/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.15927193]

What is the topological space of a quark?

[Anonymous No.15927206]

>>15927193
the interval [0,1]

[polyphys No.15927217]

>>15927193
It's this. Now come up with a classification scheme for the topologies of flows, and this should have a correspondence with the various types of quarks and their composites, with the topological numbers of a given flow corresponding to particle properties like mass and charge. The "flows" can be fields that terminate on any of the 4 surfaces shown. I'm drawing one sphere as the universe boundary but you can invert it put it on the same level as the others, if that helps with the classification task.

[Anonymous No.15927262]

>>15927193
It’s an open compact nonempty space which is path-connected but not connected. It also has a distance metric but isn’t a Hausdorff space. I hope that helps

[Anonymous No.15927266]

>>15927262
Every compact space is a Hausdorff space anon

[Anonymous No.15927269]

quarks don't exist

[I Fucking Hate Science No.15927305]

[Anonymous No.15927390]

a question a real topologist would never waste their time to ask or answer

[Anonymous No.15927394]

>>15927305
What exactly are you trying to say? Jews are smart?

[Anonymous No.15927414]

>>15927217
https://www.writingtoiq.com/ says your IQ is 106

[I Fucking Hate Science No.15927442]

>>15927394
Science is a cult run by Babylonian Jew sorcerers and the "standard model" is unfalsifiable. Future historians are going to be laughing at you for believing in this "quark" nonsense.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3IGLak8Tqs

[Anonymous No.15927446]

>>15927394
You don't need to be smart to churn out unfalsifiable word salad

[Anonymous No.15927449]

https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.212501
very small shit is weird

[Anonymous No.15927459]

>>15927305
no one predicted quark behaviors on computer to build up atoms that react according to real life
fake science, not predictable, not simulatable, jewish trash like einstein equations

[Anonymous No.15927483]

>>15927449 (me)
are picrels similar?

[Anonymous No.15927486]

>>15927269
They sometimes exist

[Anonymous No.15927488]

>>15927483
no the two in middle are rotating fast

[Anonymous No.15927507]

>>15927488
damn that's so weird. so like how fast?

[Anonymous No.15927543]

>>15927507 me
as in it's not like relativistic speeds or something because that has mass. suppose those are neutrons? but also how do the two halves stay locked? is it because of the motion of the center neutrons or? I don't get the technicalities in the paper.

[I Fucking Hate Science No.15927544]

>>15927486
Anon, the double slit experiment is about photons and not quarks. Quarks are theoretical particles and there's no proof of their existence. Basedence is a religion.

Here is a QRD on wave-particle nonsense:
Light is a wave and never a particle. It behaves exactly like sound. The medium it travels through is called the Luminiferous Aether, and its existence was known to everyone until Stein's gang of Babylonians took over science. This wiki article will point you in the right direction: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorentz_ether_theory
The father of the Ring-Laser Gyroscope, Georges Sagnac, offers proof of this. Picrel.

"Electrons" are another phenomenon scientists misunderstand. Schrödinger's Cat thought experiment disproved the Judeo-"Copenhagen Interpretation" of QM. The cat is either alive or dead. The cat doesn't collapse into an indeterminate waveform just because you lock it in a box.
Electron fields are waves and have no particle-like properties. An "electron" occupies the entire atomic orbital and isn't a particle that's floating in space. The reason why they seem to strike a point is they have to have a source and sink atom.

[Anonymous No.15927591]

>>15927394
He's saying
>I don't understand anything about physics but that's OK because this guy is a le Jew

[Anonymous No.15927593]

>>15927544
Clueless larping faggot

[Anonymous No.15927596]

>>15927593

[Anonymous No.15927622]

>>15927596
YWNBAP

[Anonymous No.15927662]

>>15927622
thanks for the high quality debate, Jew boy

[Anonymous No.15927690]

>>15927662
awww did sharty want a big boy debate? :(

[Anonymous No.15927699]

>>15927266
every compact metric space is hausdorff. There are compact spaces that are not hausdorff. Although the person youre responding to mentioned that theres a metric on the space, so he's still wrong

[Anonymous No.15927967]

>>15927544
Kind of sounds like you love science. You've clearly spent enough time reading about science to make up your own theories about it, even if they are all wrong

[Anonymous No.15927978]

>>15927414
https://www.writingtofaglevel.com/ says you are a HUGE FAG

[Anonymous No.15928315]

>>15927414
(genius)

[Anonymous No.15928325]

>>15927269
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=quark+1968+slac+pdf