Why is it that IQfags find math intimidating?

[Anonymous No.16071746]

[Anonymous No.16071751]

>>16071746
Math can be a pretty intimidating field regardless of whether you are concerned about IQ.

I literally do math at a graduate level and find learning new math intimidating at times.

[Anonymous No.16071752]

>>16071746
You'd be scared as to how many people are genuinely scared of math. And for good reason : solving math problems require you to do work, in a physical sense.

[Anonymous No.16071767]

>>16071746
>n=1
IQ and math failure.

[Anonymous No.16071778]

>>16071746
Because IQ fags have nothing other than muh IQ to be proud of. They have no real intelligence, just a skill learned by doing hundreds of IQ tests.
>Note: I don't mean to say IQ isn't real, just that there's a particular person on the internet that will do dozens of IQ tests just to get a larger number.

[Anonymous No.16071871]

>>16071778
this

[Anonymous No.16071879]

I'm a mathematician and an IQ supremacist. I consider low IQ plebs to be of lesser value.

[Anonymous No.16071988]

>>16071746
perfectionism

[Anonymous No.16073205]

>>16071746
fuck off

[Anonymous No.16073445]

>>16071746
You actually have to sit there and do meticulous work like some loser.

[Anonymous No.16073480]

>>16071746
Math skills can be practiced which means it is irrelevant to g-factor.

[Anonymous No.16073495]

I find IQ test intimidating.

[Anonymous No.16073511]

>>16073495
what a retard. He thinks you can rotate an object 2π and then it transforms into a new object.

[Anonymous No.16073531]

>>16073495
>feel like it's 4 because vibe
>read the answer
>don't understand a goddamn word he's saying
I still think it's 4.

[Anonymous No.16073542]

>>16073495
Let's analyze the given series:

#^/, 17
=#^, 18
%#%, 84
#%/, ?

From the provided examples, it seems that each item in the series consists of a sequence of symbols followed by a number. Let's break down the transformations:

From #^/ to =#^: Each symbol is shifted to the right by one position in the ASCII table.
From =#^ to %#%: Each symbol is reversed.
From %#% to #%/: Each symbol is shifted to the left by one position in the ASCII table.

Now, let's apply these transformations to find the missing number:

Starting with %#%:

Shifting each symbol to the left by one position in the ASCII table: "%#$".
So, the sequence becomes "%#$", with the number yet to be determined.

To find the missing number, let's look at the transformations between consecutive numbers:

From 17 to 18: +1
From 18 to 84: *4

Applying the same pattern to find the next number:

*4 to "%#$": 84 * 4 = 336

So, the missing number represented by the question mark (?) is 336.

Thus, the series is as follows:
#^/, 17; =#^, 18; %#%, 84; #%/, 336

[Anonymous No.16073550]

>>16073495
>Ultra-high IQ hobbyists
What in the hell does that even mean?

[Anonymous No.16073558]

>>16073550
People whose hobby is repeatedly doing IQ test problems until they can get ultra high scores.

[Anonymous No.16073561]

>>16073531
It's not as difficult as it sounds. You need to realize that the shape doesn't start as complete. A new piece gets added at every step and then they get rotated together.

[Anonymous No.16073563]

>>16073558
That sounds like a miserable existence.

[Anonymous No.16073571]

>>16073561
Or perhaps this is easier to visualize. I've colored each piece with different colors. In first panel, there is only the semicircle. In the second panel, the rotated semicircle is facing towards the viewer and a triangle is added to the shape. In the third panel, semicircle rotates to become invisible, triangle is facing the viewer and a half-pentagon is added.

[Anonymous No.16073574]

>>16073571
*semicircle rotates to become invisible in the 4th panel, not 3rd, my bad

[Anonymous No.16073704]

>>16073511
Can't tell whether retard with poor reading comprehension or radian version of turn-360-degrees bait.

[Anonymous No.16073705]

>>16073495
Anti-IQ seethers think there's no association between people who can solve problems like that and people who can excel in math.

[Anonymous No.16073708]

>>16071767
>IQ and math failure.
This. It could even be n=0, given how much motive OP clearly has in making screenshots to shit on IQ obsessives. No way of knowing whether he wrote that entire exchange himself and posted it.

[Anonymous No.16073726]

>>16073480
>Math skills can be practiced which means it is irrelevant to g-factor.
midwits get mad that iq tests are accessible to everyone and can quickly determine raw intellectual ability. they'd prefer to be respected for their accumulation of knowledge. even a 120-iq midwit can go through a math curriculum and attain a high level of math erudition. he just won't be a perelman.

[Anonymous No.16073977]

>>16073705
Where is the association

[Anonymous No.16074078]

>>16073571
Thanks Anon that's very easy to understand now. I thought it was a single shape from the start and just rotating.

[Anonymous No.16074102]

>>16073571
pretty easy, i guess im 140iq

[Anonymous No.16074502]

>>16073563
No worse than sudoku puzzles or any other similar hobbies.

[Anonymous No.16074531]

>>16073571
Amazing. Thanks for explaining it in a way that can actually be understood

[Anonymous No.16076974]

no thanks I'm not crazy about solving for X, what I really like are questions like "is the opposite of a black cat a white dog"

[Anonymous No.16076983]

>>16076974
You have to be underage, no way an adult is that stupid

[Anonymous No.16076995]

>>16073726
It's so cringe to hear non-math folk babble over what they believe math research is like.

[Anonymous No.16077502]

>>16071746
It's probably the same as how lots of people find crossword puzzles and sudokus fun but are not one bit interested in maths.

[Anonymous No.16077509]

>>16073726
>iq tests are accessible to everyone and can quickly determine raw intellectual ability
>iq test... can quickly determine raw intellectual ability
Friend, this guy >>16073495 thinks that if you go through a 2pi rotation you end up in a different location to where you start. That's not even math, that's just intuitive that if you move around a circle once is the same as not moving at all.

[Anonymous No.16078965]

>>16073542
I thought it was just the number of lines before a sharp turn. For example # is 4 and = ^ are 2 while % is 3. Then you would only need to identify the pattern that leads to each actual number result

[Anonymous No.16078972]

it's just practice

[Anonymous No.16079077]

>>16073571
Thank you I finally understand it. It’s a 3d object composed of 4 separate objects which is being rotated vertically starting with one object and a new object being added with each quarter rotation (bottom->front->top->rear). This one was impossible for me because I was always going to assume there had to be a correlation between all shapes and making it look like a 2D drawing made me not even consider the possibility of it being a 3D problem.

[Anonymous No.16079078]

>>16078965
I think what anon is trying to show is that it's such a vaguely defined sequence that any number of patterns could fit it.

[Anonymous No.16079532]

>>16071746
Math builds on itself with a few exceptions like maybe combinatorics which is mostly more a collection of various tools. The average person can't just spend a year catching up to speed on advanced math unless they're really gifted. Even when you get to the graduate level I've already met people who can get through the classes but just can't cut it at research. By the time you get here it's mostly just perseverance and some base level IQ stat but even producing research is a skill a lot of people don't have and they just get stuck learning new math without contributing or somehow just become very lazy outside of somebody telling them what to do and study etc.

[Anonymous No.16079607]

>>16071746
LMAO, that guy has low conscientiousness and therefore his IQ is irrelevant. If he didn't inherited wealth he is fucked, is simple as that.

[Anonymous No.16079611]

>>16071746 (OP)
LMAO, that guy has low conscientiousness and therefore his IQ is irrelevant. If he didn't inherit wealth he is fucked, is simple as that.