/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.15723121]

>100k qbit computer

How the fuck did they jump from 50 qbits to 100000 qbits in only 7 years?

The chungese and russbots can berally do 100 qbits.


Also...please,please,please tell me they made a fucking programming language for it. Im really tired of this scheme bullshit i have to use to make algorithms.

[Anonymous No.15723135]

>>15723121
?
Lies are very easy to make up.
It's making the cattle believe it that's the hard part ( already convinced you obviously, you worthless goylem filth, no offense ).

[Anonymous No.15723155]

>>15723121
why do these quantum computers always look like something out a horror movie?

[Anonymous No.15723188]

>>15723155
sounds like a you problem

[Anonymous No.15723218]

>>15723155
Be not afraid

[Anonymous No.15723348]

>>15723121
Quantum computers are a scam.

[Anonymous No.15723353]

did they manage to do any calculation faster with a quantum computer than it would take with classical one?

[Anonymous No.15723371]

>>15723155
biblically accurate cpus

[Anonymous No.15723373]

>>15723371
kek

[Anonymous No.15723414]

>>15723121
whats the error rate?

[Anonymous No.15723478]

>>15723121

Yeah nice „quantum“ computer
> actually fucking huge
> obviously just a few springs and wires glued together on plates.
> it works, dont you trust the soience?
> muh q bits
> no keyboard
> no display

Yeah Im not falling for this

[Anonymous No.15723547]

the french chads will break the quantum computer hymen
https://www.quantonation.com/portfolio/?_sft_p_country=fr

https://venturebeat.com/business/alicebob-raises-3-3-million-to-create-the-first-fault-tolerant-quantum-computer/

[Anonymous No.15723743]

>>15723414
Yes

[Anonymous No.15723773]

>>15723478
It seems you don't know shit about quantum computers.

[Anonymous No.15724015]

>>15723135
>>15723155
>>15723348
>>15723353
>>15723478

Why is it that everytime someome makes a quantum post you get the most retarded replies /sci has ever seen

[Anonymous No.15724045]

>>15723121
It's useless for now like...you can make your own 1cm cpu with a clipper and they do the same with microscopes

[Anonymous No.15724841]

>>15723121
Look, I'll freely confess to not knowing shit about anything, but here's my idiot's guess:

Whatever the step was that got them beyond 50 qbits probably didn't just get them to 51 qbits. Does that make any sense? Once you figure out how to get beyond whatever hurdle was blocking your path, you run as far as you can until you hit another hurdle.

[Anonymous No.15724842]

>>15724015
If you believe in the quantum woo nonsense, then you're already beyond help.

[Anonymous No.15727619]

>>15724841
>50+ 1 does not equal 51
you're retarded. suck my cock clean.

[Anonymous No.15727627]

>>15723121
No such thing as a "qbit computer." Run Shor and maybe someone will care

[Anonymous No.15727710]

>>15723121
To put it simple is click bait. Top management wants them built in x years, they allocated some money, and that's it. Academia and corporations are infected with woke cultists so failure is guaranteed.

[Anonymous No.15727738]

>>15723121
Damn random number generators are getting really random

[Anonymous No.15727743]

>>15727738
(they're not)

[Anonymous No.15727837]

>>15723121
Quantum computers are pure fiction.

[Anonymous No.15727848]

>>15723121
this shit is alive

[Anonymous No.15728029]

>>15723218
>>15723371
lel

[Anonymous No.15728056]

>>15723121
This looks the funny box thing from that Hellraiser movie. Maybe they really shouldn't try to activate it.

[Anonymous No.15728140]

>2012+11
>still not even a single video of a quantum computer or quantum program being demonstrated
>all quantum computer videos are just people talking about what quantum computers would theoretically be able to do, accompanied by some shitty CGI made in 3DSmax
s'fake innit

[Anonymous No.15728149]

the only value of a quantum computer would be to detect the existence of contradictions
>muh 0 and 1 and the same time
Unfortunately, a faggot fucking computer isn't enough to solve contradictions, and angels exist which can translate contradictions into fucking English as well as take instructions from god to solve them.

So no, this is stupid.
this entire quantum thing is stupid.
There is not much utility to humanity being aware that they are being operated on.

[Anonymous No.15728193]

>>15723155
Because they try to combine very finicky chips and liquid helium cooling in a place as small as they can

[Anonymous No.15728236]

>>15727743
then what's the point of 100k qbits versus 50 qbits for a quantum computer; does it only speed up the RNG without changing the actual calculation being done therefore technically having the same randomness?

[Anonymous No.15728239]

>>15728193
>liquid helium cooled random number generators
This is autism on a whole new level.
What are they actually using the liquid helium to cool, it must be something else they are hiding, it can't just be a random number generator?
Surely they're using it to cool a regular silicon(or semiconductor) based supercomputer with enormous capacity, with the random numbers of the quantum computer being fed in and used for some kind of crazy simulation, but since the quantum RNG is crucial to the simulation its considered all as one "le quantum supercomputer"

[Anonymous No.15728250]

>>15723155
95% of it is cooling

[Anonymous No.15728262]

Why do midwits insist there's some sort of pressing need for a true RNG?

[Anonymous No.15728266]

>>15728262

[Anonymous No.15728299]

quantum computers arent a random number generator.

[Anonymous No.15728395]

quantum computers arent

[Anonymous No.15728417]

>>15728262
That's not what they claim the computers purpose is.
They claim there is a quantum speedup, essentially reducing the algorithmic complexity of some problems by farming out computation to quantum physics.
This has not been conclusively demonstrated and entanglement is not well enough understood to be sure its even possible

[Anonymous No.15728471]

I heard that a quantum computer can essentially run a calculation with all variables and filter down to the 1 answer you want in 1 operation. Like if you're trying to break a password, you set the target hash as the filter and then iterate through all possible character combinations with a hash function computed on top of them. the computer does every calculation and stores all the results in the same value and it takes only as long as it takes to compute one of them (?) then the filter gets applied and all the non-matching results 'collapse' and you're left with the input conditions that gave you the match.

is that true?

[Anonymous No.15728495]

>>15728417
I remember there was some talk few years back that when quantum computers will solve something faster than a classical computer that's when we know quantum computers are real (theory gets validated) and that in turn will (and I may be wrong here) validate some qm interpretation? like Copenhagen? and that would imply there's more parallel universes or something along those lines.
is that real or did I misunderstand it?

[Anonymous No.15728497]

>>15723121
They have been building these Quantum Computers for decades now, have these computers performed any task that your normal digital computer can't? Do they even work?

[Anonymous No.15728564]

>quantum computing dosent exi

Do retards in this thread realise they can just send their algorithm online to a quantum computer to run their algorithm and then get back the runtime?

Or better yet...

You can simulate qbits on your very own pc

[Anonymous No.15728580]

>>15728564
>just send their algorithm online to a quantum computer
Then it should be trivial to show that the end to end runtime has a different exponent on N than a regular algorithm would.
This would extinguish all my doubt yet I haven't seen it.
>You can simulate
doesnt count. they wouldnt be investing billions if it didnt work in their models on paper.

[Anonymous No.15728618]

>>15728564
qbits are just trinary on an angstrom scale node, there is no computational speedup, only increased density and switching frequency

they're honestly half distraction half research concept, the distraction aspect is that its not so easy to build a superconducting microchip but it is easy to probe small bits of superconducting semiconductors and try to derive logic from them

[Anonymous No.15728657]

>>15728618
Their models do show a speedup.
There is physics to be discovered, probably at the observation, making sense of the results part of the computation that would explain there being no speedup.

[Anonymous No.15728666]

>>15728497
Can somebody please answer this?

[Anonymous No.15728671]

>>15728497
>>15728666
Yes they do work no they haven't done any novel computation

[Anonymous No.15728681]

>>15728666
In a nutshell the superposition of the bits allows to run exponential algorithms in minutes as opposes to "classical bits" which would take years

[Anonymous No.15728698]

>>15728681
The problem with this is that to date no algorithm that would take the ENIAC years has been run in minutes using quantum computing.

[Anonymous No.15730590]

>>15728417
>>15728564
>>15728681
>>15728698
kek quantum religion is so cute

[Anonymous No.15730724]

>>15728471
Nah. Even if quantum computers were a real thing(they're not) it doesn't work like that. Like, AES encryption only loses half its bits in quantum cracking algorithms.