/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.15815737]

A black hole is actually a 4dimensional cylinder moving through the universe

[Anonymous No.15815741]

[Anonymous No.15815743]

>>15815741
This isn't a real picture.

[Anonymous No.15815744]

And the collapse of a star into a black hole can be modeled by a blue-sky catastrophe bifurcation

[Anonymous No.15815746]

[Anonymous No.15815750]

>>15815743
it's based of the most modern models of black holes. The real photo has a low resolution so you won't be able to clearly see the accretion disc since its so thin.

[Anonymous No.15815757]

And if you slice the cylinder you'll be able to see the chaotic flows of the light, similar to the flow of clouds on saturn

[Anonymous No.15815772]

[Anonymous No.15815777]

[Anonymous No.15815786]

a similar effect happens on earth, same model as the black hole, it's called a "waterspout". I am currently writing a paper that uses navier-stokes equations and bifurcation theory to describe the formation and destruction of the waterspout structure.

Most people don't know this but when a waterspout forms there is also rain somewhere nearby, that is, there is a flow from the ocean into the sky (Through the funnel) and then back into the ocean by rain. Basically it is the same model as in the black hole.

[Anonymous No.15815812]

All the cool photos that we've seen from hubble of gas and dust in space is caused by turbulant mixing from extremely large black holes

[Anonymous No.15815813]

[Anonymous No.15815819]

Galaxy formation is simply due to von-karman flow around the black hole. The stars and dust are grouped up into spirals and eventually float off in groups far away from the black hole and stabilize into a galaxy.

[Anonymous No.15815839]

>>15815737
Nice schizo post.

[Anonymous No.15815868]

>>15815750
That also isn't a real picture. It's AI generated. The news media just said it was a real picture because science reporting is retarded.

[Anonymous No.15815958]

what is it about black holes that makes them the number one most popular popsci topic of discussion amongst the brainlet soience fangoys?
is it the comic bookish aspects of the spectacular, unrealistic and completely non disprovable conjectures which go along with the topic that make black holes so popular amongst the scientist posers and wannabes?

[Anonymous No.15815998]

>>15815958
>>/sci/?task=search&ghost=false&search_text=%22what+is+it+about+black+holes+that+makes+them+the+number+one+most+popular+popsci+topic+of+discussion%22

[Anonymous No.15816359]

>>15815868
I thought it was a cool picture until I watched a video on it, ungodly number of gb of data stitched together from several telescopes around the world getting heavily processed for a year. Just to make 1 blurry pic that can't be proven to be 'real' and has no predictive value. At least the gravity wave detector thing detected some cosmic events that other telescopes were able to focus on and give evidence that the thing was actually reading something

[Anonymous No.15816364]

>>15815737
>>15815741
Black holes live rent-free in the goyim brain.

[Anonymous No.15816378]

>>15815737
So are magnets but psueds wouldn't know

[Anonymous No.15816387]

>>15816359
thats how you extract such tiny images from a collection of of photographs. To get even a single pixel you need to extract the tiniest amount of information from pixels next to it over time. Think of it as a super high exposure time photograph. If you track and look at something long enough, eventually enough photons from there will arrive, no matter how far away it is.
Afaik they didnt use any generative AI with a programmed bias but a classic machine learning approach. So while the result is heavily interpolated, nothing there is "made up" by a preprogrammed bias.

[Anonymous No.15816429]

>>15816387
I'll believe they did produce a reasonably faithful image because they had the four independent teams working on the data, but I have trouble imagining much useful info coming out of such a heavily processed blurry image. Apparently they recently released a sharper version of the image, this time using machine learning that actually was trained on the outputs of computer modeling, so I don't have any faith in that. I guess it only cost $20 mil, not that much for an astronomy project.

[Anonymous No.15816580]

>>15815737
>backholes

[Anonymous No.15816599]

>>15815737
Ok so what physical consequences would this have? Anything which can be tested through experiment? If not then fuck off.

[Anonymous No.15816678]

>>15816387
you don't know anything about digital signal processing.

[Anonymous No.15816710]

>>15815737
so youre telling me its an enormous black tube moving through space?

[Anonymous No.15816716]

>>15815737
What if our universe is situated in the same type of cylinder amid a universe filled with the same thing and black holes are the doorway to different universes?