/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.1624728]

http://www.conservapedia.com/Evolution

[Anonymous No.1624734]

Lol.
"Discovery Institute's Center for Science and Culture...announced that over 700 scientists from around the world have now signed a statement expressing their skepticism about the contemporary theory of Darwinian evolution."

700 scientists?! THAT'S SO MANY!

[Anonymous No.1624749]

You should read the email correspondence between that site's creator and a microbiologist, the microbiologist rips him to shreds.

[Anonymous No.1624758]

I wonder how these people manage to operate a computer, let alone spell an English word correctly.

[Anonymous No.1624761]

www.conservapedia.com

[Anonymous No.1624767]

>If the evolutionary position was valid, then there should be "transitional forms" in the fossil record reflecting the intermediate life forms. Another term for these "transitional forms" is "missing links".

HUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUE

[Anonymous No.1624772]

As Phil Plait said, skeptics are different from deniers. Skeptics require more evidence, while deniers ignore evidence.

You wouldn't be much of a scientist if you weren't a skeptic. You wouldn't be a scientist at all if you were a denier.

[Anonymous No.1624784]

>>1624772

The creator of the site believes the world is around 6000 years old.

On another note, many of these popular creationists are doctors. What popsicle stand did they get their title from?

[Anonymous No.1624788]

http://www.conservapedia.com/Atheism

[Anonymous No.1624789]

>>1624784
Exactly what I'm saying. It's okay to be an evolution skeptic. But this guy is clearly a denier. What good does a petition do anyway? It's like those 700 scientists are opening themselves up to mockery.

[Anonymous No.1624795]

While we're at it.

http://www.conservapedia.com/Counterexamples_to_Relativity

You rage you lose

[Anonymous No.1624800]

http://www.conservapedia.com/Global_warming

I lold at the second picture

[Anonymous No.1624806]

>>1624749
link?

[Anonymous No.1624817]

>>1624795
>The theory of relativity is a mathematical system that allows no exceptions. It is heavily promoted by liberals who like its encouragement of relativism and its tendency to mislead people in how they view the world.
wtf?
why are they against relativity?

>9. The action-at-a-distance by Jesus, described in John 4:46-54.

[Anonymous No.1624818]

Conservapedia is fucking gold mine of lols.

[Anonymous No.1624821]

>Based on Wired Magazine's observation that atheists tend to be quarrelsome, socially challenged men, to say nothing of the unpleasant personalities of leading public atheists such as Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens and Michel Onfray, one could reasonably hypothesize that there is likely to be a strong correlation between Asperger's and atheism.

[Anonymous No.1624828]

>>1624795
>The observed lack of curvature in overall space.[4]
cited:
>↑ If space were curved, one would never expect the universe as a whole to be almost precisely flat. Yet it is.

[Anonymous No.1624830]

>>1624817

I think it is primarily just the creator of the site, Adam Schlafly, who is so up in arms over it. If you read the talk page you find that the arguments have been destroyed repeatedly but he just ignores the comments, mostly. Or talks them down to his level and then ignores them.

[Anonymous No.1624831]

>http://www.conservapedia.com/Counterexamples_to_an_Old_Earth

[Anonymous No.1624833]

http://www.conservapedia.com/Essay:Quantifying_Openmindedness

If you don't ace this test then you can't call yourself open minded.

[Anonymous No.1624838]

http://www.conservapedia.com/Equality

That's... all?

[Anonymous No.1624844]

>>1624831
>>1624795

Bible wins!

http://www.conservapedia.com/Counterexamples_to_the_Bible

[Anonymous No.1624845]

>>1624828

[Anonymous No.1624850]

>A liberal generally supports many of the following political positions and practices:
>fourth one on the list is child pornography

[Anonymous No.1624857]

>The oldest direct evidence of life -- written documents, clothing, remnants of civilizations, tree rings, etc. -- is no older than about 3000 B.C.

[Anonymous No.1624866]

>>1624844

>Do you think that it is impossible for the speed of light to have been different in the past?


from the talk page
>For example, I would be not be close-minded to say that evolution is impossible if I had studied information theory and knew how it negated the possibility.

holy shit goddamn

[Anonymous No.1624867]

>The Climategate scandal revealed how liberal scientists appeared to be deceiving the public with the use of fraudulent data for use as climate science.

LOL

[Anonymous No.1624878]

>Counter-example to relativity:
>The action-at-a-distance by Jesus, described in John 4:46-54.

facepalm.jpeg

[Anonymous No.1624891]

>>1624833
Most biased questions I've ever read, lol

[Anonymous No.1624916]

man what the hell
our tree ring records alone go back over 11,000 years

[Anonymous No.1624923]

its has no entry on Lady Gaga. it is flawed.

[Anonymous No.1624957]

>>1624734
Much to be read into that statement such as that it does not deny evolution, only that the current theory about it doesn't sit well with those 700, which makes sense because theories change over time to fit the latest and greatest data.

[Anonymous No.1624978]

>>1624867
Fuck yeah, all I needed to hear. I'll go buy myself a coal powered car because that shit is in no way bad for the world. Maybe I'll buy a few orphans to shovel the coal too, or midgets.

[Anonymous No.1624989]

"Do you think that is impossible for the power of 2 in Newtonian gravity, whereby the gravitational force is proportional to 1/r2, to be more precise with an exponent that is slightly different from 2, such as a gravitational force proportional to 1/r2.00000001?"
Ok, I'm missing something here, what dumb as shit is this question trying to guide me toward?

[Anonymous No.1624994]

>>1624989
>>1624989

That scienceis not infallible

in some way, in their mind, this should lead you to the conclusion that jesus is the only answer

[Anonymous No.1625013]

>>1624994
Oh, well that is stupid, science is constantly refining its constants as our ability to measure shit improves. Oh that guy. Pic not related.

[Anonymous No.1625016]

http://www.conservapedia.com/Atheism

I MAD. JGKD:FLJKA:SLJDKS:AF

[Anonymous No.1625025]

>>1625016
That entry.

[Anonymous No.1625038]

http://conservapedia.com/Carl_Sagan

[Anonymous No.1625042]

I just looked up Colbert's article out of curiosity. It's like the opposite of what goes down at Wikipedia. If you look at the edit history, all of the reasonable edits get written over with craziness by older users.

[Anonymous No.1625048]

>>1625038

oh shit, I forgot to check. until about 6 days ago there was a line that said

>Carl Sagan was also an avid marijuana smoker who claimed marijuana gave him scientific insights.[3] Sagan's pot smoking and atheism no doubt helped inspire various atheistic pseudoscience fantasies that Sagan foisted on his gullible fans.

[Anonymous No.1625053]

>my face when reading http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Lenski_dialog

[Anonymous No.1625060]

http://www.conservapedia.com/Causes_of_Homosexuality

The first image. Holy shit, I almost died laughing.

[Anonymous No.1625064]

>>1625060
Sex with men. Apparently not profitable.

[Anonymous No.1625065]

>>1625038
that's not too bad an article, actually.

[Anonymous No.1625073]

>>1625065

>>1625048

[Anonymous No.1625074]

http://www.conservapedia.com/Abortion

[Anonymous No.1625078]

http://www.conservapedia.com/Obama

[Anonymous No.1625090]

>>1625078

>The evidence that Obama is a Muslim includes:

>He has said that "Islam can be compatible with the modern world

[Anonymous No.1625097]

>>1625060
>>1625064
i lol'd hard

[Anonymous No.1625109]

>>1625078
>Barack Hussein Obama II (birth name Barry Soetoro,[1][2][3] allegedly born in Honolulu August 4, 1961[4][5][6][7][8]) is the 44th President of the United States, and the first President who is biracial.

HOLY FUCK 8 CITATIONS IN THE FIRST SENTENCE!

[Anonymous No.1625114]

>>1625090
>In the book Obama,"Renegade" his friends say that "he actually really wasn't much of a churchgoer."
FUCK
AND I VOTED FOR HIM

[Anonymous No.1625124]

>>1625109
Then it must be true.

>The evidence that Obama is a Muslim includes:
>Contrary to Christianity, the Islamic doctrine of taqiyya encourages adherents to deny they are Muslim if it advances the cause of Islam.

[Anonymous No.1625161]

>the Founding Fathers made no secret of their Christian faith and unfailing belief in God in the Declaration of Independence and later writings.

I mad.

[Anonymous No.1625213]

On old Earth.
>The intelligence of humans is rapidly declining, whether measured by SAT scores,[12] music, personal letters,[13] quality of political debates,[14] the quality of news articles,[15] or any other measure.

[Anonymous No.1625230]

Conservapedia was conceived to troll /sci/

[Anonymous No.1625244]

># The interior of the earth is heated by decay of radioactive isotopes, which could not possibly still be persisting in sufficient quantities after 5 billion, or even half a billion, years.
>[Citation Needed]

[Anonymous No.1625271]

>>1625230
I fucking wish that's all it were there for. It's been around for a while though

[Anonymous No.1625273]

>>1625078
>>1625090
>>1625109

My favorite is

>Obama declared in prepared remarks, "The United States has been enriched by Muslim Americans. Many other Americans have Muslims in their families or have lived in a Muslim-majority country - I know, because I am one of them."[204]

Because anyone with a an ounce of reading comprehension can tell he was referring to himself being on of those people with "Muslims in their families or have lived in a Muslim-majority country" he doesnt hide his muslim relatives or ancestors.

[Anonymous No.1625279]

>Christian women at a religious retreat. Studies and web traffic data appear to indicate that women in the Western World tend to be more religious than men.[119][120]

Man, you fags just sure got told. Bet you wish you were a devout Christian now huh?

[huevoscalientes !!S9+DRAZt9ba No.1625346]

http://www.conservapedia.com/Richard_Dawkins_and_pseudoscience

[Anonymous No.1625409]

>http://www.conservapedia.com/Richard_Dawkins,_atheist_atrocities,_and_historical_revisio
nism

All of my hate, ALL OF IT.

[Anonymous No.1625459]

>http://www.conservapedia.com/Atheism_and_mass_murder

Note to self: I don't want to live on this planet anymore.

[Anonymous No.1625465]

>>1625459
>>1625409

It's cure how they just HAVE to project their own sins on other people.

[Anonymous No.1625467]

>>1625465

>cute

my bad

[Inurdaes !lololSGJBw No.1625471]

>>1625459
SHOULDA STARTED TERRAFORMIN' MARS DIDN'TYA

[Anonymous No.1625488]

>http://www.conservapedia.com/Richard_Dawkins%27_commentary_on_Adolf_Hitler

FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFf-

[Anonymous No.1625499]

The moronic creator of the site got butthurt over wikipedia using BCE and CE.

Also,
>To obscure the overwhelming liberal dominance of the media...

FAUX NEWS TRUMPS THESE SO CALLED 'LIBERAL MEDIA OUTLETS', YOU FUCKING STUPID, INANE, WASTES OF LIFE! I swear these idiots are somehow subconsciously projecting their own retarded characteristics to others.

[Anonymous No.1625505]

http://www.conservapedia.com/Liberal_bias#Examples_of_Liberal_Style

Get ready to rage

[Anonymous No.1625513]

>>1625505
>call something disliked a "conspiracy theory," but don't use that term against wacky liberal theories like global warming

WHAT?! Aw hell nahhh

[Anonymous No.1625519]

>>1625053
this is so awesome

>P.P.S. I hope that some readers might get a chuckle out of this story. The same Sunday (15 June 2008) that you and some of your acolytes were posting and promoting scurrilous attacks on me and our research (wasn’t that a bit disrespectful of the Sabbath?), I was in a church attending a wedding. And do you know what Old Testament lesson was read? It was Genesis 1:27-28, in which God created Man and Woman. It’s a very simple and lovely story, and I did not ask any questions, storm out, or demand the evidence that it happened as written at a time when science did not yet exist. I was there in the realm of spirituality and mutual respect, not confusing a house of religion for a science class or laboratory. And it was a beautiful wedding, too.

[Anonymous No.1625531]

>The moon is receding from the Earth at a rate[2] that would have placed it too close to the Earth merely four billion years ago, causing instability in its orbit, tidal catastrophes on Earth, and other problems, causing Earth and the moon to be as they are today.

AAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHMY BRAIN

[Anonymous No.1625534]

http://www.conservapedia.com/Essay:_An_atheist_trying_to_stop_Christianity

HOW DID YOU GUYS NOT NOTICE THIS

[Anonymous No.1625538]

>>1625534

http://www.conservapedia.com/Comedy_and_satires_concerning_atheism_and_evolution

AAAAHHHH

[Anonymous No.1625539]

>There are no Counterexamples to the Bible.

what what wwhat what waht awhat whatwaht wtwaht wahtwhtawhat awht wahtawht waht tawhtwaht awthtwa h

i think they are trolling us

[Anonymous No.1625542]

http://www.conservapedia.com/Essay:_The_transitional_animal_the_flying_kitty%3F

what is this I don't even

[Anonymous No.1625543]

>http://conservapedia.com/Cain
>For example, many Egyptian pharaohs married their sisters and had perfectly normal offspring
lolno

[Anonymous No.1625545]

>>1625542

[Anonymous No.1625548]

>>1625538

Wow, I usually can laugh about myslef but that stuff ist mostly pretty dull.

[Anonymous No.1625555]

>>1625542
...what? Fuck trying to understand that, I'm going back to my quantum mechanics work.

[Anonymous No.1625560]

I had a look at the google search result for this site with : atheist and : jesus. There are about 700 results for atheist and 1000 for jesus.
Feeling threatened much god boy?

[Anonymous No.1625569]

>http://www.conservapedia.com/Catholic_views_on_creation

>Because current theories of evolution do generally deny one Adam and one Eve, they are prohibited by Catholic doctrine.

>mfw The Catechism of the Catholic Church is somehow a liberal document


fucking fundies...

[Anonymous No.1625577]

>>1625569

I love how they prefer a huge incest fest to ancestry that goes billions of years back.

[Anonymous No.1625581]

>>1625577
Whats aggravating is as a fully Orthodox Catholic (On /sci/ what a shock!) that claim is wrong...dreadfully wrong. I mean the Vatican just hosted this past year or so a conference on Evolutionary Science and pissed the fuck out of all the fundie protestants when we gave a finger to Intelligent Design proponents.

I mean truth is truth..

[Anonymous No.1625667]

>>1625569
The catholic church has, on several occasions, been a proponent of using evolution (and big bang, abiogenesis, etc) for explaining the mechanism, and god as the why.
That seems to contradict that article.

[Anonymous No.1625670]

>Unlike Christianity, which is supported by a large body of sound evidence (see: Christian apologetics), atheism has no proof and evidence supporting its ideology.

>FACEPALM.JPG

[Anonymous No.1625671]

>>1625667
Exactly, hence the Pic.

It's hard enough being a Catholic in the 21st Century, it takes a fucking act of God to get people to realize your church isn't a bunch of Young Earth fundies. Hell Gregor Lemaitre (The Big Bang dude) was a priest!

If you read any more on that website it pretty much proceeds into Catholic bashing calling Catholic Charities a "Liberal" Organization.

[Anonymous No.1625686]

>>1625581

So you are saying that the church is faliable?

STOP BEING A RELIGIOUS FAGGOT!

[GL Pretentious Hipster !!NU1qDw5ZF2C No.1625691]

>>1625686

Church? Yes.

Pope? No.

[Anonymous No.1625700]

>>1625686
Not at all, The Church isn't fallible in Ethics and Morals, but I really don't want to get into theology on /sci/. Papal Infalability is another one of those issues that gets thrown around alot by people who really don't understand it, but googling the term "Ex Cathedra" should help.

My main point of contention was that the Conservepedia utterly butchers the Catholic position. The Wikipedia article paints a far more in depth picture
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Church_and_evolution

[Anonymous No.1625705]

>>1625700
sorry I ment that the church is infallible in regards to "Faith and Morals"

[Anonymous No.1625709]

http://www.conservapedia.com/Deism
>In its typical modern form, deism is anti-Christian, as it denies the divinity of Jesus Christ, rejects >the Bible (and all other texts) as God's scripture, and denies his signs and miracles to men. It >lacks any coherent morality, and an excuse to claim to be religious while engaging in immoral >liberal activity. Thus it is a favorite of liberals who do not want to be branded with atheism.

I MAD!!!

[Anonymous No.1625710]

>>1625705

You are so full off shit. GTFO of /sci/ you hippocrit.

[Anonymous No.1625711]

>>1625709
Makes me wonder if the Conservepedia would label the Majority of our founders Godless dicks. They better not write any glowing remarks about Jefferson or Paine.

[Anonymous No.1625715]

>>1625710
You seem to be under the impression that Faith and Science are antagonists and not mutual allies...

This may help change that:
http://www.bede.org.uk/conflict.htm

[Anonymous No.1625716]

>>1625705

>church
>infallible

DOHOHOHOHOHO

[Anonymous No.1625717]

>>1625716
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Papal_infallibility

It's been used a grand total of three times...

[Anonymous No.1625720]

>>1625716
Also note in regard to:"Faith and Morals", it's why she doesn't make a ruling on the Shroud of Turin, it's beyond her "expertise".

but I really...don't wanna get into Theology

[Anonymous No.1625723]

>>1625715

Not sure if troll...

backing out of thread just in case.

[Anonymous No.1625726]

>>1625723
Perhaps you should read the link and stop regurgitating 19th Century drivel?

Pop Quiz who has the oldest Astronomy in the world?

[Anonymous No.1625729]

>>1625726

The Sumer civilisation?

[Anonymous No.1625734]

>>1625711
Paine was the only one who comes close to being a founding father who dabbled in atheism. Jefferson was a deist, and considered himself a Christian.

[Anonymous No.1625735]

>>1625723
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Church_and_science

Bitches don't know about my Jesuits...

[Anonymous No.1625738]

>>1625734

>christian who disagreed with most of the bible and christian dogma

Sure thing bro.

[Scia No.1625742]

>>1625711
>Franklin later repudiated many of his earlier views and he believed in a God that "ought to be worshiped," and at the Constitutional Convention less than three years from his death Benjamin Franklin advocated public prayer. He praised Christianity, but his letter to Ezra Stiles a month before his death was noncommittal as to the divinity of Jesus:

[Anonymous No.1625745]

>>1625742
I think you missed his implication that our Founding Fathers weren't exactly paragons of Christian Orthodoxy as much as Conservepedia would have them be

[Anonymous No.1625753]

>>1625738
He hardly "disagreed with the Bible". He compiled and had published his own compendium called "The Life and Morals of Jesus Christ", which he donated several thousand copies to the Congressional library for use by congressmen. He said several times that he was a disciple of Jesus Christ and his doctrines.

[Scia No.1625766]

>>1625745
nah i got it I was just reinforcing it

[Anonymous No.1625768]

>>1625766
I apologize for not recognizing...

mea culpa

[Anonymous No.1625798]

How can they deny human evolution...

Just look at the fossil record for hominids, it's fucking obvious.

[Anonymous No.1625810]

http://www.conservapedia.com/Dinosaur#Dinosaur-like_creatures_in_history_and_modern_sightings

[Anonymous No.1625816]

we should all sodd the shit out of this site

[Anonymous No.1625817]

>>1625810
>Dinosaur-like creatures in history and modern sightings
>Creationists cite a number of reasons to believe that dinosaurs have existed until relatively recent times, and perhaps still survive.

>There have been a number of claimed sightings of dinosaur-like creatures.
A thousand people reported seeing a dinosaur-like monster in two sightings around Sayram Lake in Xinjiang according to the Chinese publication, China Today.[9]
>Locals in the Congo have reported a creature they name Mokele-mbembe[9][14], and from its description it appears to be a small plant-eating dinosaur. The reports have been taken seriously enough that a biologist from the University of Chicago has made several expeditions to find the creature. Another biologist has reported seeing the creature.[9]
>Dinosaur-like creatures have been seen by several people in two different parts of Papua New Guinea since 1990.

Extreme retardation is extremely retarded

[Anonymous No.1625821]

>>1625810
>Descriptions of dragons are widespread and match descriptions of dinosaurs, suggesting that dragons were real creatures and were actually dinosaurs.

>this is what creationists actually believe

[Anonymous No.1625836]

>>1625821
Extremely extreme retardation is extremely X-TREME!

[Anonymous No.1626230]

[Kagura No.1626242]

>>1625735
thats nice fucktard, why don't you flip to that part about praying for miracles and maybe you'll remember why your religion is retarded. I'm still waiting on you faggots to cure all diseases with but a wave of the hand. surely one of you dipshits must believe hard enough that it will be granted by god, I mean, the only other explination is your book was written by retards and almost everything in it is questionable, I mean, who cares if adam is made of clay or DNA, when science disproves a core tenant of Christianity, Jesus can does and will preform miracles and intervene in your life directly at your whim (as long as you are a true Christian)

Or well, I suppose thats something of a fallacy, Another possibility is that none of you morons are really Christian and forsaken by god.

[Anonymous No.1626254]

eheh derp, i just checked the page for lulz (cba going through christian crap AGAIN) to see if they'd put a picture of hitler on it as they usually do. and yeah ofcourse, hitler is on it too :D gg

[Jennie !NSPcQQMvS. No.1626293]

>>1625053
"In other words, it’s not that we claim to have glimpsed “a unicorn in the garden” – we have a whole population of them living in my lab! [ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Unicorn_in_the_Garden] And lest you accuse me further of fraud, I do not literally mean that we have unicorns in the lab. Rather, I am making a literary allusion. [ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allusion] "

Bahahaha!

[Anonymous No.1626308]

http://www.conservapedia.com/Essay:_The_transitional_animal_the_flying_kitty%3F#Richard_Dawkins_vs._
the_Flying_Kitty
"The web traffic tracking companies Alexa and Quantcast indicate that Richard Dawkins' lady viewership is below average which is quite embarrassing to Richard Dawkins"
lolUMAD

[Anonymous No.1626340]

please tell me some (most?) of this is just (counter-)trolls changing shit in their site...

I mean I know some of them are dumb and ignorant but so much of this is just fuckign retarded. No joke.

[Anonymous No.1627069]

>>1626340

Nah, they really believe it bro.

[Anonymous No.1627276]

There's already a thread for conservapedia. Now if you all start making threads for a single article on there, /sci/ will get cancerous

[Anonymous No.1628679]

>conservapedia

is this shit for real?

[Anonymous No.1628685]

>>1628679
I mean, how can they allow freedom in editing for the community when it's pure fucking B/S ?

[Anonymous No.1628694]

>>1628685
>Fuck off, you're not conservative enough!

>But I'm a member of the Republican party, I'm a congressman from Utah!

>Fuck off, you're no longer our nominee, a tea party candidate had defeated you! You no longer qualify to edit this page according to out revised values!

etc

[Anonymous No.1628802]

>recognizing that the Bible is the most logical book ever written

[Anonymous No.1628808]

>>1628802
http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservative

[Anonymous No.1628850]

>>1624749
>>1624749
link to that convo please

[Anonymous No.1628873]

I have been following the talk page on "Counterexamples to Relativity" off and on for a while now:

http://conservapedia.com/Talk:Counterexamples_to_Relativity

You can really see the mind of an ideologue at work here. Andy Schlafly is just determined to keep his shitty counterexamples up no matter how many times they get ripped to shreds. The comment about GPS systems not using relativity is particularly egregious. Schlafly says "name the engineer that used relativity in their design or else I won't believe it!" Seriously, it is like he thinks it is simply inconceivable that any engineer would ever learn general relativity, under any condition. The man is delusional. And he founded the whole site.

[Anonymous No.1628875]

>>1628850
http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Lenski_dialog

Anon delivars.

[Anonymous No.1628901]

>>1628875
wow mr. schlafly is fucking retarded

[Anonymous No.1628905]

>>1628875
>Dear Professor X,

>Skepticism has been expressed on Conservapedia about your claims ...

Imagine the amount of people one can troll with shit like this. Seriously, who would reply ? :)

[Anonymous No.1628946]

>>1628850
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Lenski_affair

Basically, scientist observes bacteria developing citric acid oxidation. Schlafly demands that he give him his bacteria, and then gets owned by Lenski and by the Academy of Natural Sciences. If you've read The Greatest Show on Earth, you've seen it.

[Anonymous No.1629016]

I couldn't help but chuckle when I saw this

[Anonymous No.1629045]

>>1625810
A portion of the Nile Mosaic of Palestrina, depicting the hunting of an animal which is often said to resemble a dinosaur (but which appears to be labelled "crocodile" in Greek).

DEHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
HOW STUPID CAN U GET IN YOUR OWN SENTENCE AND NOT REALIZE IT

[Anonymous No.1629078]

notice that the entire article of OP's post is extremely one sided toward its untruthfulness, and nothing about its validity

700 scientists on a petition? there are possibly millions of scientists around the world that study in this related field

all polls taken are clearly skewed

[Courage Wolf !penisASZp2 No.1629089]

>>1625038
Im not gonna click it
IM NOT GOING TO READ IT.
Fuck...

[Anonymous No.1629093]

>>1629089
>implying Sagan wasn't a Republican

[Anonymous No.1629096]

>>1629093
0/10

[Anonymous No.1629241]

"Dragons appear in the flag of Wales, in traditional Chinese New Years' Day celebrations, and in the Chinese calendar."

They use this as proof Dinosaurs co-existing with man.
Whut?

[Anonymous No.1630216]

>>1624728
I can summarize the whole site with this picture.

[Courage Wolf !penisASZp2 No.1631378]

http://www.conservapedia.com/Counterexamples_to_an_Old_Earth