[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 613 KB, 1980x1320, 16876961521852.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15769639 No.15769639 [Reply] [Original]

In this pic are a lot of repeats of the same star due to a understanding gravity and no gravity differences when viewing stars. The telescope and scientists are accidentally recording the same star at different points in its activity because in space there is the chaos of total motion when this motion is stilled when viewing from gravitational Earth. Check that blue star out, it makes a perfect cube because it is just recorded at different points in its quad helix activity.

>> No.15769642

There are less than 3 billion stars therefore.

If there were 'trillions of billions' of stars. I would have killed myself because it's collapse would be too dangerous.

>> No.15769663

This adds more fuel to the nightmare fire that something like this might actually be correct.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=-gLNlC_hQ3M&pp=

>> No.15769666

What is bigger: trillions of billions or billions of trillions?

>> No.15769686

>namfag

>> No.15770570

I remember you from a previous thread on God's existence. I'm really interested in seeing your full proof. Please share your thoughts, I beg you.