Hello Hello Hello

[Anonymous No.15880147]

Do more women need to die during childbirth to end the obesity crisis? This British Unoid Jack seems to think 10% of women died in childbirth before 1930, prior to the introduction of modern obstetrics, filtering bad genes for fatties.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YlzBlmXQgYM

[Anonymous No.15880153]

>>15880147
stopped watching him after the sloppy deepthroat he performed on peterson. he's fucking insane

[Anonymous No.15880158]

vaxxie vaxxie

[Anonymous No.15880169]

I see he's got someone funding his video editing now, big red and black letters.

Whatever happened to Woodley? I miss that guy he actually had a working brain.

[Anonymous No.15880181]

>>15880147
>This British Unoid Jack seems to think 10% of women died in childbirth before 1930, prior to the introduction of modern obstetrics, filtering bad genes for fatties.
That's the most retarded thing I've ever heard. I've read historical midwife logbooks and in the 18th century there was less than a 1% chance of dying in childbirth with a midwife. Child mortality was high because of childhood diseases, not because of birth complications. If anything modern doctors are applying a substantial negative pressure to women by making them give birth in non-gravity-assisted positions that increase birth complications.

[Anonymous No.15880485]

>>15880147
What did you expect from a brishit? They are fucking retarded. The Romans civilized those bastards by killing the most retarded among them.

[Anonymous No.15880581]

>>15880181
>If anything modern doctors are applying a substantial negative pressure to women by making them give birth in non-gravity-assisted positions that increase birth complications.
If we put delivery wards on bullet trains, we could do a lot better than grav-assist.

[Anonymous No.15880601]

>>15880169
That was the golden era. I stopped watching after Woodley ditched. There was something so funny about watching Woodley get more and more agitated as the stream went on due to Duttons autistic rudeness. Also people used to say Woodley had CORVID 19 because he has a bird.

I think Woodley ditched because he wasn't on board with the politics. Sutton quickly turned it into a partisan political channel rather than purely a scientific thing which Woodley wanted.

[Anonymous No.15881404]

>>15880153
Why is his channel covcered with all the ugly red black and white letters now?
I keep getting co rec'd this diary of a ceo channel which is full of the same typesetting and connected to some Steve Bartlett guy?
His stuff seems even more clickbaity than it was before too.
Does anyone know anything more?

[Anonymous No.15881509]

>>15880147
I think we need to return to the word cunny rabbit

[Anonymous No.15881642]

>>15880147
Watch this.
It is more important.
https://youtu.be/nQ3WJDM5eww

[Anonymous No.15881844]

>>15881642
Might this be his most important to date?

[Anonymous No.15881858]

>>15881844
Nope, his most important ones are on IQ decline and demographic crisis.

[Anonymous No.15882156]

>>15880147
I had a gell-mann amnesia episode with one of this chaps videos where he spoke about something i happened to know and he got it completely wrong.
I figure that as an academic he selectively picks his source material and doesnt check it, he spreads fake news.

[Anonymous No.15882170]

>>15882156
After watching a handful of his videos, it seems he's a one dimensional material Darwinist. Absolutely everything is explained as a comprehensive "just-so" story of evolutionary pop-science.

[Anonymous No.15882175]

I was literally shocked by the way he debased himself. don't care why he did it for, if he's going for politics I'm out.

[Anonymous No.15882185]

>>15882170
Yeah that's one way to put it.
he has his pet evo psych theories he pushes and makes overly reaching statements.
I think his earlier work is more valid but it's clear his internet persona is taking its toll.
Michael was honestly the main reason I would follow the channel, his technical breakdowns were well put together

[Anonymous No.15882477]

>>15882185
He's very weird about genetic determinism. He seems much more interested in denigrating his own people out of some kind of self-hatred.

[Anonymous No.15882593]

>>15880147
if it was so good for filtering out those genes then why are there still fatties left? indeed, seems the only thing that changed was the birth rates, meaning that only the stupid or bad-doctors genes were removed and in this future we have a higher success for delivering babies!

[Anonymous No.15882609]

>>15880147
He did best when all of his videos were on gender, autism and IQ. I guess he got over his issues.