/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.16094554]

Why is no one impressed by this?

[Anonymous No.16094557]

>>16094554
just have a lot going on
also i have seen wire in brain gizmos before

[Anonymous No.16094581]

>>16094554
Because right now this technology is only useful for people paralyzed from the neck down. If you can use your hands then a mouse and keyboard are far greater tools than this technology at the present state.

When it gets good enough to be a compelling option for normal people, then normal people will start to get excited.

[Anonymous No.16094594]

>>16094581
why would you do it if you're not having any issues? if it ain't broke, don't fix it.
it's not like that is going to make you competitive with AI.

[Anonymous No.16094595]

Excited? I'm terrified

[Anonymous No.16094599]

Because neural implant technology is just going to be used to the theoretical maximum possible agony on goyim, because they believe satan is the god of this world and they think it would be funny

[Anonymous No.16094601]

>>16094594
That's my point. This isn't compelling technology for 99.999% of people, that's why nobody is excited about it.

[Anonymous No.16094672]

>>16094554
The monkey playing pong was impressive. This is kind of more of the same thing. It's not not impressive, it's just that I think it was expected to work from prior demonstrations. Now he's said they're working on allowing people born blind to see. That will be impressive

[Cult of Passion No.16094684]

>>16094581
Mmm, I like alien-computer rape too.

We understand.

[Anonymous No.16094695]

>>16094554
I am. Matter of fact I am already planning my future existence as cosmic nano-bot swarm

[Cult of Passion No.16094696]

>>16094684
What a classic. And a national hero.

[Anonymous No.16094701]

>>16094695
you won't be a computer, you'll still be a person but then there's gonna be a copy of you in a computer

[Anonymous No.16094722]

>>16094701
and if I gradually replace parts of my nervous system every year at what year will there be a copy of me in a computer while I myself am not a puter?

[Anonymous No.16094727]

>>16094554
Been doable for years, is he really reactivating this old research in hope he can brainchip people with a barcode?

Or there's a message here

[Anonymous No.16094811]

>I will run in a computer
anyone unironically saying it is a popsci retard who doesn't understand shit about shit, but heard others use it so they'll also parrot it.

[Anonymous No.16094816]

>>16094554
cause it's shit.
we have been able to do the same or more without drilling a hole in your skull.

[Anonymous No.16094818]

>>16094816
but now we can do it with drilling a hole in your skull.

[Anonymous No.16094821]

>>16094818
can they do it without an actual fucking usb-c connector on the back of the head? like via wifi/wireless charging or whatever.

[Anonymous No.16094822]

>>16094818
That was also possible before, this is a technological regression

[Anonymous No.16094829]

yuri's revenge will be REAL

[Anonymous No.16094832]

>That was also possible before, this is a technological regression
then how come we haven't been using it as a treatment for paraplegia all these years? I mean if it's technological regression ...

[Anonymous No.16094833]

>>16094832
>>16094822

[Anonymous No.16094838]

input
not output

[Anonymous No.16094888]

>>16094554
ill be impressed when People start receiving data from it.

[Anonymous No.16094892]

>>16094554
What do you mean no one? The guy was given telepathic ability. Blindness is next.

[Anonymous No.16094906]

>>16094722
Fuck of Theseus you piece of shit

[Anonymous No.16095129]

>>16094554
Because right now what it's done isn't especially immediately impressive. Things like this have existed for a while, they were just big and bulky. So far it's basically just miniaturized existing technology. While Neuralink is already doing significant things, it's not doing things that will really get eyes on it. Taking certain extremely niche technologies that almost no one ever interacted with and making them smaller, more standardized, and not bespoke isn't very exciting to most people.
When Neuralink starts restoring senses and limb movement that's when it'll really get people talking about it.

[Anonymous No.16095346]

>>16094816
Non invasive BCI have a piss poor signal to noise ratio, invasive BCI don't have the skull in the way blocking signal, neuralink has 1500 channels, previous BCI have around 84

[Anonymous No.16095348]

>>16094821
Neuralink is wireless

[Anonymous No.16095379]

>>16095348
does it have internal battery?

[Anonymous No.16095396]

>>16094906
imagine being this triggered at the perspective of being able to live forever, or even for just longer than we do on average.

[Anonymous No.16095402]

>>16094554
I was a little impressed but correcting retards injecting themselves into discussions on it kinda sabotaged the whole experience.

[Anonymous No.16095408]

>>16094554
because derangement syndrome retards get triggered by it. they are expecting musk to do something clearly bad any day now, but they only see him winning. then they proceed to project that frustration on anons willing to discuss the tech.

[Anonymous No.16095450]

>>16095379
Yes, it charges wirelessly

[sage No.16096855]

>>16094672
this

We've known about this for a while with chimps, now humans is not a big jump

[Anonymous No.16097604]

>>16095402
>>16095408
>>16094892
you niggers are probable impressed by optimus too. anyone worth a salt knows optimus is a fucking joke vaporware by Musk to pump TSLA.

[Anonymous No.16097731]

>>16094554
Because they’re scared

[Anonymous No.16097741]

>>16094554
>Why is no one impressed by this?
Elon Musk is a grifter. He has never invented anything, except ways of promoting himself, and ways to extract more money from his rubes.

Neurolink is made up of actual scientists that were already working on this, but the bulk of the information to do this was already done by others, and was funded by the government.

Space X is a government contractor, and is made up of actual engineers who had already been working on reusable airframes. His clients are all either states, meaning your tax money, or they are other monopolists. He even has gotten in on the orbital monopoly himself with Starlink, never being one to pass up an opportunity to form a dependence he can exploit.

Tesla was an established company that Elon bought, then, by exploiting labor, government regulations, and making it so you never actually own your car, made a company that gets most of its money off selling carbon credits, and is in the process of creating even more network effect systems so that he can make more monopolies and monopsonies so that he can extort even more.

He built his career stealing what others have made in order to make monopolies that create dependence that he then extorts.

[Anonymous No.16097806]

>>16097731
Scared of wire in brain? I would

[Anonymous No.16097929]

>>16097741
So you were fired from Twitter? Good.

[Anonymous No.16097963]

it's an incremental improvement over +30 years old technology.
It simply allows cripples to move a cursor on a screen with their brain, it does nothing of what elon claims it does.

btw the cripple's brain and eye coordination does 99% of the work. the chip just reads brain signals coming from the motor cortex, it doesn't read his thoughts. the person has to learn to associate certain brain activity with desired action. it's like learning how to walk

[Anonymous No.16097984]

Elon is the master of inventing stuff that already exists. Also, he is quite economic on the exact details of his success, and so far, it is nothing that hasn't been shown before.

[Anonymous No.16098057]

>>16094554
The issue is the humans that control society are very evil and would use this technology to actually enslave people to their agenda for good. No human will ever agree to a brain implant unless you torture them horrificly or they are too retarded to understand the implications.

[Anonymous No.16098083]

i don't want a goddamn implant
but i do want a headband that lets me control keyboard and mouse functions with my mind

[Anonymous No.16098128]

>>16094684
>>16094696
Kys faggot

[Anonymous No.16098140]

>>16098057
They already do control people and have enslaved their cognitive infrastructure entirely. The reason for negative articles and thoughts against this comes from media portrayal of Musk. Why particularly Musk? Because Musk took away one of their propaganda tools.

[Anonymous No.16098141]

>>16098128
-farts on you-
-poops on your face-

[Anonymous No.16098144]

> Why is no one impressed by this?
Why am I not impressed that an autistic man child took a break from shilling a dog themed cryptocurrency to duct tape a microchip to someone's brain

[Anonymous No.16098161]

>>16098140
I never implied Musk wants to enslave people.

[Anonymous No.16098224]

>>16094554
It's a red herring. Misdirect. Neuralink is 1950's tech. By the 1970's they no longer surgical implants. Everyone is so far behind on the real state of science that they engage with this garbage they float in the public sphere for all the typical reasons.

See Jose Delgado, WR Adey, MKULTRA Subproject 119, Project Pandora, Synthetic telepathy / sympathetic magic / entrainment / EEG autocorrelation / patterned ELF / heterodyning tech. Again, literally, 1970's tech they're now cluing you in on it. They don't need implants. They haven't needed them for decades. And even if they did they can just grow them in you.

Elon Musk is basically a puiblic face made to laugh at you. His "Boring Company" is laughing at you for focusing on him rather than the company he keeps, who unlike him, is not almost unnaturally boring. Elon? He's a boring guy. Also tunneling boring tech is old too btw.

It's impossible to get ahead of this stuff. I lay it out over and over and over and they just won't get it. It's fuckin' weird. But there ya go. They're making you afraid they're going to put chips in you when they haven't needed that for remote sensing or brain activity entrainment for a long time. The type of biofeedback they might want otherwise, they could just inject or have you inhale shit that would go through RF guided self assembly in your body. Genetically modified microorganisms, shewanella, yeasts, whatever. Shits old. Old old old. And when they do it they're not going to ask for your opinion, either. Cause they already did it.

[Anonymous No.16098295]

>>16095379
No it powers itself through utilizing the inherent electrical properties of the aether.

[Anonymous No.16098311]

>>16097741
>Neurolink
Neuralink
>funded by the government
Source?
>engineers who had already been working on reusable airframes
Nice, what does the mechanical structure of airplanes have to do with propulsively landing rockets though?
>His clients are all either states, meaning your tax money, or they are other monopolist
No, SpaceX has a number of private contracts, you can easily google this.
>Tesla was an established company that Elon bought
No they weren't, they didn't even have a prototype for their first production vehicle before Elon bought the company.
>made a company that gets most of its money off selling carbon credits
Tesla made ~96 Billion in total revenue as of 2023. 1.76 billion of that total was in regulatory credits, meaning about %2 of their total revenue was generated through regulatory credits. You can easily check this yourself.
>He built his career stealing what others have made in order to make monopolies that create dependence that he then extort
None of Musk's businesses are monopolies in any definitional sense. Every industry he has a foot in has a number of competing firms.

QED: You are retarded.

[Anonymous No.16098327]

>>16098311
Even if correct in the most literal sense, you have an extremely clamped mindset on this.

[Anonymous No.16098366]

>>16094554
1) its not new
2) it has no market outlook, there are allot of Musk fanboys outthere but i doubt many will line up to get their dome cracked open to receive their master's shitpost right into their brains

[Anonymous No.16098551]

>>16098327
The anon made a series of points to put forward the idea that Musk is a fraud, I showrd him why his points were false. If you want to suggest he was still in essence right even if wrong on the details then you can put forward your own case.

[Anonymous No.16098556]

>>16098551
My case has been made here. >>16098224
You are asserting "free agents" and true separation where there is none. The world behaves more like an organism, or a simple ecology at its most atomized, not a bunch of particles moving around in a field. It takes a lot of extreme destruction and a very deliberate effort to degrade it into behaving otherwise. You would have to try to return the world to a bose-einstein condensate to get it to behave in the divided manner you're asserting. IT simply doesn't do that, it's not the way the human concept and the universe is designed.

This is not tangential trivia, nor is it functionally irrelevant. It is absolutely fundamental.

[Anonymous No.16099126]

>>16098556
Take your meds anon. Delusions of grandeur are common among schizaffectives, you arent clued into the fabric of reality, you're just spouting wordsalad nonsense.

[Anonymous No.16099131]

>>16098327
>you must open your mind to my bullshit or else you're le bad

[Anonymous No.16099248]

>>16096855
chimps are disposable
humans imply near 100% success rate

[Anonymous No.16099254]

>>16099248
>Chimps are disposable.

Disgusting life pervert.

[Anonymous No.16099257]

It's a simulator hoax. No, the implants don't work. The simulation adds that 'working' part into everyone's experience of that locale. The blind people will 'pretend' it works.

Ffs when are you sheeple going to wake up

[Anonymous No.16099258]

-keeps farting-
-grabs a hold of your head and pulls it down-
-finishing moves you-

[Anonymous No.16099262]

>>16099126
Projection. You're the covert form of what you just accused me of, and you're replying out of envy.

[Anonymous No.16099267]

>>16094554
Retards expected full immersion vr and downloading knoledge. It was always to allow cripples to move a mouse cursor.

[Anonymous No.16099295]

Musk man bad

[Anonymous No.16099312]

>>16094554
His credibility was shot by hyperloop and twitter

[Anonymous No.16099324]

>>16099312
It's all made up bro.
>muh 44 BILLIONSZZZZZZZZ
Fucking kek.

[Anonymous No.16099404]

>>16094554
Why would I believe it works when musk companies lied about their results in the past? They already faked videos and lied about what they could do for solar roofs and full self driving. Why would I suddenly believe they are being honest now?
Other neurotech companies have used invasive BCIs already anyways. This jist gets more attention because of gullible musk fanboys.

[Anonymous No.16099533]

How long does it last? I have a kid with spina bifida who needs shunts in his head, and they had to he replaced 6 times and he is only just now three years old.

[Anonymous No.16099592]

>>16094554
I'm excited to see this technology be widely adopted because I want to see what happens when they get blasted by an EMP.

[Anonymous No.16099608]

>>16099592
whatever function the chip does, disappears.
can these people get close to any MRI machine after implant?

[Anonymous No.16099684]

>>16099608
I'm completely locked out from being able to contact the simulation. I can at most observe.

[Anonymous No.16099688]

>>16099592
There's no getting a go, every time I try to do something mental, I'm knocked off and prevented from the peak of any move. My thoughts are restricted. I'm very retarded in that all the intelligence I gained now stands as nothing but instinct because I can't contact the right parts to actually feel intelligence.

[Anonymous No.16099690]

>>16099608
If I look at the hole on the pyramid, the grandest effect I can achieve is seeing the internal as an area of relative worth to the abstracting nature of the pyramid and it's counter abstraction.

[Anonymous No.16099694]

>>16099688
A good resolution would be find who's observing the hole in all possible abstract circumstances plus machine grade eyes with rods in them.

[Anonymous No.16099706]

>>16099684
why do you want to contact the simulation?

[Anonymous No.16099715]

>>16099694
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jatmXfImeq8
7:11

[Anonymous No.16099716]

>>16099715
26:44 rather. I was looking at time remaining.

[Anonymous No.16099750]

>>16094554
old hat
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9NOncx2jU0Q