NASA Team Here, How Do We Improve NASA?

[Anonymous No.15807073]

[Anonymous No.15807077]

>>15807073
Cancel all human spaceflight programs, go with robots only.

[Anonymous No.15807088]

>>15807073
get us to mars

[Anonymous No.15807090]

Focus entirely on orbital infrastructure and asteroid mining. End all useless scientific expeditions, those can be done at any time, with the possible exceptions of research into the Sun (largest energy producer in the solar system, also solar flares), Mars/Moon, and asteroids. There is no need to do anything involving Jupiter or Saturn right now. Save that for future generations.

[Anonymous No.15807115]

>>15807088
Wasn't this the fucking plan

[Anonymous No.15807180]

>>15807073
work on solar energy more

[Anonymous No.15807200]

By making your projects cost less. Pajeets could do it with a tiny tiny fraction of money you use.

[Anonymous No.15807266]

>>15807073
This >>15807090 or defund.
Also stop building telescopes. You fucks don't actually know what you are looking at anyways.

[Anonymous No.15807294]

>>15807073
Stick a bacalhau node in front of the petabytes of data holed up in your server room to let everyone run edge compute on it

https://github.com/bacalhau-project/lilypad

Bonus points if you make it pay per job with crypto with lilypad

Its insane the taxpayers fund data vollection, but only a handful of users can ssh im and run analysis on it

This will be one small step for nasa, one giant leap for science

[Anonymous No.15807407]

Make a documentary series about astronomy and rocketry tools and how they're used

[Anonymous No.15807411]

>>15807073
I think it would make NASA look really good if you guys all chipped in to buy me a McDouble :)

[Anonymous No.15807715]

>>15807073

[Anonymous No.15807822]

>>15807073
unhire the femoids

[Anonymous No.15808385]

>>15807073
follow the jonestown model, have every one of the toxic leeches at nasa drink cyanide and the organization will be improved dramatically from being the massive waste that produces and stands in the way of progress that it currently is to being just some funerary expenses.

[Anonymous No.15808641]

>>15807073
Use dry-zipper, velcro or how it's called in zero-gravity so people could normally walk there.

[Anonymous No.15808823]

>>15807073
You're one of the Goddard worms, aren't you?

[Anonymous No.15809331]

[Anonymous No.15809340]

Acquire blackmail on a sufficient number of congressional members, to remove requirements that spending be spread across as many districts as possible. Related to that, get rid of any sort of cost+ contracts, as those easily ballon in price. Offer fixed amount contracts only.

[Anonymous No.15810628]

Stop dicking around with erector sets and use your funds to hire mercenaries to plunder Lockheed-Martin and expose their reverse-engineered FTL craft for the benefit of mankind.

[Anonymous No.15810686]

>>15807073
Make it a science organization, not a social change organization.

[Anonymous No.15810704]

>>15807407
NASA would have to hire subcontractors to do that because they do not know how astronomy and rocketry tools are used.
NASA's only successful operation in the past several decades is t-shirt sales.

[Anonymous No.15810794]

>>15807200
Just take all the NASA money and give it directly to SpaceX.
There I just advanced US spaceflight by 1,000 years.

[Anonymous No.15810969]

>>15807073
>How Do We Improve NASA?
drop Boeing you fucking idiots!

[Anonymous No.15811523]

>>15807266
We have a fairly good idea what we're looking at, if even just in a broad sense. But the point is figure out what all of the stuff out there is, how it works, and hence how the laws of nature work.

That said, expensive "everything to everyone" telescopes like JWST are a massive mistake. For the same price we could've gotten three excellent specialized telescopes.

[Anonymous No.15811546]

>>15811523
>We have a fairly good idea what we're looking at
No you don't.
>figure out what all of the stuff out there is, how it works, and hence how the laws of nature work
You do realize all you are doing is seeing dots in the sky and extrapolating how things work here on Earth to those dots?
It's no different from the famous frog in a well story told to kids.
If laws of nature are different out there all your cosmological conclusions becomes completely bogus.

[Anonymous No.15811548]

>>15807073
mass suicide

[Anonymous No.15811561]

>>15811546
Pretty much this. There is no reason to believe the light seen from some distant start traveled in a straight line. Data is going to bring the whole charade to a close. Dark matter is fake and gay.

[Anonymous No.15811574]

>>15811561
It might traveled in a straight line or it might not have.
Point is there is no way to verify what the hell exactly is going on out there until you have a ship you can fly out.
For all we know we are stuck in some bubble and NASA's been examining natural patterns on a cosmic dome this whole time.
It's like what that other guy said, stick with Mars/Moon/asteroids and stop wasting entire careers spinning what could very well be fairy tales.

[Anonymous No.15812167]

>>15807073
Stop hiring faggots.

[Anonymous No.15812172]

>>15812167
No, more free cash for lack of heterosexuality on space travel, you heteros will hump half the air on a trip to the launching pad

[Anonymous No.15812796]

>>15811546
Go look at a galaxy or nebula in your own telescope and tell me it's just "dots." You haven't even put in enough effort to learn the basics of how we know these things, let alone JUST FUCKING LOOK AT THEM, so you have no place talking about such things.

>>15811561
It depends what you mean by a straight line, but even if it doesn't, it doesn't seem to spontaneously change where it's coming from. In other words, we always see the same galaxies in the same spots. Thus if light doesn't travel in a straight line, there's still something like a 1-to-1 correspondence between the universe and the celestial sphere. Also dark matter is absolutely real, regardless of whether the name is appropriate or palatable to you.

>>15811574
That level of skepticism precludes actually flying out there and looking at things too. Why should one set of senses be better than another? In fact, pretty much all science is looking at displays on electronic devices. You cannot escape that gap between reality and your mind.

[Anonymous No.15812821]

>>15807073
Make it official that you're kicking Musk's meme rocket off of Artemis and re-allocate his funding to Dynetics. Their horizontal lander was dope af.

[Anonymous No.15812880]

>>15812796
>Go look at a galaxy or nebula in your own telescope and tell me it's just "dots."
Now that you mentioned it they actually look like salami.
>That level of skepticism precludes actually flying out there and looking at things too.
You are flying out to interact with them to find out what they actually are not just gapping at the view like you do now.

[diversity and inclusion officer No.15812897]

>>15807088
>>15807073
And make sure the pilots are aboriginals please

[Anonymous No.15813354]

>>15807073
>>15812897
bring all men back from the ISS. make a women-only space mission.