[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 238 KB, 1338x1528, NOAA xweet.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16117641 No.16117641 [Reply] [Original]

NOAA admits that CO2 is not a greenhouse gas and has no effect on the climate. According to NOAA:
>The amount of CO2 in the atmosphere today is comparable to around
>4.3 million years ago, when sea level was about 75 ft higher than today,
>the average temp was 7 degrees F higher than in pre-industrial times, &
>large forests occupied areas of the Arctic that are now tundra.
Which is to say that even though CO2 is the same now as it was 4.3 million years ago, the climate today is far, far different and much colder than it was 4.3 million years ago and this is because atmospheric CO2 levels have no effect or undetectably little effect on the Earth's climate. Its also worth noting that atmospheric CO2 levels have been substantially above where they have been in the recent past for over 100 years now and there has been no substantial change in the climate during that time, which only further proves NOAA's assertion that CO2 doesn't affect the Earth's climate and that CO2 is not a meaningful greenhouse gas.

>> No.16117656
File: 1.89 MB, 202x360, hexagonal packing.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16117656

Cool, here's a cookie wizard.

>> No.16117761

>>16117641
>He doesn't know what hysteresis is and thinks everything always happens immediately
You are legit a retard.

>> No.16117956

>>16117761
Course I know what a hysterisis is it's when my mom starts saying crazy stuff after I stayed out "too late" on a weekday.

>> No.16118180

>>16117641
As a midwit my take on climate change has always been that it is fake and ghey soley because trees need C02, simple as…

>> No.16118479
File: 99 KB, 960x720, co2 is good for the environment.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16118479

>>16118180
Not only do plants absorb CO2, but they also absorb solar energy and transform it into physical mass rather than reemitting it at a lower frequency. This process increases exponentially as the atmospheric CO2 levels increase because plants are 3 dimensional objects, so when CO2 levels increase the plants' growth rates grow in 3 dimensions, doubling CO2 makes plants add mass 8x faster, however eventually they start blocking out each others' sunlight so the process can't really grow like that forever

>> No.16119328

>>16118180
>>16118479
Retard takes

>> No.16119988 [DELETED] 

>>16119328
you're just too low iq to understand it

>> No.16120075

>>16119988
>the color red is actually green
>you're just too low iq to understand it

>> No.16120521 [DELETED] 

>>16120075
you're too low IQ to understand science, sorry of that upsets you so much

>> No.16120857

>>16120521
>the color red is actually green
>you're just too low iq to understand it

>> No.16121440 [DELETED] 

>>16120857
>t. retard

>> No.16121550

>>16121440
>the color red is actually green
>you're just too low iq to understand it

>> No.16122037 [DELETED] 

>>16117761
You'd be able to calculate the time frames involved yourself if you'd ever passed freshmen level thermodynamics, which you clearly haven't

>> No.16122104

>>16117656
wtf is this real

>> No.16122300

>>16122037
Cope harder.

>> No.16122697

>>16117641
>anon doesn't understand what time is

>> No.16123285 [DELETED] 

>>16118479
The more CO2 there is in the atmosphere, the faster and more efficiently plant sequester solar radiation. Thats why adding CO2 to the atmosphere causes global cooling

>> No.16123513

>>16123285
Lol no.

>> No.16123865 [DELETED] 

>>16123285
Thats probably how ice ages get started

>> No.16125098 [DELETED] 

>>16117641
How come sea level isn't 75' higher? Because CO2 has no influence on climate?

>> No.16126288 [DELETED] 

>>16125098
correct, if CO2 had any significant influence on the climate then sea levels would be rising massively. instead they aren't rising at all.

>> No.16126819 [DELETED] 
File: 70 KB, 822x351, sea level going down.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16126819

>>16126288
Sea level is actually falling measurably in a lot of locations

>> No.16126826

Nah globohomo is flipping the script cause they realized threatening people with fear will make them want to kill millionaires rather than stop grilling
Boooooo bad play, I wanted TMD

>> No.16126830 [DELETED] 

>>16126826
>I'm jealous of everyone who has more money than me
Let me guess, everyone who has less money than you is a worthless lazy bum and deserves to be genocided just as much as everyone with more money than you does and of course you're a perfect special snowflake

>> No.16126831

>>16125098
>>16126288
Where would all that water come from? Do the math.

>> No.16127949 [DELETED] 

>>16118479
Thats why burning hydrocarbon fuels couldn't possibly cause global warming. The energy stored in those fuels is stored solar energy, its not endemically of Earthly origin so releasing it sends it on it's way once again, delayed by a a few hundred million years or so

>> No.16128025

>>16127949
You are a moron. It's not heat from fossil fuels driving global warming, it's heat from the sun being trapped by the greenhouse gasses from fossil fuel emissions.

>> No.16128461
File: 258 KB, 1089x907, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16128461

>>16126819
>a variable is controlled by more than 1 factor
This confuses a contrarian

>> No.16128603 [DELETED] 

>>16128025
>REEEEE!!!! YOUR DUM!!!!!
I can tell this is an emotional issue for you because of how you were driven to childish name calling, but there is no evidence that CO2 is a greenhouse gas and vast quantities of evidence which proves that it isn't a greenhouse gas

>> No.16128607

>>16118479
This is true. High CO2 means high growth for plants/trees.

>> No.16128609

>>16117641
if you turn up a heater in a room does the entire room heat up immediately?

>> No.16128620

>>16128603
I can tell you never pursued higher education because you failed to source your absurd claims.

>> No.16128623
File: 209 KB, 600x600, Liebigs-Law-of-Minimum-600x600-1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16128623

>>16128607
No it doesn't.

>> No.16128632 [DELETED] 

Why did this t not read get massacred?

>> No.16129916 [DELETED] 

>>16128620
NOAA says that CO2 is not a greenhouse gas, its in OP

>> No.16130328

>>16129916
Incorrect.

>> No.16130854 [DELETED] 

>>16130328
NOAA admits that CO2 is not a greenhouse gas and has no effect on the climate. According to NOAA:
>>The amount of CO2 in the atmosphere today is comparable to around
>>4.3 million years ago, when sea level was about 75 ft higher than today,
>>the average temp was 7 degrees F higher than in pre-industrial times, &
>>large forests occupied areas of the Arctic that are now tundra.
Which is to say that even though CO2 is the same now as it was 4.3 million years ago, the climate today is far, far different and much colder than it was 4.3 million years ago and this is because atmospheric CO2 levels have no effect or undetectably little effect on the Earth's climate. Its also worth noting that atmospheric CO2 levels have been substantially above where they have been in the recent past for over 100 years now and there has been no substantial change in the climate during that time, which only further proves NOAA's assertion that CO2 doesn't affect the Earth's climate and that CO2 is not a meaningful greenhouse gas.

>> No.16130867

>>16130854
Non sequitur. Why do you have to lie to try to prove your argument?

>> No.16132118 [DELETED] 

>>16117641
Its nice of them to finally admit it

>> No.16132910 [DELETED] 

>>16128609
everywhere on the planet warms up during the day and cools off at night. if CO2 were a greenhouse gas then the reduced rate of cooling at night due to CO2 would be measurable. instead it still cools off at night, just as much as ever, because CO2 is not a greenhouse gas

>> No.16132913

>>16130867
A lie is not a non sequitur my nigger

>> No.16132917

>>16132913
It is in this case.

>> No.16134105 [DELETED] 

>>16117641
Thats quite a change, I wonder what it was that finally made them come around?

>> No.16134764

>>16117641
>and this is because atmospheric CO2 levels have no effect or undetectably little effect on the Earth's climate
no, it's not
this fucking board, sigh

>> No.16135203

>>16134764
>I hate /sci/
why are you here?

>> No.16136406

>>16132913
the n word is racist

>> No.16136884

>>16136406
That's whats so great about it

>> No.16136918

>>16128623
Yes it does. This is a well known and studied fact. Why is it under fire all of a sudden?

>> No.16137359

>>16136918
It never worked that way. You only thought it did because you are a retard who misunderstood what you were told.

https://www.cropnutrition.com/resource-library/the-law-of-the-minimum/

>> No.16137400
File: 499 KB, 944x720, white cat.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16137400

>>16118479
>The only thing trees need is CO2. Clearly water and nutrients be damned.

>> No.16138535 [DELETED] 

>>16137359
CO2 makes plants grow better, why does that upset you so much? Do you hate plants and want them to die or something?

>> No.16138834

>>16138535
You are a moron who clearly either didn't read or didn't understand that link.

>> No.16139536

>>16138834
CO2 makes plants grow better, why does that upset you so much? Do you hate plants and want them to die or something?

>> No.16140082

>>16139536
You are a moron who clearly either didn't read or didn't understand that link.

>> No.16140762
File: 73 KB, 540x1006, enough of fucking around.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16140762

it knows...

>> No.16140763

>>16135203
>why are you here?
because among the crowd of retards, there are still other scientists here whom I learn things from.