/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.16168270]

Who is your favorite scientist?

[Anonymous No.16168288]

[Anonymous No.16168327]

For me, it's Pasteur

[Anonymous No.16168386]

>>16168270
https://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/en/institut/news/wed-02142024-1200/on-the-death-of-dr-ingeborg-levin

[Anonymous No.16168397]

>>16168327
Louis Pasteur was a lying fraud who tortured animals for fun.

[Anonymous No.16168403]

>>16168327
Based choice.

[Anonymous No.16168407]

Probably Richard Feynman or Carl Sagan. Not because of their great scientific contributions, but because they were cool as fuck. Ranked purely by greatness I'd say someone like Darwin, Newton, or Aristotle.

[Anonymous No.16168409]

>>16168327
Germaphobia is a disease

[Anonymous No.16168416]

Probably Robert Koch. Discovered the cause of tuberculosis and was a weeaboo.

[Anonymous No.16168424]

[Anonymous No.16168467]

Albert

[Anonymous No.16168515]

>>16168270
Neil Smokin deGrasse Tyson

[Anonymous No.16168534]

>>16168288
FPBP

[Anonymous No.16169155]

>>16168270
Woodward for his autistically super clean molecule structure drawing ability.
Sanger for being down to earth excelent experimentalist.
Darwin for his writting ability coupled with focus and clear reasoning.

[Anonymous No.16169220]

>>16168270
Ed Witten and Terrence Tao are the one who can cure all the psuedo scientists and frauds posted in this thread, including OP pic.

[Anonymous No.16169232]

Does Tesla count?

[Anonymous No.16169463]

>>16169232
No, Twum is the only scientist that matters. All others are mere facsimiles and imitators

[Anonymous No.16169641]

>>16168270
>>16168288
>>16168424
>>16168515
What I wouldn't give to be a fly on the wall in a room where these four are having a conversation.

[Anonymous No.16169842]

[Anonymous No.16170079]

>>16168288
ALL HAIL THE CHICKENHEAD STRIPPER!

[Anonymous No.16170887]

>>16168288
twum!

[Anonymous No.16170911]

>>16169641
the first would assert her dominance over the other three. she is not a good physicist but she is highly aggressive and unstable

[Anonymous No.16171009]

>>16170911
twum wouldn't let that little bitch dominate her

[Anonymous No.16171028]

>>16168270
Left or right doesn't matter, people with chud phenotype always have extremist ideas.

[Anonymous No.16171598]

>>16168270
Trofim Lysenko
Laid the groundwork for making science subservient to political necessity. Without which, we would not have a climatic crisis.

[Anonymous No.16171600]

>>16168288
literally who

[Anonymous No.16171605]

>>16171598
>children inheriting characteristics built by parents in their lifetime.
based af. Russians were ahead of the curve. the westoid tranny soientists now revisiting this idea like it's something groundbreaking they invented.

[Anonymous No.16171610]

>>16171605
>the westoid tranny soientists now revisiting this idea like it's something groundbreaking they invented.
are you talking about the "generational trauma" bullshit?

[Anonymous No.16171630]

myself

[Anonymous No.16171632]

>>16171600
/scipol/ meme akin to Jacob Barnett, but now with racism

[Anonymous No.16171697]

>>16171632
whats wrong about racism?

[Anonymous No.16171703]

>>16171697
Racism is skub and /pol/ is cancer.

[Anonymous No.16171722]

>>16171703

[Anonymous No.16171728]

>>16171722
gb2 stormfront

[Anonymous No.16172811]

>>16171728
How come you can't explain whats wrong with racism?
I sure hope you're not just irrationally bigoted against people who look out for their own kind. Not everyone is as self centered as you are, some people care about their families and their race, not just themselves.

[Anonymous No.16172914]

>>16172811
>some people care about their families
yes
>and their race
lol no what a bitch
Anyway, fuck off back to pol where you belong, election tourist permanewfag.

[Anonymous No.16173495]

>>16172914
Since you can't explain whats wrong with racism, how come you presume that racism is an irrational belief?
Is your dislike for racism something thats strictly an emotional urge for you?
Your race is your extended family, why do you hate them? Why do you favor outsiders over your own kind?

[Anonymous No.16173646]

>>16168270
>Who is your favorite scientist?

[Anonymous No.16173651]

>>16173495
>whats wrong with racism
what an edgelord, kek

[Anonymous No.16173972]

>>16173495
>Your race is your extended family
Literal sub-70 IQ take.

[Anonymous No.16174022]

>>16168270
>Chanda
Damn I wanna face fuck her so bad. I want to have her suck it all the way down and have her nose touching my pubic bone while her eyes looking up at me that'll be so hot. Imagine face fucking her while asking her physics questions that'll be so hot.

[Anonymous No.16174694]

>>16168270
this bitch is hideous.

[Anonymous No.16174702]

>>16168270
Has Rufo checked this bitch for plagiarism?

[Anonymous No.16175023]

>>16174694
unfortunate result of race mixing. mixed race people are always ugly

[Anonymous No.16175024]

>>16168386
The only non-meme scientist ITT. Absolute state of pop/sci/ chuds in this board

[Anonymous No.16175154]

>>16168270
>Who is your favorite scientist?

Benjamin Franklin

[Anonymous No.16175178]

my 2 favorite scientists taking a selfie with my favorite president.

[Anonymous No.16176278]

>>16168397
>tortured animals
experimenting on animals is based

[Anonymous No.16176784]

>>16168288
>https://quillette.com/2024/02/15/intersectionalitys-cosmic-inquisitor/
>Over time, the UNH scientist [Chanda] has escalated her grievances into increasingly dubious accusations of scholarly misconduct, misogyny, and homophobia, as well as entirely unsubstantiated remarks about sexual harassment.
>Additionally, Quillette has obtained copies of complaints against Prescod-Weinstein recently submitted to UNH by three other scholars. Among these materials is a database cataloguing over 50,000 of the tweets that Prescod-Weinstein posted during the five-year period ending in September 2023.
>Taken together, the sources reviewed by Quillette cover dozens of vilification campaigns waged by Prescod-Weinstein, beginning in 2015 and continuing to the present day.
>In some cases, these attacks were rooted in contentious social-justice issues playing out in the fields of astronomy and physics.
>But others seem to have been sparked by nothing more than glancing social-media disagreements, jokes, minor rebukes, or a targeted individual’s failure to take what Prescod-Weinstein deemed to be suitable notice of her accomplishments.
>While most of Prescod-Weinstein’s documented targets are scientists, others include a reporter, an art-history researcher, an early childhood educator,
>and the collective fan base of Taylor Swift, which Prescod-Weinstein has publicly suggested shares common features with white supremacists.
>She calls The New York Times “trash,” the Wall Street Journal “racist,” and the United States “christofascist.” Indeed, a scan of her tweets indicates that she views almost every major institution in American society as being governed by “fascists.”
>That includes X itself,
>despite the fact that Prescod-Weinstein tweets, on average, more than 50 times per day.
This chick is a fucking joke, holy shit. All that Jewish blood did was make her a prolific slanderer.

[Anonymous No.16177662]

who was the harvard dishonesty researcher that was caught falsifying her data?

[Anonymous No.16177688]

>>16173651
>>16173972
Still no explanation for why it's bad.

[Anonymous No.16178119]

>>16177662
Francesca Gino

[Anonymous No.16178128]

>>16177688
go live more, you traumatized, bitter, sad person. Seek help

[Anonymous No.16178169]

>>16168288
born to be jacked

[Anonymous No.16178697]

>>16177688
Hey retard, here's a hint, you don't choose your race.

[Anonymous No.16178713]

>>16178697
People don't choose to be paranoid schizophrenics, but we still tend to avoid them in the name of personal safety.

[Anonymous No.16178726]

>>16178713
That would still depend on the individual schizophrenic and mental health is inherently different from race, so your analogy fails on two fronts.

[Anonymous No.16178730]

>>16178128
>>16178697
Still no explanation for why it's bad. Just monkeys flinging shit lmao.

[Anonymous No.16178734]

>>16178730
Imagine you're bleeding out on the street. The hospital that's treating you intentionally gives you inferior service because you are of your particular race and they don't want to race resources on your race. You die as a result. Clear enough for you?

[Anonymous No.16178740]

>>16178734
Oh okay, so bad for interiors but not for me. The morality of racism is subjective in the absolute. Thank you for your clarification.

[Anonymous No.16178742]

>>16178726
>That would still depend on the individual schizophrenic
And yet you would still behave differently around someone if you knew they were schizophrenic, and treat claims they make differently, out of a natural sense of self-preservation, especially if you didn't know them well or at all.
>mental health is inherently different from race
Different, but analogous. Neither are chosen, both impact the person, both SHOULD impact how you approach that person when you don't know them well or at all.

[Anonymous No.16178743]

>>16178740
Oh you don't care until it happens to you because you're an NPC lacking in basic imagination and/or empathy neurons. Thank you for the clarification.

[Anonymous No.16178749]

>>16178742
>And yet you would still behave differently around someone if you knew they were schizophrenic
You don't know shit about me. Don't assume how I'd behave.
>but analogous
*Disanalogous
>both impact the person
You don't demonstrate HOW they impact the person. Both your examples break down on the general level and are still case-by-case for how we treat the person.

[Anonymous No.16178750]

>>16178743
I mean you really championed the subjectivity of it. Read your post again and tell me you didn't. I'll be waiting for an objective reason why racism is bad.

[Anonymous No.16178751]

>>16178750
Okay I didn't.

[Anonymous No.16178754]

>>16178749
>You don't know shit about me. Don't assume how I'd behave.
Okay, so you just have no sense of self-preservation and would approach any stranger exactly the same way even if you've been explicitly told they suffer from a debilitating mental illness that makes them a danger to themselves and others?

[Anonymous No.16178759]

>>16178754
Why do you always think only in generalities? Let me say it a third time since you can't read: it depends on the individual case and what symptoms they show that dictate how we go about dealing with that person.

[Anonymous No.16178761]

>>16178751
Still waiting on the objective reason why it's bad.

[Anonymous No.16178763]

>>16178761
You got it.

[Anonymous No.16178765]

>>16178763
Where is it?

[Anonymous No.16178768]

>>16178765
The post giving an example showing that it's immoral to cause someone to die because of their race.

[Anonymous No.16178777]

>>16178768
So your only reason is morality, a subjective abstraction?

[Anonymous No.16178782]

>>16178768
Can you point me to an experiment that will prove the absolute laws of morality?

[Anonymous No.16178783]

>>16178759
I can't tell if you're just being disingenuous or if you're actually this stupid. We're not talking about some clinical setting where you get access to a complete medical history and can debate for a few hours about the man's behavioral tendencies before choosing a correct course of action in how to interact with him. We're talking about some guy you come across out in the world and the only thing you know about him is that he has a dangerous mental illness.

[Anonymous No.16178798]

>>16168270
Me. While I'm not famous or even highly cited, I'm still my own favorite scientist.

[Anonymous No.16178812]

>>16178782
I'm still waiting. Where can I find info on objective morality?

[Anonymous No.16179196]

>>16178128
racism will win

[Anonymous No.16179201]

Myself and those who called out covid jabs for being rushed garbage.

[Anonymous No.16179235]

>>16178697
you don't choose to be ugly either but nothing wrong with making fun of uggos

[Anonymous No.16179237]

>>16178768
but the immorality here isn't the race part, it's the causing someone to die part. Denying someone medical treatment because they're a chud would be just as bad

[Anonymous No.16179295]

>>16176784
Twum never did any of that.

[Anonymous No.16179892]

>>16179237
Still waiting on the evidence proving objective morality.

[Anonymous No.16180870]

>>16179237
we are waiting

[Anonymous No.16180894]

>>16178798
haha i was gonna add myself too. i did some genetics grant work and measured roley poleys morphology. couple papers.

[Anonymous No.16180911]

>>16168270
Orkimedes, the invertor of the Telliporta.
[Picture generated by Copilot, as you can see that shit is retarded AF.]

[Anonymous No.16180913]

>>16168288
>88
The gods have spoken, Twum is the indisputable greatest scientist of all time

[Anonymous No.16180923]

>>16171697
There is nothing wrong with racism. Only morons are not racist.

[Anonymous No.16181461]

Why hasn't that anon provided proof that morality is an objective abstraction?

[Anonymous No.16182076]

>>16181461
^bumping the thread one last time so he can post his proof of morality's objective abstraction.

[Anonymous No.16182086]

>>16182076
>this thread triggers me
why not just hide it instead of turning yourself into a little bitch? do you enjoy being angry and upset all the time?

[Anonymous No.16183077]

>>16178734
nice headcannon but that never happened

[Anonymous No.16183091]

>>16182086
>ask for a legitimate and objective reason explaining why racism is bad
>get subjective morality-based feelings and damage control instead of an objective reason
Anon, everyone loses from time to time, but it's not good to bitch and moan when you do.

[Anonymous No.16183979]

>>16182086
>^bumping the thread one last time so he can post his proof of morality's objective abstraction.

[Anonymous No.16183980]

>>16178798
You suck and your papers should all be retracted

[Anonymous No.16184571]

>>16180923
Racism has pros and cons. If one group actually is significantly different than another, then it could be useful to create social norms and heuristics on how to deal with that group. The downside is that it can lead to false positives, such as assuming a black nerd is retarded and violent just because ghetto blacks are more likely to be. Or that dark skinned Brahmins are the same as Africans simply based on color.

Ideologies like religion have tried to extend the concept of the in-group to be larger and larger, so as to reduce inter-group violence and increase cooperation. Christianity especially is known for its values of charity, mercy, forgiveness, salvation. These try to give people second chances and reduce the incidence of blood feuds between groups, leading to a 'brotherhood of man.' In this sense they try to make the meaningful difference between people based on values or culture, rather than physical appearance. In terms of game theory this strategy worked better for multiethnic empires, as memes spread much faster than genes.

Since there are genetic differences between ethnic groups, and that may explain some percentage of the variance in behavior, it's not entirely baseless to be 'racist' to some degree. However it's possible for culture and upbringing to supercede genetic predispositions in large part. Perhaps the more reasonable future position will be to recognize there are average differences, not expect perfect equality of outcomes, but still give people a chance to prove their merit.

[Anonymous No.16185229]

>>16175023
Is more like 50% ugly AF, 25% ugly, 12.5% below average, 6.25% average, 3.125% above average, 1.0625% pretty, and so on.

[Anonymous No.16185258]

>>16168407
midwit spotted

[Anonymous No.16185732]

>>16168270
Rupert Sheldrake

History will vindicate him.

[Anonymous No.16187045]

the holy trio of /sci/

[Anonymous No.16187059]

>>16187045
>trio
Black hole cunt, lab tech nigger, and what's the third?

[Anonymous No.16187247]

>>16169220
>Terrence Tao
>Scientist

[Anonymous No.16188501]

>>16187059
noobs don't know about ghost tits nance

[Anonymous No.16188556]

>>16188501
Can't say I've ever seen this posted here before.

[Anonymous No.16188559]

>>16168270
Why does her nose look so flattened?

[Anonymous No.16188906]

>>16188501
>consumption
Why does every interaction with media need to be described as consuming/consumption? Why not:
>We don't exist to be leered at"
>to be pleasant to your eyes
>to be sexy
>to be enjoyable
literally anything else.

[Anonymous No.16188910]

>>16188906
>we don't exist to be leered at
>that's why I did a sexy photoshoot to show off my body to millions of people

[Anonymous No.16188956]

>>16188556
You either don't visit much or you're a newfag. That image was getting posted constantly for a year or two.

[Anonymous No.16189036]

>>16168270
living? James Steele. Did a meta-analysis of exercise studies and sifted through data. Showed that the only thing that really matters in exercise is intensity and that more than 1 set is not required when reaching failure. Results are remarkably consistent when you account for hitting failure. Before this, most studies did not equate proximity to failure, but when controlling for intensity by only searching studies that had subjects reaching failure you find maximal potential muscle building benefit. All other factors of exercise performance are essentially irrelevant. Also did some research on lifting and how it pertains to "cardio". Showed that AMPK was maximally stimulated when reaching failure, meaning that you get maximal non-specific aerobic benefit from reaching failure as well as vascular adaptation. Other "cardio" benefits are activity specific. So if you wanted to be a runner then you would train for running by running and wouldn't just expect to be able to be good without training for it, but running itself does not provide any specific magic benefit as a superior form of general "cardio" training. This dude, James Fischer, and their colleagues trimmed off 99% of all the exercise industry horseshit in 2 studies even though industry fags refuse to acknowledge it because it would destroy their profit structure.

He's literally the
>"Personal trainers HATE him! Get ripped in 1/10th the time with this ONE simple trick"
guy except for real. (1/10th the time spent exercising, not calendar days from starting training until you're ripped) I have the utmost respect for this guy despite his terrible physique due to shit genetics.

Dead? Tesla, because he was cool and single handedly launched us 100 years into the future.

[Anonymous No.16189038]

>>16189036
forgot picrel

[Anonymous No.16189705]

>>16168270

[Anonymous No.16190685]

>>16188956
Her tits are made out of dark matter

[Anonymous No.16191860]

>>16188501
>noobs b&
based jannie

[Anonymous No.16192370]

>>16188910
>that's why I did a sexy photoshoot to show off my body
>sexy
she'd be more attractive in hijab

[Anonymous No.16192377]

>>16192370
She's trying to be sexy regardless of your opinion on her success in doing so.

[Anonymous No.16192985]

>>16168270
Pastuer
William Shockley
William Luther Pierce
Feynman
Joseph Fourier
Isaac Newton
James Clerk Maxwell
James Dewey Watson
Darwin

[Anonymous No.16193138]

>>16188501
Shes fat

Has there ever been any studies done on the obesity problem amongst scientists? It seems to be particularly bad amongst females in astronomy and physics. Go into any astro department in any university and most of the females seem to have emotional eating disorders.

[Anonymous No.16193709]

>>16168270
Bill Nye, Neil Degrasse Tyson, Greta Thunderberg and Jack Horkeheimer. And those black girls that invented the Pythagorean theorem

[Anonymous No.16194731]

>>16193709
No Carl Sagan? Sure hope you're not antisemitic

[Anonymous No.16194845]

>>16171703
>>16171728
>>16172914
>>16173651
>>16178128
>>16178734
>>16178743
>>16178751
>>16178763
>>16178768
>>16178726
>>16178749
>>16178759
>>16173972
"Racism", 'racial-prejudice', however you wish to refer to it, is a survival mechanism. Pic related.

>>16178697
You might not be able to choose your race, but you can certainly choose your personal actions. Turns out that individuals of particular races choose undesirable actions at a higher rate.

[Anonymous No.16194847]

>>16171697
Firstly, racism is wrong because when people believe it, it usually results in harm to people. Ranging from the relatively trivial harms of cruel jokes and offensive stereotypes to the catastrophic harms of things like apartheid and genocide. It would therefore be better in general if no one were racist.

And then it’s also wrong because it is factually inaccurate. A belief in the innate superiority of any racial or ethnic group is not scientifically supported; and even the definitions and divisions of racial and ethnic groups that we use are often not scientifically supported.

[Anonymous No.16194850]

>>16194845

[Anonymous No.16196404]

>>16194847
>I hate whites
>because they're racist

[Anonymous No.16196475]

>>16194847
Still subjective morality. Please post proof that racism is objectively wrong.

[Anonymous No.16197252]

>>16194847
>racism is wrong because when people believe it, it usually results in harm to people
Thats exactly wrong, banning racism has caused hundreds of millions of deaths over the past century, racists have caused none. Banning racism is a key component of communism because communists want people to reserve all of their loyalty strictly for their communists totalitarian masters rather than for their own kin.

[Anonymous No.16197277]

>>16173495
nothing lol. others just ragebait you. of course they know racism is good.((()))

[Anonymous No.16198331]

>>16194845
Semite nations are the most criminal, Israel ranks higher than some subsaharan nations. So middle easterners are even worse than blacks in terms of criminality

[Anonymous No.16198578]

>>16196404
You hate whites because they're racist.
I hate whites because I'm racist.
We are not the same.

[Anonymous No.16198581]

>>16168270
Karl Marx (Das Kapital is a purely scientific work, go cry about it)

[Anonymous No.16198583]

>>16198578
It's only natural for a Subhuman to hate his superiors. He has an inherent feeling that he's been cheated by life that there is a race that so utterly dominates him and his history that all he can muster is awe and hate.

[Anonymous No.16198584]

>>16194845
>you can certainly choose your personal actions

Can you? Is everyone qualified enough to exercise free will?

[Anonymous No.16198589]

>>16197252
Quadroon spotted

[Anonymous No.16198592]

>>16175154
He invented Death? Holy fuck.

[Anonymous No.16198595]

>>16198583
This perfectly defines shitskin hatred for whites.

[Anonymous No.16198599]

>>16187247
>He is smart!!!! Greatest Scientist Ever!!!

Understanding what others have done is not what makes you a scientist. A scientist contributes his own verse in the powerful play of life.

[Anonymous No.16198816]

>>16198583
This perfectly defines the gentile's hatred for the Chosen people.

[Anonymous No.16198820]

chritnopher nolan

[Anonymous No.16198998]

>>16198816
I'm a secular Jew. All my jewish ancestry ever gave me is mental problems and acid reflux. Oh, and they circumcised my dick too.

[Anonymous No.16199269]

>>16198584
well everyone is on a ladder and if that anon gave the idea that you can choose said personal actions, then I'm sure he can.
you on the other hand are just trying to argue for the argument's sake and probing nothing.
Here's a question for you, if you are doing well off and live a state of life that you are satisfied by, then notice a deprived young animal on the street that is close to death, what would you actions be?

[Anonymous No.16199906]

[Anonymous No.16200372]

>>16193709
Also peanut butter science man

[Anonymous No.16200375]

>>16169232
He counts the most. He didn't just talk schizo babble, he said "watch this" and made useful shit out of it.

[Anonymous No.16201484]

>>16200375
Same was true of Edison and the Wright brothers and many others of their era. We don't have anyone like that around today, we only have the schizophasiacs spewing their baby babble

[Anonymous No.16202118]

>>16198581
>>>/pol/

[Anonymous No.16202123]

>>16198578
Whites aren't racist, thats the problem with them and why they'll soon be extinct. Every other race is massively racist.

[Anonymous No.16202553]

>>16168270
me :3

[Anonymous No.16203438]

>>16199906
good pic

[Anonymous No.16205023]

>>16180913
Janny tried to delete the evidence of Twum being the greatest scientist because janny is a filthy disgusting racist

[Anonymous No.16205981]

>>16188556
newfag summerfag

[Anonymous No.16205983]

>>16168515
Chocolate Einstein?

[Boo-ker No.16206002]

>>16205983
Bootel, now

[Anonymous No.16206093]

My heart belongs to.....

[Anonymous No.16206381]

>>16168270
Dr. Arnim Zola

[Anonymous No.16206386]

newton

[Anonymous No.16207263]

>>16193138

[Anonymous No.16207846]

>>16206093
What's her OnlyFans?

[Anonymous No.16208112]

>>16198592
lol

[Anonymous No.16208597]

>>16207846
She's a good girl. Her brains draw attention, not just the pussy.

[Anonymous No.16208603]

>>16208597
>She's a good girl.
Don't lie, I can see that tattoo.

[Anonymous No.16208630]

>>16208603
All the girls in her church group get that tattoo

[Anonymous No.16208637]

>>16208603
What does the turkey mean?

[Anonymous No.16208652]

>>16208637
The turkey is a wise, noble bird. It out-smarts almost all of the best hunters. And, Wild Turkey 101 is best bang for the buck of Kentucky bourbon. It's clearly the best tattoo anyone could receive.

[Anonymous No.16208666]

>>16208637
It means she gobbles cock.

[Anonymous No.16208697]

>>16208666

[Anonymous No.16209194]

>>16188501
>ghost tits nance

[Anonymous No.16210349]

>>16168270
what sort of hideous creature is that?

[Anonymous No.16210367]

>>16206093
Moar

[Anonymous No.16210377]

>>16168467
Shtollen

[Anonymous No.16210409]

More of a scientist than anyone here.

[Anonymous No.16210533]

>>16210409
Social media influencer? Based on the current state of science, she probably is the most sciencie of anyone in this thread.

[Anonymous No.16210884]

>>16210533
PhD student now apparently, so yes for sure.

[Anonymous No.16212199]

>>16210409
she is jewish

[Anonymous No.16212320]

>>16212199
She is Jewish(you)

[Anonymous No.16212651]

>>16168270
the brotha that found out the atrazine was making the frogs gay

[Anonymous No.16216831]

>>16212651
>making the frogs gay
Pepe?

[Anonymous No.16216910]

>>16171703
Antiscientific retard

[Anonymous No.16216918]

>>16194847
>Firstly, racism is wrong because when people believe it, it usually results in harm to people.
Fucking LOL, literally "You're not allowed to acknowledge reality if it hurts the feefees of the ethnic groups I worship :("

>And then it’s also wrong because it is factually inaccurate.
What would you accept as proof of a given race being superior? How do you define superiority? Try to defy your nature and not be snake.

[Anonymous No.16216925]

>>16194847
>and even the definitions and divisions of racial and ethnic groups that we use are often not scientifically supported.
Impartial partitioning of genetic data results in clusters that map almost 1:1 to traditional racial divisions. Stop lying.

[Anonymous No.16218702]

>>16175178

[Anonymous No.16218759]

>>16176784
She's utterly delusional.

[Anonymous No.16218790]

>>16168270
That crazy Hungarian guy that wanted to make huge bombs.

[Anonymous No.16219154]

How does /sci/ feel about their personal support roles

[Anonymous No.16220952]

>>16176784
what was deleted?

[Anonymous No.16221216]

the ugliest woman alive, I love her seething

[Anonymous No.16221251]

>>16178128
Not him but I did that and it made me more racist. Give up your gay ass neoliberal religion, it's nonsense.

[Anonymous No.16221253]

>>16221251
Also that said, you should be kind to everyone on a personal level regardless of race, although it pays to be wary of some. Except anti racists, they're fucking subhumans and should die.

[Anonymous No.16221257]

>>16178697
According to modern neuroscience you don't choose anything. What's your point? That it isn't technically your fault that you were born a faggot?

[Anonymous No.16221312]

>>16178734
Sounds like an argument for monoethnic societies

[Anonymous No.16221711]

>>16171728
gb2 jail

[Anonymous No.16221824]

>>16188501
>we don't exist for consumption
she doesn't

[Anonymous No.16221847]

>>16178759
you're a fucking idiot

[Anonymous No.16222449]

>>16221216
>the ugliest woman alive, I love her seething
She could Angry Fuck me

[Anonymous No.16223663]

>>16221847

[Anonymous No.16224522]

>>16221216
Germans are at peace when seething. She looks great.

[Anonymous No.16226061]

>>16221312

[Anonymous No.16227791]

>>16194731
>Sure hope you're not antisemitic
whats wrong with antisemitism?

[Anonymous No.16227800]

A poast so clowning God ignores the faggots at cern

[Anonymous No.16229146]

>>16227791
Nothing, antisemitism is based

[Anonymous No.16230580]

>>16193709
upvoted for bill noye the soiyence goy

[Anonymous No.16230667]

>>16230580
How many times did you save your shitty thread from dying fucktard?

[Anonymous No.16231799]

>>16218790
>Hungarian
he was jewish, not Hungarian

[Anonymous No.16231839]

>>16168270
von Helmholtz or Purkinje.

[Anonymous No.16232636]

>>16168270
Fritz Haber

[Anonymous No.16233492]

>>16168416
*otaku

[Anonymous No.16233583]

>>16189705
Hawt

[Anonymous No.16233598]

Rosalyn Franklin got a raw deal

[Anonymous No.16233731]

>>16233598
Actually she didn't at all. That idea is just pushed for political reasons.
She wasn't awarded the nobel prize because she was dead, and the prize is never awarded posthumously.
Also the prize was awarded for the mathematical model which predicted the exact angles of every bond in DNA, which was developed entirely by Crick. It was not awarded to its siater paper which rosalind wrote, because, while important, Franklin's findings did not present a mathematical model for the exact angle of every bond in the molecule.

[Anonymous No.16233732]

>>16169842
Based

[Anonymous No.16233876]

>>16168270

[Anonymous No.16233886]

>>16168397
Let me guess, you're one of those narcissistic schizoid "people" who think that germ theory is wrong?

[Anonymous No.16233912]

>>16233886
NTA, but even if you believe in germ theory it's plain to see that Pasteur's quest (and that of those who followed him) to demonize and destroy all bacteria was immeasurably stupid and harmful. It took nearly 100 years for people to realize that bacteria can be beneficial and killing them all with antibiotics literally everywhere (from antibiotic medications prescribed for every illness to antibacterial soap at every sink) is a horrible idea.

[Anonymous No.16233946]

>>16233912
>even if you believe in germ theory
>believe
You don't "believe" in facts, they are true regardless of whether or not you want them to be.
>it's plain to see that Pasteur's quest (and that of those who followed him) to demonize and destroy all bacteria was immeasurably stupid and harmful. It took nearly 100 years for people to realize that bacteria can be beneficial and killing them all with antibiotics literally everywhere (from antibiotic medications prescribed for every illness to antibacterial soap at every sink) is a horrible idea.
Sure, some bacteria are beneficial. But quite a lot of them aren't, and those ones are the reason why we take sanitation seriously.
Antibacterial soap is stupid, but it's not because having a bunch of bacteria on your hands is a good thing, it's because it will inevitably cause antibiotic resistance. Prescribing antibiotics for infections that aren't bacterial in nature is also stupid, for the same reason. Antibiotics should only be used when necessary (such as for bacterial infections or, for example, in hospital settings where things need to be sterile).

[Anonymous No.16233979]

>>16233946
Bacteria don't infect people, they just often proliferate in environments that are harmful to humans. If you stumble on the corpse of an animal and find it full of maggots, do you blame the maggots for killing the animal or do you understand that maggots simply thrive on dead animal tissue and they were introduced after the fact? Same with bacteria; there's bacteria that proliferates in the presence of fecal matter, but it's the fecal matter that's harmful to you, not the bacteria that's eating it. The benefit of hygiene isn't destroying bacteria, it's removing toxic substances like shit and piss and dirt and whatever else. You can find every supposedly pathogenic bacteria crawling all over humans inside and out at all times, but they never cause any problems. That some of them grow in population when something is wrong with you is not a sign that bacteria have caused you harm or infected you, they're just proliferating in response to a change in your body that's bad for you and good for them.

[Anonymous No.16234003]

>>16233979
NTA, but you're a literal retard of the most dangerous kind

[Anonymous No.16234712]

>>16233876
craziest response in this thread.

[Anonymous No.16235469]

>>16175178
are they standing behind the niggers and the pedophile?

[Anonymous No.16235577]

>>16235469
umm... that's.... wow...

[Anonymous No.16236670]

>>16188501
should have got a nose job too

[Anonymous No.16236683]

>>16233731
Lol don’t rely on technicalities to negate her work, Sucking and Dick would have been so lost without her input

[Anonymous No.16237497]

>>16236683
women can't do science

[Anonymous No.16237511]

>>16178128
i feel like that picture inherently thinks everyone is the same, and there is many more text and art that take that though as a baseline, is there a name for this cult of thinking ?

[Anonymous No.16237524]

>women can't do science

[Anonymous No.16237550]

>>16168270
John Doyle. not only is he a gigachad with multiple sports world records and 3pl8 bench but he basically founded an entire field of control theory.

[Anonymous No.16237571]

>>16233946
>You don't "believe" in facts, they are true regardless of whether or not you want them to be
how can you type this out, wait for captcha, solve the captcha, press post and not stop yourself from posting this utter cringe

[Anonymous No.16238358]

>>16237571
>my facts are the real inarguable truth
>your facts are just dumb opinions

[Anonymous No.16239785]

>>16238358
Popular fallacy amongst immature low IQ emotional basket cases

[Anonymous No.16240636]

>210 replies
>only 4 mentions of Twum
/sci/ had fallen