[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 124 KB, 1047x681, 25189288.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1803311 No.1803311 [Reply] [Original]

My thread 404'd yesterday, but it was basically about how a random crazy-ass Youtube commenter mentioned something about tornadoes being columns of anti-gravity.

Well I found a new source that goes into more detail about this theory. I don't have a strong physics background, but is anything in this source accurate?

http://www.antigravity.de/tornadoprinciple.htm

Keep in mind that we still have no idea how tornadoes form, so anything is open to suggestion.

>> No.1803314

>Keep in mind that we still have no idea how tornadoes form, so anything is open to suggestion.

Yes, we do. Stop posting links to yourself every few hours trying to troll.

>> No.1803318

>>1803314
No, we don't. Please enlighten us. How do you think they form?

>> No.1803326

>>1803318
google.com will answer that question. If you're too stupid to be able to use the internet, here is the first link:

http://www.windows2universe.org/earth/Atmosphere/tornado/formation.html

The severe thunderstorms which produce tornadoes form where cold dry polar air meets warm moist tropical air. These air currents meeting causes a funnel formation, with a low pressure core. That is a tornado.

>> No.1803328

>Keep in mind that we still have no idea how tornadoes form, so anything is open to suggestion.
0/10
Yes we do. And even if we didn't, antigravity is NOT open to suggestion.

>> No.1803341

>>1803326
Nice try, but what you just described is a mesocyclone. We've known how they form for a long time. Warm air rising meets cold air, horizontal rotation turns vertical via wind shear and updrafts, etc. That's a mesocyclone.

What we DON'T know is how a funnel comes down and transfers the high winds from the mesocyclone down to the ground in a small, concentrated area.

>> No.1803343

ever watch water go down the drain

there you go

>> No.1803356

>>1803343
You're thinking of a dust devil. A tornado is not a dust devil.

>> No.1803357

>>1803341
Antigravity isn't your answer for why things come DOWN. You ever think it could be regular old gravity?

Also, google.com

>> No.1803361

>>1803357
Tornadoes don't suck things down.

>> No.1803363

from, that site:
According to the theory of relativity, the principles of which are all reflected in the formula E=mc², mass m and velocity c are mutually interchangeable. This means that mass is always defined by its velocity. There are no absolute masses. Mass only seems absolute on the surface of the earth since it all has the same velocity, the same direction and the same angular momentum.

seems legit

>> No.1803395

>>1803361
That's thanks to the low pressure. Keep your arguments straight and stop jumping around.

>> No.1803400

>>1803395
Why is there low pressure?

>> No.1803454
File: 62 KB, 696x525, 12398f37121496.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1803454

>>1803311

>> No.1803497

>>1803454
Hey. No one has yet to even say how they think tornadoes form.

>> No.1803501
File: 26 KB, 565x546, NotScience.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1803501

> increase in mass does not occur linearly, but rather it occurs exponentially. As a result, a gravitational well is created in the "proboscis" of the tornado, repelling the gravitational field of the earth.

lolno

>> No.1803513

>>1803497
>>1803400
see
>>1803326


and let this thread die.

>> No.1803532

>>1803513
That explanation was almost as inaccurate as the article in the OP. Why don't you look at the advanced version ON THAT SAME SITE for a more professional explanation?

http://www.windows2universe.org/earth/Atmosphere/tornado/formation.html&edu=high

>> No.1803574

>>1803532
Stop bumping this troll thread.

>> No.1803656

>>1803574
So because you were owned, it's now a troll thread. Okay.

>> No.1803672

>>1803656
We've been calling you a troll the entire time. Fuck off.

>> No.1803692

>>1803672
You fuck off. You're contributing nothing to this thread. You posted a link to an article that proved yourself wrong.