/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.15727986]

does the pattern here line up with solar cycles? or maybe with milanocovich cycles?

[Anonymous No.15728075]

there were solar minimums in 2008 & 2019 and a maximum in 2014
all of which can possibly be somewhat vaguely imagined to potentially match a rough fit to the data, maybe

[Anonymous No.15729284]

>>15728075
Why isn't sea ice disappearing if global warming is real?

[Anonymous No.15730872]

>>15729284

[Anonymous No.15732045]

>>15728075
theres somewhat of a pattern relative to that, maybe

[Anonymous No.15733194]

>>15727986
Why not both?

[Anonymous No.15733213]

>>15729284
While the amount of sea ice is relatively stable, there's a difference between multi year sea ice and yearly sea ice. We know that global warming is causing large declines in multi year sea ice which is basically permafrost, and replacing it with single year ice which is just kind of a relatively thin layer on top of the water.

The graph hides this fact by using square kilometers, it's just looking at the surface area of the ice and not the actual volume of it in the ocean.

[Anonymous No.15733245]

>>15727986
>>15733213
Here's when you look at changes in volume. You can hide a lot of things when you ignore details, as they say "tip of the iceberg".

[Anonymous No.15733258]

>>15733245
why'd you choose data that ends in 2010?
heres the data you excluded

[Anonymous No.15733266]

>>15733258
>square miles
You didn't even read my post, did you?

[Sage No.15733271]

>>15733266
He did not. He did not read your post anon

[Anonymous No.15733287]

[Anonymous No.15734812]

[Anonymous No.15734829]

>>15734812
>square miles
Faggot

[Anonymous No.15734884]

>>15727986
They don't?

[Anonymous No.15734909]

>>15734829
No matter how much you desire it, the polar caps are not shrinking.
You should lose your narcissistic savior complex and try to be more honest instead of lying and trying to be sneaky and manipulative all the time, you'll be better off if you do