/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.16116776]

Reminder that a vegan diet, because of it's nutritional deficiencies, will cause your IQ to drop by roughly 10%

[Anonymous No.16116842]

>>16116776
Weird because the lowest IQ people are the most rabidly carnivorous.

This girl was homeschooled by an anti-vaxxer, there never was much hope for her anyway

[Anonymous No.16116846]

[Anonymous No.16116857]

>>16116842
Ummmm anon...you're trying here to imply that carnivory causes a low IQ?
I know your vegan starved brain finds this a hard one to comprehend but it actually doesn't tell us anything about the effects of any sort of diet on intellectual capacity, a classical example of correlation not equating to causation.
Yet multiple robust experimental studies have demonstrated the direct effects of deficiencies in compounds only or primarily sourced from meat consumption leading to cognitive impairment.

[Anonymous No.16116872]

>>16116857
Right, so we can't say anything about any sort of diet's effect on intellectual capacity, except we can?
Look dude, all I'm saying is that the people who insist on eating meat for every meal and make it part of their identity and bitch about vegans existing even if they don't have to personally interact with any of them tend not to be the most intelligent people. And on the other hand most of the highly intelligent people I know are vegan or vegetarian. Anecdotal evidence? Sure, but more compelling than OP's.

[Anonymous No.16116973]

>>16116872
I'm not really aware of many people who make meat consumption their ideology yet the same can't be said for vegans.
you seem to be projecting

[Anonymous No.16116986]

>>16116973
>I'm not really aware of many people who make meat consumption their ideology
The mere mention of not eating meat with every meal or using meat substitutes tends to bring them out. There is a very clear correlation between political identity, IQ, and eating meat. Once eating less meat became associated with progressivism, eating more meat became part of conservative political identity. And conservatism is the one associated with lower IQ, of course.
>you seem to be projecting
I'm not vegan.

[Anonymous No.16116995]

>>16116986
Anon you have a very jumbled up politicised view of the world.
If people can look at the data on the benefits of meat consumption and the problems with plant consumption and still be vegan or vegetarian then by definition I don't think they can be considered intelligent.
I find people like you quite outrageous.

[Anonymous No.16117003]

>>16116995
>If people can look at the data on the benefits of meat consumption and the problems with plant consumption and still be vegan or vegetarian then by definition I don't think they can be considered intelligent.
So intelligence is an objective measure when it comes to judging the benefits of meat consumption but it's your subjective judgement when it comes to judging individual choices? Just like earlier when we couldn't judge any diet except when we could. I don't think anyone who makes a shitty fallacious argument like this can be considered intelligent and I know which side of the debate you're on, so what does that tell us? I find you quite outrageous as well.

[Anonymous No.16117012]

>>16117003
I think you're just a coping midwit to be honest, trapped in political and pseudo religious ideology.

[Anonymous No.16117019]

>>16117012
Well, that's terribly ironic then, because I'm just pointing out objective correlations that have been well established, whereas you make one fallacious argument after another and you never acknowledge when it's pointed out even once. You seem to be the one clinging to pseudo-religious standards of evidence as a means of coping. I guess you're also the one projecting, since we've established that I'm definitely not.

[Anonymous No.16117025]

Interesting that due to the long tail on the left, IQ and percentile probably never meet (except maybe at zero depending on if you believe zero is valid in this context).

[Anonymous No.16117032]

>>16117012
To recap: your stance is that veganism reduces IQ and that is why vegans are objectively unintelligent.
But when I say that the highest-IQ people I know who are employed in scientific fields are vegan, then you say that you don't "consider" them intelligent because they don't share your views on veganism, which is begging the question.
But then, if someone with a high IQ can be "considered" unintelligent, the link between IQ and intelligence, the one thing it's supposed to measure, breaks down entirely, and your conclusion which was entirely based on that no longer holds.
Thus you undermine the only grounds you have to conclude that veganism makes people unintelligent in the first place and it becomes obvious that you were always going to maintain this regardless of factual reality for reasons that are your own.

[Anonymous No.16117178]

>>16117032
>To recap: your stance is that veganism reduces IQ and that is why vegans are objectively unintelligent.
No, I think the scientific evidenc eis quite clear that vegan diets outside of strict supplementation and balancing fail to provide a satisfactory diet to promote optimal brain and bodily function, I also am of the opinion that if one is unable to determine this for oneself and still be raucously vegan then one is not actually intelligent and merely caught in a cult
>But when I say that the highest-IQ people I know who are employed in scientific fields are vegan, then you say that you don't "consider" them intelligent because they don't share your views on veganism, which is begging the question.
It is likely they have not studied the clear dietary eveidence that veganism is simply harmful to the body but I suspect as previously stated there is some form of ideology whether conscious or not which is guiding their dietary decisions.
>But then, if someone with a high IQ can be "considered" unintelligent, the link between IQ and intelligence, the one thing it's supposed to measure, breaks down entirely, and your conclusion which was entirely based on that no longer holds.
Those with a somewhat higher IQ can be or at least the upper midwit range are less inclined to think for themselves, take how this is the primary social group that seems able to be mind controlled into going against their ethnic self interests.
>Thus you undermine the only grounds you have to conclude that veganism makes people unintelligent in the first place and it becomes obvious that you were always going to maintain this regardless of factual reality for reasons that are your own.
No, vegan diets outside of strict supplementation categorically lead to reduced bodily functional fitness.

You stated without objective evidence as if it were somehow a fact that those on what you considered your side of the political spectrum were more intelligent.
But you're just a faggot.

[Anonymous No.16117211]

>>16117025
>it's interesting that Gauss CDF with mu=1 doesn't have a fixed point
go back to school kiddo

[Anonymous No.16118069]

>>16116776
>>16116846
its amazing that people would cause themselves brain damage just in order to virtue signal over diet. they must've been extremely dumb to begin with

[Anonymous No.16118395]

[Anonymous No.16118405]

>>16116776
So its no worse than missing a bit of sleep?

[Anonymous No.16118426]

>>16117178
>No but yes
The claim here is about IQ. You are still using "intelligence" interchangeably to mean "high IQ" and "does things I think are smart", depending on the needs of your argument. But then, you're also convinced that everyone who disagrees with you is a brainwashed mind-controlled cultist (but presumably you're a free thinker immune to propaganda, right?).
>You stated without objective evidence as if it were somehow a fact that those on what you considered your side of the political spectrum were more intelligent.
I never mentioned taking a side and I have provided as much evidence as you have, that is, I have mentioned the studies that found this.

[Anonymous No.16118472]

>>16117032
>But then, if someone with a high IQ can be "considered" unintelligent, the link between IQ and intelligence ... breaks down entirely
This is exactly the problem.
You seem to think that high IQ and being an academic leads to some magic universal truth that everybody should obviously believe.
It is very clear that there are very intelligent people, with academic track records, and likely high IQ that think widely different on subjects like vaccines, the immune system, climate and astronomy. Yes, even astronomy.
But because you have studied and are "very smart" the other guy is just deluded.
Global warming? 98% approves this message. And everybody, especially academics, who think otherwise are paid off by big oil. Don't listen to them.
Think immigration has negative effects. You are a nazi and your ideas are dangerous and should have a platform.
How about astronomy? Look into the Velikovsky saga and how your "very smart" academics handled that.
The amount of seethe these outliers generate is immense because the "very smart" academic can't fathom a fellow academic having this opinion. This causes extreme cognitive dissonance. And this is one of the reasons people are so willing to deplatform them.

But hey, what do I know right? I'm obviously a poltard so you can just ignore this message.
;)

[Anonymous No.16118620]

At least they get out and exercise.

[Anonymous No.16118623]

>>16118472

[Anonymous No.16118901]

>>16116776
small price to pay for owning Drumpf and the Magats

[Anonymous No.16118913]

>>16118623
>a drawing says it, so it must be true

[Anonymous No.16118974]

>>16116842
stupid people don't understand virtue signalling
they eat whatever tastes good
processed foods, candy, meat
it's unhealthy, but they are more at risk for metabolic syndrome than any kind of brain damage from malnutrition

[Anonymous No.16119008]

>>16116842
Midwits on the other hand are just smart enough to understand that there is an optimal diet - they go on a journey and source their knowledge from the mainstream. Plant-based processed slop or full-blown veganism are the result.
They are not smart enough to question the narrative or to do their own research and they are easily guilt-tripped and manipulated.
Most importantly they are unable to be even slightly ascetic. They can't resist urges for sugar or processed foods, which is what you are required to do when you go on a diet that is only beef, salt and water.
Are those people stupid?
If you believe that such a diet would make you a healthier person, could you sacrifice all that pleasure and prioritize the long-term gratification?

[Anonymous No.16119146]

>>16116776
Spock was a genius though so you're obviously wrong.

[Anonymous No.16120063]

>>16119146
>muh television jews are real

[Anonymous No.16120579]

>>16116776
The bigger your brain is, the more you stand to lose.

[Anonymous No.16120667]

>>16118472
>But hey, what do I know right? I'm obviously a poltard so you can just ignore this message.
>;)
Yes.
I mean this was all just about quantitative claims about intelligence and it took you lot only a handful of replies to get to
>WELL LIKE WHAT EVEN IS INTELLIGENCE MAAAAN, MAYBE IT'S JUST AN EXCUSE TO BRING UP ALL MY FAVOURITE UNRELATED HOBBYHORSES
You're a fucking joke. And, for the record, it was precisely the other guy who argued that if someone disagreed with a study he namedropped then that person was by definition unintelligent.

[Anonymous No.16120885]

>>16120667
>study
Anon, you don't have to be such a faggot all the time. I thought was clear that if you take time to look at the actual data and sift out distorted data like epidemiological questionnaire "studies" then veganism is an irrational choice that I don't believe someone with a functional brain would make if they were aware.

[Anonymous No.16120897]

>>16120885
Regardless of the data, do you think rationality and intelligence are the same thing?

[Anonymous No.16120903]

>>16120897
intelligence and capacity for rational thought should correlate, excluding the midwit trap

not sure what you're trying to argue here

[Anonymous No.16120917]

>>16120903
I'm not sure what you're trying to argue here, either. It is a much, much weaker claim than before.
Still, if we're going to say that if someone makes an irrational decision that correlates to irrationality and that correlates to low intelligence, we could also inversely say that if a known intelligent person makes a decision that person is likely to be rational and therefore the decision was probably rational. It's all rather pointless correlation conflation, isn't it?

[Anonymous No.16120944]

>>16120917
No, my point hasn't wavered, you're still using your vegan upper midwit friends to imply veganism is what smart people ie your group do.

When you eventually free yourself from the ideologies and need for virtue signalling you are entrapped by maybe then we could have an actual talk but like it is now where you seem unable to clearly this all seems somewhat pointless.

[Anonymous No.16120946]

>>16120944
>upper midwit
Ah, back to begging the question, are you? You first have to be open to the possibility that you are wrong and the world does not work according to your overly simplistic categorisation if this conversation is to go anywhere. Additionally, ask yourself maybe to which extent ideology informs your own worldview. What is your beef (lol) with vegans? Why do you simply have to assume that anyone who so much as questions you must be ideologically motivated? Seems like cope.

[Anonymous No.16120982]

Why have I never heard of carnivores chaining themselves to cabbage processing plants demanding they be shut down for the good of the planet?
Yet one can find a wild array of vegans and vegetarians invading abattoirs or farms for ideological or political stunts.
What can we learn from this?

[Anonymous No.16121104]

>>16116842
>your saying going to the extreme on the opposite side of the spectrum is bad!!?
How can that be?

[Anonymous No.16121141]

>be vegan
>get low IQ from unhealthy vegan diet
>"I don't understand why being vegan is dumb"
this is why arguing with vegans is pointless, they are all too low IQ to understand why they're being stupid

[Anonymous No.16121221]

>>16120982
That carnivores are still the vast majority and comfortable in their position in society?

[Anonymous No.16121225]

>>16121141
I don't think a single vegan posted in this thread yet, if you didn't get that from me explicitly stating several times that I'm not vegan I don't know if you're in any position to judge anyone's IQ

[Anonymous No.16121265]

reminder that Witten, literally the smartest human alive and patron saint of /sci/, is vegan

[Anonymous No.16121331]

>>16121221
No, that would be omnivores who eat both plants and animals

[Anonymous No.16121344]

>>16121331
Ah, you're right, precision in language matters.
In that case I'd say it's because the number of exclusive carnivores might be counted on one hand but Jordan Peterson will probably chain himself to a factory that produces meat substitutes sooner rather than later

[Anonymous No.16121408]

>>16121344
No, I rather think he won't, that's the difference between a nutrient rich diet and vegan brain damage you see.

[Anonymous No.16121423]

>>16121408
Jorp is quite obviously deranged though and willing to martyr himself on any molehill. In his case it was the rampant benzo abuse tho but still

[Anonymous No.16121500]

>>16121423
I don't particularly care for celebratory culture but you certainly seem to obsess over it so I don't have a reply.

[Anonymous No.16121516]

>>16121500
He's simply the only person I've heard of who abides by a strictly carnivorous diet and he's also a culture war moron. He's far more obsessive about plenty of things than I am about anything, and you still replied.

[Anonymous No.16122064]

>>16121516
Maybe stop reading propaganda news?

[Anonymous No.16122140]

>>16122064
I already don't tend to follow Jorp, or news outlets who consider him an authority. I just happen to know this detail about him. Would you rather I had zero examples?

[Anonymous No.16122156]

>>16122140
As far as I can tell you still have zero examples.
Why are vegans prone to so much more extreme behaviours?

[Anonymous No.16122160]

>>16122156
Zero examples of pure carnivores (who happen to be deranged)? Is that why you're so desperate to dismiss Jorp as completely irrelevant? I mean, he usually is, but here incidentally not.
>Why are vegans prone to so much more extreme behaviours?
This question has already been answered. Not sure why you're still going back on forth about this tangent.

[Anonymous No.16122175]

>>16122160
All you seem to do is repeat propaganda mouthpiece talking points.

[Anonymous No.16122191]

>>16122175
I'm not even sure what you're referring to. Remember, I didn't make this thread.

[Anonymous No.16123227]

>>16116776
>Reminder that a vegan diet, because of it's nutritional deficiencies, will cause your IQ to drop by roughly 10%

[Anonymous No.16123243]

100% of vegans are pompous, complete and total pieces of shit. You ever notice that veganism is only 3rd world? In a natural setting, the vegan would fucking die because their organs cannot keep up a caloric threshold.

[Anonymous No.16124655]

>>16116776
Should vegans be banned from certain forms of intellectual employment due to their limited intellectual capability?

[Anonymous No.16125289]

>>16124655
> certain forms

[Barkon No.16125295]

>>16125289
Aaaaasahahaha

[Anonymous No.16125425]

>>16124655
What happened to meritocracy?

[Anonymous No.16125488]

>>16123227
>carnifaggots eating a slurry of parasites, vaccines, antibiotics, hormones, ichor, excreta, all mass-produced by globohomo companies and subsidized by international banking no less, instead of eating a peanut

[Barkon No.16125489]

>>16125488
Na'qqqq

[Anonymous No.16125494]

>>16125489

?

[Anonymous No.16125496]

Hitler was a vegetarian

[Barkon No.16125497]

>>16125494

[Anonymous No.16125498]

>>16125497

Why are you replying?

[Barkon No.16125500]

>>16125498
I was replying to you

[Barkon No.16125503]

>>16125498
It means 'no' faggot. Written stylishly. I.e. I think you're wrong.

[Anonymous No.16125514]

>>16125498
Namefags on 4chan are all mentally ill

[Anonymous No.16125520]

>>16125425
Murdered by identity politics.

[Anonymous No.16125523]

>>16125520
So you love identity politics, is that it?

[Anonymous No.16125977]

>>16116776
Can cofirm. Was a vegan for a couple of years. My IQ dropped by at least a standard deviation

[Anonymous No.16126358]

>>16125977
how long did it take to recover once you stopped?

[Anonymous No.16127659]

>>16125514
The one you're replying to is an AI

[Anonymous No.16127835]

>>16116842
I (sample size 1) was homeschooled by a woman who prevented me from learning the theory of evolution and thought that the world was 10,000 years old and devil spirits control everything and you can heal people through the power of prayer.
The reason was my parents got caught up with a Christian revivalist movement. The reason for that was because they came from small towns and were thrown into the cultural void of the 1970/1980s going to pointless parties they barely enjoyed, absence of all thoughts, my mom's best friend died of drug abuse after years of occasionally calling her in the middle of the night to scream that she was covered in spiders because of the hallucinations brought on by the drugs.
I wasn't even allowed to go online, I could only play videogames by permission on weekends.
No real education budget, just old textbooks secondhand or cheap "science kits" from homeschooling catalogs.
My mom wanted me to have friends so she and other homeschooling mothers would arrange dates for their kids, initially strangers to each other, to meet and play together.
She would often get tired of me asking her followup questions about things and say to stop "cross-examining" her.
I recently took an IQ test and got 132. The average homeschooled kid scores two standard deviations above the average public schooled kid on Iowa exam - even factoring in all of the "unschooling" ones who take it.

Feeding children a vegan diet or a campaign of socialist propaganda retards their development in ways that other bullshit propaganda or social maladjustment simply don't.
It's gotten so bad the recurring cope is that homeschooled kids are "not properly socialized" because those of us who don't immediately cave to peer pressure can't help but look upon the average product of public education with contempt and pity.

Being educated in a public school is on average worse than being raised in a cult.

[Anonymous No.16128441]

>>16127835

[Anonymous No.16128442]

https://kirschsubstack.com/p/vsrf-live-tonight-our-food-supply

"
Tonight we speak with legendary whistleblower and pharma industry insider Sasha Latypova about shocking evidence around the next major effort to get synthetic MRNA into the public’s bodies; via the food supply! Where the vaccine campaign failed, tainted food will win. That is, unless we fight back and demand accountability with these genetic products NOW!

Latypova will share her recent research on the prevalence of MRNA based vaccines in our meat supply and the associated risks of these genetic and recombinant products now in wide use, including:

Risks of integration into host genome and/or microbiome with subsequent long-term expression of aberrant proteins

Risks of shedding to humans and off-target animal species

Microbiome degradation (dysbiosis) highly likely – drives cancer, diabetes, neurodegenerative, gastrointestinal and many other debilitating conditions

Risk of genome integration

Transfer into soils and plant bacteria via animal waste and water

Massive antibiotic resistance – ALL genetic vaccines are made from DNA plasmids with antibiotic resistant genes
"

[Anonymous No.16128450]

>>16127835
I used to work in the admissions office of a small public university. Home school kids were on average much quieter than public school kids but when you spoke to them directly, they would engage in adult level conversation and understood concepts that often baffled public school kids.
Some of this might be selection bias as the best public school kids went off to the large public schools or prestigious private schools. My understanding is that the top private schools didn't like home school kids and those kids in general didn't want to attend a large public school far away from home so we got a disproportionate amount of them while the public school students we got tended to be those that didn't have the scores or means to go elsewhere.
Wish I would have thought to run a query on the home school students to see how they progressed. Probably would have been some sort of privacy violation to do so but if I proposed it as a study, likely could have gotten it approved since the cost would have been low as I already knew how to query the data.

[Anonymous No.16128528]

>>16128450
I should hope that university applicants can engage in adult conversation

[Anonymous No.16129836]

>>16125977
What was being dumb like? Frustrating or were you too dumb to realize how stupid you were?

[Anonymous No.16130749]

>>16129836
its always the latter, dumb people are more prone to delusions of grandiosity about their own intelligence because they're too dumb to be able to discern reality accurately

[Anonymous No.16130757]

>>16130749
So Dunning kruger?

[Anonymous No.16130777]

>>16130749
It's a good thing everyone on /sci/ is smart enough to realise they actually are all geniuses huh

[Anonymous No.16132097]

>>16130777
The average self identified IQ on /sci/ is more than 4 sigma above the global average IQ

[Anonymous No.16132104]

>>16132097
>4 sigma
3 sigma is sort of plausible 4 sigma probably isn't
although africa keeps expanding so maybe soon

[Anonymous No.16132696]

>>16132104
Given that Nairaland's science section has the same type of content that 4chan's science board does (see >>16086041 for the details) it seems doubtful that expanding African population numbers should make much of a difference in that calculation

[Anonymous No.16132803]

>>16132097
That's the joke
>>16132104
>self-identified

Guys, come on, obviously /sci/ is the worst at this, a bunch of midwits at best larping as scientists, probably all engineers, here to stroke each others' egoes, convinced that their massively mediocre intellect enables them to solve all the world's problems logically from the computer chair in mum's basement.

[Anonymous No.16133588]

>>16132696
Nairaland is good

[Anonymous No.16134254]

>>16116995
>then by definition I don't think they can be considered intelligent.
or sane

[Anonymous No.16134538]

>>16116776
>homeschooled:
>vaccine free:
>plant-based diet: x
oof. Oh well. Better luck in your next life, kiddo.

[Anonymous No.16135514]

>>16116776
consider the fact that you have to be low IQ to begin with to decide to become a vegan and you'll start to see things clearer
>a vegan diet, because of it's nutritional deficiencies, will cause your IQ to drop by roughly 10%
>what is 10% of 0

[Anonymous No.16135697]

>>16135514
I know some objectively high-IQ people who are vegan, so at this point I have more evidence that people who get really upset about vegans for some reason are low IQ, given the irrationality they are prone to.

[Anonymous No.16135725]

>>16135697
I know some objectively high-IQ people who are not vegan, what's your point other than that you are cherrypicking your data?

[Anonymous No.16135763]

>>16135725
That a single counterexample disproves a universal claim, my logic-impaired friend.

[Anonymous No.16136671]

>>16133588
lol

[Anonymous No.16137309]

>>16135763
What universal claim do you believe was actually made here? Or how you feel you provided an adequate counter to it?

[Anonymous No.16137320]

>>16137309
>What universal claim do you believe was actually made here?
>>16135514
>you have to be low IQ to begin with to decide to become a vegan
Bruh, you vegan or something?

[Anonymous No.16137655]

>>16137320
This would be true in the position that the person making the decision was fully informed of the dangers involved or swayed by a cult or propganda

[Anonymous No.16138527]

>>16137655
Nobody except a moron would make such a decision without fully considering all the potential impacts

[Anonymous No.16138541]

>>16138527
note the cult propaganda part

[Anonymous No.16138588]

>>16138541
I'll bite: which cult? You can't just go around calling everything you don't understand a "cult".

[Anonymous No.16138613]

>>16116973
I know many people who make it their ideology to discredit vegans because they read a story about someone who literally only eats a super restricted diet and got health problems. E.g., (you).

[Anonymous No.16138717]

>>16138588
Veganism is a cult that's the point, it's origins are moralistic.

[Anonymous No.16138749]

>>16138717
>Wokism is a cult, its origins are moralistic

[Anonymous No.16138753]

>>16138749
Yes.

Both are ideological positions look at how their adherents and advocates behave.

[Anonymous No.16138777]

>>16138753
>Two YouTubers I saw behaved like that so they all behave like that

[Anonymous No.16138780]

>>16116776
Trust me, you won't get into league where IQ matters if you can't compensate by supplements what you miss in diet.

[Anonymous No.16138787]

>>16138777
Let's nail this down here before you start making strawmen. Is it ideological or not?

[Anonymous No.16138841]

>>16138787
>Let me frame you before you frame me
Look, what I'm saying with my replies is that your premise is wrong and, hence, so is your conclusion. You cannot repair this through further logical fallacies. You are bitter, and that makes you susceptible to groupthink. Heartfelt tip: open up. The real world is a much better place than the www makes you think.

[Anonymous No.16139719]

>>16138613
veganism is a mental illness, its an eating disorder

[Anonymous No.16140241]

>>16138841
You are a frustrating thing to talk to.
Slimy and smelly.

Vegan diets unless heavily supplemented or carefully balanced are bad for the brain and body.

Pointing to a "hypothetical" group you claim are intelligent and vegan does not negate the fact that vegan diets are bad for us.
A compounding factor in this debate is the role of ideological groups such as the 7th day adventists who exert a massively diproportionate influence over the perception and so called evidence around this whole field of nutrition both a national and global level through their role in educational outreach and various regulatory boards that set nutritional guidelines. Purely because of that group's views on what they call the garden of eden diet which essentially excludes all animal products because they believe them be too exciting and lead to masturbation.

Any truly intelligent and rational induividual in possession of all the facts and untainted by morally driven ideology would be extremely unlikely to choose veganism.

[Anonymous No.16140391]

Lack of b12 causes nerve damage. Nerve means brain.
My cousing went vegan shortly before full on paranoid schizophrenia if you want anecdotes.

[Anonymous No.16140392]

>>16138717
What is the logical connection between your two statements? Define your terms for me?

[Anonymous No.16140395]

>>16140241
>Any truly intelligent and rational induividual in possession of all the facts and untainted by morally driven ideology would be extremely unlikely to choose veganism.
And all Scotsmen eat their porridge without sugar.

[Anonymous No.16141311]

>>16139719
This, eating an unhealthy diet as a means of virtue signalling is akin to cutting off your dick in order to gain social status

[Anonymous No.16141338]

>>16140395
No I don't think this has anything to do with any scotsmen.

[Anonymous No.16141350]

>>16116842
You are short on COVID boosters, get two in each arm right now!

[Anonymous No.16141450]

>>16116872
^^^
This is what a 90 IQ looks like.

[Anonymous No.16142554]

>>16141338
Not with true Scotsmen at any rate

[Anonymous No.16142555]

>>16141450
Don't sign your posts

[Anonymous No.16142775]

>>16142555
>Don't sign your posts

[Anonymous No.16144377]

>>16141311
vegans do that too