Concise Reconciliation Between Materialism and Idealism

[Anonymous No.15989892]

The video puts forth a rigorous and concise reconciliation between the hard sciences and mystical/metaphysical traditions, in the process answering:

Hard problem of consciousnes
Problem of qualia
Problem of free will
The intelligiblity problem
Problem of theodicy

https://youtu.be/xqY08gN_FCM?si=PZUTrvxZ4bS2Qb9-

Thank you and I look forward to collecting my Nobel

[Anonymous No.15989930]

Justin Riddle's Three World's model is another proposed way to reconcile materialism and idealism.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ic3qYSSk30

[Anonymous No.15989968]

>>15989930
I think you'll notice that most large scale theoretical models come to rest on triadic structures (as discussed in the video):

Father, Son, Holy Spirit
Unconscious, Subconscious, Conscious
Wave, Particle, Observer
Environment, Organism, Selection

[Anonymous No.15990519]

>>15989892
empty schizo garbage. be thankful i even bumped your pathetic thread.

[Anonymous No.15990554]

>>15989892
>Problem of free will
Free will is logically impossible. No point discussing something that cannot possibly exist.

[Anonymous No.15991386]

>>15989930
How can the math world project the physical?

[Anonymous No.15991398]

>>15991386
Presumably in the way it actually does as far as application is concerned.

Then again I'm not a Platonist and I don't know what the neo-Platonists are proposing

[Anonymous No.15991493]

>>15990554
>No point discussing something that cannot possibly exist.
Those are the favorite debate topics for people, things with no cognitive value, like god and ethics, since they don't have any sense/logic they are perfect debate material because you can just come up with anything on spot to further any discussion

[Anonymous No.15991496]

>>15991493
Things with no cognitive value, like your existence

[bodhi No.15991591]

>>15989930
That's Roger Penrose's model dingus