[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 2.18 MB, 1x1, 1684060306970281.pdf [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15967568 No.15967568[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

This is a short clip of a physics lecture at the University of California Berkley which shows how badly faked the global warming data is
https://youtu.be/8BQpciw8suk

The PDF is the climategate emails referred to in the lecture

>> No.15967575

>>15967568
>Look mom, I posted it again

>> No.15967585

good thread, never let them forget

>> No.15967589

>>15967568
Nobody said any of this.

>> No.15967590

>>15967568
>Richard A. Muller
An 80 year-old (who doesn't care about the future), funded by the Charles G. Koch Foundation. Why is it always dinosaurs funded by the Koch brothers who deny global warming? Always!

>> No.15967601

>>15967568
yeah I really want to hear what a physicist has to say about climatology

>> No.15967603

so why did the raw data deviate from the graph?
did they literally graft on two unrelated data sources to push a narative?

>> No.15967622

>>15967601
better than journalists

>> No.15967660

https://reason.com/2023/04/27/global-warming-trend-is-only-one-half-of-the-climate-model-simulations-says-new-paper/
>"the new NOAA data do not support a claim that warming in the troposphere has undergone a statistically-significant change in trend."

I think this was one of the salient questions I was most resistant to changing my mind about,since the actual "science" of AGW appeared solid and it wasn't an obviously partisan topic at first.

>> No.15967729
File: 393 KB, 1109x622, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15967729

>impressive, very nice.
>Now let's see Richard A. Muller's global temperature reconstruction.

>> No.15967814
File: 262 KB, 663x625, 1683264872483873.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15967814

>>15967729
berkeleyearth.org is a propaganda website, not a valid source of scientific data. the video in OP shows clearly how your that graph is

>> No.15967838
File: 71 KB, 857x621, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15967838

>>15967814
Why are you conflating Europe temp reconstruction with global temperatures?
>propaganda website
Muller and his team addressed the issues he talked about in the video. Do you have valid concerns about BEST or do you just dislike sceptics capable of admitting they were wrong?

>> No.15968074

>>15967622
Hardly

>> No.15969073

>>15967838
>2011