/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.16046776]

It's just science, lads.

[Anonymous No.16046786]

>>16046776
who "sampled" and where? did he/him normalize and shit?

[Anonymous No.16046793]

Now say it with me in a Birmingham accent: "It's just science, lads."

[Anonymous No.16046795]

>>16046776
There are people who are upset about "woke" being used as a pejorative. Presumably, they sympathise with some of the issues which most people understand "woke" to be concerned with.
If they're sympathetic to "woke" causes, why do they get upset at people using "woke" as a pejorative?
If you believe "woke" ideals are worthy and commendable, then when someone calls you "woke", it should be a compliment, no?

[Anonymous No.16046805]

The people who have issue with the term "woke" being thrown around are the same people that call you "alt-right," "ultra-maga," "white supremacist," "transphobic," etc. if you take issue with children being chemically or surgically mutilated to appease their mental illness, or if you refused to be injected with the experimental mRNA gene therapy.

[Anonymous No.16046807]

>>16046795
>If they're sympathetic to "woke" causes, why do they get upset at people using "woke" as a pejorative?
Say that again real slowly, see if you get it.

[Anonymous No.16046815]

>>16046776
Posting twitter screenshots should not just be an automatic ban; A person should also go to your house and beat you senselessly with a bamboo stick before smashing your PC to pieces.

[Anonymous No.16046822]

>>16046815
If you can't beat them, join them

[Anonymous No.16046834]

>>16046815
>beat you senselessly
This means that the person beating me should do so whilst in a state of senselessness instead of beating me till I'm senseless, fyi

[Anonymous No.16046841]

>>16046815
Did you get youratest booster shot?

[Anonymous No.16046904]

>>16046841
Fat-fingered phoneposter

[Anonymous No.16046912]

>>16046904
But did you get your latest booster shot?

[Anonymous No.16046951]

They're mad because their labels keep getting associated with their actions, which taints them and turns them into negative terms. Woke and SJW were meant to be positive terms for leftists who engage in radical activism to bully society into meeting their demands. They wanted to gain external validation (the crack cocaine of the leftist's existence) from applying the terms to themselves. But that only works inside their bubbles for a short period. Once someone starts using the term outside of the bubble, the rest of society equates it with the negative attributes of those who wear it.
The irony here is that they've been busy trying to change the definition of words throughout society to match their goals and worldview but now are angry that their made up words keep going from their fantasy definitions to meanings that accurately reflect who they are. And no matter how much they try, they can't force society to accept their fantasy definitions instead of the ones based on observation and experience.
The last stage is to deny that they ever used the terms to describe themselves and claim it was their evil enemies (for which they do have their own made up labels) who coined the terms. Both SJW and Woke are tainted but they'll come up with something new and that will quickly get tainted too.
Life is hell when you live in a reality without up and down arrows on everything to create an artificial bubble "reality".

[Anonymous No.16046964]

The only problem with the word "woke" is that it implies that it's some kind of new development, instead of just the same degenerate communists subverting western society for the past hundred years.

[Anonymous No.16046970]

>>16046951
tl;dr schizo, no one cares
The words are only "tainted" in minds that are tainted

[Anonymous No.16046972]

>>16046795
That's like the entire history of the left.

>Introduce some shitty idea
>People start mocking it
>Claim the idea wasn't yours, and that mocking it is bigotry
>Reintroduce the idea under a different name

[Anonymous No.16046979]

>>16046795
>>16046951
>>16046972
You tremendous retards, how hard is it really?
The left uses "woke" to mean good things
Reactionaries hate good things, so it's a pejorative *to them*.
So that's how you know that everyone who uses "woke" as a pejorative hates good things.
That's the only development here. No one has become convinced that "woke" is actually bad by bad people hating it, or divested themselves from it. On the contrary, the campaign against "woke" has led to many people saying "okay if being for basic human rights is woke then consider me woke I guess"
Why do conservatives always come up with such elaborate armchair explanations that don't align with reality at any point?

[Anonymous No.16046989]

>>16046979
If conservatives were capable of accurately interpreting the nature of society or the laws governing it, they wouldn't be conservatives

[Anonymous No.16046992]

>>16046979
This, except you have it completely backwards.

[Anonymous No.16047009]

>>16046979
>hurrr durrr hurrr conservatives

Step out of your echo chamber, you stupid faggot. Rational liberals also detest woke ideology and doctrine, like allowing children to be chemically or surgically mutilated to appease their mental illnesses, because that's what your ideological mouthpieces tell you you're supposed to support.

[Anonymous No.16047018]

>>16047009
>rational liberals
lol
You mean fascists masquerading as liberals. You're one to talk about echo chambers.

[Anonymous No.16047019]

>>16046979
Didn't read. You're heavily vaxxed

[Anonymous No.16047020]

>>16047018
not even your precious shitskins like your gay race communism being inflicted on their children

[Anonymous No.16047028]

>>16046992
It doesn't even matter what your personal moral judgement on the matter is, the process works the same. But you are unable to empathise with people who hold a different view from you. You're unable to consider that someone considers good what you deem bad, so you come up with an elaborate narrative wherein people embrace bad things but are at the same time embarrassed that people who disagree with them tell them it's bad even though they disagree with them so why wouldn't they disagree here? You're fundamentally incapable of conceiving of the "other" as people with their own internal lives, likely because your own internal lives are so shallow.
>>16047020
>gay race communism
lmao what does that even mean
Same as "woke" prolly innit
Same as "Critical Race Theory" which is also meaningless out of your mouth.
This looks like that stat that found that a majority of people supported the "affordable care act" but opposed "Obamacare". Simple semantic manipulation, zero content.

[Anonymous No.16047070]

>>16047028
Everything you promote is indefensibly evil.

[Anonymous No.16047077]

>>16047070
What I promote:
>Freedom and justice
What you promote:
>Genocide and oppression
Maybe we should put this one before a jury but I'm pretty sure which one is indefensibly evil between us

[Anonymous No.16047078]

>>16047077
>freedom and justice is when I get to sterilize children

[Anonymous No.16047082]

>>16046776
>he/him
Tranny mentality

[Anonymous No.16047089]

>>16047018
You people are so deranged I sometimes actually sympathize with fascists. Your lack of moral and intellectual credibility is so insulting to my instincts as a thinking human being, I wonder if killing all you people off might really be the best option for humanity, the most "progressive" option, if you will.

Now please, don't let me stop you from cutting off your own dick.

[Anonymous No.16047116]

>>16047078
No one is doing that but why are you thinking of reproducing with children you sick fuck?
>>16047089
You're not "sympathising with" fascists, you're just a fascist, and not even hiding it too well.

[Anonymous No.16047120]

>Hi I'm a rational concerned moderate liberal centrist but DAE think that we should enact a widespread policy of genocide against degenerate subhuman leftists?

[Anonymous No.16047123]

>>16047116
yes you are
>>16047120
that's the moderate solution

[Anonymous No.16047134]

>>16047123
>Fascism is the moderate solution
t. a fascist, obviously

[Anonymous No.16047138]

>>16047123
Your picture is the moderate solution, moron. Old man Brandon is milquetoast as fuck.

[Anonymous No.16047142]

>>16047134
well not necessarily, but I'll take any ideology that involves the mass execution of leftytroons, because I like being able to have nice things

[Anonymous No.16047146]

>>16047142
>I'm not necessarily fascist just because I want to do a fascism with the other fascists
I think it really speaks to your inability to put yourself in someone else's shoes that you continue to think you're fooling anyone

[Anonymous No.16047148]

>>16046776
bayesian inference is fraud
>j-just adjust your priors
shut the fuck up

[Anonymous No.16047151]

>>16047142
>>16047146
>I'll take any ideology as long as it's fascism because fascism is the only good one
>Not a fascist tho
At times like these it's good to remind myself of that bit about how fascists only use words to intimidate people and amuse themselves and never seriously

[Anonymous No.16047152]

>>16047116
>If you don't have your papers proving you've recieved your experimental mRNA gene therapy for the cold you cannot eat in this restaurant!!!!! Papers please!!!!!!
>YOU'RE the fascist

I hope you die a prolonged and agonizing death.

[Anonymous No.16047156]

>>16047146
>>16047151
>fascism is when you don't let me trans your children

[Anonymous No.16047167]

>>16047152
>>16047156
So are you delusional or dishonest or both? I'm guessing it's both.

[Anonymous No.16047183]

>>16047167
>t. thinks he's a woman

[Anonymous No.16047184]

>>16047167
I'm not >>16047156 you fucking idiot.

Now, did you get your latest covid booster?

[Anonymous No.16047194]

>>16047183
>Everyone who disagrees with me on 4chan dot org is trans
Definitely both, then
>>16047184
So are YOU delusional, dishonest, or both?
I honestly have no idea which of the two posts is yours and which is his lmao, you're interchangeable NPCs regurgitating the same retarded talking points

[Anonymous No.16047214]

>>16047194
>everyone
trannies always so this lmao
No, we're talking (You)

[Anonymous No.16047217]

>>16047214
No you're not. You're talking the strawman in your warped fashoid walnut brain. You seem to think that, because someone can identify your ideology by the things you say instead of what you claim to be, you can turn it around. But of course you don't understand what you're doing at all and the two things aren't remotely interchangeable.
So, again, you show that you don't understand how people work and you lack empathy. Wow, it's almost like it's a pattern with fascists!

[Anonymous No.16047444]

>>16047217
The problem with anything you say is that you look like this.

[bodhi No.16047451]

>>16046951
Yes. I explained this many years ago
https://esotericawakening.com/weaponized-language

nice post

[bodhi No.16047454]

>>16046970
stfu tranny

[bodhi No.16047459]

>>16046979
>good things
the problem is you are a deranged psychopath and what you think it is "good" most normal people want to kill you to prevent but you are too mentally ill to ever understand it.

[Anonymous No.16047466]

that doesn't sound like the lawyer randomly picked a stats book and mixed words up to sound scientific.

[bodhi No.16047467]

>>16047089
Now you are starting to see. These freaks will never stop. Normal families will never know peace until we have a solution .... a final solution if you will.

[Anonymous No.16047488]

>>16047467
uhh
based

[Anonymous No.16047491]

>>16046805
>The people who have issue with the term "woke" being thrown around are the same people that call you "alt-right," "ultra-maga," "white supremacist," "transphobic," etc. if you take issue with children being chemically or surgically mutilated to appease their mental illness, or if you refused to be injected with the experimental mRNA gene therapy.

this. Woketards are afraid

[Anonymous No.16047503]

>>16046979
nigger

[Anonymous No.16047549]

>>16047444
>You're talking the strawman in your warped fashoid walnut brain.
Case in point. All you have are wild assertions with no basis in reality. I base my judgement upon known defining characteristics of fascism which you exhibit (virulent, murderous hatred of leftism; obsession with plots; scapegoating minorities; obsession with purity; and, oh yeah, explicit support for fascism you dope). You, on the other hand, struggle to connect an anonymous post to the relevant strawman, because despite your insistence to the contrary, all you really know about me is that I disagree with you.

But of course, fascists have a tenuous relationship with the truth, because they care not about facts but about power. You surely must be aware what an incredibly poor guess it is to assert a random person who disagrees with you is trans. You are not only overwhelmingly likely to be wrong, but you can also furthermore infer that I don't really care about being called trans either way. But that's not the point, because you're not asserting it as a factual statement. Rather, your insistence upon a patently ridiculous and unfounded claim is meant to signal something: "reason will not avail you here". You assert power through the conscious adoption of irrationality. There is an implied threat: if you were in front of me in an SS uniform holding a luger, it doesn't matter if I'm factually trans or not (let alone whether that is wrong or not). What matters is you say I am, and you have the gun. This is how fascists use language "to intimidate and disconcert". Your insults per se are feeble because they are utterly baseless. It is the wilful rejection of good faith that is implied by them that is truly disturbing.

[Anonymous No.16047550]

>>16047459
Always projection with you people... I hope you will someday get the help you need.

[bodhi No.16047556]

>>16047550
>projecting your projection
classic, you belong in a padded room. you lack the faculties to accurately assess reality. you are delusional and deranged and incapable of reason

[bodhi No.16047567]

>>16047550
forgot pic rel

[Anonymous No.16047569]

>>16047556
>>16047567
Oh good with the added pic I don't even have to comment any more, really, you discredit yourself

[Anonymous No.16047594]

>>16047567
he's right you know

[Anonymous No.16047621]

>>16047594
>If I decide that non-leftists decide what leftism is then leftism is non-leftism
Transparent tautology

[Anonymous No.16047626]

>>16047621
>no true scotsmen

[Anonymous No.16047638]

>>16046776

I'm pretty sure you can say the same about anybody who uses scientific authority to make political arguments.

[Anonymous No.16047640]

>>16047626
>I, an Englishman, am here to tell you what a true Scotsman is
Andy Ngo is a pathological liar btw, not even his accent is real

[Anonymous No.16047643]

>>16047640
you're a melanin worshipping marxist transvestite thoughever

[Anonymous No.16047645]

>>16047643
Again we run into the same issue where my claims are verifiable fact and yours are delusional whimsy

[bodhi No.16047652]

>>16047594
I do know lad, I do

[Anonymous No.16047653]

>>16047643
one of your main issues (among many) is that you can't even pass on an anonymous image board

[bodhi No.16047655]

>>16047594
>>16047626
>>16047643
>>16047653
bravo lad, bravo, expose these psychopathic nutjobs to the world. Every time they crawl out from under their rock beat their asses back into submission

[Anonymous No.16047656]

>>16046805
I just think it’s a stupid word with no clear meaning and no sting. we should just call them jews or faggots. and I denounce the talmud

[Anonymous No.16047659]

>>16047653
One of your main issues is apparently that you can't even quote correctly. The other is, of course, that you are profoundly delusional and your cheerleader is a bonafide schizophrenic.

[Anonymous No.16047661]

>>16047659
one of your main issues (among many) is that you can't even pass on an anonymous image board

[Anonymous No.16047662]

>>16047661
Oh wow, got it in two. Still mining a pathological liar for anecdotes, too. I can only imagine what a warped view of reality you must have.

[Anonymous No.16047666]

>>16047662
It's not an anecdote when you're all melanin worshipping transvestites

[Anonymous No.16047671]

>>16047666
>It's not an anecdote when I really want to believe

>666
Trips reveal the truth, Satan.

[Anonymous No.16047674]

>>16047671
You look like that and say that

[bodhi No.16047677]

>>16047671
we must cleanse you with fire

[Anonymous No.16047680]

>>16047674
I say what now
>>16047677
>Sides with Satan
>Loves fire
Bit on the nose innit

[bodhi No.16047683]

>>16047680
it is the only way you will ever know peace child. give in to the light and let us bless you with the flame to sure all your woes

[bodhi No.16047686]

>>16047683
*cure

stupid auto correct

[Anonymous No.16047695]

>>16047683
Marxists lighting themselves on fire is fine too.

[Anonymous No.16047700]

>>16047686
Stupid phone poster, more like

[Anonymous No.16047896]

>>16046776
hegel's science is not even pseudoscience

[bodhi No.16047914]

>>16047700
I was taking a shit atm and when I came back you were still a retard

[Anonymous No.16048296]

>>16047567
>Yes, we admit that when we use these terms we actually mean "Jews"
>But the fact that they recognise it means we're right!
Okay, by the same token, antifa can beat up anyone they like because if you say "but when they say fascist they mean moderate liberals like me!" you just showed us you understand that that you're a fascist and you deserve to be beaten up

[Anonymous No.16048298]

>>16047914
>Three hour shit
Damn, I knew you were full of it but that's impressive

[Anonymous No.16048464]

>>16048296
No, that's not what that means.

[Anonymous No.16048489]

>>16048464
Exactly my point, dear anon, it's shitty pseudologic and it's wrong in both instances. But it is the exact same logic.
>It's funny how antifa more or less entails ridding your country of fascists and you just kind of understand that this targets you
>Therefore you are a fascist
>Therefore anyone antifa beats up is by definition a fascist and antifa can never be wrong

[Anonymous No.16048512]

>>16048464
>>16048489
Oh, we can add to this:
>California Senate committee has unanimously passed a bill that would give the death penalty to traitors and fascists
>The amount of people not understanding that this is going to be used to kill Republicans is making me lose my mind
Uh-oh, Republicans are all fascist traitors by their own admission???

[Anonymous No.16048518]

>>16048489
It isn't the same because you're wrong, and also a tranny.

[bodhi No.16048522]

>>16048296
Oh you bet I am a fascist and killing commies is my favorite hobby bucko. So you just say when deranged troon

[Anonymous No.16048524]

>>16048518
>>16048522
Top minds of fascism
You're literally not even human any more. You've renounced the reasoning faculty that separates us from animals.

[Anonymous No.16048525]

>>16048524
rich coming from a marxist transvestite

[Anonymous No.16048527]

>>16048522
>killing commies is my favorite hobby
You've never killed a commie, poser. Stay out of the hobby.

[Anonymous No.16048530]

>>16048525
See >>16047645
This is a recurrent issue we have here

[Anonymous No.16048535]

>>16047655
Fuck off namefag. We don't need you.

[Anonymous No.16048548]

>>16048530
Yes, the axe wound in your crotch will need continual dilation for the rest of your short life.

[bodhi No.16048549]

>>16048535
>we
you are nothing and nobody. you have no "we"

[bodhi No.16048551]

>>16048524
you are deranged and need to be blessed by the holy fire

[Anonymous No.16048554]

>It's different because uhhh you're wrong
>tranny tranny tranny pee pee doo doo
>I kill u!
Literally the minds of toddlers in the bodies of grown men. I bet you actually feel tough when you manage to make someone uneasy in real life, unaware that people are also uneasy around hysterical adult retards who escaped their wranglers and for good reason. In fact, it increasingly seems that the difference between them and you is negligible.

[bodhi No.16048555]

>>16048527
Stop by whenever you like and you can be my first

[Anonymous No.16048556]

>>16048524
Are you some kind of speciesist? That's one step away from racism and homophobia. Fucking fascist.

[Anonymous No.16048562]

>>16048555
Where do you live?

[bodhi No.16048566]

>>16048562
In your mom's basement when I am not sleeping in her bed

[Anonymous No.16048569]

>>16048566
Damn, even when you're making something up to look tough on the internet you live in someone's mum's basement, huh

[Anonymous No.16048573]

>>16048569
Right now he's living rent free in your head.

[Anonymous No.16048574]

>>16048554

[Anonymous No.16048578]

>>16048574
These people wouldn't even know how to use a gun if it was handed to them locked and loaded. This is why they don't concern me in any way. If it ever comes to shooting, it will be a bloodbath, and all of them will be culled in a matter of days, taking their gay fucking ideology with them into the trash heap of history. And the sun will still rise in the morning.

[Anonymous No.16048579]

>>16048573
Because I happen to reply to him? Is that why you took that burden away from him? Imagine simping for a namefag lmao
You might be thinking of him day and night, hoping sempai will notice you, but don't project that on me

[Anonymous No.16048585]

>>16048579
I just think you're a stupid fucking faggot and it's funny to laugh at you. Now dilate harder, faggot.

[Anonymous No.16048586]

>>16046776
>Please don't blame me for pointing this out -- it's just science.

[Anonymous No.16048593]

>>16048585
You're free to imagine whatever you like but you're laughing entirely at your own imagination and that's pretty sad

[Anonymous No.16048599]

>You're free to imagine whatever you like but you're laughing entirely at your own imagination and that's pretty s-ACK

[Anonymous No.16048602]

>>16048599
oh no
meanwhile irl i'm still alive to respond to your shitposts

[Anonymous No.16048606]

>oh no
>meanwhile irl i'm still alive to respond to your shitpo-ACK

[Anonymous No.16048609]

>>16048593
I'm laughing at you, faggot. Now dilate harder, you'll never be a real woman at this rate!

[bodhi No.16048610]

>>16048602
you are legitimately mentally ill and need some serious padded room time before being blessed with the flame

[Anonymous No.16048619]

>>16048606
oh no
oh wait shit damn that happened solely in your imagination AGAIN
>>16048609
you're laughing at a cartoon that you're pretending is me because you can't find anything in reality to laugh at yet you're desperate for something
>>16048610
also based entirely on your delusions

holy shit that's three people now who can only cope with the world by projecting their insane shared delusion onto it

[Anonymous No.16048625]

>oh no
>oh wait shit damn that happened solely in your imagination AGAIN

[Anonymous No.16048634]

>The transphobe is a prime example of a person who has entered into bad faith to avoid responsibility. He attempts to relinquish his responsibility to transphobia and a community of transphobes. He "fears every kind of solitariness… however small his stature, he takes every precaution to make it smaller, lest he stand out from the herd and find himself face to face with himself. He has made himself a transphobe because that is something one cannot be alone." Transphobia is a way of feeling good, proud even, rather than guilty at the abandonment of responsibility and the flight before the impossibility of true sincerity. The transphobe abandons himself to the crowd and his bad faith, he "flees responsibility as he flees his own consciousness, and choosing for his personality the permanence of the rock, he chooses for his morality the scale of petrified values." He pulls down shutters, blinds, mirrors and mirages over his consciousness to keep himself in his bad faith away from his responsibilities and his liberty. The transphobe is afraid "of himself, of his own consciousness, of his own liberty, of his instincts, of his responsibilities, of solitariness, of change, of society, and the world – of everything except the trannies." He is "a coward who does not want to admit his cowardice to himself." The transphobe wallows in the depths of an extreme bad faith. "Transphobia, in short, is fear of the human condition. The transphobe is a man who wishes to be pitiless stone, a furious torrent, a devastating thunderbolt – anything except a man." This is his bad faith.

[Anonymous No.16048637]

>>16048625
oh maybe i'm really dead this time
oh no how does this keep happening?
how are you wrong every single time when you're totally not delusional?

[Anonymous No.16048646]

>>16048599
>>16048606
>>16048625
also how many of these do you fucking have lol
who's living rent free in whose head again?
more trannies in your head than brain cells m8

[Anonymous No.16048722]

>>16046795
>There are people who are upset about "woke" being used as a pejorative
I just think "woke" is a stupid pejorative that demonstrates the idiocy of its speaker. They're unable to articulate any substantive criticisms of an issue and so default to safe cuckservative buzzwords like "woke."

[Anonymous No.16048766]

>>16048634
t.

[Anonymous No.16048787]

>>16048722
it's not an inherently conservative word, it's a layman word for the general public who are observing the subversion being used by the socialists/'progressives' but do not understand the ideology behind it and require something to describe it and push back. words fitting this purpose will be inevitably misused and overused

[Anonymous No.16048794]

>>16048619
I'm not laughing at a cartoon, faggot, I'm laughing at (you), anon, for being such an unhinged faggot.

[Anonymous No.16048823]

>>16048794
You have a strange definition of "unhinged faggot" if calmly refuting your fallacious non-arguments meets it but the guy ranting about cleansing fires to imaginary trannies doesn't

[Anonymous No.16048827]

>>16046776
He's right. We should use "nigger" more often, in its place.

[Anonymous No.16048831]

>>16048787
It is, in fact, originally a progressive word, but in its current pejorative application it is the nigh-exclusive domain of fringe reactionaries. What you perceive to be the "general public" is in fact a narrow echo chamber. You are correct that none of them understand the thing they're trying to criticise, though. In fact, to which purpose is this word fit, really? Can *you* define it?

[Anonymous No.16048847]

>>16048823
>>16048794
But again, you demonstrate the fascist imperviousness to reason and its purpose. To you, it's like a joke that the other party isn't in on. Continued attempts to reason with you are inherently absurd but you feel like you're the only one in a position to appreciate the absurdity, which makes it even funnier. The more someone attempts to reach you with facts and logic, the bigger the fool they make of themselves. This, once more, is the power of wilful irrationality.

[Anonymous No.16048956]

>oh maybe i'm really dead this time
>oh no how does this keep happening?
>how are you wrong every single time when you're totally not delusi-ACK

[Anonymous No.16048964]

>>16048831
News referencing "woke" shit shows up on my work computer's news ticker, which means it's in normie consciousness.
Non-normies don't call you "woke", they correcrly identify you as degenerate communists enacting a color revolution in the U.S.

[Anonymous No.16048969]

>>16048956
I must've gotten under your skin considering how you keep repeating this ritualistic murder in effigy hoping for some different outcome

[Anonymous No.16048976]

>>16048964
So your argument is that "woke" is a normie word because normies DON'T use it? ok

[Anonymous No.16048992]

>>16048976
No, my argument was the exact opposite, and clearly your HRT has given you brain damage.

[Anonymous No.16049000]

>>16048992
You used a picture that doesn't have the word "woke" in it and you only mention referencing what you deem "woke shit" in your own words, which could be anything
I will admit I misread your second line but that might've been because of how retarded it is

[Anonymous No.16049002]

>>16049000
>I'M ILLITERATE
I noticed.
Unfortunately for you, your master plan of inserting marxist niggerfaggotry into absolutely everything was unavoidably noticed by normies, which they are now openly rejecting.

[Anonymous No.16049010]

>>16049002
Figures I can admit one minor mistake and never live it down but you lot are outright making up 99% of the shit you spew and you don't even flinch when it's brought to light. But of course, hypocrisy is a feature of fascism and not a bug.

You still haven't provided any evidence for your point, for example.

[Anonymous No.16049025]

>>16046795
It's not that they don't take pride in what they do, it's that they know they use deceptive practices and infiltrate at every turn to get it done and that being called out, condemned, and waryness of them spreading harms their cause.

[Anonymous No.16049033]

>>16049025
No, once again, it really is just that if you use "woke" as a pejorative they know that you disagree with them. That's literally it. What is honestly wrong with you people? It's like you're from another planet.

[Anonymous No.16049036]

>>16048823
>>16048831
You are severely mentally ill. No one is treating this discourse as seriously as you are, which is why everyone is laughing at you.

P.S. You will never be a woman.

[Anonymous No.16049041]

>>16049036
I'm amusing myself and familiarising myself with the fascist mindset. Thanks for providing the data points. Do not mistake neatness of language for investment. All of you have been far more insistent and clearly emotionally affected.

[Anonymous No.16049044]

Everything cool is "fascist coded".

[Anonymous No.16049049]

>>16049033
t. knows nothing about propaganda
The existence of a simple and catchy insult can be a big detriment to any group
It's comparable to a person gaining a nickname like "Stinky" and getting disrespected for years to come by everyone who learns it
The informational equivalent of being sprayed by a spunk and not being able to wash it off
Just disagreeing with someone isn't nearly as bad for them as successfully labeling them a lesser and teaching others to think the same of them

[Anonymous No.16049051]

>>16049036
>>16049041
What's interesting here is that your mockery goes unacknowledged by its intended target and yet you insist upon it with a fervour bordering on obsession. Clearly its real purpose is not whatever psychological effect you're imagining it to have on me, but the psychological effect it has on you. I suppose it relieves some of the shame and inferiority you feel.

Also interesting to note is how anonymity, rather than being the foil of ad-hominem arguments it is often touted to be, has instead opened the door to the full range of possible ad-hominems without regard for reality, allowing you to essentially construct your opponent as you see fit. Beyond the words you read on your screen, every part of "me" you've fashioned into an effigy resides (rent free) in your head. This only further proves that the main purpose of such name-calling is not rhetorical but psychological. Essentially, when someone has thoroughly intellectually trounced you as I have, going "yeah well you're a tranny" may merely lead to bemusement and pity in your interlocutor, but it is a wonderful balm to the wounded ego.

[Anonymous No.16049058]

>>16049049
The issue is that bad things are bad regardless of how you label or relabel them, so it doesn't really matter how you label cultural marxism when it still amounts to all the things that normal people dislike that are being forced on them.
It only starts to matter when you delve deeper into the ideological lineage of these movements, and realize it's (predictably) the jews, a tale as old as time, and the universal enemy of humanity.

[Anonymous No.16049059]

>>16049049
But "woke" doesn't denote anything lesser, it merely denotes all the same things you already hated. It's like calling people, I dunno, "cake". It's only a bad thing if you already hate cake. You have your little group of cake-haters who think no one should have cake and actively tries to sabotage bakeries. And then when you go "oh no another cake ploy to open a bakery, let's send them mail bombs" it's not the word "cake" that's the problem. But we can tell that you're a bakery bomber because you use it as a pejorative.

[Anonymous No.16049070]

>>16049059
It actually does denote everything lesser, that's why it's entered common usage as a term for the sweeping societal changes marxists are demanding to make everything gayer, uglier, and more dysfunctional than ever.

[Anonymous No.16049073]

>>16049070
I already know what you think of it but you're also delusional so I don't particularly care either.

[Anonymous No.16049077]

>>16049059
>Analogy
>Food analogy

[Anonymous No.16049083]

>>16049073
It actually doesn't matter what I personally think of it, this entire conversation revolves around the fact that the overwhelming majority of people reject your gay race communism now that you've started inserting it into every single one of their normalfag spaces.

[bodhi No.16049091]

>>16048619
flames are the only thing that can cleanse your mentally ill mind

[bodhi No.16049096]

>>16048964
The sad part is I had decided the only way to correct the course for this country was some kind of revolution. I have been aware of the creeping authoritarianism since the early 2000's, the patriot actm snowden leaks etc. I have known the system is rigged for a long time and it would only get worse, it was just a matter of how long it would take to achieve full 1984. I would be marching with them if they ddnt get subverted into race communist trannies. I was thinking more along the lines of 1776, watering the tree of liberty and what not. The Jews really mind fucked these retards.

[Anonymous No.16049153]

>>16049096
On the plus side, there does not exist any scenario in which marxists ever achieve final victory, because they aren't evil geniuses, they're evil retards.
The first thing they've consistently done when subverting any institution is drive it straight into the ground in record time.
Nobody watches their "news", nobody consumes their "entertainment", nobody trusts their "experts", and nobody takes their "credentials" seriously.

[bodhi No.16049158]

>>16049153
True, they actually helped our message. The normies had no clue how fucked they really are. They were just frogs in the boiling water and at least these fucking retards made the flames spark up above the lid so the normies realized they were being cooked. If it wasnt for these morons trying to talk about the encroaching tyranny to normies they would just call you tin foil or w/e. Now instead of insulting people who are smarter than them and can see further than them, they can see it with their own eyes

[Anonymous No.16049186]

>>16049051
Sorry, I was busy fucking my wife, what was that you said? I'm some kind of fascist or something?

[bodhi No.16049239]

>>16047695
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=157_1KTSGUc

[Anonymous No.16049322]

>>16049083
Yes, the conversation revolves around this delusion of yours

[Anonymous No.16049325]

>>16049186
Sorry, I was also fucking your wife

[Anonymous No.16049371]

>>16049083
this

[Anonymous No.16049383]

>>16049371
Left-wing extremism and all of right-wing thought
Horse shoe theory is true after all

[Anonymous No.16049396]

>>16049383
No.

[Anonymous No.16049408]

>>16046776
OMG I HECKIN' LOVE SCIENCE!
GONNA POST THIS ON MY FAVORITE REDDIT BOARDS, LIKE< RIGHT NOW!!!E11EVEN!

[Anonymous No.16049516]

>>16048787
>it's a layman word for the general public who are observing the subversion being used by the socialists/'progressives' but do not understand the ideology behind it and require something to describe it and push back
It's not used by the general public much either, though. It's used mostly by Fox News and pundits like Ben Shapiro who want to critique progressive ideology but without offending their boomer audience.

[Anonymous No.16049809]

>>16049396
Rightoids avoid psychologists like the plague because they'd all have to be involuntarily committed as soon as they walked in the door. That's why they don't show up on these statistics but on the statistics for autistic manifesto-scribbling terrorists.
No one who is familiar with psychopathy and narcissism could deny that these constitute the current baseline of the GOP. Only on the left are they considered exceptoinal enough to remark upon.

[Anonymous No.16049822]

>>16047156
The thing on the left part of your image actually happened under Trump and not Biden

[bodhi No.16049834]

>>16049371
I called this out and wrote an article about many years before it started being spread around on the internet. I know the signs and how to spot people who are off and I know exactly how they think and their bizarre pseud logic, projection and gas lighting

[El Arcón No.16049851]

Normal people call it "politically correct" and it's always pejorative.

[Anonymous No.16049864]

>>16047567
Pretty accurate summation.

[Anonymous No.16049873]

>>16049834
>I know the signs and how to spot people who are off
Practiced in the mirror eh
>I know exactly how they think and their bizarre pseud logic, projection and gas lighting
Those who gaze into the abyss...

[Anonymous No.16049883]

>>16049809
No.

[bodhi No.16049892]

>>16049873
silence heathen, blessed be thy flame, come to me child and let me releave your suffering

[Anonymous No.16049914]

I've talked before about how fascist rejection of reason is like an in-joke, but I am privy to an even greater joke. The "Western man" they claim to be fighting for? I am he. I am a straight, cis man of Germanic descent. I am a well-liked member of my community, academically accomplished, considered attractive, in a long-term committed relationship to a woman, gainfully employed. As for my politics? Just consider me a rational conservative who detests fascist ideology and doctrine :^)

That's what really gets me, you know? Every time they call me a Jewish gay tranny they supply more and more evidence that it's not even really about any of the things they say it's about. I am literally none of those things they claim to hate me for and they hate me anyway. Which goes to show that the real point is just to scapegoat and alleviate any undue mental stress they are feeling from coping with reality. They recognise their superior, and they try to tear him down. That they harbour murderous rage, based on figments of their imagination, towards someone they ought to hold up as an example, now that is a glorious punchline to a joke of cosmic proportions.

[Anonymous No.16049930]

>>16049914
You're a mentally ill marxist transvestite.
You're not a member of the village if all you do is sabotage the village.

[Anonymous No.16049934]

>>16049930
See? He's doing it again, lol! Absolutely mental. Loopy. Truly gone fishing. If it ever comes to blows IRL, now that would be the funniest shit.

[Anonymous No.16049935]

>>16049934
Doing what again?

[Anonymous No.16049936]

>>16049935
Failing to read, apparently.

My village knows no greater threat than you btw, not even close

[Anonymous No.16049942]

>>16049936
You don't have a village, see:
>>16049883

[Anonymous No.16049952]

>>16049942
Of course I do. See, it is precisely your bullheaded insistence on some ill-interpreted statistic over the factual reality of my life that makes you such a threat to me and mine. Like a fireman who insists they need to burn down my house in a controlled fire to stop the spread of a blazing inferno, except there is no inferno. You're just demanding to burn down my house over a figment of your imagination. I live in the real world with real people. You live in a constructed reality built out of cherry-picked conveniently twistable factoids. My advice? Touch some grass. The internet gave you brain worms.

[Anonymous No.16049960]

>>16049952
You hate your family, you hate your neighbors, you hate your surrounding community, and only show loyalty to groups who are openly hostile to them.

[Anonymous No.16049973]

>>16049960
I don't hate anyone. I love my family, neighbours, and community, in fact, and they me as far as I know. You hate me though, and I might be your family, your neighbour, or your surrounding community. You are the one who is openly hostile to me and my community and you are the one who demands loyalty from me. You demonstrably lie to me and then accuse me of lying about myself, to myself. It's so brazen it's almost impressive. Once again you insist that your idea of me based entirely on half-baked memes supersedes factual reality. You are trying to impose your delusion upon reality and declare me a liar for failing to adhere to your delusion.

[Anonymous No.16049977]

>>16049960
>>16049973
This, by the way, is probably why fascism is rampant on 4chan (along with genuine unmedicated schizophrenics). There is no requirement or incentive to adhere to the truth, here, so you can easily insulate yourself from real life and build up an online shared fantasy based on misinformation. You don't know anything about me and consistently guess wildly wrong, but that doesn't matter here. It's the truth to you and no one can dissuade you from it. Fascism, then, is the organised attempt to take this fantasy world back into reality and impose it on the world. Once millions are dead, once entire actual village communities are entirely eradicated and no one speaks for them any more, does it really matter who they were in fact? Or only which role they played in your narrative?

[Anonymous No.16049982]

>>16049973
>>16049977
No.

[Anonymous No.16049989]

>>16049982
Yes. And it's funny because it can actually be seen in our respective attitudes in this conversation. I base my conclusions based on observations made about you in this very thread, moving from the particular to the general, confining myself only to that which can be seen. You, on the other hand, are trying to superimpose your strawman onto me without any regard for reality, plastering me with labels pulled straight from your arse, trying to force the general (whatever you originally based that on) onto the specific. Yours is a fundamentally backwards attitude incompatible with scientific scepticism.

[Anonymous No.16049990]

>>16049989
lol

[Anonymous No.16049992]

>>16049989
>>16049982
And of course, without that, we could both be screaming "no YOU're doing DARVO" "no YOU are" but at some point, factual reality intervenes and breaks the tie, not that you ever let that stop you.
>>16049990
>Citing a proven liar -again-
Doesn't do much for you vis-á-vis your already demonstrably tenuous relationship to reality

[Anonymous No.16049995]

>>16049992
The difference is that we both know you're lying.

[Anonymous No.16050006]

>>16049995
I know I'm not, which means I therefore know you are. See, that is why my stance is fundamentally evidence-based and yours is fundamentally feelings-based. You act as if I don't exist, as if I'm just another figment of your mind that you can shape however you like. And you can do that here, in your safe, online fantasy world, but it doesn't extend into reality, where I am an actual person who does not remotely resemble your delusional image of me. You're so accustomed to lying that you don't even stop to wonder about the strangeness of lying about someone to his face. You're not accustomed to having to deal with a reality outside of this that isn't infinitely malleable and yielding to your whims.

[Anonymous No.16050031]

>>16050006
No, you exist, you're just identical to the other thousand transgender marxist pathological liars, which is why what you type has no meaning.

[Anonymous No.16050036]

>>16049995
>>16050006
Thus we see that fascists fundamentally don't use language with reference to tangible reality, but only as weapons in their arsenal. To them, calling someone a liar is calling someone a liar, is an attack, whether that is because the person actually told a lie, or simply because they are their enemies, always perfectly equivalent in all instances because the truth doesn't enter into it.
>>16050031
You see, my reasoning, that of a normal, healthy brain, goes like this:
>Anon is making a baseless claim about me
>He doesn't provide evidence, nor is there any possible way for him to know
>I can see with my own eyes that it is factually wrong
>Yet he insist upon it
>This meest the definition of lying, i.e. knowingly telling a falsehood
>Therefore he is lying

Yours, on the other hand, seems to follow something like this:
>This guy disagrees with me
>Therefore he is the Enemy
>The Enemy is trans gay Jewish lying communists
>Therefore he is all those things
>Therefore he is lying
Notice how you've conveniently absolved yourself of having to provide evidence of me lying by superimposing this image onto me? It doesn't even make any sense; each of those groups per se constitute a tiny minority already. How do you convince yourself that all your enemies are all those things? That your judgement is not based in logic is furthermore demonstrated by your inability to see the logical corrolary:
>My Enemy is always lying
>This guy is not lying
>Therefore, this guy cannot possibly be my Enemy

[Anonymous No.16050043]

>>16050036
You don't have a normal, healthy brain, you're a sociopathic transgendered marxist, which is why youre defending sociopathic transgendered marxists.

[Anonymous No.16050047]

>>16050043
>You don't have a normal, healthy brain
Evidently I do, because again, my reasoning follows a demonstrably logical pattern, whereas yours continues to twist itself into pretzels in defiance of the evidence. See how once more you are unable to address the logic and have to resort to simply baselessly asserting things, again?

[Anonymous No.16050055]

>>16050047
How do you have the time to just sit around and act like a deranged retard on 4chan for so long? Don't you have anything else to do, like dilating or masturbating to lolicon? Don't you have friends or family? A job? Hobbies?

What a fucking loser.

[Anonymous No.16050057]

>>16050047
The evidence is that you're a sociopathic transgendered marxist, because you defend sociopathic transgendered marxists.
As an aside, you also type like a coping dropout trying (and failing) to compensate for it.

[Anonymous No.16050071]

>>16050055
You realise that someone else has been keeping up his part of this conversation? But I'm sure he can shitpost whilst masturbating to lolicon just as I can shitpost during work.
>>16050057
>The evidence is the conclusion

>As an aside, you also type like a coping dropout trying (and failing) to compensate for it.
Another swing and a miss. You know, you're not even arguing with me. I'm watching you argue with your own imagination, really. It's kinda like you're going over arguments in the shower, except instead of thinking up things you can hypothetically say, you just ignore what is actually said in favour of bullshit

[Anonymous No.16050084]

>>16050055
He's a transgendered marxist, of course he doesn't have anything going on his life.
I just have a slow day at work because we had a company town hall yesterday, so nobody was doing any chemistry, but I'm heading to the gym we have on site in a few minutes.

[Anonymous No.16050088]

>>16050084
>of course he doesn't have anything going on his life.
>I just have a slow day at work
lmao, the absolute lack of self-awareness

[Anonymous No.16050094]

>>16050088
I'm aware I'm advancing my career and making money while also getting increasingly more fit, while you're going to spend the rest of your day (life) dilating in the dark and trying to groom children on Discord.
I have no advice for you, because I don't believe you have the ability to turn your life around.

[Anonymous No.16050098]

>>16050094
You know what, given your pattern of lying I'm starting to doubt that you're even telling the truth about yourself. Clearly at least half of your post is a comforting fiction you tell yourself, why wouldn't all of it be? I would've had no problem believing you at least had a job and work out sometimes if you didn't make a point of insisting on it so much whilst doubling down on the obvious lies.

[Anonymous No.16050121]

>>16050094
Non-sense. He will one day evolve into his tranny janny form.

[Anonymous No.16050889]

>>16049371
>>16049396
Does leftism make people mentally ill, or do mentally ill people choose leftism?

[bodhi No.16050940]

>>16050889
To be fair, these types of people seek out places they can be chameleon and also wield power. During the medieval period they would gravitate towards clergy so they could rob, beat and burn people at the stake. The ideology is a just cloak of indivisibility for them

[bodhi No.16050942]

>>16050889
tldr, leftism just gives them a chance to wield power over other people maliciously while pretending to be virtuous

[Anonymous No.16051027]

>>16048512
you really think those are analogous? criminalizing actual acts vs. criminalizing a fuzzily definedand reviled political stance?
tells a lot about your mind, none of it positive.

[Anonymous No.16051244]

>>16051027
>Treason is not an act
>Membership of a fascist organisation is unclear

[Anonymous No.16051252]

>>16050889
This is a multifaceted issue. Psychopathy and narcissism in particular are hardly exclusive to leftism, probably not even majorly represented there. But there is a correlation between people who seek therapy and left-leaning politics (note that this doesn't necessarily mean "scary" disorders but also stuff like ADHD). This is because mental health is still a taboo topic amongst conservatives, and so mentally ill people in conservative communities often go unnoticed for a long time and refuse to seek help even if they are aware that they are struggling. There is a large focus on personal responsibility, and seeking help is seen as a moral failure. The more fringe conservatives are even openly sceptical of psychology and directly oppose it. The end result is, naturally, that leftists and liberals are inherently more likely to seek a diagnosis. But, inversely, if a conservative person does seek therapy, it also means that he can face ostracism from his community and question some of his ideological assumptions. Thus, people with a mental health diagnosis are also likely to gravitate away from conservatism.

None of this applies to narcissists and psychopaths, of course.

>>16050940
>During the medieval period they would gravitate towards clergy so they could rob, beat and burn people at the stake.
They still do.
Also gravitate towards fascist movements, of course. In fact I've theorised that fascism might be properly understood as a shared narcissism. A regular narcissist has a frail ego and completely denies reality to protect it, puffing himself up and responding harshly, sometimes even violently, when that image is threatened. With fascism, it is the projected image of a strong leader outside the individual that provides the same sense of superiority by association. Just look at how people on the right insist that Diaper Don is a golden adonis. They are all, in a way, extensions of his narcissism. They can't be wrong because he can't be wrong.

[Anonymous No.16051260]

Looking forward to the coming excuses attempting to come up with reasons why an ideology that is nakedly about power and cruelty would be less appealing to psychopaths and narcissists than one that is ostensibly about egalitarianism. I can already predict "that's not what it's REALLY about" but of course unlike fascists they at least have an image to keep up so a left-wing organisation can never be as openly cruel, exclusionary, hierarchical, or bent on the subjugation and humiliation of "inferiors" as a fascist one. It's already rare for psychopaths and narcissists to be professionally diagnosed, and for fascists I consider the odds to be zero, so they would all fly under the radar, propagating their mental illness under the guise of "legitimate political discourse". Again, only on the left-wing are these people exceptional, or even noticeable, due to the contrast with the baselines for the respective ideologies.

[Anonymous No.16051275]

>>16051027
>>16051244
I mean you lot toss around the accusation of "grooming" for things like "existing on the same planet as children and simply living a life" so don't pretend that the law can't be interpreted however the governing body well pleases. How long before handholding between same-sex couples within 500m of a child is going to be legally defined as "sexual crimes against children"? Yet fascism is "fuzzily defined" even though, of course, a legislative body would necessarily have to define it in order to pass a law about it.
But of course the law is clear and unambiguous when it's aimed at people you dislike and it's vague and unenforcable when it's aimed at you.

[Anonymous No.16051276]

>>16051260
>a left-wing organisation can never be as openly cruel, exclusionary, hierarchical, or bent on the subjugation and humiliation of "inferiors" as a fascist one.
lol

[Anonymous No.16051287]

>>16051276
Did you select the wrong image, or...? The context seems to suggest you wanted to show an example regarding left-wingers.

[Anonymous No.16051292]

>>16051287
LOL

[Anonymous No.16051297]

>>16046776

[Anonymous No.16051305]

>>16049914
>rational conservative
Oxymoron

[Anonymous No.16051306]

>>16049914
Tell us how may Fascist authors you read

[Anonymous No.16051309]

>>16051260
> a left-wing organisation can never be as openly cruel, exclusionary, hierarchical, or bent on the subjugation and humiliation of "inferiors" as a fascist one
Literally the current left wing position against white men is all of these things, including labeling them as inferiors, while promoting regimes to supress them.
Have you never heard of the progressive stack, they are a literal caste system built in

[Anonymous No.16051313]

>>16051292
Not going to take a single word Ngo tweets at face value, sorry. But even if you do, that's an obvious fallacy you're making. Is everything antifa wants by definition far-left? Is everyone antifa agrees with by definition far-left? I see someone wearing trousers there, I hope you don't do that, commie scum.

[Anonymous No.16051315]

>>16051306
Well, there are 44 posters in this thread alone besides me

[Anonymous No.16051318]

>>16051309
>Someone told me to pipe down for once in my white suburban middle-class life, this is literally the holocaust, now I truly understand oppression and also that I am the only one in history to actually face it

[Anonymous No.16051319]

>>16051318
Calm down with the snark and just admit you were wrong.

[Anonymous No.16051321]

>>16051319
Why would I, when I'm not wrong? Oh no, snark, those uppity blacks can't possibly understand what you're experiencing right now

[Anonymous No.16051322]

>>16051292
>>16051313
Wait, this is the exact same reasoning that leads people to "every single person who disagrees with me is a black Jewish gay trans antifa Marxist all at the same time" isn't it? Because you disagree with all of those so they're interchangeable to you.

[Anonymous No.16051324]

>>16051321
He's right, you are wrong.

[Anonymous No.16051325]

>>16051321
>Here is an example of the left being openly
exclusionary and hierarchical
>Pee pee poo poo, stupid white karen.

[Anonymous No.16051328]

>>16051318
Nice strawman.

[Anonymous No.16051329]

>>16051322
I think someone who's spent days defending antifa agrees with antifa, and I don't think you've successfully convinced anyone otherwise.

[Anonymous No.16051333]

>>16051325
You've yet to give an actual example, though. Your histrionic whine isn't one. I can say white people are literally being carted off to camps right now but again, we run into the issue that there is an actual world outside the internet where things actually do or do not happen and you can't always pretend
>>16051328
One good turn deserves another
>>16051329
Haven't done much of anything except dunk on a couple of delusional schizos, actually. Well, I'm defending myself, I suppose, but that'd be tautological. And, for the record, are you doubling down on "I imagine you're antifa so you must necessarily be all those other things too"?

[Anonymous No.16051336]

>>16051333
>You've yet to give an actual example, thouglh
Here is a link to the Democrat Socialists of America webpage , a left wing insitution.
Note Rule 6, where the progressive stack is enforced.
https://www.dsausa.org/organize/respectful_discussion/

[Anonymous No.16051340]

>>16051333
see
>>16051329

[Anonymous No.16051341]

>>16051336
Point number 2 is also quite funny.

[Anonymous No.16051342]

>>16051336
>if someone who has not spoken raises their hand, they go to the top of the list. If someone who is of an oppressed group raises their hand, they go to the top of the list unless they have already contributed significantly to the discussion.
Oh, the horror, you might have to wait a while to speak in a discussion that is about the very oppressed people whose voices they want to bring to the forefront! This is just like being denied a job on the basis of your race.

[Anonymous No.16051343]

>>16051322
>black
No, but you wish you were.
>Jewish
~30% chance, possible but I would expect an actual kike to be better at this than you are
>gay
Obviously
>trans
Obviously
>antifa
Obviously
>Marxist
Obviously

[Anonymous No.16051345]

>>16051340
What am I seeing?

I've been here longer than you btw

[Anonymous No.16051347]

>>16051342
>It doesn't happen, that's a conspiracy theory!
>Okay, it does happen, but it's a good thing and you deserve it!
Hmmm, where have I heard this one before?

[Anonymous No.16051349]

>>16051342
>It doesn't happen
>It does happen and its a Good thing you bigot.
Everytime

[Anonymous No.16051350]

>>16051347
>>16051349
You're framing this as punishment of you when in fact it is a way to structure a debate in which time is necessarily limited so as to provide a greater diversity of viewpoints. It's not about you at all.

And also, if you had a worse example of discrimination, it's safe to assume you'd have gone with that one, instead. So this is it. You're bitching about an organisation you're not even part of structuring its internal debates in such a way that if you hypothetically were there you might have to wait longer to speak, especially if you've spoken before.
Just don't go to an DSA meeting, lol, problem solved

[Anonymous No.16051353]

>>16051350
>You're framing this as punishment of you when in fact it is a way to structure a debate in which time is necessarily limited so as to provide a greater diversity of viewpoints. It's not about you at all.
So it is, indeed, a good thing?

[Anonymous No.16051354]

>>16051343
Ah, back to the part where you write seething fan-fiction about me!
You know, I've come to realise that in a way, this is the just world fallacy in action. Of course, you don't think that people who disagree with you should exist. But even you cannot escape the fact that they do. So you focus on the facts you can escape. Yes, I may disagree with you... but obviously that puts me in every single "wrong" category you can think of, and everything makes sense again. The world is as it should be, in a sense. Only the black gay Jewish trans antifa Marxists would disagree with you and it's expected of them.

[Anonymous No.16051357]

>>16051353
I'm ambivalent towards it but what it isn't is exclusionary, cruel, or designating anyone to be inferior.

[Anonymous No.16051358]

>>16051354
You defend antifa, so the rest logically follows from there.

[Anonymous No.16051359]

>>16051357
>exclusionary, cruel, or designating anyone to be inferior.
>can literallty anyone besides you people speak up, ugh fine, the white man has the floor.
You have already made it quite obvious you are not arguing in good faith

[Anonymous No.16051362]

>>16051357
It's certainly designating the voice of someone not "oppressed" to be downprioritized, as I suppose it is deemed less worthy.

[Anonymous No.16051365]

>>16051349
It makes you notice.

[Anonymous No.16051369]

>>16051365
Lmao, Sweden finds itself at stage 3 with regards to the muslim infestation. Norway's approaching stage 2.
They can't sell it as a good thing in and of itself, but they do try to sell all the other benefits.
It's so tiresome.

[Anonymous No.16051371]

>>16051358
>You defend antifa
Where?
>>16051359
It doesn't even say "white men". It says "oppressed minority". You're arguing that it's oppression not to be counted among the oppressed for no other reason than that you're not otherwise oppressed. Also, you can imagine the moderator to as passive-aggressive as you like in this little persecutory delusion of yours, but even then they STILL GIVE YOU THE FLOOR.

You're so sadly desperate for the slightest hint of oppression coming your way in order to justify the massive tantrum you already fully intended to throw anyway.
>>16051362
You're the one trying to read moral worth into it. It's about relevance to the conversation.

[Anonymous No.16051373]

>>16041350
>And also, if you had a worse example of discrimination, it's safe to assume you'd have gone with that one, instead.
I just found a better one actually, but I appreciate your incorrect assumption
>>16051342
>This is just like being denied a job on the basis of your race.
You know funny you mention that as an example, here is a link where white men were denied a job because of their race in the royal air force. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-66060490
I am curious to see how you spin this one.

[Anonymous No.16051374]

>>16051350
>And also, if you had a worse example of discrimination, it's safe to assume you'd have gone with that one, instead.
I just found a better one actually, but I appreciate your incorrect assumption
>>16051342
>This is just like being denied a job on the basis of your race.
You know funny you mention that as an example, here is a link where white men were denied a job because of their race in the royal air force. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-66060490
I am curious to see how you spin this one.

[Anonymous No.16051375]

>>16051371
>You're the one trying to read moral worth into it. It's about relevance to the conversation.
How does my oppression level directly correspond to my idea's relevance to a conversation?

[Anonymous No.16051376]

>>16051374
>the unnamed senior female RAF recruitment officer told her superiors that fast tracking women and ethnic minorities was contrary to the equality act and discriminated against white men
Oh look, the law applies to everyone equally and corrects itself. The misguided actions of a bureaucratic institution don't reflect the ideology. The law does.
Anyway the UK doesn't have a left-wing government so it's a moot point, really, the left isn't even responsible for this

[Anonymous No.16051377]

>>16051371
Whitelisting everyone besides you is functionally the same as blacklisting you.
Granting everyone a privilege besides one racial group is the same as denying one group a privilege.

[Anonymous No.16051378]

>>16051375
The whole organisation is about addressing social injustice and oppression.
>>16051377
No, it's not. Blacklisting would prevent you from speaking. You're not prevented from speaking. And, again, your complaint still boils down to this: it's oppression that you're not oppressed.

[Anonymous No.16051380]

>>16051376
So it's not oppression as long as they later condemned?
Or it isn't oppression as long as the law changes it later
Is that your official stance.

[Anonymous No.16051381]

>>16051378
>The whole organisation is about addressing social injustice and oppression.
So on the basis of what can they measure my level of oppression? And again, how does that perception evaluate the worthiness of my opinion before hearing it?

[Anonymous No.16051382]

>>16051378
>Being sent to the back of the bus isn't oppression because you can still get on the bus.

[Anonymous No.16051383]

Anyway, we've already established you're incredibly emotionally invested in your persecution narratives and also that fascists don't care about factual reality anyway, so whilst this is fun, I do actually (contrary to your aspersions) have better things to do.

>>16051380
>>16051381
I'm not getting into detail here, just going to point out you're well aware of what oppression is and you're playing dumb on purpose, even repeating explicitly refuted points now. Toodle pip

[Anonymous No.16051385]

>>16051383
Embarrassing, as soon as he finds something that isn't easy to refute like an image spammer, he flees the scene.

[Anonymous No.16051388]

>>16051383
>*refuses to elaborate*
Well, kind of based, but also to be expected.

[Anonymous No.16051398]

LOL

[Anonymous No.16051402]

>>16051398
More years to be a ragie wagie!

[Anonymous No.16051410]

>>16051398
This is a concerning trend we need to fix. How do we do so?

[Anonymous No.16051411]

>>16051410
We need more leftism so everyone kills themselves.

[Anonymous No.16051421]

The science is in. And that's science, folks. You don't want to be antiscience, do you? Only science and reality based science for my clean science cranium, thank you very much.

[bodhi No.16051433]

>>16051365

---------> >>16047459

[Anonymous No.16051513]

>>16051385
>>16051388
Back again, just popping my nose in to show that your points are easily refuted but I really can't spend my entire day babysitting a bunch of mental toddlers.

"Oppression" is not the same as incidental discrimination.
I do love the implication that the RAF and the Tory government are communist bulwarks. Seriously, some military paper pusher misapplying a rule is unfortunate but it's hardly reflective of ideology.

The SDA can decide who is oppressed same way you've decided you don't fit that category
Again, it's not about "worth" but about letting different viewpoints be heard in a discussion with limited time. But if you really, really feel that you have a unique take that the SDA absolutely needs to hear, you can get in line. I imagine the bigger hurdle here is that you're a fascist.

[Anonymous No.16051518]

>>16051398
Life expectancy in the USA in 1961: 69.84
Life expectancy in the USA in 2019: 78.87
https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/USA/united-states/life-expectancy

[Anonymous No.16051519]

>>16051513
>Back again, just popping my nose in to show that your points are easily refuted but I really can't spend my entire day babysitting a bunch of mental toddlers.
>You're wrong™ #sorrynotsorry.

[Anonymous No.16051524]

>>16051411
>Bootlicking stooge looking at the most capitalist country in the world:
>"This is leftism!"
Fucking hell, everything is fucking leftism to you people.

[Anonymous No.16051526]

>>16051513
>just popping my nose in
Oh I see what you did there.

[Anonymous No.16051532]

>>16051519
Once I saw the pattern of fascists treating discussions as mere mudslinging it really began to appear everywhere. An actual refutation is as good as an insult and an insult is a fine refutation when the discussion is entirely disconnected from the real world outside of it. The irony is that fascists believe in strict hierarchies but on a sociolinguistic level they flatten everything into equivalent meaninglessness. It's anti-intellectualism as encapsulated by Asimov: "my ignorance is as good as your knowledge". And it's the only way their points have any chance to stand at all.

[Anonymous No.16051534]

>>16051532
Everything's a fascist, isn't it?

[Anonymous No.16051541]

>>16051513
>"Oppression" is not the same as incidental discrimination.
By what fucking absurb definition is that the case.
You are just throwing your hands up into the air, screeching that I am wrong, with nothing but word games to back it up.
But I provided two examples to your none.

[Anonymous No.16051542]

>>16051534
Is it? Delusional reactionary anti-intellectual racist personality cultist seems rather specific. Then again, so does black Jewish gay trans antifa Marxist and we've established that those people are EVERYWHERE
All over 4chan
In your closet
Under your bed

[Anonymous No.16051543]

>>16051524
America is run by homosexual communists, which is why it's collapsing.

[Anonymous No.16051545]

>>16051542
Who's we?
Or are you one of those types who thinks the whole thread is the same person?

[Anonymous No.16051547]

>>16051541
>By what fucking absurb definition is that the case.
By what definition is a single incident "oppression"?
>But I provided two examples to your none.
Yes, the absolute injustice of having to wait your turn, and one actual instance of discrimination under the Tory government that affected a handful of people and was then quickly addressed under existing anti-discrimination law.
What do you want me to provide an example of? White people -not- being discriminated? Here's one: https://www.dsausa.org/organize/respectful_discussion/
Entitled git

[Anonymous No.16051551]

>>16051543
Ah, so that's why all the red states are the worst off. "Red". Could've known. It was right under our noses.
>>16051545
Yes, I use the third person plural pronoun to refer to a single person. Idiot.

[Anonymous No.16051557]

Of course I can never duck out of this thread any more at any moment without once again being accused of fleeing, even after I've already demonstrated an able willingness to return and address the feeble arguments presented. There's simply no end to them, however, because fascists never back down. It's a catch-22: I stay and argue all day with them and I'm somehow the no-life loser, I have social obligations and responsibilities and I'm defeated. It's yet another way that their sheer unreasonable obstinacy becomes a source of strength.

[Anonymous No.16051558]

>>16051551
>Yes, I use the third person plural pronoun to refer to a single person.
No, but it could be used to refer to two people, you and I. But I now see you mean "we" in a more patronizing manner.

[Anonymous No.16051559]

>>16051557
Two points:
1. You sure do write a lot.
2. Why do you write as though you're addressing a crowd?

[Anonymous No.16051561]

>>16051559
Because I am.

[Anonymous No.16051565]

>>16051561
You write as though you're addressing a group of people who agree with you, like all the comrades came over for beer.
But you're not. It's just you and the fascist horde.

[Anonymous No.16051570]

>>16051557
Holy shit you are fucking mental. Reading this thread is like reading a psyc patients journal. You need serious help. I am surprised you are still on the streets and havent been put away somewhere yet

[Anonymous No.16051575]

>>16051547
>Entitled git
>Its facism to not want to be judged and discrimatinated against for your race.
Heil fucking hitler then, you Anti white trash.

[Anonymous No.16051576]

>>16051543
this

[Anonymous No.16051586]

>>16051565
I write to organise my thoughts so I can put my observations out there. If anyone can benefit from them, all the better.
>>16051570
>Reading this thread is like reading a psyc patients journal.
Funny you should mention it, I have been treating this thread as an experiment to obtain insight into the fascist shared delusion. It indeed reads like several psych patients' journals in fact. One regaling his violent pyromaniac fantasies about cleansing fire. Another rambling about his monomaniacal obsession with trannies, trannies, trannies. Yet another making one paranoid accusation after another. But they have commonalities in the way that they think which shows in their attitude in a conversation.

It's interesting that, among all those to pick from, you zero in on the person who has done little more than accurately describing them.
>>16051575
>Heil fucking hitler then
Didn't take much did it
You honestly expect me to believe you weren't eager to drop that one from the start? And yet, again, who judged you for your race? Still no one. I'm judging you for being a disingenuous fascist though.

[Anonymous No.16051589]

>>16048524
LMAO, we are right and you are mentally ill.

[Anonymous No.16051594]

>>16051589
I feel like I've exhausted this thread because the patterns are repeating now. You're making the same assertion about me that I am about you. Yet, where I provide ample evidence, you provide none. To the fascist mind, these things are equivalent because it's just words, and words are as good as each other.

I'm beginning to suspect that fascists don't simply refuse to engage in good faith discussion, but that they are ideologically and psychologically incapable of it.

[Anonymous No.16051595]

>>16051586
>I write to organise my thoughts so I can put my observations out there. If anyone can benefit from them, all the better.
This is what's normally called a blog, usually done on private webpages and not an imageboard.
You might as well become a tripfag.

[Anonymous No.16051596]

>>16051586
tranny tranny tranny

[Anonymous No.16051598]

>>16051595
Thanks for the advice, maybe I will become a tripfag

[Anonymous No.16051601]

>>16051586
>And yet, again, who judged you for your race?
The democratic socialists of America, the UK govt, any company than employs DEI for hiring pratices ( all of largest ones), and any college that pratices affirmative action.
I also noticed you didn't deny your anti white tendencies, very telling

[Anonymous No.16051602]

>>16051598
Please do.

[Anonymous No.16051604]

>>16051594
>Yet, where I provide ample evidence, you provide none
You haven't provided shit. Link one of your posts with "evidence".

[Anonymous No.16051606]

>>16051601
>The democratic socialists of America
No they didn't.
>the UK govt
Are you a resident of the UK who applied to join the RAF?
> any company than employs DEI for hiring pratices ( all of largest ones), and any college that pratices affirmative action.
Ah, back to vague claims because the specific ones aren't cutting it
>I also noticed you didn't deny your anti white tendencies, very telling
Didn't realise I was expected to address that part and I doubt you'd accept any answer that didn't confirm your biases anyway.
You didn't deny that you were a disingenuous fascist all along.

[Anonymous No.16051608]

>>16051604
>>16051586
Literally the one above yours. Only one of many throughout the thread.

[Anonymous No.16051609]

>>16051606
learn to code, tranny

[Anonymous No.16051614]

>>16051609
Admitting that your manufactured problem is entirely overblown and furthermore subject to market forces more than ideology, weird idea of an "own"

[Anonymous No.16051615]

>>16051606
lets check in on how leftist governance is going

[Anonymous No.16051621]

>>16046776
Science truly is settled. I'm now completely fine with fags and the immigrants flooding my country.

[Anonymous No.16051623]

>>16051615
I know you're American but as a fascist you really have to realise that to your left doesn't mean leftist, anymore than China is part of the West for being west of Japan.

[Anonymous No.16051627]

>>16051609
>>16051614
Ah, I should've seen it coming, of course
>Thus, by a continuous shifting of rhetorical focus, the enemies are at the same time too strong and too weak. Fascist governments are condemned to lose wars because they are constitutionally incapable of objectively evaluating the force of the enemy.

[Anonymous No.16051633]

>>16051615
Jacksonville, FL has a higher crime rate than Philadelphia

[Anonymous No.16051634]

>>16051627
Leftists will never win because you're gay retards.
Destroying things is easy, what you've proven utterly incapable of is replacing everything you destroy with anything that works.

[Anonymous No.16051636]

>>16051633
You don't say.

[Anonymous No.16051637]

>>16051634
You're literally the ones who want to destroy people, and the irony is the defective people are you

[Anonymous No.16051638]

>>16051634
So what if someone said "hey what if instead of cutting people's legs off we give them boxes, have we tried doing that" and you go like "NO THAT NEVER WORKS", how exactly do you suppose you've refuted them?

[Anonymous No.16051641]

>>16051636
You'd think that Red States might at some point address the fact that they have the highest crime rates out there. But I guess destroying things is all the GOP is good at, and what they're utterly incapable of is building anything that works

[Anonymous No.16051643]

>>16051638
Because you're still suggesting cutting people's legs off, while making up new names for cutting people's lega off.

[Anonymous No.16051645]

>>16051606
>No they didn't.
Yes they did, they judge if I can speak based on my race.
>Are you a resident of the UK who applied to join the RAF?
What if I am.
>Ah, back to vague claims because the specific ones aren't cutting it
I am not required to educate you, I was merely demonstating the wider state of anti white pratices that were highlighted in my two eariler examples.
>Didn't realise I was expected to address that part
One of your many failings, be better.
>and I doubt you'd accept any answer that didn't confirm your biases anyway.
Personal attacks on an anonymous images board, tsk tsk.
>You didn't deny that you were a disingenuous fascist all along.
Didn't realise I was expected to address that part and I doubt you'd accept any answer that didn't confirm your biases anyway.

[Anonymous No.16051647]

>>16051643
So you think that anyone who's suggesting to use boxes actually isn't doing that? So there is no possible way to ever even suggest using boxes because it never actually means to use boxes, regardless of who says it?
So are you going to tell me that you're not a proponent of genocide yourself, whereupon I would point out you people are always proponents of genocide regardless of what you say, or you just come out and say that you are and prove yourself a hypocrite?

[Anonymous No.16051650]

>>16051645
>Yes they did, they judge if I can speak based on my race.
You mean they assign you a spot in the order of speaking. But, of course, you were never at one of their meetings, so no, they didn't even do that.
>What if I am.
You're right, it doesn't matter. You weren't judged for your race, you got caught in a bureaucratic snafu. They had a quota to meet, that's all. I don't think you even have a concept of what it means to be judged for your race, as a person, on a moral level, as being inferior. You're just grasping for things that look superficially similar to someone with neither personal experience on the subject nor empathy.
>I am not required to educate you
And that's my luck because you're utterly incapable of it.
>Personal attacks on an anonymous images board
lol
>Didn't realise I was expected to address that part and I doubt you'd accept any answer that didn't confirm your biases anyway.
Oh, my, who could have seen that one coming. You think your hypocrisy is lessened by leaning into it? One of your many failings, but it's really comprised by the big one of being a disingenuous fascist.

[Anonymous No.16051655]

>>16051645
>>16051650
PS I have no anti-white tendencies

[bodhi No.16051656]

>>16051643
francesca is a such a retarded bitch. What blast from the past, I havent heard about this stupid whore since 2016

[Anonymous No.16051667]

>>16051650
>You weren't judged for your race, you got caught in a bureaucratic snafu.
You are being delibrately obtuse because you know you are wrong
>Blacks aren't judged for their race, they are caught in a bureauceatic snafu because their neighborhoods commit more crime.Its concidence the police patrol there.
That is your stance with some madlib replacement.
>You mean they assign you a spot in the order of speaking.
By race, and if time is too short they wouldn't even let white men speak at all.
>And that's my luck because you're utterly incapable of it
Outreach to the mentally incompetent is truely beyond my power.

[Anonymous No.16051669]

Every reply above or below this one was made by a slack-jawed white nigger, prove me wrong using the scientific method.

[Anonymous No.16051674]

>>16051647
No, once again, we're taking about you, not "anyone", nor "everyone".

[Anonymous No.16051685]

>>16051667
>You are being delibrately obtuse because you know you are wrong
No. I even made this part explicit for you and you, of course, don't even acknowledge it. No one has made any sort of judgement about your moral character. No one has ever considered you an inferior based on your race. These things simply don't ever happen to you. It's so far out of your realm of experience you can't even imagine what it's like. So you think that having to wait your turn to speak is what it's like. You're making up imaginary scenarios wherein a meeting you would never attend is so overcrowded with oppressed minorities who all desperately want to speak their mind on the subject that they never get around to your hot take. And yet, if there is a meeting of an organisation concerned with oppressed minorities and it is attended by a lot of oppressed minorities and they all feel that they have something relevant to say on the topic, why do you think that you desperately need to be heard before any of them?
And then you bring up a "madlibs" example of systemic injustice and that just completely glances over the fact that your one proper example was actually successfully addressed by the system and corrected. I mean, of course. It wasn't supposed to happen to white men.

>>16051674
Ah, so your claims are once more entirely baseless.
Anyway, are you going to be honest about your genocidal inclinations or not?

[Anonymous No.16051690]

>>16051685
They are based on the fact that not everyone, not anyone, bit you, personally, are a transgendered communist.

[Anonymous No.16051694]

>>16051690
So if someone other than the scary imaginary trans commie under your bed suggested using boxes, that'd be all right? That'd be a good thing?

[Anonymous No.16051698]

>>16051694
Maybe if they hadn't spent the last 48 hours straight defending transgendered communists, I might be more willing to believe they aren't a transgendered communist like you.

[Anonymous No.16051700]

>>16051690
>>16051694
Because then the question is, how would you distinguish between them, when you automatically assume anyone talking about boxes is the spectre of trans communism and therefore actually not talking about it? So in actual fact you don't think improvement is possible because anyone talking about improvement is assumed to be a liar who doesn't want to improve anything, and this is your justification for eliminating anyone who claims to want improvement with great prejudice.

Yeah I was going to let you walk into my rhetorical trap and reply to it later when I got back but I see the bump limit has been reached and even though it's not a fast board I guess I should just get it over with.
>>16051698
Well, fitting to end on one final delusion from you, which is the same delusion you've been obsessively repeating for 48 hours straight.

[Anonymous No.16051715]

>>16051700
You can't even pass on an anonymous message board, it's not hard to tell.

[Anonymous No.16051792]

>>16051609
SUFFERING FROM SUCCESS

[Anonymous No.16052772]

>>16051715
Only brainwormed fascists believe that repeatedly calling a man a man is an insult. You're probably just as terrible at this IRL, because of course, how would you know? You could pass dozens of trans people in a day without noticing and then walk up to a menopausal woman and tell her she'll "never pass" and pat yourself on the back on your infallible ability to detect trannies

[Anonymous No.16052927]

>>16052772
ywnbaw