*deboonks your favourite theory*

[Anonymous No.15989554]

[Anonymous No.15989695]

>>15989554
she agrees with all my favorite theories, because she's very smart

[Anonymous No.15989708]

>>15989554
Stop it Sabine! My member is now hard!

[Anonymous No.15989723]

>>15989554
I watched a lot of her long form debates with other physics fags and when she has more time you see that she is much more reasonable and less black and white. But I assume she simplifies her stance on things for retards who watch her main channel. She's actually not as stupid as I thought at first. But she's for sure a German Autist and that limits her creativity. She's basically allergic to the philosophy side of physics.

>>15989708
Also this.

[Anonymous No.15989750]

>>15989723
>the philosophy side of physics.
Not science.

[Anonymous No.15989761]

>>15989723
Maybe youre so quick to judge because your goyslop culture produces and values low effort science philosopher brainlets so much.

[Anonymous No.15989833]

>>15989723
>philosophy side of natural philosophy
>>15989750
>>the philosophy side of natural philosophy
>Not natural philosophy
>>15989761
>natural philosophy philosopher

[Anonymous No.15989853]

>>15989554
Stopped watching her content after she tried to make an argument where every individual point was correct but irrelevant to the conclusion.

[Anonymous No.15989901]

>>15989554
>*denies climate change*

[Anonymous No.15990024]

>>15989554
>Doesn't tackle the behavioral and political effects of genital cutting

[Anonymous No.15990036]

>>15990024
do americans really

[Anonymous No.15990049]

>>15990036
Yep. No funskin allowed. Only bare glans rubbing all the time, leading to passive aggression and hypersexual lability with amplified dominance and submission dynamics. And splitting the core self by amputating part of an infant in the preverbal stage.

[Anonymous No.15990081]

>>15990049
>American is born
>Leaves a tip

[Anonymous No.15990086]

>>15990081
Indeed, truly vile.

[Anonymous No.15990099]

>>15989750
Yes, of course. Hamilton's principle of least action has absolutely no philosophical underpinnings at all (despite being an almost entirely axiomatic framework which then proliferates throughout all of causal macro physics).

[Anonymous No.15990117]

>>15990081
Better be the a full tip. The doctor did just perform a $1500 delivery in a nice delivery room. Least you can do is give him the frenulum.

[Anonymous No.15990123]

>>15989750
You get a PhD in physics, you know what the P stands for right??

Also the exact response you gave is why physicists have been spinning their wheels accomplishing jack shit for decades vs their peers from generations past. Those physicists knew that the coin has two sides. There is no science without philosophy. You can't put the cart before the horse.....or let me guess, you think that's air you're breathing?

[Anonymous No.15990125]

>>15990117
He can take the cord blood too while he's at it.

[Anonymous No.15990154]

>>15989750
BUWHWHWhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah


Eat shit loser
Die slow
Sabine has spoken!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3UNPOG3ZJ4

[Anonymous No.15990200]

>>15989723
History's greatest philosophers are all German autists, cease your slander

[Anonymous No.15990374]

>>15989554
another grifter vaguely appealing to science skeptic boomers.

[Anonymous No.15990383]

>>15989554
Reddit the physisist

[Anonymous No.15990662]

>>15990123
>>15990099
>>15989833
no one gives a shit, the only philosophy of science is the scientific method which is just a pedantic way to say "you have to do independent objective checks". This isnt a field of knowledge, literally just the scientific method

[Anonymous No.15990702]

>>15989695
>she agrees with all my favorite theories, because she's very smart
Literally me

[Anonymous No.15990747]

>>15989723
Philosophy of Science is as useful to scientists as Ornithology is to birds.

[Anonymous No.15990755]

>>15989554
This stupid bitch need to sit down, shut the fuck up and let the real scientists do their work

[Anonymous No.15990770]

>On the question of free will, Hossenfelder advocates incompatibilism. Free will cannot be justified by any laws of nature, as these are deterministic (even in chaos theory) with the exception of quantum mechanics, which in turn only recognizes uncontrollable chance.

[Anonymous No.15990777]

>>15990770
>He doesn't have a divine spark with a basis outside the universe
Okay, hylic.

[Anonymous No.15990788]

>>15990747
>Philosophy of Science is as useful to scientists as
>music theory to musicians
>learning piano as a second instrument is an actual requirement for all musicians both by conservatory and business

[Anonymous No.15990810]

>>15990788
you cant make an argument about science so you just talk about other things?
Pray tell how is philosophy useful for science?

[Anonymous No.15990822]

>>15990810
>Pray tell how is philosophy useful for science?
Anyone who has to ask this will never make a useful polymath, they lack the underlying cognitive and psychological "architecture" to be truly interdisciplinary. So anyone answering you is wasting their time. Either you get it or you don't, and if you're capable, you'll come out of it on your own anyway.

I'm replying to discourage that anon and anyone else from engaging with you.

[Anonymous No.15990838]

>>15989554
the only thing i disagree with her about is dismissing dark matter without even mentioning the strongest evidence in its favor, i haven't ever seen her say anything else that i would especially disagree with

[Anonymous No.15990956]

>>15990822
its clear you just dont know what are pretending to defend. You are a pretentious impostor playing as an intellectual but are completely hollow and exposed

[Anonymous No.15990961]

>>15990956
You forgot to attach a brainlet wojak meme.
lel

[Anonymous No.15990967]

>>15990961
all these excuses instead of making an argument

[Anonymous No.15990968]

>>15990967
You're reaction based, like a bot. A biobot. You just asked me for a prompt.

[Anonymous No.15991162]

>>15990200
Your german pseuds have never done a single useful thing for society all they've amounted to is recreating religious texts for their pseud followers to debate like theologians and have tax money wasted on universities to study their garbage that does nothing useful for anyone except make retards think they're intelligent. The greatest philosophers are Pythagoras, Plato, and Jesus.

[Anonymous No.15991165]

>>15990662
The philosophy retards typically redefine the word to appropriate science and then call themselves philosophers since they read a faggot's book and act as if they're responsible for science that they could never understand because they're a philosopher and philosophy can also mean science

[Anonymous No.15991170]

>>15991165
You are a slave.

[Anonymous No.15991175]

>>15991170
How original

[Anonymous No.15991178]

>>15991175
You're welcome.

I do whatever I want. I use anything and everything for what I want. I don't care about its creator, its ecology, or you.

You are a slave.
I accept the burden of being in control.

We're in different worlds and we're not the same.

[Anonymous No.15991183]

>>15989750
A lot of physics stems down from thoughts experiments which are essentially philosophy.

Remember that Shannon's greatest invention was directly inspired by his philosophy class.

Philosophy is a way to qualitatively articulate ideas and thoughts beyond simply crushing numbers.

[Anonymous No.15991184]

>>15991178
>You're a slave because you called out the fallacy of defining everything as philosophy then taking credit for science that has nothing to do with debating what german retards say
Okay

[Anonymous No.15991189]

>>15991184
Ha, oh well. Everything has its place. You're made to do that sort of work. The natural order, no ill will intended. Best of luck!

[Anonymous No.15991192]

>>15991189
You really don't like being outed as a lair do you?

[Anonymous No.15991193]

>>15991192
What exactly do you think is going on here, Anon?

[Anonymous No.15991196]

>>15991193
You tried to define science as philosophy so you could take credit for it for philosophy that's mostly used to refer to non-scientific discussion about ethics or metaphysics, got outed as a liar, then began posting teenager pseud tier insults

[Anonymous No.15991199]

[math]f(x_i)[math]

[Anonymous No.15991202]

>>15991196
I didn't do anything. This >>15990822 was my first reply to you. You were so TRRRIIGGGEEERRRREEEEDDDDD!!! (lol) that you didn't bother to read + comprehend.
>I'm replying to discourage that anon and anyone else from engaging with you.
A pattern which cintinued and is probably all pervasive throughout your checkered life spent in the highly selective perception of base consciousness.

[Anonymous No.15991207]

>>15991202
That was a separate anon, you replied to >>15991165 for no apparent reason other than being upset at it.

[Anonymous No.15991208]

>>15991207
You have a fundamental malformation in how you think.

[Anonymous No.15991210]

>>15991208
Powerful

[Anonymous No.15991211]

>>15991210
Inspitational.
So brave.
Moved me to the core.

[Anonymous No.15991293]

>>15991162
>creating religious texts for their pseud followers to debate like theologians and have tax money wasted on universities to study their garbage that does nothing useful for anyone
I agree, that perfectly describes plato, jesus and pythagoras (like all philosophers in the current sense.) But at least kant and schopenhauer deboonked all of them. Feel free to seeth and cope though

[Anonymous No.15991359]

>>15991293
It doesn't perfectly describe Jesus at all since he never wrote any of his doctrines down as far as we know they were written by his followers at least twenty years after he died, some maybe over a hundred years. As for Plato and Pythagoras most of their writings are written precisely and unambiguously unlike the germans pseuds who intentionally wrote vaguely to get their retarded followers to beg them for answers and then eventually deify them. And even if you're accusations were true, the difference is they actually created new ideas that inspired people and formed new religions and helped normal people answer questions. Your germans did absolutely nothing, they contributed nothing to society whatsoever.

[Anonymous No.15991363]

>>15991293
Oh and feel free to explain how your pseuds debunked their unfalsifiable ideas.

[Anonymous No.15991373]

>>15990024
>americans are so obsessed with foreskin that they will bring it up unprompted, completely randomly, in a thread that has nothing at all to do with it
You wouldn't have a girlfriend even if you had an intact foreskin.

[Anonymous No.15991378]

>>15991373
I am American, and I have an intact foreskin.

You tried! hahahahaaa

[Anonymous No.15991380]

>>15991378
So you have an intact foreskin but you are still obsessed with other people's lack of intact foreskins to the point you'll randomly bring it up for no reason?

[Anonymous No.15991383]

>>15991210
Powerful. yeah
nigger

[Anonymous No.15991384]

>>15991380
That is correct. I grew up submerged within and surrounded by a genital cutting culture and its products. I have things to say about this.

[Anonymous No.15991399]

SHE DEBOONKED THE SCHRODINGER'S CAT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mJDWPLlI5I4

[Anonymous No.15991414]

>>15991384
So talk about it where it's relevant, not in random fucking threads, retard.

[Anonymous No.15991425]

>>15991414
I'm not here for you, bud. It's the other way around. I'd tack on "And don't you forget it", but it doesn't actually matter what goes on in your animal consciousness.

[Anonymous No.15991430]

>>15991425
Okay, gay autist. I bet you have pictures of cut and uncut cocks that you post to show how evil circumcision is.

[Anonymous No.15991436]

>>15991430
Nope, just the one. >>15990024

Which I should have titled "nofunskinallowed"

[Anonymous No.15991441]

>>15991430
Also the more you reply to me, the more you sound like you're circumcoping. Just saiyan.

[Anonymous No.15991442]

>>15991436
Yes, I bet you think foreskin is a lot of fun. You like sucking smeggies out of another man's foreskin? I bet you do, faggot.

[Anonymous No.15991451]

>>15991442
>Yes, I bet you think foreskin is a lot of fun
My funskin being enjoyable is implied, yes. Do you like talking about penises in depth, anon? Do you like thinking about dicks and foreskin DEEEEPPPLY?

kek

[Anonymous No.15991475]

>>15991183
>>A lot of physics stems down from thoughts experiments which are essentially philosophy.
If you can test it, then it's science. If you can't test it, then it's worthless.

[Anonymous No.15991488]

>>15990662
I thought the same thing but I definitely see this being actually useful like it's consequences. Do you want to test some ideas? There are philosophies behind it. It's why they're not doing genetic engineering and don't do race studies. Obviously their "philosophy" is wrong. Lombroso's ideas are back too.

[Anonymous No.15991501]

>>15990810
age?

[Anonymous No.15991504]

>>15990747
So, very important? That's how we learn to preserve bird species

[Anonymous No.15991526]

>>15990125
I wonder about this because I would imagine it would apply to other mammals, too. However, I've had two breeding pairs of Golden Retrievers and the bitch would always eat the placenta and umbilical cord within seconds of birthing a pup. I would think if the benefits were so profound that waiting to remove these parts would have been favored evolutionarily and we would see mothers wait before doing this cleaning.

[Anonymous No.15991530]

>>15991526
I agree, and have thought about this from an evolutionary psychology / behavioral patterning perspective as well. Apparently it varies in primates what they do with the cord, and I'm not really aware of the physiology involved with animals that have "litters" in terms of placental transfusion. The whole "clamping" aspect is just done to provide hemostasis in humans, even though placental transfusion completes on its own anyway. Mamking it doubly retarded because you cna just wait a few minutes.

However given that this is /sci/, we can just refer to the research literature. Where these parameters have been evaluated.

Boys have lower fine motor and social scores at 4 years old. Significant reduction in brain myelination.
https://www.jpeds.com/article/S0022-3476(18)31079-5/fulltext
At 4 months:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6259583/
And 12 months:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32702760/

History of cord management.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3423128/

A review of placental transfusion:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5290307/

Role of ferritin (iron stores) in free radical defense and early neurodevelopment
https://chem.libretexts.org/Courses/Saint_Marys_College_Notre_Dame_IN/CHEM_342%3A_Bio-inorganic_Chemistry/Readings/Metals_in_Biological_Systems_(Saint_Mary's_College)/Iron_Storage%3A_Ferritin

https://www.who.int/elena/titles/cord_clamping/en/
https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD004074.pub3/full?highlightAbstract=umbil%7Cumbilical
https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD003248.pub4/full?highlightAbstract=umbil%7Cumbilical

So pretty much it looks to me that "modern medicine" and modern human consciousness is pretty much at or below the base consciousness of animals.

[Anonymous No.15991538]

>>15990747
like, are you comparing scientists to birds? literal bird brains lmao

[Anonymous No.15991541]

>>15991538
Btw that's a quote from Richard Feynman, Nobel prize winner in physics

[Anonymous No.15991560]

>>15989554
another dysgenic downs looking european in science. gross kys

[Anonymous No.15991682]

>>15991359
>Plato and Pythagoras most of their writings are written precisely and unambiguously
How do you know this? Did you somehow find a 2500 year old manuscript written by pythagoras? You would probably be the greatest living archeologist if you achieved such a thing
For Plato, republic is literally assigned to undergrads because its arguments/logic (or lack thereof) are so easy to tear apart.
>and then eventually deify them
You mean actually deify them, in the case of pythagoras and jesus?
>they actually created new ideas that inspired people and formed new religions
El Ron Hubbard is a great philosopher now you guys!
>helped normal people answer questions
Shouldn't a philosopher (natural or otherwise) focus on finding the truth, or the closest possible thing to the truth?

[Anonymous No.15991992]

>>15991488
Those methods of testing ideas are science so why not just call it science instead of philosophy which is extremely vague and basically encompasses all forms of thought?

[Anonymous No.15992008]

>>15991992
Because you don't test if it works, you choose the "path" the field goes in the usage. Hard sciences and pure research are different from more practical applications.
Ethics have long cucked even the research to see if the ideas work.

Europeans had underlying concepts and theories. Asians knew random cool facts that were scientifically proven. Who got ahead? That same concepts like those of morals can also hinder or guide them.

[Anonymous No.15992241]

>>15991183
>thoughts experiments
this is an example of the absurdism of philosophy. A mental experiment. Such idiocy.
An experiment is done in the real world. Planning an experiment or theorizing about them is not and will never be "mental experiments", which are not even concepts.

[Anonymous No.15992277]

>>15990049
If it were possible to grow neurons from stem cells, what about just implanting more neurons in the shaft of the penis and connecting them to the rest already there with microsurgery? Would this result in increased sensation or would the brain be unable to interpret the new signals?

[Anonymous No.15992288]

>>15992277
do they even have to be the right type? I like when you touch your cock, are the neurons sending a pleasure signal or are they sending a touch signal and the brain perceives it as pleasure because it comes from the penis?

[Anonymous No.15992291]

>>15992288
oh god i meant
>Like when you touch your cock*

[Anonymous No.15992298]

>>15989554
>I DON'T HAVE FREE WILL!! THE COLLISION OF PREVIOUS ATOMS FORCED ME TO MAKE THIS VIDEO!
Why would I listen to such a loon lmao.

[Anonymous No.15992305]

>>15992298
is she really wrong tho

[Anonymous No.15992324]

>>15992305
Hume straightened this out well before today's physics ironically. Not only is determinism compatibility with free will but it can be argued to be a prerequisite. If we understood every person as a decision making agent that chooses what to do based on its experience of reality, then we need determinism. Both for the person to be able to make choices using information such that they can actually know and expect different consequences of their different decisions, and also so that the decision making process itself is rational rather than effectively random and/or meaningless.

[Cult of Passion No.15992332]

>>15989833
>philosophy side of natural philosophy
Intuitive Theory, theorizing measurements and testing with applied.

[Anonymous No.15992395]

>>15992324
schizo babble

[Anonymous No.15992415]

>>15992395
No he's saying that free will and determinism can work together.

You are a being who can make choices. Your decision-making is influenced by your experience of reality. You need determinism to be able to choose things in a rational way. You have to be able to predict what could/should/will happen. In essence you free will and determinism are not separate but rather free will needs a deterministic universe.

[Anonymous No.15992426]

>>15992415
every choice you make is determined by physics not influenced

[Anonymous No.15992446]

>>15989554
and yet she won't touch bigbangists, only mild irritatiom about inflation

[El Arcón No.15992561]

[Anonymous No.15992585]

>>15990024
>AAAAHHHHHHHHHHH
>I'M CIRCUMDEBOOOOOOOOONNNNKKKINATINGGG!!!!!