[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 656 KB, 812x742, chilllllllll.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15946435 No.15946435 [Reply] [Original]

What's the science behind this

>> No.15946442

>>15946435
what do you need to study to become a happiness expert?

>> No.15946449

>>15946442
Judaism

>> No.15946634

>>15946442
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Dolan_(behavioural_scientist)

I found this little gem from him

Anand, Paul; Dolan, Paul (January 2005). "Equity, capabilities and health". Social Science & Medicine. 60 (2): 219–222. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.04.031. PMID 15522479.

But most of his work is surveys and he touches on the inherent problems of objectively measuring the subjective .

Whether it's a legitimate investigation or justifying motivated reasoning idk yet.

>> No.15946642
File: 94 KB, 1689x951, Dolan.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15946642

>Dolan

>> No.15946661
File: 121 KB, 682x1023, paul faggot dolan.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15946661

>>15946634
You don't know whether the bullshit social science research that doesn't bother to be informed by sociobiology/genetics and is done by a fucking faggot who looks like this is bullshit or not? Are you alright?

>> No.15946664

>>15946661
>I love doing research telling women to ignore their biological imperative and duty to humanity and not have kids. But even more so, I love being in a 14 year old boy's ass.

- Paul "Faggot" Dolan

>> No.15946670

>>15946634
Is this really how you normally get introduced into new scientific areas? I often struggle reading sophisticated papers with their own vocabulary, methods etc. and I thought you maybe knew how to get over this problem.

>> No.15946697

>>15946642
>judge Gooby m diforse daysee
>gosh Dolun who du childrun get
>Gooby pls

>> No.15946719

>>15946435

jews of course

>> No.15946774

>>15946435
social "science"

>> No.15946780

This and "I now totally regret that I didn't settle down" happily co-exist.

>> No.15946854

>>15946435
>50+% are on antidepressants
All of these “single-women are happier” studies are either self-reported or bunk. Evidence (and many studies) suggests the opposite

>> No.15946859
File: 182 KB, 700x678, 1631693688911.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15946859

>>15946435
>women are happier without children or a spouse

Now test the women in their 50's, 60's, 70's and 80's.

>> No.15946866

>>15946435
Cope and pre-seethe

>> No.15946946

>>15946634
Good find bro

>> No.15946954

>>15946435
>Be bitter woman in 30s
>See survey about happiness
>Say how happy you are
>$5 has been deposited into your account
>Be married woman
>Be happy in marriage
>Ignore survey

>> No.15946957

>>15946661
>picrel
Jew

>> No.15947066
File: 154 KB, 970x1133, BFC3598E-23DD-4732-90B1-EA07C7E7929B.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15947066

>>15946435
>

>> No.15947095

>>15946435
Is this why childless white women over the age of 40 are the biggest consumers of anti depressants?

>> No.15947101

>>15946954
That survey is literally fake, real research has been done on this issue.
Married woman with children are the most happy and satisfied ones.
It is basic biology, it's how the primal instincts and hormones work.
Childless woman develop maternal angst that drives them crazy.
Getting pregnant and giving birth is an important stage of development in a female's life, it's like it completes them.

>> No.15947455

>THE SURVEY MUST BE WRONG!!!
nice science board

>> No.15947463

>>15946435
You mean söyence

>> No.15947494
File: 31 KB, 590x350, Paul-Dolan.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15947494

>>15947455
In this case, Dolan had to issue a retraction because he misinterpreted the research he was reading and came away with the opposite conclusion from what the paper made because he didn't understand the terminology. Even after issuing his retraction, he insisted that he was still correct because everyone he knows fits his theory. He literally was wrong and when publicly shown to be wrong, had to retract and reverted to "Well, it was real to me!".
Yes, very nice science Paul and you subscribe to.

>> No.15947526

>>15947494
Reading some of his stuff makes it clear that he for some reason just really hates heterosexual men and actively hunts for research that will in some way put straight men in a bad light so he can amplify those papers. Maybe his dad never said he was proud of him or didn't hug him enough. Who knows but it obviously colors his "research" to such a degree that he is unable to read the research of others without interpreting it through his desired lens.

>> No.15947552

>>15946435
If there's any truth to that claim whatsoever, it's about misinterpreting statistics: Young people tend to be less stressed and more energetic and thus happier, and young people also tend to not have children. Other than that, I can't believe that'd be true. I simply do not know a single mother who is bitter and hateful, whereas catladies like that are all over the place.

>> No.15948749

>>15947101
>real research has been done of this issue
>it’s another survey

>> No.15948835

>>15946435
In unrelated news, antidepressant use, suicide, and cat ownership are all also much higher among the same group.

And in *extremely* unrelated news, single women are the only demographic left that reliably votes democrat.

>> No.15948860
File: 10 KB, 279x445, The Hedonistic Imperative - David Pearce.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15948860

>>15946442
https://www.hedweb.com/

>> No.15948864
File: 32 KB, 314x500, Can Biotechnology Abolish Suffering?.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15948864

>>15946442

>> No.15948867

>the extent to which a woman will lie about her happiness is directly correlated with her lack of happiness

>> No.15948870

>>15946435
People don't want children, they want sex.
Children are an unpleasant byproduct.

>> No.15948871

>>15946435
>What's the science behind this

They are committing genetic suicide.
Nothing of worth is loss.
Soon all females like this will go extinct, leaving only women that want to become wives and mothers.

>> No.15948877

>>15948871
You'll still have a fair share forced into it by guilt or regional laws, surely

>> No.15948881

>>15946435
Male here, I have no children or wife/gf, reasons are I am poorfag and no nice woman will date me. I have been single for so long that I don't mind it anymore. It mattered when I was in my early twenties because there was peer pressure from everyone for me to get gf, I am 30 now and all that has stopped. I am also poor however I only work part time wagie job but still have enough money for things, have savings and don't live paycheck to paycheck because I really don't spend that much. Having family can be fun (I guess) when one is rich and can afford things and not worry about money, when someone is poor then having family is a nightmare.

>> No.15948883

>>15947101
>Married woman with children are the most happy and satisfied ones.
Yes because that means the provider is providing and they have little else to worry about other than looking after children.
Now make a survey about unmarried single mothers with a kid or two and no provider and how happy they are vs unmarried single childless women

>> No.15949402

>>15947552
Gay man hates straight men. It's that simple.

>> No.15949404

>>15948870
Explain adoption.

>> No.15949432
File: 107 KB, 680x453, bidens.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15949432

>>15946634
That is the kind of vermin that must be boiled alive and then thrown to starving dogs.

>> No.15949566

>>15946435
I just had this propagada piece pushed at me
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W5XZ_gJBnns