[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 87 KB, 500x500, atheistwheeloflogic.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1660868 No.1660868 [Reply] [Original]

Yep, just putting it out there for you.

>> No.1660879

hear bull claim.
study said claim.
yup it's bullshit.

sounds accurate to me!

>> No.1660883

>>1660868


assume religion's are divinely inspired miracles of 100% goodness and virtue.

Read any religious text.

WTFamIreading.jpg

>> No.1660885
File: 84 KB, 500x500, 1282920176498.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1660885

>>1660868
>fix'd

>> No.1660913
File: 21 KB, 400x300, 4aec0803_8c12_bb10.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1660913

I believe in scientific truth, not personal truth.

>> No.1660919

>>1660913
>scientific truth
no such thing

>> No.1660938

>>1660919
Of course there is, it's just called "science" instead.

>> No.1660952

>>1660913
The first duty of every starfleet officer?
Congrats OP best trolling pic I've seen in a while btw

>> No.1660968

>>>/b/>>267296628

>> No.1660977

I don't know who the fuck is Dawkins, but you're a faggot. And everyone else in this thread is a fucking idiot for not saging this thread.

>> No.1660978

>>1660938
Bitches don't know about my pessimistic induction.
No such thing as truth, period. Only theories.

>> No.1660982
File: 211 KB, 4877x4500, sigh2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1660982

>>1660978
Please keep philosophy out of a science board.

>> No.1660988

>>>/b/267296628

>> No.1661012

>>1660982
I know it's mostly sowing butthurt, but scientists really should be able to put their theories in perspective as tentative truths at best. I honestly think that.

>> No.1661036

>>1660978
Yes there is. Lrn2logic. And you forgot your sage, bud.

>> No.1661274

>>1660879
It's called prejudice broski

>> No.1661346 [DELETED] 

>>1661012
Then why doesn't Scientists focus more on other issues like disease, aids, curing cancer, instead of wasting their time attacking religion and writing books about it; all Dawkins is doing is naming the obvious stuff we already know. We don't need a book to tell us if God is real or not, it's pointless. In the end, it will depend on the individual whether or not it's real.

Btw, not trolling, just saying what I think.

>> No.1661369

fucking WIN OP

FUCKIng WIN

LOL

>> No.1661377
File: 109 KB, 600x750, motivatorc787d4ca55e831fbb4e644c4e1dcbdcd79e45f1f.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1661377

>>1661346

> Hurdur why doesn't Scientists focus magnets on other issues like disease, aids, curing cancer, instead of derping their time attacking religion and writing books about it. <unintelligible nonsense about how the poster is an athist>

9/10, almost had me

>> No.1661383

>>1660868
Agreed.

More accurately millions of people in the world have been talking of personal testimony of God for centuries. I can't be wrong therefore millions of people throughout history have been deluding themselves about something I know nothing about.

In order to be correct atheists must believe that every person who's ever had a spiritual experience is
1. lying
2. hallucinating
3. stupid

This is their only argument and it sucks.

>> No.1661387
File: 73 KB, 755x1255, Trolls.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1661387

Meanwhile, at OP's house.

>> No.1661388
File: 17 KB, 328x250, godsaidit.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1661388

>> No.1661397

>>1661383
>This is their only argument and it sucks.
Your posts prompts us to add another common property:
4. Delusional.

>>1660978
By virtue of that argument, you can't prove that it is correct either.

>> No.1661408

>>1661377
>Marry a primate.
Protip: Humans are primates. But if you're as hot as the girl pictured then you should be allowed to chose any primate, as long as you release vids.

>> No.1661449

Good job OP.

>> No.1661543

>>1661397
Look stupid, science cant say truth because everything is subject to future evidences, truths can't be wrong. thats why mathematics is basically the only thing that deals with truths.

>> No.1661561

>>1661383
expect that a lot of this experiences implicitly contradict each other, so we have to assume that vast majority is bullshit one way or another
then assuming that all of them are bullshit is the next logical step