/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.16349341]

How is he right on everything everytime?

[Anonymous No.16349345]

>debunks LK99
>debunks Veritasium
>debunks solar freaking roadways
>musk hater before it was cool

[Anonymous No.16349346]

[math] \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \blacktriangle [/math]
[math] \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \blacktriangle \; \; \blacktriangle [/math]
[math] \blacktriangledown \; \; \blacktriangledown \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \blacktriangledown \; \; \blacktriangledown [/math]
[math] \; \; \blacktriangledown \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \blacktriangledown [/math]
[math] \; \; \blacktriangle \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \blacktriangle [/math]
[math] \blacktriangle \; \; \blacktriangle \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \blacktriangle \; \; \blacktriangle [/math]
[math] \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \blacktriangledown \; \; \blacktriangledown [/math]
[math] \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \blacktriangledown [/math]

[Anonymous No.16349348]

>>16349341
He understands physics and economics.
The average person doesn't.

[Cult of Passion No.16349350]

>>16349341
Why does he only have one notable achievement in Chemistry?

mf colored metal or whatever

[Anonymous No.16349353]

>>16349350
Can you post your current body? It's been so long since we've seen you topless

[Cult of Passion No.16349355]

>>16349348
>economics
Arithmatic, he isnt "a Systems" anything.

Physics? Then why;
>>16349350
>one notable achievement

[Anonymous No.16349356]

>>16349350
Why do you have 0 even though you ramble about being a number theorist or whatever

[Cult of Passion No.16349364]

>>16349356
>ramble
Fail.

You judgement is based on your emotional narrative, not peer review. Youre defending your ego by pushing into a victim's position.

I can see through wires.

[Cult of Passion No.16349377]

>>16349364
>victim's
Victor's. Just woke up and smoked and dealing with shit around the world.

>>16349353
I havnt been to the gym in months because of retarded work called "fucking with GeoPolitics".

I just face wall, manipulate world affairs, only warfare, only.

[Anonymous No.16349378]

>>16349377
>victim is
>victor is

[Cult of Passion No.16349387]

>>16349378
I struggle to imagine how someone could be so desperate for wins they fake them. Just living out a lie for "lulz", but only when certain people are around...

This is animated adult Amerixan TV tier behavior. Mon-keigh C, Mon-keigh dew.

[Anonymous No.16349388]

>>16349355
Physics and economics are the same.
Both are requirements for the material applications in chemistry.

[Cult of Passion No.16349396]

>>16349388
>Physics and economics are the same.
I know, but Arithmatic for cost/benefit ratios are not Physics, its a measure of Technological and Societal efficiency, which is Chemistry via Nutrition and BioMed, which are Physics.

Why cant he judge SpaceX fairly?...

[Cult of Passion No.16349397]

>What are you known for?
>[hiss-destroys]
A constructive member of the comminity.

[Anonymous No.16349402]

>>16349397
If it weren't for people like him, elon musk would have been elected president
Picture hell

[Cult of Passion No.16349413]

>>16349402
>"fucking with GeoPolitics".
What do you think words mean? Elon is lost on the world stage, he belong in a machine shop or lab...he knows the internet, not the same thing.

Secondly, youre looking up to him, you need to show me your credentials then. PhD, field work, technical training etc. Otherwise youre worshipping what you *think* in intelligent, not what I know is.

[Anonymous No.16349415]

>>16349346
teach me how to do this

[Cult of Passion No.16349416]

>>16349413
>looking up to him
Thunderfoot.

Here is another "smart guy" saying something wildly insane to me.

Not very "worldly affairs" aware.

[Anonymous No.16349483]

>>16349341
Didn't he forgot that mars has 1/3rd gravity acceleration on surface compared to earth and made 1h video mocking nasa for falling for mars chopper that obviously won't fly? The one that finally broke down few weeks ago.

[Anonymous No.16349516]

>>16349483
You mean the one where he doesn't say that at all, does the calculations and says it can work, on which he is later proven 100% correct.

[Anonymous No.16349730]

>>16349516

No, I mean the one made before it worked. Did he deleted the first one?
I also recall he said that starlink wouldn't work because satelites in LEO move too fast to target antennas at them (he obviously wasn't aware of phased array antennas at the time)

[Anonymous No.16349740]

>>16349730
>no man he said that in a video i swear existed

[Anonymous No.16349742]

>>16349730
I think you have been reading too many blogs.

[Anonymous No.16349752]

>>16349356
>Deflects in shame.
Shut up and take the L: Your beloved guru is a failure in science.

[Anonymous No.16349757]

>>16349752
you're not familiar with that schizo

[Anonymous No.16349774]

I remember way back in the day when Thunderfag agreed to an in-person debate with Ray Comfort. Thunderfag got fucking DESTROYED. Even his fans were pissed at him. It was absolutely humiliating for him. I laughed my ass off.

[Anonymous No.16349788]

>>16349742
That might be the case.
I also recall him screeching at musk for starlink "outage" after some pigger diplomat barked at Musk on twater for end of free gibs (I wouldn't be surprised if it turned out this war makes bulk of starlink revenue now).
I also do not recall him laying fiber to oinkrainian front lines (because starlink is obviously inferior to fiber) or doing fundraising for other kind of sat com equipment.
>>16349740
A grifter would delete video in which he made hilariously wrong prediction about something? Yes such thing is unheard of on the internet. Especially when it's possible that he might end up doing some work for organization that he mocked.
He's not all bad through. I was somewhat enthusiastic about hydrogen adsorbed on graphene cassete tape, mostly because I skimmed through articles about it and instead reading what is written, I filled blanks with stuff that could plausibly work.

[Anonymous No.16349796]

>>16349788
>doing some work
Impossible, he is unemployable due to sperging out about feminism and sjws back in the day

[Anonymous No.16349802]

>>16349730
Thunderfart deletes his own videos if they turn out to be wrong or embarrassing.

[Anonymous No.16349812]

>>16349802
Such as? Prove it
You have the wayback machine

[Anonymous No.16349838]

>>16349341
I'll just leave this here.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=OCUceQzCh-Q

[Cult of Passion No.16349850]

>>16349838
Jeez, its hard hearing someone reach so hard for so long...I cant eat all that shit.

[Anonymous No.16349862]

>>16349341

[Cult of Passion No.16349869]

>>16349862
Rocket Science and Rocket Engineering arent the same thing.

Me thinks that is his problem. Cat or dryer-verse...one cannot know without a third frame of reference.

[Anonymous No.16350009]

>>16349838
Came to post this

[Anonymous No.16350101]

>>16349341
Post the video where he's folloiwng the space ship launch and being so very smug about how it's going to blow up and how this and that are wrong and it's definitely going to blow up any second now... and everyhting went perfectly well.

[Anonymous No.16350475]

>>16350101
See >>16349838

[Anonymous No.16350511]

>>16350475
It just took 50 tries for it to not blow up

[Raphael No.16350514]

>>16349341
Kind of

[Anonymous No.16350541]

>>16350511
It took 4 tests to work out the bugs. SpaceX and Musk are not perfect, but they are making space flights more frequently than NASA ever did.

[Anonymous No.16352242]

>>16349415
https://pastebin.com/raw/VGPGtk17

[Anonymous No.16352246]

>>16349341
Doesn't he believe in judaism? That's a gay superstition for desert hillbillies.

[Anonymous No.16352372]

>>16352246
>Atheist
>"Doesn't he believe in Judaism?"
I want you to look in the mirror, and think about your life.

[Anonymous No.16352713]

>>16350541
Blue origin worked first try

[Anonymous No.16352835]

>>16352713
Carnival rides have been around for a long time. There's nothing special about copying one from sixty years ago.

[Anonymous No.16352849]

>>16352713
BO had the time and money from Bezos' billions to test a little hopper without any revenue on the horizon. SpaceX had to take their rocket that made them money and figure out how to make it land. Totally different approaches from totally different circumstances.

[Anonymous No.16353607]

>>16352835
Well musk can't even do that properly

[Anonymous No.16353608]

>>16352849
>SpaceX
>Make money

[(Not) God No.16353616]

Test

▲▲

▼▼▼▼

▼▼

▲▲

▲▲▲▲

▼▼

▼

[Anonymous No.16353700]

>>16349341
the funniest thing about him is that he's hated by BreadTubers, yet they regularly steal his videos almost verbatim, but replace the cool science experiments with shitty moralizing

[Anonymous No.16353898]

>>16353607
SpaceX is rescuing the stranded astronauts from ISS so they must be able to send a ship into orbit and return it safely. Weird that you don't already know about this since you act like you know everything but apparent know pretty much nothing.

[Anonymous No.16353901]

>>16353898
Muh daddy elon ran stopped sucking bbc for one second to run his mouth on twitter how he will rescue le epyc astronauts like that time he saved the thai kids from the cave

[Anonymous No.16353910]

>>16353608
The cost for producing a Falcon 9 first stage is between $30-40M, 2nd stages are known <$10M.
The sticker price for a one-off Falcon 9 launch with droneship recovery is $62M, and we know for a fact it costs less than $10M to recover, inspect, and refurbish a booster core instead of building a new one.
Even if SpaceX was flying 100% expendable they'd still be netting at least $10M in profit from each launch (if not double that), but they also reuse boosters for more than 90% of their launches. Internal cost for a starlink launch probably approaches $20M.

>buh buh why don't they charge less then?
They set the price at $62M because it undercuts all the competition in the medium launch market segment; there is absolutely no fucking reason at all whatsoever for SpaceX to cut their prices until they operate as a non-profit. They aren't a charity, they're a business, and since nobody on earth can get 20 tons to LEO for less than 70 million it makes sense for them to charge just barely less than that for now. Eventually when Starship is up and running with a regular cadence they can undercut the rest of the launch industry by 95%
>16353901
(You)

[Anonymous No.16353912]

>>16353910
>per launch

[Anonymous No.16353922]

>>16353901
Ah, I see. You're here for the cheap dopamine hits. Here's a clue for you: your body becomes accustomed to those. The tiny rush you feel from getting a bit of human contact with your trolling will become smaller and small until eventually you won't even feel good from it any more. It will become a compulsion you can't control. Something you do not to feel good but just to feel normal, even if just for a moment.
As you body continued to adapt, you'll have to spend more and more of your day trolling just to get to a baseline of normality. Days will turn into weeks, weeks will turn into years, and years will turn into decades. You'll reach the end of your life and have nothing to look back on except an endless desperate struggle to feel normal in tiny increments. You won't even remember what you wrote or what it was about. You'll only remember that you felt the need to do it over and over and over again just to feel a bit normal, just for a tiny bit of time.

[Anonymous No.16353926]

>>16353922
Not reading all that

[Anonymous No.16353928]

What scientific questions has he opined on and proven right?

[Anonymous No.16353929]

>thundefag thread
>muskrats get offended and take over the thread

[Anonymous No.16353937]

>>16353912
First of all that's Starship, a new rocket currently in development, not Falcon 9. Starship is going to be significantly cheaper by the time it's hitting cadence.
Secondly, that graphic is not approved by SpaceX or NASA and was created by either some dumb journalist or a competitor of SpaceX, either way trying to discredit them with falsehoods (there are multiple different graphics like that which all use entirely different made-up numbers for the amount of launches needed, and they're all wrong.)
Thirdly, that one orange rocket in the middle called SLS costs 5.7 BILLION, that's with a capital B BILLION, per launch. The launch price of every single one of those Starships in the pic combined (far more than really needed) is not even equal to the cost of launching that one orange rocket, and the Starships are doing over 90% of the real work. In fact if you took SLS out of the picture entirely and had a dragon dock with HLS in LEO you could cut the mission cost by over 50% and probably get more done at the same time, but that would take jobs away from the boeing niggers that lobbied congress to make SLS in the first place.

[Anonymous No.16353940]

i remember when people were shitting on him when he was talking about hyperloop being total bullshit kek

[Anonymous No.16353949]

>>16353929
If you want a hugbox where objective discussion is banned you can always go to reddit, they all hate musk over there. Unfortunately this website is not an echo chamber where only things that conform to your (wrong) opinion are allowed.

>>16353940
broken clock twice a day, all that. He still didn't seem to understand the real reason musk pushed for hyperloop which was infinitely more scummy and evil than just being incompetent. Hyperloop was constructed purely as a political ploy to kill california high speed rail so that musk could sell more of his shitty electric cars; HSR was set to take millions of cars off the road and Cali was at the time tesla's biggest market by a huge margin. Hyperloop was used as a weapon to attack HSR and get it defunded and cancelled, and as soon as that happened musk entirely abandoned the project. I'm not here to defend musk, blunderfag is just dead wrong every time he criticizes SpaceX specifically.

[Anonymous No.16353952]

>>16353940
Does he cope well with the fact that SpaceX has grown to dominate the launch market. Even if autopilot and hyperloop are a crock of shit.

[Anonymous No.16353960]

>>16353952
on the verge of a complete mental breakdown because of it. see >>16349838
He muted the stream audio partway through because he couldn't handle hearing the SpaceX engineers calling out success after success during the flight; by the end of it he was genuinely unironically making comparisons to Orwell's 1984 all because a rocket managed to fly correctly.

[Anonymous No.16354012]

>>16353960
The only problem I have with this pseud is he won't called out boeing. What makes thundercuck bad faith is he won't call out any establishment faggotry.

[Anonymous No.16354070]

>>16353926
Responses are rarely meant to be read just by whoever the response was to.

[Anonymous No.16354072]

>>16353949
Nice fantasy but California hasn't CANCELLED their HSR project and they've managed to fuck it up all on their own. You might or might not be correct about Musk's motivations with Hyperloop but you're 100% wrong on every thing else. HSR is still going ahead and it's still wildly over budget and none of that has anything to do with Musk.

[Anonymous No.16355345]

>>16354072
I guess I'm just plain retarded
last I knew it was effectively soft-cancelled and hadn't received any major funding for 3+ years but that was many years ago; apparently the biden(minecraft)admin is now bankrolling it? I knew it was a fucking mess but I wrongly thought progress had completely stalled and there was no political will to proceed

[Anonymous No.16355391]

>>16353912
Smarter Every Day is literally part of the Alabama space industrial complex. The SLS is extremely important to their state economy. You got fooled by a blatant propaganda video lmao

[Anonymous No.16355967]

>>16352246
what the fuck are you talking about

[Anonymous No.16356564]

>>16353940
Most of elon's ventures are scams and bullshit, but SpaceX is a massive success and the mediocre chemist is gonna have to seethe and cope.

[Anonymous No.16356572]

>>16353608
Anon, if you start thinking like that you'll realize essentially half the US economy is just government money recycling itself and the number government employees is practically double the official figures.

[Anonymous No.16356579]

>>16353912
I don't care that SpaceX is almost certainly using the (currently non-existent) new lunar program to push voluminous funding for Starship, because I want to see Starship fully operational, lowering the cost/kg for orbit and giving large payloads a routine access to space.

It's kinda silly all these people are tentatively implying "hey uh g...g..guys, I think S..SpaceX, a private company, might be grifting the govt for money, t..this is totally unprecedented!".
Of fucking course they are, that's how every company that receives economic interference from the government works. At least SpaceX looks cool doing it.

[Anonymous No.16356649]

>>16356579
They're not even grifting, every contract they get is reasonably priced and they deliver at least what they're asked to. deadline overruns are inevitable but SpaceX has never once gone over budget and asked for more. In fact, they have on more than one occasion refused, REFUSED to accept cost+ contracts unless they're modified to be firm fixed price. Elon has genuine autism rage for inefficiency and cost plus is just a breeding ground for grift

[Anonymous No.16356855]

>>16356572
Most of SpaceX's revenue does not come from the government

[Anonymous No.16356885]

>>16356649
Where do you read about the case study on something like this? I don't want just a quote from Musk. This is an intriguing study because I have worked in a few industries and their approach is fucked when it comes to securing contracts. Like reeling in a fish with false promises and bait.

[Anonymous No.16357908]

>>16352242
[math] \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \blacktriangle [/math]
[math] \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \blacktriangle \; \; \blacktriangle [/math]
[math] \blacktriangledown \; \; \blacktriangledown \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \blacktriangledown \; \; \blacktriangledown [/math]
[math] \; \; \blacktriangledown \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \blacktriangledown [/math]
[math] \; \; \blacktriangle \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \blacktriangle [/math]
[math] \blacktriangle \; \; \blacktriangle \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \blacktriangle \; \; \blacktriangle [/math]
[math] \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \blacktriangledown \; \; \blacktriangledown [/math]
[math] \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \blacktriangledown [/math]

[Anonymous No.16357997]

>>16349345
what has this guy said thats not true

[Anonymous No.16358000]

>>16357997
i think he knows the truth about most economic and mathematical implications of these entrepreneurial innovations that retards are attempting