my Computing course, still got a few years left yet. VB programming atm.

Dim yourafaggot as String
Dim name as string

Console.Writeline("Enter Name:")
Name = Console.Readline
Yourafaggot = "Your a faggot"
Console.Writleine("Hi " & Name & Yourafaggot)"

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980419]

>>1980167
Check above:
>>1980387

The triangle is not harmonic, and you don't have a triangle face, and the earth doesn't have a triangle structure, and there aren't three different colour races of humans, there are black, white (duality), and all inbetween (dynamic).

[Anonymous No.1980431]

>>1980405
First, that has absolutely nothing to do with P != NP. Congrats at failing.

Second, I actually have a programming degree from a respected university (University of Michigan), unlike your sorry ass who's merely in university. You spoke as though you had a degree. Nice lying there asshat.

Third, lol @ Visual Basic. Why not try a real programming language? (Yes, I know that possibly more lines of code have been written in VB than any other programming language. That doesn't make it any less shitty.) Seriously, what the hell college are you at which teaches in VB? Seriously, go somewhere else.

[blibus !!uaJD4WCa5V/ No.1980435]

>>1980419

There is no literal black race.

You have brown, pale, yellow. Corresponds to my triangle. Everything is triangular, not cubic.

Harmonic is just a buzzword in the way you are using it.

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980438]

Interesting Cubician Tutorial right. I suppose Cubic Science and Cubic Math are superior to One Science and One Math (nihilistic).

[Anonymous No.1980442]

>>1980376
Still waiting for you to show an application of your ideas, such as "I should not murder", "There are no fossil rabbits in the Pre-Cambrian", or any other useful statement.

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980453]

At the end of the day, dumb-eduated faggots, this is science and math, just a meaningful form of it. As it gets you guys ruffled up so much, I'll make it my avatar from now on, so I can teach whilst I troll.


"I shall never murder someone"

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980455]

"I can murder someone"

[sage No.1980457]

Sage goes in all fields

[blibus !!uaJD4WCa5V/ No.1980458]

>>1980435

Come at me, prove me wrong.

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980461]

You guys give up yet? You mad yet? Still feel the need to suppress ?

[blibus !!uaJD4WCa5V/ No.1980466]

>>1980461
>>1980458

Come on bro.
I ain't mad.
I just waitin' for more of your faggortory.

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980467]

>>1980458
Ok. There is a Dark race, and a Light race, and all inbetween.

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980477]

I've OWNED you kids so HARD this time. You better feel that BUTTHURT, because it's only gonna get harder next time. BOOOM! WOOOOOOOO!

[blibus !!uaJD4WCa5V/ No.1980478]

>>1980467

Well you can say there is a dark race, a light race, and a middle race.

Or you can say there is one race, that of humans. Or you can say there are thousands of races (Albino, Peach, Tan, Yellow, Blue, dark brown, light brown, regular brown, etc.)

You are just giving arbitrary limits.

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980482]

Look. This very picture proves the part in the bible where God tells adam, you came from dust, and to dust you will return. :)

[Anonymous No.1980487]

>>1980477
Through your incorrect use of grammar, punctuation, and capitalization, your refusal to use well accepted terms (ex: science), your open admittal that you lied through your fucking teeth to make yourself sound better (you said you had a programming degree), and your complete and utter lack of rationality - no sir, you are the loser. For you, I have only ridicule and scorn.

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980494]

>>1980478
You can say that, but it's not the wisest explanation is it. You're trying hard. There is a dark and light race, and all inbetween. There are no Blue races, or Red races, it's either Dark, or Light.

[Anonymous No.1980504]

>>1980482
Man. It's like I'm reading Plato all over again, and I hated Plato.

Yo idiot who says he's learning programming. The creator of C++, arguably one of the most successful programming languages ever, Bjarne Stroustrup once said "Proof by analogy is fraud". That is what you are doing good sir, just like Plato.

You have yet to make a single moral statement or a single falsifiable prediction on the natural world, and thus your ideas are bullshit. I have only ridicule for you, in the hopes that you would form coherent ideas for us to discuss.

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980505]

>>1980487
Point out where I said I had a degree.

>Now, when he goes to check, he'll realize I never said anything about a degree. He'll come back, as a liar, living up to his scientific laws of living by lies, and say nothing, or be like a neutered dog, all depressed that he just got butt raped.

[Anonymous No.1980506]

>>1980494
Why? Why not tall races, short races, and everything in between? Asians are pretty short, and blacks are pretty tall.

[blibus !!uaJD4WCa5V/ No.1980514]

>>1980494

Well that is completely up to your viewpoint. Most people view it as Black, White, and Yellow. (In my experience it is about a 50/50 split on who includes red in here.)

Therefore, arbitrary limits. Time is triangular. Prove me wrong without using completely subjective viewpoints.

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980515]

>>1980506
Height and Skin colour are two different things.

But speaking of height, width and depth....

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980531]

>>1980514
There's a difference between TRUTH and opinion. There is a midnight, midday, evening and morning race. They all relate to the static duality of day and night. Shit you kids are ignorant. You're ignoring to protect your degree/education and your paycheck. You'd sacrifice the people to save your income. You're gonna get your whole race killed, trust me, you might not wanna be wise, but I am.

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980537]

You mad yet? Accept defeat?

[Anonymous No.1980544]

>>1980515
So, why do you claim that there are black races, white races, and everything in between but not tall races, short races, and everything in between? Why call out black, white, and mix as special? Is "black, white, in between" more special than "tall, short, in between"? Why?

Moreover, I can pick damn near any attribute with two extremes, like fat and skinny, physically strong and weak, and so on. Why is any one of those more special than the rest.

[blibus !!uaJD4WCa5V/ No.1980546]

>>1980531

Yeah, saying that races should be classified as dark and light is an opinion.

Time is Triangular, spread the word.

[Anonymous No.1980548]

>>1980442
Still waiting [3] for you to show an application of your ideas, such as "I should not murder", "There are no fossil rabbits in the Pre-Cambrian", or any other useful statement.

[Anonymous No.1980552]

>>1980546
>time is triangular
You are just trolling him, or using his own stupid reasoning against him right? You don't actually believe that bullshit /means/ anything, do you?

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980557]

Or do you believe in the singularity, that people can achieve cubic wisdom the long way, and become more intelligent at the end of it. No. Einstein didn't fabricate his theory, you guys did. Einstein believed it was smarter without the knowledge singularity. In the end you make everyone dumber, and robotic, no free-thought and fucking depressed, all because you THOUGHT it was the right thing to do. Well, you're wrong. kill yourselves.

[Anonymous No.1980560]

>>1980537
No.

Also, still waiting [4] for you to show an application of your ideas, such as "I should not murder", "There are no fossil rabbits in the Pre-Cambrian", or any other useful statement.

[Anonymous No.1980565]

>>1980557
Speaking of which, why do you call yourself the servant of evil? Shouldn't you call yourself the servant of good? Are you a servant of evil? Shouldn't we kill servants of evil?

Also, still waiting [5] for you to show an application of your ideas, such as a moral one, ex: "I should not murder", or a falsifiable one of the natural world, ex: "There are no fossil rabbits in the Pre-Cambrian", or any other useful statement.

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980569]

It's cubic. I've done a lot of research on this. You don't believe it because the person teaching you doesn't stand infront of a black board forcing propaganda down your throats for money. I imagine 100% of the people posting against this in this thread are those people.

[Anonymous No.1980574]

Still waiting [6] for you to show an application of your ideas, such as a moral one, ex: "I should not murder", or a falsifiable one of the natural world, ex: "There are no fossil rabbits in the Pre-Cambrian", or any other useful statement.

[blibus !!uaJD4WCa5V/ No.1980576]

>>1980552

Of course time is triangular!

Look at the bible: Father, Son, Holy spirit

Look at the American government system: Executive, Legislative, Judicial.

Look at what cosmic bodies truly matter to us: Sun, moon, Earth.

Or, if you want to say matter to Earth: Sun, moon, stars

Come on, it is just so obvious that time is triangular. There are three days in every day. Look at your head in the mirror, it is a THREE dimensional object! We go through THREE stages in life: Child, Adult, Elder.

I mean, how can anyone even argue?

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980586]

I'm a Servant of Evil, cause I'm continuing along education and living amongst society, until I reach the source, where I will change it. Right now, I'm doing all I can.

Also, why does it bother you so much? Wouldn't it be easier just to learn it or prove it wrong? I don't understand, WHY SO SUPPRESSIVE?

[Anonymous No.1980587]

>>1980576
Good ridicule sir.

[Anonymous No.1980591]

>>1980586
I don't think I was suppressing anything.

Still waiting [7] for you to show an application of your ideas, such as a moral one, ex: "I should not murder", or a falsifiable one of the natural world, ex: "There are no fossil rabbits in the Pre-Cambrian", or any other useful statement.

[Anonymous No.1980593]

>>1980557

just found the time cube website, fuck its sad, it sounds like it was made by an attention whore. and judging by your posts, made for attention whores to copy follow and paste for attention...... incredibly sad.

worst thing is I have friends who will follow it because they have played portal etc they want to be sad fucks who follow losers round like sheeps, I need new friends

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980602]

Hang on just one minute.

"FREE SPEECH in AMERICA is
"BULL SHIT",
EVIL EDUCATORS
block and suppress
www.timecube.com."
-Gene Ray

So, Gene Ray was telling the truth also! You are suppressing and blocking right now, aminotrite?

1. You're not attempting to notice it.
2. You're not proving it wrong.
3. You're ignoring it.
4. You're saying to get it away.
5. You're suppressing and blocking.

[Anonymous No.1980611]

>>1980602
I have done no worse than you regarding so called "nihilist science". In fact, you've done more suppression today than I.


Still waiting [8] for you to show an application of your ideas, such as a moral one, ex: "I should not murder", or a falsifiable one of the natural world, ex: "There are no fossil rabbits in the Pre-Cambrian", or any other useful statement.

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980614]

I'll come to your question in picture form soon, mr (mrs) [1], [2]. [3].... hypocritical slut.

[blibus !!uaJD4WCa5V/ No.1980615]

>>1980576

This just in guys, a divine message has been given to me! Time is really a DUALITY!

Think about it logically: Two hemispheres, Old Testament and New Testament, Government and common man, Two eyes, Two nostrils, Two ears, Two balls, Two legs, Two arms, etc.

Two Towers were destroyed on 9/11 (9 and 11 are TWO numbers). There are Two stages of life: Childhood and Adulthood. There are Two halves of our brain. Look in the mirror: You see a TWO dimensional picture of yourself (A three dimensional picture would should your entire three dimensional body).

I mean it is just so obvious, how can anyone even argue? They must all be stupid fools who have been enslaved by the propaganda machine who wants to eliminate God (Two main views: Atheistic and Theistic) and destroy the world.

[blibus !!uaJD4WCa5V/ No.1980624]

>>1980602

Stop supressing my message of a divine dichotomy you even heathen life-hater!

You are putting down my work by not giving it immediate praise! I have shown you all the proof you need, and my theory actually predicts everything in the universe unlike yours. (Proof: Reactants react, then a Product of this reaction is formed. A DICHOTOMY!!!!!!!)

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980625]

>>1980614
Just to mention. This is what the BIBLE explains, all you Christian scientists on this board. What you have to do is, to take it back to it's primitive sate.

Remove all semantics from the words, all fields of semantics too. That's ~the meanings of the words~ so that only the LEXIS (words themselves) remains. Once done, you need to apply science to the words. You'll notice that the rules are 'opposites' in cubic nature. You'll also notice that 1 day was put in there by the same type of guys suppressing timecube.

[Anonymous No.1980631]

>>1980569

>I've done a lot of research on this.

Consisting of what? Sitting in your mom's basement and thinking? Mind showing us some of your findings?

>You don't believe it because the person teaching you doesn't stand in front of a black board forcing propaganda down your throats for money.

I don't believe it because it's insipid, pseudointellectual drivel, based on observations a three-year-old could make, non-sequiturs, circular logic, and baseless conjecture, thank you. It makes no sense, it has no application, and does nothing to further any objectives other than its own. If a college professor were teaching this, I'd drop the class in a hurry.

Enjoy your conspiracy-theory-esque alternate reality.

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980632]

[Anonymous No.1980636]

>>1980625
I don't know what it means to apply science to words.

I don't know what it means to take away the semantics of words and look only at their lexical nature. Also, you do know that the original Bible was written in Greek and/or Hebrew, right? Thus the lexical nature of the English would be completely unrelated to the lexical nature of the original bible.

Still waiting [9] for you to show an application of your ideas, such as a moral one, ex: "I should not murder", or a falsifiable one of the natural world, ex: "There are no fossil rabbits in the Pre-Cambrian", or any other useful statement.

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980638]

>>1980387
>>1980631

You two are often in these threads, and you act like it's the first time every time. You just proved this is your second time by posting the same pics as the time before. Are you really that dumb AND nonsensical ?

[Anonymous No.1980641]

>>1980615

[Gyro !!3eZypOuomFi No.1980642]

Oh no. Oh no. No.

I should have checked on this earlier. I didn't think he was serious.

http://www.zettabyte.ws/viewtopic.php?p=5190#p5190

I'm so sorry, /sci/. Please forgive me. ;_;

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980643]

It's easy to destroy the semantics, treat each word as undefined, just a row of meaningless letters. You stupid slut. Be patient.

[blibus !!uaJD4WCa5V/ No.1980648]

>>1980625
>>1980624

HOLY COCKBALLS, THIS REVALATION WAS ACTUALLY JUST A TEMPTATION BY THE COCK OF EVIL WHICH PLAGUES THE UNIVERSE WITH ITS LIFE-HATING.

Life is actually all about fives!

Think about the 23 enigma (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/23_Enigma))

Now if we take the lesson from the wise Discordians we understand that everything is related to fives (23, 2+3 = 5!!!!).

Think about it: Five fingers, Five toes. Look in the mirror and you see TWO nostrils + TWO eyes + 1 mouth = 5!!!!

Time is FIVE FACED!!!!! SPREAD THE WORD OF ALMIGHTY ERIS, THE FIVE SIDED GODDESS!!!!!

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980652]

Again........
Let's take into account the fact that you have a face with 3 pairs of dualities, top bottom. left right. front back. existing as dualities.

1 this side and 1 this side
or 1 above, and 1 below.
1 front, 1 behind etc.

The mathematical construct of '1' is equal to, in line form: I <--- this.

If you're saying a human is 1 thing, then you're lying, disobeying truths and assuming there is none. But a human DOES have these dualities, so in this context, '1' would be a cube. Strictly speaking, on terms of 'science' if you were to explain it, 'scientifically', then you would call it a cube, and not 1.

This TRUTH is real. So it also shows that the TRUTHS you ignore are also real. So stop crying and do something about it or get laughed at by me every post you make and I ignore.

[blibus !!uaJD4WCa5V/ No.1980664]

>>1980638

YOU GIANT COCKSUCKER, BOW DOWN TO ERIS!

I have explained that in the last topic, when I was an uneducated slut-cunt like you are now, you refused to argue, and you just ran away.

NOW IS THE TIME TO REDEEM YOUR COCK-RIDDLED ASS! JOIN ERIS'S HOLY SECT!

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980667]

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980670]

Again.
Let's take into account the fact that you have a face with 3 pairs of dualities, top bottom. left right. front back. existing as dualities.

1 this side and 1 this side
or 1 above, and 1 below.
1 front, 1 behind etc.

The mathematical construct of '1' is equal to, in line form: I <--- this.

If you're saying a human is 1 thing, then you're lying, disobeying truths and assuming there is none. But a human DOES have these dualities, so in this context, '1' would be a cube. Strictly speaking, on terms of 'science' if you were to explain it, 'scientifically', then you would call it a cube, and not 1.

This TRUTH is real. So it also shows that the TRUTHS you ignore are also real. So stop crying and do something about it or get laughed at by me every post you make and I ignore.

[Anonymous No.1980672]

>>1980652
Again, still waiting [10] for you to show an application of your ideas, such as a moral one, ex: "I should not murder", or a falsifiable one of the natural world, ex: "There are no fossil rabbits in the Pre-Cambrian", or any other useful statement.

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980678]

One More Time:
Let's take into account the fact that you have a face with 3 pairs of dualities, top bottom. left right. front back. existing as dualities.

1 this side and 1 this side
or 1 above, and 1 below.
1 front, 1 behind etc.

The mathematical construct of '1' is equal to, in line form: I <--- this.

If you're saying a human is 1 thing, then you're lying, disobeying truths and assuming there is none. But a human DOES have these dualities, so in this context, '1' would be a cube. Strictly speaking, on terms of 'science' if you were to explain it, 'scientifically', then you would call it a cube, and not 1.

This TRUTH is real. So it also shows that the TRUTHS you ignore are also real. So stop crying and do something about it or get laughed at by me every post you make and I ignore.

ALL INFORMATION HERE CAN BE FOUND:
WWW.CUBICAO.COM
ALL INFORMATION HERE CAN BE FOUND:
WWW.CUBICAO.COM
ALL INFORMATION HERE CAN BE FOUND:
WWW.CUBICAO.COM
ALL INFORMATION HERE CAN BE FOUND:
WWW.CUBICAO.COM
ALL INFORMATION HERE CAN BE FOUND:
WWW.CUBICAO.COM
ALL INFORMATION HERE CAN BE FOUND:
WWW.CUBICAO.COM
ALL INFORMATION HERE CAN BE FOUND:
WWW.CUBICAO.COM
ALL INFORMATION HERE CAN BE FOUND:
WWW.CUBICAO.COM
ALL INFORMATION HERE CAN BE FOUND:
WWW.CUBICAO.COM
ALL INFORMATION HERE CAN BE FOUND:
WWW.CUBICAO.COM

+ MORE TOPICS:-
RELIGION
SOCIETY
WORD-VIRUS
AFTERLIFE
HELL/HEAVEN

ETC.

[blibus !!uaJD4WCa5V/ No.1980680]

>>1980667

QUIT SUPPRESSING ME YOU LOOSE ANUSED COCKSUCKER AND MUCH ON ERIS'S HOLY CARPET. YOU ONLY HAVE A (relatively) SHORT AMOUNT OF TIME BEFORE YOU ARE ENVELOPED BY THE EVIL COCK AND ARE FORCED TO SUBMIT FOREVER.

[Anonymous No.1980682]

>>1980642
>>1980642
>>1980642
>>1980642
>>1980642
>>1980642
>>1980642
>>1980642
>>1980642
>>1980642

This whole thread is undeniably a troll. We're done here. Everybody go home.

[Anonymous No.1980684]

>>1980678
Again, still waiting [11] for you to show an application of your ideas, such as a moral one, ex: "I should not murder", or a falsifiable one of the natural world, ex: "There are no fossil rabbits in the Pre-Cambrian", or any other useful statement.

[blibus !!uaJD4WCa5V/ No.1980685]

>>1980678

>RELIGION
>SOCIETY
>WORD-VIRUS
>AFTERLIFE
>HELL/HEAVEN

FIVE!!!! FIVE TOPICS!!!! THE GLORY OF ERIS SHINES EVEN IN THIS COCK WHORE'S BLASPHEMY!

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980688]

I'D DIE FOR THIS! ;)

GOOD NIGHT AND GOD BLESS.

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980691]

ALL INFORMATION HERE CAN BE FOUND:
WWW.CUBICAO.COM
ALL INFORMATION HERE CAN BE FOUND:
WWW.CUBICAO.COM
ALL INFORMATION HERE CAN BE FOUND:
WWW.CUBICAO.COM
ALL INFORMATION HERE CAN BE FOUND:
WWW.CUBICAO.COM
ALL INFORMATION HERE CAN BE FOUND:
WWW.CUBICAO.COM
ALL INFORMATION HERE CAN BE FOUND:
WWW.CUBICAO.COM
ALL INFORMATION HERE CAN BE FOUND:
WWW.CUBICAO.COM
ALL INFORMATION HERE CAN BE FOUND:
WWW.CUBICAO.COM
ALL INFORMATION HERE CAN BE FOUND:
WWW.CUBICAO.COM
ALL INFORMATION HERE CAN BE FOUND:
WWW.CUBICAO.COM

+ MORE TOPICS:-
RELIGION
SOCIETY
WORD-VIRUS
AFTERLIFE
HELL/HEAVEN

[blibus !!uaJD4WCa5V/ No.1980693]

>>1980688

THE COCK IS WAITING IN YOUR BED!

[Anonymous No.1980703]

I just went to cubitao.com.
Wow. Most elaborate troll of all time. I'm impressed.

It's just too bad freaking Noctis has to ruin the fun.

[Anonymous No.1980704]

>>1980703
*cubicao.com

[Anonymous No.1980706]

>>1980638

Well isn't this peachy. No wonder you actually believe in this crap. You jump to conclusions like a motherfucker.

How do you KNOW we're the same two posters you're thinking of? Sure, we may have posted pictures you recognize, but you're ignoring all the underlying possibilities that could potentially conflict with what your gut is telling you.

Your gut is telling you that we're the same posters. The fact is that this board is anonymous, with no unique identifiers other than those that the posters choose for themselves. The possibility exists that someone could have simply downloaded the picture and decided to use it in a similar thread (in fact, pictures are downloaded, reused, and reposted all the time on 4chan) but you ignore this.

Ah well, just confirms what we already know, I guess.

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980709]

i finally understand wat aether is talking about -- that site has proof + evidence extras which support the case

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980713]

omg aether what a sweet thread i've never seen you rape so much, check out www.cubicao.com

[Anonymous No.1980719]

Go back to /r9k/ and suck a dick,aether

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980721]

OMG So true. How did you find this out Noctis? You're smart. I understand completely what you mean by the bible explaining cubic creation now. You're the best

www.cubicao.com
www.cubicao.com
www.cubicao.com
www.cubicao.com
www.cubicao.com

Cool site man. Love you.

[Anonymous No.1980724]

>>1980709
>>1980713

Forgot to stop tripfagging, eh?

Nice fail, there, buddy. Not that I expected anything better of you.

[blibus !!uaJD4WCa5V/ No.1980726]

>>1980721
>>1980713
>>1980709

Sure is not taking trip off, cock mongler.

[www.cubicao.com, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980728]

Yo aether. I love you man. You try to fix the delusion Christians and religious people by showing them the truth and freeing their minds. You also teach the kids of the future the basic logic that their TEACHERS AND PARENTS AND ADULTS LEFT OUT. What great parenting skills you have aether, you should be king, you should lead the world.

Also,
www.cubicao.com
www.cubicao.com
www.cubicao.com
www.cubicao.com
www.cubicao.com
www.cubicao.com
www.cubicao.com

[Anonymous No.1980732]

NOCTIS IS AN OBVIOUS TROLL AND YOU ARE ALL GULLIBLE
NOCTIS IS AN OBVIOUS TROLL AND YOU ARE ALL GULLIBLE
NOCTIS IS AN OBVIOUS TROLL AND YOU ARE ALL GULLIBLE
NOCTIS IS AN OBVIOUS TROLL AND YOU ARE ALL GULLIBLE
NOCTIS IS AN OBVIOUS TROLL AND YOU ARE ALL GULLIBLE
NOCTIS IS AN OBVIOUS TROLL AND YOU ARE ALL GULLIBLE
NOCTIS IS AN OBVIOUS TROLL AND YOU ARE ALL GULLIBLE
NOCTIS IS AN OBVIOUS TROLL AND YOU ARE ALL GULLIBLE
NOCTIS IS AN OBVIOUS TROLL AND YOU ARE ALL GULLIBLE
NOCTIS IS AN OBVIOUS TROLL AND YOU ARE ALL GULLIBLE
NOCTIS IS AN OBVIOUS TROLL AND YOU ARE ALL GULLIBLE
NOCTIS IS AN OBVIOUS TROLL AND YOU ARE ALL GULLIBLE
NOCTIS IS AN OBVIOUS TROLL AND YOU ARE ALL GULLIBLE
NOCTIS IS AN OBVIOUS TROLL AND YOU ARE ALL GULLIBLE
NOCTIS IS AN OBVIOUS TROLL AND YOU ARE ALL GULLIBLE
NOCTIS IS AN OBVIOUS TROLL AND YOU ARE ALL GULLIBLE
NOCTIS IS AN OBVIOUS TROLL AND YOU ARE ALL GULLIBLE
NOCTIS IS AN OBVIOUS TROLL AND YOU ARE ALL GULLIBLE
NOCTIS IS AN OBVIOUS TROLL AND YOU ARE ALL GULLIBLE
NOCTIS IS AN OBVIOUS TROLL AND YOU ARE ALL GULLIBLE
NOCTIS IS AN OBVIOUS TROLL AND YOU ARE ALL GULLIBLE
NOCTIS IS AN OBVIOUS TROLL AND YOU ARE ALL GULLIBLE
NOCTIS IS AN OBVIOUS TROLL AND YOU ARE ALL GULLIBLE
NOCTIS IS AN OBVIOUS TROLL AND YOU ARE ALL GULLIBLE
NOCTIS IS AN OBVIOUS TROLL AND YOU ARE ALL GULLIBLE

[www.cubicao.com, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980738]

LOL DEY MAD NOW! CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH LIKE LITTLE MAD FAGGOTS.

www.cubicao.com
www.cubicao.com
www.cubicao.com

THIS SITE IS WIN!

[blibus !!uaJD4WCa5V/ No.1980739]

>>1980732

Clearly he is just the slut of the evil cock, much like you are.

[Anonymous No.1980740]

hey what if we ddos cubicao.com?

[www.cubicao.com, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980749]

Then I'll just have to spam the lessons on here, daily.

www.cubicao.com
?????????????

[Anonymous No.1980751]

>>1980732

Or, he's completely off his rocker. Given the fact that he's been here for months doing exactly the same shit, close to every single damn day, I'm starting to think he isn't a troll.

And that scares me.

>>1980740

Sounds like a good idea.

[Anonymous No.1980759]

>>1980740
You have my axe

[Anonymous No.1980760]

>>1980740
Prolly get better results ddos'ing Aether's isp, assuming he isn't behind 9000 proxies and transmitting from a mental institution somewhere...

But it's more fun to weigh his ideas in the free market and see why they fail.

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980762]

>>1980751
And you've been replying in every single thread, with the same fucking reply. Surely there are some people on this board who can see this obvious suppression.

Obviously it is Brian.
Also, if it didn't matter, why would you ddos the site? LOL? LOL? Isn't that another stupid move admitting you're suppressing it?

Kill yourself you're not smart hahahahah, you're ill, in the head, cure = shotgun FUCKING USE IT AHAHAHAAAAHAHSH

[Anonymous No.1980764]

>>1980760
Someone should make a thread about it.It would be cool if we could get the /b/tards on this...although the latter could backfire horribly

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980770]

Good night, God bell. I love you humanity. <3

[Anonymous No.1980772]

>>1980762
aether i didn't know you fapped to such a photo

[Anonymous No.1980776]

>>1980762

*sigh*

And here I thought you were going to bed.

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980777]

God bless. Obviously hurp. Gnight. TRY CATCH ME FAGGOTS I'M THE MUFUCKIN NATURE BOY WOOOOO!

[Anonymous No.1980780]

>>1980764
/b/tards would side with Aether, they (we) love a troll that brings all kinds of butthurt.

[Anonymous No.1980784]

[Anonymous No.1980791]

>>1980751

I haven't been coming to /sci/ for long, but this troll sounds a lot like the futa spammer on /d/. If he does have the same mentality, get rid of him as quickly as you can or prepare for him to keep fucking up the board indefinitely. /d/ has been almost unusable for most of the past year due to one determined idiot.

I wonder whether they might be the same person...

[Anonymous No.1980794]

>>1980780
This.
We should raep aether on our own

[Anonymous No.1980795]

>>1980682
Don't you wish /sci/ had mods.

[Anonymous No.1980810]

>>1980791

No kidding? Well, it's certainly possible. I've seen aether post on other boards.

Unfortunately, /sci/ doesn't have mods. And if we DO have mods, they aren't nearly as aggressive as they should be.

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980815]

BECAUSE ONLY FAGGOTS OBEY THE RULES1 WOOOO1 AND YOU TEH FAGGIEST FAGS IN FAGGOTRY WOOOOOOOOO!

www.cubicao.com

[Anonymous No.1980824]

He wouldn't spend so much time spamming the board if he had any credibility in real life, and if he didn't take himself seriously. Anyone who takes himself that seriously but isn't taken seriously by anyone else is just begging to be trolled.

Sure he's a troll, but he's also probably actually butthurt when he gets trolled and rejected.

I say let him do what he does, it keeps him off the street and out of real trouble, and he's only hurting his own delicate feelings.

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980847]

THE WORST CRIME SOMEONE CAN COMMIT IS CARING TOO MUCH. - OP

No. The worst crime someone can commit is caring too little.

"Fuck it! Cut down ALL the trees" - Too Little
"Stop! Preserve ALL the trees" - Too Much

TIME FLOWS - OP

No, it doesn't. Imagine spinning a little spinning top. That's how time works. We tick. By putting a line on a circle the illusion makes it SEEM as if it's ticking in seconds. Really it's not ticking at all.

Everything OP said is a lie. It's the EXACT opposite of timecube. They're attempting to condition you back to the point before you read anything I put on this board. The people saging, posting and trolling are the SAME people as every time - the group from www.scienceforums.net. I went there the other day and made a post, and one of them said the SAME thing as he said on here, then deleted his post to cover it up. Watch out people, they want your SOUL for NIHILISM.

[Anonymous No.1980875]

>>1980762
Sir. The moral, or Aesop if you will, of free speech is that by openly discussing all ideas, we can arrive at those which are correct. The ideas which are deemed to not be correct are not much discussed further. This is not suppression. Those who still care can still talk about it. However, the majority does not talk about the stupid ideas. That is the Aesop. In this way, we think your ideas are stupid, and we say so. This is how free speech works.

The attempts to DDOS you, now that is suppression, unlike calling you stupid.

[Anonymous No.1980879]

>>1980875
Also, still waiting [12] for you to show an application of your ideas, such as a moral one, ex: "I should not murder", or a falsifiable one of the natural world, ex: "There are no fossil rabbits in the Pre-Cambrian", or any other useful statement.

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980895]

suppressed - kept from public knowledge by various means;

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980913]

In this case.

1. Making 'Pseudo-science' mainstream.
2. Tightening security on pseudo-science.
3. Not proving timecube wrong, after it's been proved right.
4. Ignoring the fact it's being proved in front of your eyes, and claiming it's stupid.
5. General diagnosis that anyone who believes it has a mental disorder; usually 'scitzo'.
+ Much more.

If you didn't care, you wouldn't say shit. If you did care, you'd prove it wrong. You don't do either, so you care, but you can't prove it wrong. (when it's been proved right, just by a minority and that's why you suppress it; the one truth, the forbidden truth)

You lose guys, seriously. Pack it up and GO DIE.

[Anonymous No.1980930]

>>1980913
It's an arbitrary epistemology, it's internally true and thus can't be proven false, but internal truth doesn't confer inductive utility.

It's up to you to demonstrate how your arbitrary vision has utility... and this is where you lose.

Nobody needs to disprove it, you need to show how it's useful. Failing that, you need to be mocked and ultimately ignored. Which so far you seem to be.

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980955]

>>1980930
It's useful because it shows people how the universe works, how they came to be. All this 'Evolution', 'Origins of Life' and so on. Maybe not how to build rockets or make planets, but it explains everything that doesn't include 'advancement'. It's the LOGIC of the universe, the information people do science to learn, not the information people get in science.

It's true. You're such a fucking fag for suppressing I hope you know that and you are HELPING destroy humanity, because YOUR IGNORANT. It's PROOF that if you carry on the way you are you will KILL US. You're so fucking dumb that if I seen you in real life I would slit your throat. I fucking hate your nerdy little proud intelligent cunts. I HOPE, I sincerely HOPE that there is a racial war in America within the next two years and I HOPE that the blacks win, because if the whites win, nothing changes, we keep walkinng this road to death. Just hurry up and start upping the tensions so you get killed faster. If you're on this planet to DIE, then why no just allow the blacks to kill you now? easilly? Why kill everyone else? Just die, in a fire. Fucking Americans and Amerifans who are SO FUCKING DUMB They don't realize the only reason they are 'smart' is because of a fucking word virus that began with the word 'God', at least in semantics. Or that a clock, is an illusion, with a hand ticking around the circle rather than the WHOLE CIRCLE SPINNING. You're soooooo DUMB

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1980963]

Carnivore, Herbivore

[Anonymous No.1980970]

>>1980955
Holy fuck Aether, can you just leave? Everyone is sick of your shit.

[Anonymous No.1980983]

>Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. Ideas must be distinct before reason can act upon them; and no man ever had a distinct idea of the trinity. It is the mere Abracadabra of the mountebanks calling themselves the priests of Jesus."
-Thomas Jefferson, letter to Francis Adrian Van der Kemp, 30 July, 1816

>>1980913
I cannot disprove your shit because it doesn't say anything at all. [12] If you could show an application of your ideas, such as a moral one, ex: "I should not murder", or a falsifiable one of the natural world, ex: "There are no fossil rabbits in the Pre-Cambrian", or any other useful statement.

[Anonymous No.1980984]

>>1980970
If anyone ever kills Aether, I swear to god I'll give my life to stop them going to jail over it.

[Anonymous No.1980991]

>>1980955
I honestly think you'd have better luck teaching on support boards for the schizotypal.

There's a real reason why so many people diagnose your thought pattern the same way...

[Anonymous No.1981000]

>>1980955
Oh shit!
>word virus
It's this guy! Dude! I remember him!

Protip: other animals use words. Example: some gorillas have been taught over 800 words. Thank you come again.

[The Servant of Evil, Noctis !PhIopj2ZY2 No.1981019]

energy is not the same as life force, life force is good. Also, can you go kill yourselves. You dumb in denial word-fiends. What is it you don't understand? If you remove all stuff crreated by humans at this very second, leaving only humans on a natural planet, what do you have? Zoom right out of your country and you'll notice it's just a bunch of white and black people, kinda like a bunch of parasites. Soon, due to a 'racial bridge', the blacks will reach a 50/50 ratio, or close to it on terms of POWER. When that POWER is in the blacks hands, they'll kill you, I HOPE.

[Anonymous No.1981022]

>>1981019
Dude, man, plenty of other animals use words and communication. You're retarded.

[Anonymous No.1981024]

>>1981019
Now you sound like if you were batshit insane

[Anonymous No.1981210]

Trollin's a good job mate. Challengin work. Out of doors...