[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 31 KB, 418x278, 1277324239772.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1969206 No.1969206 [Reply] [Original]

How does this make you feel?

>> No.1969225
File: 18 KB, 877x493, 1288381019698.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1969225

fuck you

>> No.1969258
File: 4 KB, 245x184, 1273099222491.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1969258

>>1969225

>> No.1969268
File: 8 KB, 300x226, mah.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1969268

>>1969225
Ma niggah

>> No.1969275

best thread on sci in 4 years

>> No.1969277

>>1969275
>sci
>4 years

get the fuck out.

>> No.1969295 [DELETED] 

mine would be like this

>> No.1969299
File: 19 KB, 419x279, breast size.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1969299

more like

>> No.1969311
File: 1.12 MB, 3181x4500, Horo Post .jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1969311

>>1969299

Scientifically correct.

>> No.1969324

>>1969206
scale?

>> No.1969334

>>1969299
this

>> No.1969340
File: 15 KB, 418x278, Ideal.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1969340

>>1969299

Drew that wrong...

>> No.1969342

>>1969299
This.

>> No.1969348

>>1969340
lol

>> No.1969351
File: 17 KB, 398x345, z21.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1969351

>>1969340
yeh its drawn wrong..you cant curve back on yourself. this implies that at very large breast sizes there are 2 levels of desirability at the same time.

>> No.1969356

>>1969299
>>1969299
never could understand the fascination with huge tits that will eventually sag, its only in the last century that it became popular (i think).

>> No.1969365

>>1969356

Big hips and tits were in fashion around the same time as corsets. Made women look like natural babby factories, which was necessary because most kids never made it past early childhood.

>> No.1969371

>>1969365

*desirable at around the time corsets were in fashion.

>> No.1969384
File: 49 KB, 520x770, 1239516_f520.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1969384

>>1969351
>missed the joke
Also, at really big sizes, there IS a divergence in desirability. >_<

>>1969356
Wat? Pic related.

>> No.1969395
File: 61 KB, 400x600, 4f55b8ef223e348655187d0419688dd8e7b61ed5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1969395

Shape > Size

PROVE ME WRONG

>> No.1969401
File: 13 KB, 341x345, z9.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1969401

>>1969384
>missed the joke
wasn't funny.
>Also, at really big sizes, there IS a divergence in desirability. >_<
no, if this graph is supposed to mean something, the line would be the mean of what a certain population considers desirable.
everyone has different opinions, so you arn't all going to draw the same line anyway. so there is 'divergence in desirability' for all sizes if its decided by more than one person.

>> No.1969409

Math retard here. What's the property on the left side of the graph called, where it goes up and approaches the axis indefinitely?

>> No.1969413

>>1969409

asymptote

>> No.1969418

>>1969206
Pretty good as I am under too big and just past just right. :-D

>> No.1969420

>>1969395
2D > 3D

prove me wrong

>> No.1969426

>>1969384
I stand corrected

>> No.1969427
File: 2 KB, 126x95, cox.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1969427

>>1969418
>axis not labelled

>> No.1969462

i dont get why the limit of x as it approaches 0 size, means infinite desirability? that should be negative desirability, bro.

in other words why are small tits desired in this graph???

>> No.1969509

>>1969462

It's an /a/ thing. You'll notice the lower end of the graph is marked "DFC", meaning delicious flat chest. Some people consider it the holy grail of mammaries.

>> No.1969524

>>1969509
grody

>> No.1970089

>>1969401
..... you were bullied in high school weren't you

>> No.1971979
File: 10 KB, 418x278, 1288383926403.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1971979

I have to disagree with you op and you reposters.

>> No.1971987

>>1971979
>>1969509
I've never heard of this before.

By the way, I agree with this poster:
>>1969299

>> No.1971991
File: 146 KB, 802x1300, pedobear.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1971991

>>1971979

what is this thread doing on /sci/?

>> No.1971999

>>1969395
the ultimate truth

>> No.1972001

>>1971979
100% agree

flat and simple all the way. anything more than a mouth full is gross. also waxed if it grows natural hairless is better.

>> No.1972004

>>1972001
Wow, you guys are weird. I mean, I like them small too, but not NONEXISTANT. SOME femininity is nice.

>> No.1972007

>>1969299

This chart is the most accurate.

>> No.1972013

>>1972004
had a korean gf
She was fucked up as a person but dam she was hot
allmost no tits or hair and she was 26

>> No.1972035

>>1972013
It sounds like you just want to date a 12yo boy. Faggot.

I myself am an ass man, but a mouthful of tits can be quite enjoyable.

>> No.1972045

>>1969299
This.

>> No.1972046

>>1969206
what does the 'DFC' mean when the X value is smallest?

>> No.1972057

>>1972046
>>1969509
disregard that I suck cocks

>> No.1972089

>>1972035
12y girls are better but i might not turn down a cute boy

>> No.1972102

>>1972089
I hope this person is joking.

>> No.1972120

>>1972102
some boys look kinda girly, I also like the good traps still prefer real girls though