Would this work? Assume that one end was tied off on an extremely high structure,

File: 56 KB, 457x835, science.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:11:55 2010 No.1814220 [Reply] [Original]

Would this work? Assume that one end was tied off on an extremely high structure,

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:12:55 2010 No.1814225 cute.

>>	RoboMendel !!BJTz0OTwQdf Mon Sep 27 23:12:55 2010 No.1814226 I want to know who actually draws all these shitty things. Why waste your time?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:13:55 2010 No.1814230 >>1814226 >>1814225 So would it work or not?

>>	◄ A Delawarean ► !EFPTP/iprg!!5Jx08ArYTM2 Mon Sep 27 23:15:55 2010 No.1814239 >>1814230 It would work gloriously.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:15:55 2010 No.1814241 It would work exactly the same way as tying a string around a baseball.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:16:55 2010 No.1814244 I think it's time for science trolls to have their own board.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:16:55 2010 No.1814245 >>1814241 but baseball bat does not have gravity

Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:16:55 2010 No.1814247

>>1814230
when you pull a rope taut it always makes a straight line between both ends. At some point when you are walking around the Earth the straight line would intersect the Earth's circumference. I would actually like to see this tried. You'd need to do it on a boat though, or something. Because you'd need an incredibly vast amount of flat land.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:17:55 2010 No.1814250 >>1814245 gravity does not make things float, it does the opposite

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:18:55 2010 No.1814254 >>1814250 then what if the rope was made of magnets?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:18:55 2010 No.1814257 >>1814254 then it wouldn't be a rope it'd be a magnet

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:21:55 2010 No.1814272 >>1814257 Maybe it's a magnetized iron cable?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:21:55 2010 No.1814273 >>1814257 ok so what if the rope was in space so then it would float and not hit the earth

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:22:55 2010 No.1814278 Well heres another idea I have been working on, you think this could work guys?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:22:55 2010 No.1814279 rope would break under the tensile stress of its own weight. NEXT.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:23:55 2010 No.1814287 File: 186 KB, 700x1006, my future pool.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>1814278 lol i forgot the image

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:26:55 2010 No.1814306 >>1814287 No one wants to comment on my future plans for a pool?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:27:55 2010 No.1814311 >>1814306 Considering I saw this yesterday, and that isn't how surface tension of water works. NOPE

Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:28:55 2010 No.1814321
File: 69 KB, 376x280, beads_of_water_on_le.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>1814287

surface tension isn't remotely close enough to hold water of that kind of surface area together. i mean, are you fucking retarded? have you seen water droplets holding themselves together that are the size of cars?

NEXT

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:29:55 2010 No.1814326 File: 71 KB, 448x473, sci.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] <-- This is what you guys are

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:30:55 2010 No.1814330 >>1814321 >>1814311 It isn't fucking surface tension its the sucking of the vacuum in the straw. Jesus.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:32:55 2010 No.1814340 File: 18 KB, 576x528, einstein.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] ok guys, this one makes sense. einstein was wrong and this image proves it

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:34:55 2010 No.1814354 File: 353 KB, 800x998, this would also work.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:34:55 2010 No.1814356 >>1814330 yeah that would be the case if water is a SOLID under room temperature and pressure, you stupid fucktard. next time try hold up a cup of water without the cup by lifting the top part, you incestuous redneck imbecile.

Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:37:55 2010 No.1814378
File: 3 KB, 225x225, images[1].jpg&amp.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>1814330
Try this:
Take a bottle similar to pic. Cut off a few centimeters from the bottom, so that it is now a gaping hole. Take of the bottle's cap, then submerge half of the bottle (neck side up) onto a basin with water. Suck up some water as you would when using a straw, while lowering the bottle so the water level inside it is the same as outside. Now, replace the cap. Pull it out of the water, record and post your results.

Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:37:55 2010 No.1814381

>>1814340

V_total =! V_A + V_B

the shit you learned in high school (V_total = V_a + V_b) is called galilean velocity addition and only works for velocities far below the speed of light, so the factor of (v/c)^2 does not come into play. learn some real physics by taking some GR course at university you dumbfuck.

NEXT.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:39:55 2010 No.1814394 >>1814354 except the drag on the front dummy vehicle is also acting on the actual car behind it. NEXT

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:40:55 2010 No.1814403 >>1814378 yeah it worked like a charm. its all about creating the vacuum PERFECTLY dipshit

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:41:55 2010 No.1814407 >>1814403 How is that different from using the straw technique?

Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:41:55 2010 No.1814409
File: 54 KB, 711x455, space program.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>1814381
Well since you said next and you have been so kind so far, here is my current blueprints of a new and improved spacesuit.

I have also been trying to find a human volunteer to allow me to surgically implant a plant into their lung to allow them to swim underwater forever, would you be interested?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:43:55 2010 No.1814424 >>1814340 Your premise is wrong, but the resulting explosion would be glorious. A fuckton of energy would be released.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:44:55 2010 No.1814433 How do you faggots get mad at shit like this.

Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:44:55 2010 No.1814436

>>1814381

god how did you become so hard?

its pathetic to see someone responding to a post (a troll picture, even worse) proclaiming their knowledge of science like it makes them better than anybody else. Yeah you took some boring classes in college and learned a bunch of formulas that your teacher wrote down on the board. Theres nothing 'wrong' with that, but when you're going to share some information and correct someone (let me remind you again, it was clearly a troll picture), be humble about it.

Now you look retarded, smarty pants.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:45:55 2010 No.1814438 >>1814409 yeah except photosynthesis requires CO2 AND water. where are you gonna get the water supply?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:45:55 2010 No.1814440 File: 103 KB, 798x570, 1285535113981.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] I shat my pants when I first saw this image. Has anyone ever built one of these before?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:46:55 2010 No.1814446 >>1814438 saliva

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:46:55 2010 No.1814447 >>1814436 pointless rant. NEXT.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:46:55 2010 No.1814448 >>1814438 Pee on plant, stupid.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:48:55 2010 No.1814461 >>1814446 your body will dehydrate in the process. not a permanent solution.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:48:55 2010 No.1814462 File: 46 KB, 1151x626, truth.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] there is no reason this should not work

Blitz !OhLawdmvac Mon Sep 27 23:49:55 2010 No.1814465
File: 310 KB, 1000x770, drwhostand.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

OBJECTS MOVING NEAR THE SPEED OF LIFE ARE AFFECTED BY THE THE PASSING OF TIME MUCH MORE SLOWLY

CREATE 2 WORMHOLES

ACCELERATE ONE TO NEAR LIGHTSPEED FOR A FEW YEARS THEN BRING IT BACK

CONGRATULATIONS, YOU NOW HAVE A WORKING TIME MACHINE!

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:49:55 2010 No.1814468 >>1814447 Haha keep on telling yourself that buddy. You know I'm right.

Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:49:55 2010 No.1814469

We start with E=mc^2
Einstein's mass equivilance equation, right? This "all powerful" amazing thing that this man was mostly famous for correct? Just one problem: Einstein was wrong. According to modern physics, there is so little mass the in the universe compared to energy that we can just cross off mass and thus get E=c^2. So as you can clearly see, energy can be formed from the square of the speed of light. You can thank me later physicists.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:50:55 2010 No.1814472 >>1814438 water vapor from your breath

Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:50:55 2010 No.1814477

>>1814448

the planet is in your helmet.

how do you pee in your helmet?

even if you somehow manage, that still doesn't solve the problem of you dehydrating. so basically you need a constant supply of H2O for this to work, and H2O is like 90% oxygen, so you're basically running in a loop.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:51:55 2010 No.1814478 how have these ideas never been patented, even my college professor never thought of these i bet

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:51:55 2010 No.1814481 >>1814477 >the planet is in your helmet. woah, thats deep dude

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:52:55 2010 No.1814483 File: 36 KB, 604x444, this would really work.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] This is an idea i got a copyrighted on a while back so dont bother trying to steal it.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:52:55 2010 No.1814484 >>1814477 you don't enderstand the convervation of mass water is still a mass even if it is liquid mass

Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:53:55 2010 No.1814493

>>1814462

it doesn't work. one of the basic stipulations of einstein's theory of relativity is that the speed of light in vacuum is a constant in any frame of reference, which means, (quite conter-intuitively i must admit), that if you shoot a beam of light on a train traveling at the speed of light, the beam of light would be stationary relative to the train and not moving forward at 2C.

NEXT.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:54:55 2010 No.1814500 >>1814462 Theoretically, all I have to do is shine a flashlight into a showerhead tube that has been half-taped. Could there be any side effects though? I don't want to ruin the guest towels by accident.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:54:55 2010 No.1814502 File: 166 KB, 591x483, 1285643902629.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:55:55 2010 No.1814505 >>1814493 you fail at reading comprehension, it's a shower not a vacuum

Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:55:55 2010 No.1814506

>>1814484

conservation of mass is irrelevant. the fact that the total oxygen and hydrogen content of the universe stays the same (which isn't even true in the first place since there's something called FUSION), doesn't stop YOUR BODY from dehydrating.

i.e., your body loses water, of course, something else would gain this amount of water, but as long as that something isn't your body, you will dehydrate.

NEXT.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:55:55 2010 No.1814507 >>1814354 "whereas" does not work that way

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:55:55 2010 No.1814508 /sci/ is so mad right now also all this trolling

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:56:55 2010 No.1814514 Oh boy, this thread is great. They're actually responding to it

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:56:55 2010 No.1814517 >>1814505 it doesn't matter what the eject mechanism is, what i'm talking about is the medium in which the light shower travels. a shower head doesn't change the fact that the water is moving in air, does it? NEXT

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:56:55 2010 No.1814518 >>1814483 would this work guise?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:57:55 2010 No.1814522 >>1814517 This guy is this best, he has been telling me why each image is wrong since i started this thread, gotta love clueless people like that

Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:57:55 2010 No.1814523

>>1814462
faster = more energy
more energy = more power
shine onto solar panel, half the light still has same power as all the light

where i'm going is make big tube in desert, sunlight goes in, COVER HALF OR MORE OF THE HOLES AND SHINE ONTO SOLAR PANEL

YOU COULD GET 100X SUN POWER ONTO SMALL PANEL AND POWER ENTIRE BRASIL

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:57:55 2010 No.1814524 >>1814493 >beam of light would be stationary so c=0? GOOD JOB BREAKING PHYSICS GENIUS

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:58:55 2010 No.1814526 >>1814462 light is not a fluid and is not affected by pressure

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:58:55 2010 No.1814529 >>1814483 The 'impulse wave' or whatever it's called should travel at the speed of sound in that medium. But I'm no expert, so eh...

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:58:55 2010 No.1814530 /v/ is just trolling all you guys, and your eating it up wonderful

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:58:55 2010 No.1814531 >Bring barbells to space >Zero gravity allows you to do infinite reps >Become ripped in a couple days

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:59:55 2010 No.1814535 >>1814506 water goes nowhere its closed loop, water is used and recreated by plant-astronaut cycle

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:59:55 2010 No.1814536 >>1814493 no, your train example ignores what you stated beforehand: light always travels at the speed of light relative to the observer.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:59:55 2010 No.1814538 >>1814524 Good job on not reading on. Genius.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 23:59:55 2010 No.1814539 >>1814531 Wow. That actually might work. Fuck if I had the money to go into space I'd do it.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 28 00:00:55 2010 No.1814544 >>1814539 a bunch of anons could rent one of those planes that flys up and down and simulates space gravity for a day or 2 and get ripped that way.

Anonymous Tue Sep 28 00:00:55 2010 No.1814546

>>1814483

the "instantaneous" motion of a solid steel bar you see in real life is not instantaneous at all, the moment you push one end you send a compressional wave moving at the speed of sound in steel towards the other end. for objects of ordinary lengths, the time delay is irrelevant, therefore the feeling of instantaneousness.

for objects of the order of light years, it would take forever for the movement at one end to transmit to the other end (speed of sound in steel is of the order of kilometers/sec)

NEXT

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 28 00:01:55 2010 No.1814547 >>1814518 Nope force travels at the speed of light. Same reason if the sun just disappeared it would take 8 mins of the us to see the light was gone and it would take 8 mins for the earth to no longer feel its gravity.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 28 00:01:55 2010 No.1814551 File: 60 KB, 320x320, weally.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>1814462 Imagine if this could be combined with fiberoptics, we could have terabit ethernet internet connections or even quark computing processors.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 28 00:02:55 2010 No.1814553 >>1814247 America has some pretty big deserts. And you know who likes going to the desert? Mythbusters. Do it Kari.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 28 00:02:55 2010 No.1814554 >>1814531 >>1814539 The reason barbells help you increase muscle is because of weight.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 28 00:03:55 2010 No.1814556 >>1814502 >>1814440 read up on newton's 3rd law. NEXT

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 28 00:03:55 2010 No.1814560 >>1814546 >the moment you push one end you send a compressional wave moving at the speed of sound By that logic a sonic boom would happen every time any solid structure was pushed ever

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 28 00:03:55 2010 No.1814562 >>1814538 "stationary relative to the train" implies the observer is situated on the train, and that the beam of light he shot is stationary to him. Therefore your a idoit.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 28 00:03:55 2010 No.1814563 >>1814554 technically it is resistance, so you could make an air cloud in the space workout area to get wind friction (friction and resistance are almost the same)

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 28 00:04:55 2010 No.1814564 File: 159 KB, 500x513, 1283345880284.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>1814544 shit I need to win the lottery. I'll organize that while letting tons of you guys have free rides. God damn this is awesome.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 28 00:04:55 2010 No.1814567 >>1814465 most stupid shit in the entire thread, it's impossible to make wormholes, let alone move them, and time is constant anyway NEXT

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 28 00:05:55 2010 No.1814579 File: 92 KB, 256x256, 1282864452755.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>1814567 >TIME CONSTANT

Anonymous Tue Sep 28 00:06:55 2010 No.1814581

>>1814554
Conservastion of Masses: even in space the barbell is the same size(mass) even if it seems weightless

so you can do more reps with the same mass and still get ripped. you could probably squat double what you could on earth amnd have massive gains in 3-4 hours. but then again space makes you lost bones calcium so you have to be fast

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 28 00:06:55 2010 No.1814587 File: 49 KB, 493x335, 1280880350994.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>1814567 >he doesn't know the only constant in the universe is the speed of light

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 28 00:07:55 2010 No.1814588 >>1814560 no, because the wave is not traveling in air, it's traveling in steel.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 28 00:07:55 2010 No.1814592 >>1814562 i stand corrected. the beam would move at C relative to the train, but it would also move at C relative to a stationary observer on ground.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 28 00:08:55 2010 No.1814594 File: 77 KB, 284x267, laughingfemales.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>1814567 >time is constant

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 28 00:08:55 2010 No.1814596 >>1814587 meet >>1814462 The speed will depend on the number of open holes. Tell your grandchildren where you were when you first saw the light barrier broken on an imageboard.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 28 00:09:55 2010 No.1814598 File: 44 KB, 446x400, 1280882375944.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>1814567 >he has never heard of General Relativity

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 28 00:09:55 2010 No.1814601 >>1814531 Since the weights are weightless in this scenario the reps would be ineffective. It would be similar to doing a flexing/posing routine. The reps also wouldn't be infinite since you would still eventually fatigue.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 28 00:10:55 2010 No.1814602 >>1814547 8 minute to notice light gone... yes 8 minutes to notice gravity gone... not necessarily

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 28 00:11:55 2010 No.1814607 File: 26 KB, 300x300, 1282770405531.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>1814596 sorry man I gotta make a profit

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 28 00:11:55 2010 No.1814609 >>1814596 meet >>1814526

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 28 00:11:55 2010 No.1814612 >>1814602 Precisely. I went skydiving once and it doesn't tank 8 minutes for you to feel gravity gone and be able to swim through the air. As soon as you jump out of the plane you get the feeling.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 28 00:11:55 2010 No.1814614 >>1814567 humans created time and timezones, they dont really exist we can just bend the rules put in place and voila, time travel.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 28 00:12:55 2010 No.1814616 >>1814598 a theory and a physical construct are completely different things.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 28 00:12:55 2010 No.1814619 >>1814602 it's because of causality. Information cannot be sent somewhere faster than the speed of light, this includes any kind of information.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 28 00:12:55 2010 No.1814620 >>1814602 well it could take more time. I dont know the math involved there but speed of light is the fastest it could go.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 28 00:12:55 2010 No.1814621 >>1814598 "No bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country. " That's by General Patton, American.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 28 00:13:55 2010 No.1814625 File: 31 KB, 921x606, 1283132766779.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>1814614

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 28 00:13:55 2010 No.1814626 >>1814612 just because you don't feel it doesn't mean the force of gravity isn't there. if the human body is such a good sensor why the fuck would we bother making so many measuring devices in the first place?

>>	Blitz !OhLawdmvac Tue Sep 28 00:14:55 2010 No.1814629 File: 39 KB, 400x282, hahahaohlol.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>1814619 >He doesn't know about quantum entanglement!

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 28 00:15:55 2010 No.1814632 >>1814612 ... what that's because you're probably not even ten miles from the earth while the sun is over 93 million miles away also when did getting in a plane interfere with the force of gravity

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 28 00:16:55 2010 No.1814637 >>1814629 I don't think you actually know what that means regardless, the sun and the earth are far from quantum

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 28 00:16:55 2010 No.1814641 File: 83 KB, 393x355, 1280955124434.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>1814612 troll harder /v/irgin

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 28 00:16:55 2010 No.1814644 >>1814629 you might want to check your definition of information before making that claim

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 28 00:18:55 2010 No.1814654 somehow i have a feeling that most of you fags are either trolling or never went beyond first year general physics at university. this is fucking depressing. i'm fucking out of here. NEXT.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 28 00:19:55 2010 No.1814655 File: 67 KB, 420x360, Magic-School-Bus.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] if you want to time travel, go to bed, thats how i always skip time

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 28 00:19:55 2010 No.1814656 >>1814644 You might want to brush up on basic capitalisation and sentence structure before posting on a high-level science discussion.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 28 00:20:55 2010 No.1814657 >>1814654 >while posting on 4chan

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 28 00:20:55 2010 No.1814658 >>1814654 >implying your not >>1814567 and thought time was constant

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 28 00:21:55 2010 No.1814663 >>1814656 >high-level science discussion ROFL

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 28 00:22:55 2010 No.1814674 >>1814655 i'm about to try that right now! wish me luck, i'll post results tomorrow.

Anonymous Tue Sep 28 00:24:55 2010 No.1814683

Fire multistage rocket at Mach 2.

Rocket fires another rocket out of it at Mach 2, total speed Mach 4. Keep doubling like this and you could go faster than light. Last rocket hits turbineat speed of light, turns turbine blade at speed of light, essentially unlimited energy.

Rockets would be expensive but long term you save trillions.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 28 00:24:55 2010 No.1814685 >>1814654 >trollface images everywhere >I THINK YOU GUYS MIGHT BE TROLLIN NOT SURE THO way to go champ

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 28 00:25:55 2010 No.1814687 traveling forward in time is easy You just have to go really fast The faster you can travel the more time will pass relative people not going as fast

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 28 00:25:55 2010 No.1814689 >>1814655 I prefer drinking. Heavily.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 28 00:26:55 2010 No.1814694 File: 50 KB, 388x296, 1285536473627.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>1814685

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 28 00:26:55 2010 No.1814696 File: 62 KB, 294x294, 1285639771857.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>1814687 but my legs would get tired

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 28 00:27:55 2010 No.1814703 >>1814687 Heres one to figure out for you. If we can time travel when we get near the speed of light, what would happen if you put a light speed car on a lightspeed conveyer belt going to opposite direction?

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 28 00:28:55 2010 No.1814707 >>1814687 thats funny when i am near my relatives time seems to slow to a crawl

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 28 00:29:55 2010 No.1814711 >>1814703 do we have to account for wind resistance or is this in space

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 28 00:30:55 2010 No.1814724 File: 7 KB, 198x201, nothing.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>1814703 you wouldnt move?

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 28 00:31:34 2010 No.1814729 >>1814703 atoms on the wheels and belt would be going forward in time but the car and the person in the car would not actually be traveling at all

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 28 00:36:11 2010 No.1814752 >>1814703 The belt would contract due to the speed but whatever it was wrapped around wouldn't since it isn't moving, so it would just snap.

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]

/sci/ - Science & Math