/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.16080644]

Why is this happening? Does science have any idea or are they too low IQ to figure it out?
>in 1971 Richard Nixon declared "the war on cancer"
>53 years later, after spending trillions of dollars on research, cancer is worse than it ever has been before
Why did it end up this way?
The scientists all said they could figure cancer out and find a cure for it

[Anonymous No.16080667]

>>16080644
Because medicine and pharmacology are gigantic, for-profit industries, with complex hierarchies and incentive structures, and those incentives are not curing disease, they're causing disease, developing products that treat the symptoms of disease, making money, and winning fancy prizes.

>see cancer
>see aids
>see obesity
>see covid

[Anonymous No.16080722]

>>16080644
I noticed a lot of very poor countries are yellow, could that just be because they don't report it as often? A child with cancer is basically dead in many of those countries anyway.

[Anonymous No.16080726]

>>16080722
Maybe they don't live long enough to develop cancer?

[Anonymous No.16080801]

>>16080644
It is basically guaranteed to be environmental toxins and diet. Nothing else is a serious candidate. It has been going on for decades and it happens much more in more polluted countries with bad diets.

[Anonymous No.16080805]

>>16080722
Not as much exposure to industrial chemicals.

[Anonymous No.16080835]

>>16080644
>Why is this happening
Air pollution, inedible food, constantly touching plastics/chemically treated fabric all day

[Anonymous No.16080859]

[Anonymous No.16080879]

>>16080644
>>16080801
>>16080805
>>16080835
Leadanon here. I predicted this.

[Anonymous No.16081267]

>>16080644
>Does science have any idea or are they too low IQ to figure it out?
Of course they figured out, they're just not allowed to say it.

>>16080801
>sudden unheard before spikes in young cancers?
>"It is BASICALLY GUARANTEED to be stuff that's been going on unchanged for several decades!!"
>"NOTHING ELSE is a serious candidate!!"
>"Especially not the one thing that happened right at the start of this phenomenon!!"
Anon, I get that "correlation is not always causation", but that doesn't automatically mean that "absence of correlation is always causation"

[Anonymous No.16081278]

>>16080644

[Anonymous No.16081280]

[Anonymous No.16081282]

>>16080644
Maybe it's because people with shitty genes haven't died as infants or in child birth for a very long time, and all the shit keeps compounding generation after generation, and soon everyone is cancerous.

[Anonymous No.16081386]

>>16080644
French guyana is an interesting outlier. Since its part of france, I'd expect them to import a lot more goyslop than their neighbours.
Also guatemala has a very low rate and its a very poor country. Most of them can't afford many imports and eat what they grow locally.

[Anonymous No.16081823]

>>16081280
And how many spiders do I consume per week?

[Anonymous No.16081843]

>>16080722
Natural selection. The weak can't survive without wasting resources on them, so in poor countries they are culled enhancing the genetic fitness of those countries.

[Anonymous No.16081844]

>>16081823
about tree fiddy

[Anonymous No.16082284]

>>16081267
It didn’t happen at the start of this trend, that’s why it’s not the vaccine. Cancer rates increasing has been going on for decades. It’s worst in westernised countries which have bad diets and the worst environmental poisoning from hormones and other stuff, and it’s not so bad in places like Japan with high vaccination rates but much better diets. China also banned the Pfizer vaccine at least initially but still had cancer rates increasing for decades. That’s why it’s guaranteed to be environmental toxins and diet.

[Anonymous No.16083532]

>>16082284

[Anonymous No.16084454]

>>16081386
>its part of france
its mainly a mining/slave labor colony