How many of you are aware we live in a simulation.

[Anonymous No.15950153]

I don't mean you've read about simulation theory or think we live in a simulation. I mean how many of you have been shown proof that we live in a simulation? You can literally talk to the machine. You can make certain color cars appear on the road. The TV can start talking to you. Impossibly coincidental events people call "synchronicities".

How many of you have "seen it" with your own eyes?

[Anonymous No.15950190]

>>15950153
Whispers like footsteps you left for yourself. The simulation is YOU.

[Anonymous No.15950236]

>>15950153
>How many of you have "seen it" with your own eyes?
After 48 years on this planet, travelling four continents, lived in three different countries, and having been around the globe three times... none.

[Anonymous No.15950288]

>>15950153
Literally schizophrenia.

[Anonymous No.15950308]

>>15950153
>How many of you have "seen it" with your own eyes?
I have. Heard it too.

[Anonymous No.15950319]

>>15950153
you are describing schizophrenia

[Anonymous No.15950353]

>>15950153
why one layer deep and not a gorrilion?

[Anonymous No.15950364]

>>15950153
it's not efficient anon. it's extremely way more cheaper to design the most efficient hardware rather than simulate it.
our brains need about 20-25W while it's expected that around 2030 we'll finally have a top supercomputer that would theoretically be able to simulate a single human brain.
the simulation idea is kinda retarded

[Anonymous No.15950369]

>>15950153
I'm no shrink, but that sounds a lot like stories I've read about the experiences of people with schizophrenia in the early stages, particularly the part about the TV talking to you. I hope it's something less serious though. Schizophrenia kind of sucks.

[Anonymous No.15950724]

>>15950153
Take meds.
>>>/x/