[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 17 KB, 300x265, 100.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1620469 No.1620469 [Reply] [Original]

Hello, /sci/.

/a/ here.
We have a problem.
How much energy would be required for water to enter the vagina of a woman as detailed in this image.

>>>/a/39357963
The original thread.

>> No.1620474

Absolutely no less than 1.21 jiggawatts of water power under any circumstances.

>> No.1620478

Who the fuck cares, dude? It might be impossible for all we know about the subject. Plus that's just a cartoon, you cock.

>> No.1620481

almost none. just print out that picture and draw a vagina and put it in the sink and turn on the tap

>> No.1620482

>>1620474

Aw, fuck, I read that in his voice!

>> No.1620480

sauce

>> No.1620485
File: 999 KB, 1280x1673, 1282172253441.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1620485

>>1620480
Sex Jokes The Animation.

>> No.1620497

>>1620480

Seitokai Yakuindomo

a good anime, only to be ruined by the sexual "in your endo's"

>> No.1620503

About 189.36 kJ.

>> No.1620515
File: 28 KB, 400x300, SenseinoOjikan2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1620515

>>1620497
This show is like a less funny Sensei no Ojikan but they cast a bunch of whores to try and make up for it.

>> No.1620528

>>1620503
I do not believe you.

>> No.1620535

What the fuck.

Get the anigay shit off /sci/.

>> No.1620538

>>1620503
Actually about 367.75E27 kJ should do it.

>> No.1620543
File: 314 KB, 603x720, 1282013122603.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1620543

>>1620535

Thanks for bumping the thread.

>> No.1620546

>>1620535
Woah, show some hospitality. /a/ isn't that bad.

Captcha: motagic energy

>> No.1620549

Hurr durr children cartoon durr.

>> No.1620553

>>1620469
That's pretty vague for starters. I think the requisite energy might be roughly proportionate to the total mass of the water we're talking about. Plus we must ask ourselves, how far in counts as "in"? Not to mention this will vary from vagina to vagina.

I think you could model the lips/walls of the vagina with a Mooney-Rivlin Hyperelastic model for the deformation caused by the sress/tension induced by the incoming water, although with all complex folds involved this might be unrealistic. Then you'd need some Navier-Stokes to describe the flow of the water inward. All in all, it could plausibly become an extremely complicated problem.

>> No.1620555

>>1620546
>/a/ isn't that bad
>moe-blobs everywhere
>gay

>> No.1620563

>>1620553
It shouldn't be too far "in," I think.
Vaginal nerves decrease rapidly once inside, right?
I'm not sure.
So after a certain distance, it wouldn't be know/noticeable.
Only a little distance would be needed.

>> No.1620568

>>1620553
She usually wears a chastity belt. Would that affect the model in any way?

>> No.1620567

>>1620553
Finally, a serious answer.

We can't even approximate using a decent model because it only shows the girl from the waist up. From all we know she could be around 71/245/932 all cm w.r.t. BWH.

>> No.1620574

>>1620567
932?????!!!

>> No.1620587

>>1620574

Considering that she's had an entire dimension compressed that's pretty small.

>> No.1620628

So, /sci/, are you calculating this, or did are we asking an annoying question altogether?

>> No.1620653

>>1620628
I'm personally not gonna bother... The real deal would require graduate-level math and hardcore computational power. You could make it high school -tier with some simplifying assumptions for ease of calculuation. Let's do just this to create upper and lower bounds. Like, say it takes between 0.5-1 seconds for the whole event to occur, and that the maximum width the lips are stretched is 0.5-1.5 inches. Use hooke's law to calculate force, then how much work was done pushing the walls apart, then add on the work done to push the water from outside the vagina in (say a displacement of 0.5-2 inches), and from there calculate the total energy.

I'll let another /sci/duck do this.

>> No.1620658

>>1620653
That level of math would be best for us /a/ types.
We wouldn't even understand a complex answer if you gave it to us.

>> No.1620677

Ok, vagina-haver here. How is the animu girl standing? I can't tell from the picture.

Some postures, like standing with your legs open at shoulder width (or wider), will open the vaginal opening. Of course, this depends on the person, but it holds true for most people. Now, once it's open, the energy required to push water in deep enough to be felt, while not insignificant, is not as much as it'd be necessary to "force" water up there. Just calculate how much energy it'd take to shove a small amount of water up a lightly narrow vertical channel some 3cm.

So, food for thought, fellow /sci/ducks. I'm off to bed because I've been studying for a final all day and can't brain any longer.

>> No.1620681

>>1620677
Become a man and you can brain more.

>> No.1620687

>>1620677
>Just calculate how much energy it'd take to shove a small amount of water up a lightly narrow vertical channel some 3cm.

We don't have vaginas. You go test it out and we'll calculate.

>> No.1620690 [DELETED] 

>>1620687
Why sage? This is a lulzy thread.

>> No.1620707

>>1620690
summerfag

>> No.1620708

>>1620690
I have nothing to contribute, as I don't have a vagina or have I ever seen one live in my life.

Best leave it to those who have, especially those who has a vagina.

>> No.1620710

If somebody has a fleshlight or any other vagina shaped onahole that might work for testing. I'd do it but I own a tenga flip hole.

>> No.1620727

>>1620687
>>1620681
internally inconsistent sexism, lol

anyway just use

>> No.1620745

Hey /a/. I don't really watch anime but I saw a preview for Shiki. Quick question, quick answer: is it any good; worth watching?

I'll get back to the vagina thing after this.

>> No.1620750

About 4487 J would do it.

>> No.1620754

>>1620469
About a pelvic thrusts worth

>> No.1620757

>>1620745
Goes from kinda cool to really lame at times. If you're into "mystery" (there is no mystery, it's lolvampires from the get go) and those bits from House where they try diagnose a patient then you might want to check it out.

>> No.1620766

>>1620750
That number sounds familiar.
I think it appeared somewhere in the /a/ thread.