[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 31 KB, 486x489, Double-pendulum-system.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15735545 No.15735545 [Reply] [Original]

Is it possible to have a function that describes either the velocity or acceleration of the tip of a double pendulum as a function of time when released from certain given initial conditions?

>> No.15735548

>>15735545
>I need help with hw
If you're looking for an analytic solution, it doesn't exist.

>> No.15735553

>>15735548
Not homework I just saw a double pendulum simulation on the internet and thought this question is interesting

>> No.15735556

>>15735548
proof?

>> No.15735560

>>15735545
yes

>> No.15735567
File: 14 KB, 518x112, noanal.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15735567

>>15735556
The wiki article pretty much explains everything(en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_pendulum):
"It is not possible to go further and integrate these equations analytically, to get formulae for θ1 and θ2 as functions of time. It is however possible to perform this integration numerically using the Runge Kutta method or similar techniques." (picrel)

>> No.15735575

>>15735567
asking as a mathlet, can there be a proof that a particular PDE has no analytical solution?

>> No.15735585

>>15735545
P(theta_1 left of theta_2) / P(theta_1 right of theta_2) = 1

>> No.15735590

>>15735575
Yes, you can prove certain PDE's have no analytic solution using differential Galois theory.

>> No.15735599

>>15735590
particular ≠ certain

>> No.15735615

>>15735575
I actually dont know. (mathlet aswell)

>> No.15735624

>>15735567
to add on to this, its true that you cant get analytic solutions for θ1 and θ2. however you can use the small angle approximation to get good approximations, but that is the nature of chaotic motion though

>> No.15735629

>>15735624
I hate approximations. Those are for engineers. Mathematics is all about infinite precision.

>> No.15735645

>>15735624
Computationally speaking, the approximation scheme you'd use really depends on the problem, for this I don't think small-angle approximation would be able to flesh out the chaotic behavior. Runge-Kutta is your best bet with these sort of things.

>> No.15735702

>>15735599
say what you mean instead of faggily nitpicking anon

>> No.15735715

>>15735702
"I can prove somthing" doesn't mean "I can't prove something else"
happy?

>> No.15735722
File: 281 KB, 828x714, 1678268335474988.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15735722

>>15735715
Not really, no
See me after class

>> No.15735728

>>15735722
ok wow