can science explain

[Anonymous No.15950046]

[Anonymous No.15950047]

[Anonymous No.15950049]

[Anonymous No.15950055]

>>15950046
chemical imbalance

[Anonymous No.15950166]

>>15950046
There was a really interesting talk I saw almost a decade ago about “sexual illusions”, a theory about sexual perception, but I cannot find it.

[Anonymous No.15950168]

Fuck off back to /lgbt/

[Anonymous No.15950170]

I wish I could shove poo down your throat.

[Anonymous No.15950176]

>>15950046
Troons are demented, simple as. Chasers are hyper masculine, atavistic chads with a domination fetish

[Anonymous No.15950230]

thats that girl who goads trannys into roping themselves by sticking a dildo in her underwear

[Anonymous No.15950241]

>>15950046
>can science explain
Yes, a narcissism variant. There is trauma in her past.

[Anonymous No.15950452]

>>15950047
>being trans is not a costume

But...being a woman is?

[Anonymous No.15950453]

>>15950452
yeah you can become a woman, but you can't become a trans woman
get in the with the times chud

[Anonymous No.15950462]

>>15950046
Funniest part of all of this is how they're identifying her as a real woman based on her facial features, body shape, and natural beauty. By obvious implications they're saying trannies can never replicate such beauty, and it isn't their penis that gets them clocked all the time. In other words, they're tacitly admitting they will never be women and are eternal cosplaying fags in dresses. True pottery.

[Anonymous No.15950469]

Lame 'le hecking true real' hobbyist are replaced with more exciting hobbyist that do it more publicly and with more fun.