[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 157 KB, 1136x852, 1716340386362123.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16187151 No.16187151 [Reply] [Original]

How were these made scientifically speaking?

>> No.16187157

>>16187151
Where there's a whip, there's a way.

>> No.16187162

>>16187151
carefully

>> No.16187189
File: 70 KB, 2012x864, pepes.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16187189

>>16187157
Since you volunteered, i will happily crack the whip in your back until you construct one of those.
If you die, you die.

>> No.16187200

>>16187189
>You couldn't build this on your own, therefore it is literally impossible that a complex civilization could figure out how to.
Dumb frogposter.

>> No.16187207
File: 111 KB, 1024x1024, la.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16187207

>>16187200
Build your own or fuck off.

>> No.16187227

>>16187151
ancient economic stimulattion
teams of measure dudes guiding teams of go-betweens directing teams of chippers, and also the draggers
10s of thousands of jobs

>> No.16187319

>>16187151
by using an amount of labor modern civilizations would consider totally absurd
you can accomplish a lot of things that look impossible if you're willing to put more time into it than any sensible person would even consider

>> No.16187462

>>16187151
https://roseannechambers.com/machu-picchu-and-mysterious-gold-mortar/

>> No.16187478
File: 20 KB, 474x314, smores.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16187478

notice how they are bulbous shaped
you don't carve that shape with a chisel, it would needlessly create a ton of extra work
they are bulbous shaped because they were molten and soft when put into place
it's similar to the shape a marshmallow takes when pressure is applied to the top and bottom

>> No.16187533
File: 701 KB, 1920x1054, file.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16187533

the stones are irregularly shaped yet stacked together with perfect precision
clearly the stones were melted or dissolved to get them to fit like that
the choice to use absolutely massive irregularly shaped stones must mean they had some kind of technology to move them easily because why would you choose to use giant stones and make it 100x harder for you
observe the small stone walls added by a less technologically advanced people at a later date.

>> No.16187575

glad to see Natron theory has made it to /sci/. I actually posted it on /diy/ myself a couple of weeks ago

>> No.16187579

>>16187151
They were cast.
Turns out geopolimers were rediscovered multiple times in human history.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=C_mDhhigqNs

>> No.16187582

>>16187200
>>16187227
>>16187319
Stupid morons.

>> No.16187593

>>16187151
Well they could have been placed there by incredible amounts of precision slave labor or set in place via the use of a polymer material, but that sounds really hard so I think they were probably whistled into place by some technology that has been lost to time for the past 10,000 years and has not been recreated in any way, shape, or form by anyone in recorded history.

That seems most likely.

>> No.16187603

>>16187478
They're bulbous now because the cracks weather faster. They weren't when they were built.
>>16187533
Nah, they just ground down the sides that had to fit together.

>> No.16187604

>>16187151
>take a clay imprint of a boulder
>dry and fire it
>cover it in some kind of dye
>press against another boulder
>carefully chip dyed places
>repeat until it fits perfectly
Its not that hard to figure out

>> No.16187605
File: 489 KB, 1080x1281, Screenshot_20240522_111402_Brave.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16187605

>>16187579
Ding ding ding
https://x.com/fomahun/status/1777304096489295996?s=46

>> No.16187607

>>16187605
Do you support IQ? If yes, you're retarded. It's clearly some academic shilling their intelligence as max intelligence when truly they're academic stupid.

>> No.16187727

>>16187582
Not an argument.

>> No.16187752

>>16187533
>why would you choose to use giant stones and make it 100x harder for you
And if you have the tech to move big stuff, why waste a bunch of time cutting rocks up to make them smaller?

>> No.16187753

>>16187151
It's the ay lmaos

>> No.16187922

>>16187151
people had a lot more spare time back in the old days. probably a bunch of bored guys got together and hauled some huge stones into place because they had nothing better to do. they likely figured out how to break the bigger rocks into pieces and then fit them back together after smoothing off the edges using sand or other rocks for abrasives. after they were done it looked cool so they kept on doing it.

>> No.16187951

>>16187605
>Our

there is no ''we'' in atheism.

>> No.16187958

>>16187603
Stone doesn't wear that fast though. These structures would have to be tens of thousands of years old to show that much natural erosion.

>> No.16188332

>>16187727
LMAO, only a moron would try to argue with those idiots.

>> No.16188346

>>16187151
Generally you put one stone on top of another.

>> No.16188669

>>16187189
I don't wanna stack stones today, but the Lord of the Lash says, "nay nay nay"

>> No.16188670

>>16187478
meds now

>> No.16188681

>>16187151
>How does stacking blocks work?
It was aliens

>> No.16188687

>>16187151
Magick, which is real.

>> No.16188695

>>16187958
My bet is on 12'000+ years at the very least.

>> No.16188937

>>16187151
So what the hell is buried underneath this huge pile of stone blocks? It might be shit from Atlantis or something. They should excavate the blocks to find out.