[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 23 KB, 640x480, 1283008720769.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1665381 No.1665381 [Reply] [Original]

Daily test.

>> No.1665388

One of the pupils corrects him.

>> No.1665393

x = x

>> No.1665395

0=12

>> No.1665394

Fuck off, weeaboo.

>> No.1665399

My worst nightmare.

>> No.1665400

>>1665395

0=26 I mean. Brainfart.

>> No.1665403

>>1665394
>Mooooom! Look! I am being tough on the internet!

>> No.1665405

x - 9 = 19 + x
x = 28 + x
x - x = 28
wat

>> No.1665410

>>1665403
>moooom

>> No.1665411
File: 174 KB, 420x500, rail806.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1665411

>>1665403

>> No.1665412

animes are stupid, this proves it

>> No.1665423

>>1665403
You must be new here.

>> No.1665427
File: 24 KB, 450x351, Dawkins.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1665427

>>1665412
Ok.

>> No.1665433

>Calling someone weeaboo
>Posting on 4chan
>4chan's collaborative-community format is copied from one of the most popular forums in Japan, Futaba Channel. Different boards are dedicated to different topics, from Japanese anime, manga, and culture to videogames, music, and photography.
>Bunch of boards dedicated to Japanese culture
>Almost every banner is conected to anime/manga

u mad.

>> No.1665437

>>1665433
are you trying to apologize for being weaboo?

>> No.1665438
File: 38 KB, 251x251, cord886.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1665438

>>1665433
>started with /b/
>has seperate boards for seperate topics
>implying I'm not blocking those stupid ads

Derp.

>> No.1665443
File: 50 KB, 428x510, tralll.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1665443

>the guy who made that retarded piece of anime

>> No.1665446
File: 166 KB, 600x811, 1226420896444.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1665446

>>1665437

I think this might be a case of the pot calling the kettle black.

Pick related.

>> No.1665447

>>1665443
Wut?

>> No.1665451

>>1665446
/sci/- anime

>> No.1665456
File: 16 KB, 400x400, 1282747200772.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1665456

>>1665446

Oh yes, you are really trying to rationalize your disorder...and trying really hard!

>> No.1665457

>>1665451
4chan - child of 2chan

>> No.1665463

>>1665457
/sci/- anime

>> No.1665467
File: 2 KB, 126x114, 1203822849274.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1665467

>>1665456

u mad

>> No.1665466

>>1665456
And you are probably one of those who came on 4chan because LOL FUNNY MEMES XD XD YOU JUST LOST THE GAME ANON IS LEGION

>> No.1665471

>>1665463
Don't force it, see what /g/ has become!

>> No.1665477
File: 2.82 MB, 320x240, 1278067381018.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1665477

>>1665466
Continue, your excuses make me laugh.

>> No.1665479

>>1665471
Its a shitty troll, only gullible retards post in those threads.

>> No.1665480

>>1665467

>> No.1665489

>>1665477
Oh god you are so tough.
When is the next habbo hotel raid coming?
I know you can show them weeaboos who is the real boss here.

>> No.1665503
File: 790 KB, 330x186, 965A8659F884-1.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1665503

>>1665489
I already did. Your reactions are a proof of your insecurity and urge to show those who laughed at your disorder in your past...SHOW 'EM! SHOW 'EM ALL!

Ah, this was a triumph, thank you.

>> No.1665506

x - 7 = 19 + x
x = 19 + x + 7
x = x + 26

Therefore x = infinity

Not that hard really, and this is supposed to be the /sci/ board? Honestly guys, /v/ is disappoint.

>> No.1665510

>>1665506
infi... are you shitting me?

L={}
this is a guilty solution.

>> No.1665511

>>1665503
But funny thing is, nobody laughed at the so called "disorder" in the past.
And since when are hobbies disorders?

>> No.1665512

>>1665506
>Therefore x = infinity
hahaohwow.jpg

The answer is "false."

>> No.1665515

>>1665506
Oh, it's a 7. I thought it was a 9.

>> No.1665519

Shut up, both of you. /sci/borgs are growing tired of both the weaboo touting and the chantology crap. It's up you what you do, but please, when in Rome, alright?

>> No.1665522

>>1665503
Don't you mean mailto:RAGE?
OH MAN BURN
BURN
BURN DUDE BURN
YOU GOT BURNED
BURNED, DUDE, BURNED THAT WAS A BURN
BURN.

>> No.1665538

>>1665522
Idiot...

>> No.1665544

>>1665519

I think the issue is that they're debating what, exactly, 'Rome' is at this point.

>> No.1665558
File: 51 KB, 288x237, Hypsibiusdujardini.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1665558

>>1665544

Well, I'd say that it's not /b/, and it's not /a/. I postulate that it is probably /sci/, and I have a tardigrade to prove it.

Isn't it adorable?

>> No.1665575

>>1665558

Those are all subsections to 4chan. It's a matter of microcosmic perspective (viewing /sci/ as a stand-alone forum) versus macrocosmic (viewing /sci/ as a subsection of the 4chan collection of forums).

In the first respect, I would agree that /sci/ is not weeaboo. But in the second perspective, it is by association.

Also, yes, it is adorable.

>> No.1665832

>>1665506

Agreed. Makes perfect sense, I don't know why they're saying it's wrong, they haven't explained why. I think they must be annoyed you got it and they didn't, haha!

>> No.1665840

>>1665832
No, the answer was solved here>>1665512

It's a false equation.

>> No.1665845

>>1665512
He didn't define x as belonging to any particular set. x could well be an aleph number.

>> No.1665846

No, the answer is 0=26.

>> No.1665849

i got x=12

>> No.1665851

>>1665849
HOLY FUCK DID IT REALLY TAKE THAT LONG /SCI/?

I MEAN REALLY

>> No.1665853

>>1665849

ur horrible at maths

x's cancel
7+9 = 26

ergo 0 = 26

this is now a theorem

>> No.1665858

>>1665853


could also be -26 = 0

>> No.1665859

Dafuck are you talking about. The x's cancel.

>> No.1665860

>>1665853
>7+9 = 26
>Derp

>> No.1665871

The answer is
<span class="math"> x = \pm 13[/spoiler]
specifically, x=+13 when on the left side of an equation, and x=-13 when on the right side of an equation.

>> No.1665874

>>1665860

>derp i can't read that it says 19 not 9 derp im retard

>> No.1665872

>>1665853
i think he meant 7+19, theres no 9

>> No.1665875

>>1665871
but that's impossible, the x cannot be different in the same equation.

meaning this is a false and unsolveable equation

>> No.1665876

>>1665872

ya obviously

>> No.1665878

>>1665871
Incorrect, x cannot be two different numbers at once.

The equation is false.

>> No.1665879

>>1665506
is right.
<span class="math">x=\aleph_0[/spoiler]

>> No.1665888 [DELETED] 

>>1665878
>>1665875
Unsolvable by you yes. Unsolvable by me, no.
<span class="math">x=\Alpha_0[/spoiler]

>> No.1665887
File: 7 KB, 200x150, 1281036014717.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1665887

0=26
I always knew it, anime is damn stupid.

>> No.1665890

x-7=19+x

y1 = x-7
y2 = x + 19
These lines are parallel, and therefore intersect only when x = infinity or negative infinity.
(The cartesian plane is wrapped around a sphere).

>> No.1665894

>>1665879
no hes not

if x has to be the same number, and yes, infinity is a number

they cannot be equal if one is +26

>> No.1665893

>>1665878
>>1665875
Unsolvable by you yes. Unsolvable by me, no.
<span class="math">x=\aleph_0[/spoiler]

>> No.1665895

>>1665894
Yes they can because infinity +26 = infinity.

>> No.1665902

>>1665895
that would mean that the infinities are not the same number then.

and that's impossible in an algebra fucking 1 equation

>> No.1665916

>>1665902
No. You do not understand infinities.
<span class="math">\aleph_0 = \aleph_0 + 26[/spoiler]
<span class="math">\therefore x = \aleph_0[/spoiler] is a solution to the equation.

>> No.1665922

fucking latex
>>1665902
<span class="math">\aleph_0 = \aleph_0 + 26[/spoiler]
therefore
<span class="math">x = \aleph_0[/spoiler] is a solution to the equation.

>> No.1666014

For God's sake, /v/ has to come and save you all from your own stupidity.

Again.

x = root(169), as this is undefinable as either positive or negative. It's +13 on the left and -13 on the right, but these can both be expressed as root(169).

This is supposed to be the science and math board, are you all 12 year olds reading books you shouldn't be? It's really simple, you should be ashamed of yourselves.

>> No.1666029

>>1666014
You moron, the root of 169 can be defined as -13 or 13, but you cannot use both of those as the values of x in the same equation.

see>>1665922 for the actual answer.

>> No.1666368

NO SOLUTION IDIOTS

>> No.1666661

>>1666029
>>1666029
>>1666029

Prove it.

>> No.1666670

>>1666661
So x = root(169) = -13 and 13
Therfor: 13 = -13

wat?

>> No.1666673

>>1666670
therefore*

>> No.1666685

Like a quadratic equation can have two answers.

>> No.1666691

>>1666670

No

<span class="math"> 13^2=(-13)^2 [/spoiler]
<span class="math"> \sqrt{13^2}=\sqrt{(-13)^2} [/spoiler]
<span class="math"> |13|=|-13| [/spoiler]
<span class="math"> 13=13 [/spoiler]

>> No.1666715 [DELETED] 

>>1666691
13^2, (-13)^2, 13, and -13 are four different numbers. You're plugging the latter two into the formula, this post is completely irrelevant.

>> No.1666722

>>1666691
13^2, (-13)^2 and 13, -13 are totally different. You're plugging the latter into the formula, this post is completely irrelevant.

>> No.1666778

>>1666722

Notice the | signs?

>> No.1666794
File: 63 KB, 927x383, scimaff.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1666794

Case 4

>> No.1666806

>>1666778
Your thinking is still that root of 169 = 13 or -13, thus 13 = -13.

You cannot have two different values for the same number (x). 13 is not -13, x cannot be both, this implies that 13 is -13, since x is one number.

Circular thinking, you cannot have two completely different numbers for the value of x, since the value of x is one number.