[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 868 KB, 1200x1200, Neptune_new.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15974772 No.15974772 [Reply] [Original]

What the fuck??
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neptune

>> No.15974905

I guess scientists don't know shit about cameras

>> No.15974907

>>15974772
Retard

>> No.15974939
File: 267 KB, 1920x1200, pia19912-1920x1200mtsharp.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15974939

first it was Mars colour change now this?!!
I fucking hate this shit man space becomes less magical by the day.
when I was a kid Mars was "the red planet"
now it's just some cold Mongolian desert from recent picture.

>> No.15975075

>>15974939
Looks pretty red to me

>> No.15975094

>>15974939
I don't really buy this whole ".01 Atm" thing. I mean just look, that's a normal looking sky.

>> No.15975097

>>15974939
>Mt Sharp
>blunt as fuck
Nice one, NASA

>> No.15975228
File: 732 KB, 2400x1514, photos_space_curiosity-PIA17603.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15975228

>>15975094
it's just nasa being not dishonest but bending reality to suit them
like every photo they release with the sky, it is only showing near the horizon
I bet if you were on the surface the horizon would look more atmospherey compared to the top of the sky.

>> No.15975230

NASA's mission is now to convince you that space isn't interesting and you should stop caring about it. Before it was to make it more interesting, but space has become right wing and NASA needs to make you care about environmentalism instead.

>> No.15976230

>>15974939
That's literally red, what are you babbling about?

>> No.15976387
File: 255 KB, 1280x800, 128374.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15976387

>>15974939
it's always been that color

>> No.15976399

>>15975230
They didn't have to try very hard, it's just rocks and gas

>> No.15976410

>>15974772
you did this same shitty thread on /pol
kys

>> No.15976475

>>15976410
I don't go on /pol/

>> No.15976622

>>15975094
that's because these pictures are taken in the deserts of Arizona and Nevada

>> No.15976627

>>15974772
The old dark blue images of Neptune were false-color designed to make it easier to see atmospheric features. This is what Neptune would actually look like to the naked eye.

>> No.15977765
File: 93 KB, 1050x750, 1673880827902734.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15977765

>>15974772
>Neptune now looks like a sibling of Uranus
Uranus-bros/sistas, we have been redeemed. Now Neptune-fags will stop laughing at us!

Now joke asides, looks like Uranus in theory has more mist of what the first Voyager images did show. Why hast wikipedia updated Uranus picture too?

>> No.15977772

>>15974772
Apparently the original processing was chosen to make the cloud formations more visible. But somewhere along the way that fact was forgotten.

>> No.15978624
File: 184 KB, 800x599, combined_figures_crop-1-0b2a41bb31c82c4a580f9b8c7815af1cf115327b-s800-c85.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15978624

>>15974772
What are false color images?
>DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE

>> No.15979241

>>15978624
I don't get it. So you're saying for 40 years they actually decoded it as the wrong colors until they looked at it again?

>> No.15979257

>>15979241
False != wrong
False-colour allows you to see structures that might not be visible to the naked eye. And why would a scientific measurement restrict itself to the arbitrary limitations of the organs of a naked ape?

>> No.15979274
File: 123 KB, 512x512, caduceus.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15979274

>>15974939
They don't want to show the ruins of the first civilization that colonized mars, the truly human civilization. Current "humans" are only 1/8 human, 7/8 apes. Some races are even more ape than that.

>> No.15979290
File: 1.38 MB, 1605x1740, true vs natural.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15979290

>> No.15980215

>>15974772
There's a picture of the dark blue neptune on that page though, in the Atmosphere section. You might notice there are some words next to the picture, and if you read the words it says
>The colour is exaggerated

>> No.15980239
File: 98 KB, 1030x572, IMG_1212.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15980239

>>15974939
Science is on a sacred (unholy) mission to destroy all fun in the universe

>> No.15981544

>>15974772
No they didnt shut up chud the science is settled

>> No.15982564

>>15974772
Why do science books say the Earth's core is iron and nickel when nobody has dug that deep?

>> No.15982630

>>15974772
looks pretty flat to me

>> No.15982800

The difference is probably the difference between using a ground based telescope through earth's atmosphere and something like the Hubble.

>> No.15985037

Niggerish thread

>> No.15985992
File: 273 KB, 1080x1003, Screenshot_20240118_193523_Chrome.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15985992

Nasa is gonna need to update their Neptune page.

>> No.15985996

these kinds of threads are just so sad because i know that the majority of people aren't shitposting

>> No.15986031
File: 184 KB, 1022x1024, PIA08440.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15986031

>>15974939
You're aware that the soil can be different colours at different locations right? That it's not uniformly identical all over the planet?