The new Big Bang Theory

[new theory No.1975556]

Everything in nature has cycles.

So this is how I came to my theory, that the big bang itsself is just a part of a cycle.

Gravity is the force of matter attracting other matter. So what if the big bang came to originate because all the matter in the universe became so dense because of gravity, and then it exploded.

Now this explosion is known as the big bang. But the explosion following the denseness of all matter is so great it will expand our universe for millions of years. But when this force gradually becomes less all matter will inevitably attract to each other again, so the cycle continuous until an new big bang is created.

Lemme know what you think /sci/

[Anonymous No.1975586]

hmm,,, could be

[Anonymous No.1975594]

Big Crunch

[Anonymous No.1975601]

>>1975594
Big crunch only says it will collapse but does not mention cycle.

[Anonymous No.1975606]

Everything associated with engineering is gay.

So this is how I came to my theory, that the big bang itsself is just gay.

[Anonymous No.1975610]

Bang to Crunch

[Anonymous No.1975611]

>>1975601
Dude... Do you know the big crunch theory.
It mentions that every matter will turn into a unified black hole or Big Crunch singularity....

So a cycle...

[EK No.1975638]

hi

erm, you can measure red shift from far away stars, this indicates that they are travelling away from us. if the rate of red shift slows down, it implies that the universe is slowing its rate of expansion (after the big bang) and will eventually stop, and begin contracting, resulting in a 'big crunch' where the enture universe is pulled into a singularity again (like there was at the start of the big bang)
however ,we don't see this. by measuring the red shift, we see that the expansion is actually accelerating, which implies the universe will keep expanding forever, and will eventually result in heat death or 'the big freeze' as the temperature assymptotically approaches absolute zero.
..
aslo this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultimate_fate_of_the_universe

[Anonymous No.1975640]

Bitches don't know about my dark energy

[new theory No.1975668]

>>1975638
Wow thanks for your explanation... So logical :D

[new theory No.1975671]

>>1975638
Awesome wiki btw
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultimate_fate_of_the_universe

[EK No.1975674]

>>1975671

...don't quote a fucking wiki page that i have already delivered 3 cunting posts above your fucking own!

[Samefag No.1975682]

>>1975638
That doesn't necessarily mean the universe's expansion is accelerating. It could mean time is locally slowing down relative to the rest of the universe.

[new theory No.1975685]

>>1975674
...
intelligent yet stupid...
I meant thanks for that awesome wiki..... That You Delivered...

[Anonymous No.1975704]

>>1975671
>>1975674
haha communication flaw, epic burn

[EK No.1975721]

>>1975685

oh whoops! sorry. lol.

[Anonymous No.1975723]

But if we knew the universe was very small (at the beginning of the big bang) how could such a small amount of matter become so big... justdontgetit

[EK No.1975729]

>>1975723
very large amount of matter (infinitely big?) just in a very small amount of space.

[new theory No.1975732]

>>1975721
Well I should have been more clear :)
sorry but thanks for input

[Anonymous No.1975734]

>>1975732
bit of a faggot... :P

[Anonymous No.1975736]

>>1975729
Yeah but how can it be so small if its so much matter... its just hard to wrap my mind around it

[Anonymous No.1975780]

I heard a pre-big bang theory that the big bang was an effect created by an area of low entropy in a "black hole sea". the area low entropy created the observable universe, and allowed for normal energy reactions like vaccuum perturbations to occur at every point in space, and I think that violations of cp-symmetry would allow for matter to overcome anti-matter. this theory is a little too wierd for me to actually believe in but it makes a little more sense than like....m-brane collisions

anyways I dunno what OP is getting at but here's some more pre big bang theories http://universe-review.ca/F02-cosmicbg.htm#prebigbang

[EK No.1975786]

>>1975732
nah, u actually referenced my post at the start... i should have picked up on that.

[new theory No.1975789]

>>1975780
Yah great site thanks :), Im just investigating everything around the big bang.

[EK No.1975790]

>cp-symmetry

n.b. /b/tard lurkers, that doesn't mean what you think it does...

[new theory No.1975796]

>>1975786
ok thanks

[Anonymous No.1975797]

>>1975790
UNIVERSE WAS CREATED BY CP VIOLATIONS