/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.16029423]

What is the science behind remote viewing?

[Anonymous No.16029424]

[Anonymous No.16029435]

Basically "think china, in china".

[Anonymous No.16029472]

More importantly, what is the science behind anti-gravity, and why did the Australian intelligence community say that the CIA simultaneously tried to publicly debunk UFO’s & paranormal phenomena while privately funding the community that worked on the Manhattan Project (Teller, Dyson, Oppenheimer, Wheeler) to work on anti-gravity and UFO technology? Also, why does this perfectly line up with what Eric Weinstein (PhD Mathematics from Harvard) has said for all these years about the stagnation of physics post the invention of the Teller-Ulam design?

>Source:
>https://recordsearch.naa.gov.au/SearchNRetrieve/Interface/ViewImage.aspx?B=30030606&S=1

[Anonymous No.16029473]

>>16029472
>Also, why does this perfectly line up with what Eric Weinstein (PhD Mathematics from Harvard) has said for all these years about the stagnation of physics post the invention of the Teller-Ulam design?
Quick rundown?

[Anonymous No.16029482]

>>16029423
You need to have a soul and a healthy brain to be able to use it. Fluoride in water, vaccines, chemtrails, and corporate toxic "food" damages the brain enough to make it impossible.

[Anonymous No.16029489]

>>16029473
Eric around a year ago started talking about how the modern institution of the unification of relativistic and quantum physics (quantum gravity) through the string theoretics school was being headed by the guy (Ed Witten) whose father (Louis Witten) was also someone who worked for the precursor-company to Lockheed Martin, and Louis Witten’s task at such a military contractor was to establish theories for how anti-gravity could be accomplished and applied. A lot of the top-tiers of the physics community (Wheeler, DeWitt, even Feynman) allegedly were subsidized by anti-gravity research groups post the Manhattan project and nobody ever brings this up, despite the fact that such research inevitably led to the current movements of quantum gravity and therefore the succinct stagnation of physics amongst the theoreticians.

Good video here for it:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=eBA3RUxkZdc

[Anonymous No.16029685]

>>16029423
There's no science.
Anyone who knows parapsychological history knows that the Americans and Soviets spent tons of money during the '60s and '70s on goose chases and competitive propaganda ops. The CIA would contract all kinds of kooks on the slither of a chance that something would be found.
Tons of CIA documents from the era have been declassified because they have no value.

[Anonymous No.16029690]

>>16029685
LMAO

[Anonymous No.16029695]

>>16029685
Why'd they spend 20+ years on it then? Why'd one of the scientists who originally headed the program say that some of his former colleagues told him that the project still continues on to this day in secret?

[Anonymous No.16029721]

>>16029695
It was literally one hippie with rank who pushed it, and it took 20 years to discredit him completely.

[Anonymous No.16029735]

>>16029690
>>16029695
This is what happens when your IQ is high enough not to trust glowies but low enough to think they'd declass something of real parapsychological value.
Don't be like these /x/ posters.

[Anonymous No.16029776]

>>16029721
It was more than one and the had the backing of the director of the CIA.
>>16029735
There's plenty examples of people showing that remote viewing works. Pic related

[El Arcón No.16029782]

This book was pretty good.

[Anonymous No.16029784]

>>16029735
They didn't declassify anything out of their own will, it was an accident.

[Anonymous No.16029791]

>>16029784
>They didn't declassify anything out of their own will, it was an accident.

[Anonymous No.16029813]

>>16029791

[Anonymous No.16029825]

If it worked, governments would use it to track and kill their enemies.
If it worked, companies would use it to spy on their competition.
If it worked, oil companies would use it to know where to drill.
If it worked, someone would have won James Randi's prize.
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Remote_viewing

Now watch the creationist flat-earthers reply "nuh uh" to this post.

[Anonymous No.16029830]

>>16029685
The science on parapsychology is settled - there is an effect. This has been known since the 1950s. Skeptics just have not read the literature. Like with NDEs. And NDEs are unironically irrefutable proof that heaven really is awaiting us because (1) people see things during their NDEs when they are out of their bodies that they should not be able to under the assumption that the brain creates consciousness, and (2) anyone can have an NDE and everyone is convinced by it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U00ibBGZp7o

So any atheist would be too, so pic related is literally irrefutable proof of life after death. As one NDEr pointed out:

>"I'm still trying to fit it in with this dream that I'm walking around in, in this world. The reality of the experience is undeniable. This world that we live in, this game that we play called life is almost a phantom in comparison to the reality of that."

If NDEs were hallucinations somehow then extreme atheists and neuroscientists who had NDEs would maintain that they were halluinations after having them. But what we find is the complete opposite as NDEs convince every skeptic when they have a really deep NDE themselves. And that is why we know they are real.

[Anonymous No.16029852]

>>16029825
>If it worked, governments would use it to track and kill their enemies.
>If it worked, companies would use it to spy on their competition.
>If it worked, oil companies would use it to know where to drill.
How do you know that doesn't happen?
Also
>rationalwiki

[Anonymous No.16029857]

>>16029830
>And NDEs are unironically irrefutable proof that heaven really is awaiting us
It's proof that there is an image of heaven that is presented to us, and not what we'll actually go to if we step into the light.

During a NDE a man realizes that he's being deceived by beings to try and go into the light and then he hears a voice far away that whispered, "he's figuring it out"
https://rumble.com/v3ou3jp-he-figured-it-out-during-an-nde-he-resisted-the-false-light-and-was-sent-to.html

[Anonymous No.16030236]

>>16029830
>The science on parapsychology is settled - there is an effect. This has been known since the 1950s.
Dude, the work from that time is so shoddy, if not fraudulent, that even parapsychologists with an inclination to believe in the paranormal have called it into question.

Markwick, Betty (1978). The Soal-Goldney Experiments with Basil Shackleton: New Evidence of Data Manipulation. Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research, 56

[Anonymous No.16030249]

>>16030236
>Dude, the work from that time is so shoddy, if not fraudulent, that even parapsychologists with an inclination to believe in the paranormal have called it into question.
This.
I'm a huge /x/ and paranormal believer, and even I dispute remote viewing research for the simple fact it assumes its premises prior to even beginning any experiments.

Imagine thinking your pineal gland could see, and the way you tested it would be trying to squint really really really hard with it and then describe anything and everything that enters your mental perception as "evidence".

[Anonymous No.16030266]

>>16029423
Either a coverup for hiding the real sources, or psychosis. I'm more and more worried that it is the latter, even though the former makes more sense.
>>16029482
On the contrary, they would like if everyone had it, so they enforce things that they found to enhance the "potential", which is naturally actually what causes the brain damage, and why people are so unhealthy, both mentally and otherwise. It's also possible that Germans, or the Red Khmers, and possibly more were made the epitome evil because they were actually locking them up.

[Anonymous No.16030689]