/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.16058852]

Are there any actual scientists or mathematicians on this board?

[Anonymous No.16058854]

>>16058852

[Anonymous No.16058855]

>>16058852
Are you not? Wtf are you doing here with us

[Anonymous No.16058868]

>>16058852
I am a 4th year undergrad in physics

[Anonymous No.16058869]

>>16058852
I have an undergrad in physics, getting one in chemistry so I can pursue a masters in physchem because I like particle physics well enough and the idea of attosecond lasers letting us just track that shit sounds amazing

[Anonymous No.16058870]

No

[Anonymous No.16058886]

>>16058852
most recently, i worked as a lowly lab tech
i'm hoping to get a job as a distillation chemist soon

[Anonymous No.16058909]

>>16058869
Do you have any plans to work in the industry?

[Anonymous No.16058913]

>>16058909
You shouldn't fuck with it. It's a disgusting, cess pit of a simulation. Let it come to its own end to maximize punishment for whoever is guilty. In the mean time I'll make and have made the maximum profit from it's good parts and my sacrificial evil.

[El Arcón No.16058919]

[Anonymous No.16058920]

>>16058852
nigga I've been doing research in ML for over 5 years and have published 10 papers and have over 200+ citations.

[El Arcón No.16058923]

>>16058919
Fractional Distance: The Topology of the Real Number Line with Applications to the Riemann Hypothesis
>https://vixra.org/abs/2111.0072
>http://gg762.net/d0cs/papers/Fractional_Distance_v8-20230808.pdf
Recent analysis has uncovered a broad swath of rarely considered real numbers called real numbers in the neighborhood of infinity. Here we extend the catalog of the rudimentary analytical properties of all real numbers by defining a set of fractional distance functions on the real number line and studying their behavior. The main results of are (1) to prove with modest axioms that some real numbers are greater than any natural number, (2) to develop a technique for taking a limit at infinity via the ordinary Cauchy definition reliant on the classical epsilon-delta formalism, and (3) to demonstrate an infinite number of non-trivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function in the neighborhood of infinity. We define numbers in the neighborhood of infinity as Cartesian products of Cauchy equivalence classes of rationals. We axiomatize the arithmetic of such numbers, prove all the operations are well-defined, and then make comparisons to the similar axioms of a complete ordered field. After developing the many underlying foundations, we present a basis for a topology.

[El Arcón No.16058924]

Sixty-Six Theses: Next Steps and the Way Forward in the Modified Cosmological Model
>https://vixra.org/abs/2206.0152
>http://gg762.net/d0cs/papers/Sixty-Six_Theses__v4-20230726.pdf
The purpose is to review and lay out a plan for future inquiry pertaining to the modified cosmological model (MCM) and its overarching research program. The material is modularized as a catalog of open questions that seem likely to support productive research work. The main focus is quantum theory, but the material spans a breadth of physics and mathematics. Cosmology is heavily weighted, and some Millennium Prize problems are included. A comprehensive introduction contains a survey of falsifiable MCM predictions and associated experimental results. Listed problems include original ideas deserving further study as well as investigations of others' work when it may be germane. A longstanding and important conceptual hurdle in the approach to MCM quantum gravity is resolved with a framework for quantum cosmology time arrow eigenstates. A new elliptic curve application is presented. With several exceptions, the presentation is high-level and qualitative. Formal analyses are mostly relegated to the future work which is the topic of this book. Sufficient technical context is given that third parties might independently undertake the suggested work units.

[Anonymous No.16058927]

>>16058920
good, it's important for machines to have access to good education

[El Arcón No.16058929]

[Anonymous No.16058942]

thank god, it's easy to filter

[Anonymous No.16058974]

>>16058852
I'm a molecular biologist, my field of research is the epigenetic control of the ageing process.
That being said i have not visited /sci/ in almost a year. This place was always a shitshow, but the influx of retardation during the rona drove away most if not all actual scientists.
I figured i'd check if things are back to a normal level of retardation, or if it's still elevated, and i'm disapointed but not surprised to see it's still mostly 5g vaccine autism shit.

[Anonymous No.16059015]

I'm a particle physicist but someone insisted that I wasn't because I didn't understand them when they tried to talk about my subject
So I guess nobody is a scientist here

[Anonymous No.16059036]

>>16058974
If you believe that covid 19 wasn't a conspiracy, then you were stupid, and n acetly cysteine does stop the spike protein from attaching itself to your ace2 receptors. Anybody who took NAC prior to the vaccine and afterwards did not undergo much damage to their organs.

[Anonymous No.16059040]

What board for linguistics

[Anonymous No.16059043]

>>16058854
100%

[Anonymous No.16059404]

>>16058974
How much do you get paid?

[Anonymous No.16059701]

>>16059040
/lit/ but linguistics will inevitably attract schizos and pseuds

[Anonymous No.16059717]

>>16059043
it's 50%, you either get it right or you don't dumbass

[bodhi No.16059721]

>>16058974
I really missed you when you were gone and am sad to see you leave again. bye

[Anonymous No.16059726]

Who would trouble you? And soon after well be on top of the world.

[Anonymous No.16059740]

>>16058852
No, I lost lost on the way to /b/

[Anonymous No.16059741]

>>16059740
*Got lost

[Anonymous No.16059744]

Let's say I don't break free enough to do business today, on the wings of you, then I will process carefully whether I'll buy sanctity. Therefore, the corp should be up and running later.

[Anonymous No.16059760]

>>16058869
Ah, pursuing a degree in unemployment, noble.

[Anonymous No.16059761]

>>16058854
This question is retarded and self referential. It assumes there is a correct solution. The question, as a logical statement evaluates to an indeterminate value. It's the equivalent of saying, this statement is false. It doesn't evaluate to anything but itself.

[Anonymous No.16059778]

>>16058886
cope, seether, distillate

[Anonymous No.16059780]

>>16059036
don't act like you know anything about those receptors, anon. I'd be surprised if you even know what a receptor actually is

[Anonymous No.16059781]

>>16059015
Same. Lot of legitimate schizos on this board.

[Anonymous No.16059783]

>>16058852
I'm an EE who does actual research within statistical signal processing/detection. This place is both a fun place to shitpost, and terminally retarded.

The somewhat recent influx of hyper-determinists and finitists (if I had to guess, as a result of comp sci becoming a much more pursued field of study) makes me want to tear my hair out sometimes, but that's life.

[Anonymous No.16059785]

>>16059036
>muh NAC
Let me guess, you also snort deferoxamine and take a bunch of contraindicated "nootropics"?

[Anonymous No.16059791]

>>16059721
>look up the namefag in the archives
>10k+ posts in the past 10 months
kek

[Anonymous No.16059797]

>>16059036
Or you just take Carnosic Acid like any other sane person would.

[Anonymous No.16059803]

>>16058852
Nah, I'm a meteorologist

[Anonymous No.16059806]

>>16059036
>schizo sees anon mention covid
>goes on an off-topic tangent over some /pol/ drug
the joke writes itself

[Anonymous No.16059839]

>>16059783
Give me an intuitive understanding for why we need step up transformers on power lines (I^2R) instead of stepdown transformers (V^2/R)

[Anonymous No.16059848]

I actually met someone from /mg/ who is trying to do the Andrew Wiles thing with an interesting algebraic number theory proof.

[Anonymous No.16060235]

>>16058974
use 4chan-x with keyword filters

[Anonymous No.16060240]

>>16058852
Studying physics with no goal in my mind (or rather too much of them at the same time)

[Anonymous No.16060274]

>>16058852
I'm a fourth year math double major whose doing physics research, dunno if it counts at the undergrad level though
>>16060235
Readchan is a pretty nice app on mobile too, a few filters turn this site from an unimaginable shithole into a decent place

[Anonymous No.16060297]

>>16059404
For the basic research, i get payed pretty much fuck all, about double minimum wage. I still do it though, because i love it.
But when i was doing my BSc, i had a PI who has a spinoff biotech company, and he hired me to do industry research on the side. That pays well, and the two together suit me fine. Enough to give a good life to my wife and kid (first one will be born in 3 months).
>>16059721
I'll look back every once in a while, i can't help but rant about my research. I need some place to bump my retardation.
>>16060235
Ah, i can't be bothered. 4chan is fun, but it's not that important to me. Not enough to make an effort.

[Anonymous No.16060317]

>>16060297
paid not payed unless you're talking about rope on a boat

[Anonymous No.16060346]

>>16060317
Fair enough, english is not my first or even my second language. Thanks for the correction though.
Wait, what is the meaning of payed then?

[Anonymous No.16060711]

>>16059839
I don't work on power transformation (sorry). I could probably comb through my power systems textbook from undergrad, but I really don't do anything involving that stuff.

My section of EE is more focused on things like radar/sonar/lidar signal processing (localizing and tracking objects from noisy measurements), and signal/anomaly detection.

[Anonymous No.16060815]

>>16058852
I'm more of a metaphysician myself

An appreciator of natural philosophy, if you will

[Anonymous No.16060950]

>>16058852
Yes, if you want people pretending to be scientists or mathematicians, you can visit Reddit

[Anonymous No.16060956]

>>16059761
So you're saying there's a 0% chance that you could choose "the" correct solution?

[Anonymous No.16060964]

>>16060346
Payed is an old maritime word that has to do with waterproofing or letting the slack out of a rope/line on a boat.

In the context of nautical tomfoolery, to pay something is to coat it in tar/pitch/etc. "Jim needs to go pay the lines so they don't rot."

This is probably not what you mean, so I'd avoid "payed" unless you take up a new lease on life as a merchant marine.

[Anonymous No.16060972]

>>16060956
That would imply there was an incorrect solution. The question is meaningless and has no solution, correct or incorrect.

[Anonymous No.16060980]

>>16060972
No it wouldn't. Just because there isn't a black unicorn doesn't mean there's a non-black unicorn

[Anonymous No.16060999]

>>16060980
That's not even remotely similar. Existence of black unicorns is not self referential. There is either evidence they are there or no evidence at all. They do not belong to the same class of meaningless questions that refer to themselves.

Is this question false? Can you answer that with yes or no? Does it require evidence?

[bodhi No.16061003]

>>16060815
Like a true patrician ole chap

[Anonymous No.16061004]

>>16060999
What question?

[Anonymous No.16061009]

>>16061004
Lmao, continue playing video games zoomie, you don't have the aptitude to engage in this kind of debate.

[Anonymous No.16061012]

>>16061012
wrong

[Anonymous No.16061014]

>>16061012
My dude, did you just quote your own post number?

[Anonymous No.16061015]

>>16061014
No

[Anonymous No.16061019]

>>16061019
this guy knows what's up

[Anonymous No.16061037]

>>16061019
narciskills

[Anonymous No.16061155]

>>16060964
>unless you take up a new lease on life as a merchant marine
The temptation is always there anon... The day befeore i got accepted to uni i got accepted to be a dockworker in southern france. I almost went, then uni happened.

[Anonymous No.16061913]

>>16058974
Get used to it. You're going to be a lolcow for a while

[Anonymous No.16061956]

>>16060956
What he's saying is that grammar of English language allows to ask nonsensical questions.
It's like that plane on conveyer belt problem - will a plane be able to take off?
No. The way the problem is stated would mean that speed of the landing gear wheels would explode to infinity - ergo the question is invalid - it's incorrectly stated problem.
If English language grammar rules included maths/physics it would mean that question is ungrammatical - as you shouldn't consider it at all because it's gibberish.

[Anonymous No.16063142]

>>16058852
loads, but most of them are too busy doing actual science/math to shitpost on /sci/ all day

not me, though, it's spring break so i'm shirking all my responsibilities and playing vidya for a week.

[Anonymous No.16063148]

OPGAY

[Anonymous No.16063587]

>>16059036
You're a faggot that give bigger faggots like him an argument.
>>16058974
I hope you're not referring to the time with the whole
>trust the science
shitshow. Anyone who can't tell by now that they've been sold out, lacks critical thinking in my book.

[Anonymous No.16063603]

>>16063148
holy shit

[Anonymous No.16063607]

>>16063148
The machine spirit knows.

[Anonymous No.16063613]

There are some seriously intelligent ppl on this board, but there's also a lot of genuine schizophrenia and people that think they're smart but aren't

[Anonymous No.16063635]

>>16063613
>people that think they're smart but aren't
that's me. also the part about seriously intelligent. that's me too.

[Anonymous No.16064334]

>>16063587
We don't use that word here.

[Anonymous No.16064376]

>>16058852
There was but they've all left. It's mostly just poltards(underage) nowadays. I wonder how many came because of the haruhi problem

[Anonymous No.16064377]

>>16058852
There was but they've all left. It's mostly just poltards(underage) nowadays. I wonder how many mathematicians came for awhile because of the haruhi problem

[Anonymous No.16064978]

>>16059040
>>16059701
>>16064864
Am I the only one that holds back on this besides on /sci/? I want the simpletons on the other boards to be able to understand me so I tend to not embellish my grammar.

[Anonymous No.16064980]

>>16059040
>>16059701
Am I the only one that holds back on this besides on /sci/? I want the simpletons on the other boards to be able to understand me so I tend not to embellish my grammar.

[Anonymous No.16065021]

>>16058852
We are all coders.

[Anonymous No.16065066]

>>16058852
I’m a plasma physicist. /sci/ actually convinced me to go back to college in the first place so, thanks for that I guess.

[Anonymous No.16065070]

It's expensive in four sectors.

[Anonymous No.16065072]

>>16065070
The reverse of this expanded quad, the skeletal, is the dimension you're looking for

[Anonymous No.16065075]

>>16065072
It should look like that demonic skeletal finishing move.

[Anonymous No.16065077]

>>16065075
To upgrade Helios to the max, think of a method that's conventional. Like: because the pyramid does this, this will produce all. Rather than a symbol or random guess. it is to do with a pyramid and a blurring blue sort of sheparded away from it.

[Anonymous No.16066044]

>>16058852
No one on /sci/ actually does science anon.

[Anonymous No.16066049]

>>16066044
what do you mean?
like, they don't have careers?
or do you think the people with careers aren't doing "real" science?
it could be either one of these answers or something completely different, such a wacky board

[Anonymous No.16066268]

>>16058974
how to not age ?

[Anonymous No.16066717]

>>16064334
It's all in love anon. I call everything faggot. There's no malicious charge in me calling you, nor anyone, a fag.

[Anonymous No.16066720]

>>16066717
nta but I'm getting strong homosexual vibes off your phrasing