/sci/ - Science & Math

File: 262 KB, 2366x1027, 1693813362165799.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

/sfg/ - Spaceflight General Anonymous Mon Sep 4 10:48:57 2023 No.15718611 [Reply] [Original]

Marine notices published - edition

previous >>15715647

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 10:50:09 2023 No.15718615 >>15718352 1-2 weeks until launch

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 10:53:51 2023 No.15718621 File: 56 KB, 649x752, 006229.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] https://twitter.com/MarcusHouse/status/1698638739336249735

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 11:06:38 2023 No.15718635 File: 39 KB, 952x512, Fission Sail 1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] You want to watch a Finnish autist talking about fission fragment rockets? You wouldn't be on /sfg/ if you didn't https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I3BDn7esF2g

Anonymous Mon Sep 4 11:08:48 2023 No.15718638

>>15718621
This triggers my data preservation autism but lets be very honest again. You don't have a video stream of every single airliner taking off and landing, because that would just take up ungodly amounts of space. We're slowly being weaned into the Starship age

Anonymous Mon Sep 4 11:11:16 2023 No.15718643

>>15718293
>Is the real reason so many are mad at SpaceX only streaming on twitter because they can't watch it on TV anymore?
qrd?
I was busy this weekend and I haven't seen any twitxfag screen shots about this.
Still not gonna create a fucking account.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 11:12:25 2023 No.15718644 File: 110 KB, 657x978, 006230.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1698633907594219642

Anonymous Mon Sep 4 11:14:51 2023 No.15718648
File: 101 KB, 659x970, 006231.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1698631998875607245

Like I've said many times before, there is a clear reason why Musk bought Twitter and it is in line with the mission of colonizing Mars
people with EDS are just unwilling to accept this, if western civilization declines so much that SpaceX is unable to function anymore (for one reason or another, there are a lot of ways this could happen), then that prevents Mars colonization

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 11:14:56 2023 No.15718649 >>15718638 We would if there were only hundreds of flights per year. Now it's in the range of tens of millions.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 11:16:32 2023 No.15718650 >>15718648 >>15718644 >>15718621 stop samefagging

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 11:16:50 2023 No.15718651 >>15718644 >>15718648 Not spaceflight Fuck off with your offtopic

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 11:18:12 2023 No.15718652 >>15718650 you don't understand what samefagging means look it up retard >>15718651 seething EDS sufferer

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 11:18:41 2023 No.15718654 File: 50 KB, 600x518, 1602214136812.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15718650 >samefagging

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 11:19:13 2023 No.15718657 >>15718652 redditspacing >>15718654 redditmemes

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 11:19:58 2023 No.15718658 File: 9 KB, 478x265, 1417916373891.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15718657 go back faggot

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 11:20:14 2023 No.15718659 >>15718657 projection

Anonymous Mon Sep 4 11:36:34 2023 No.15718675
File: 20 KB, 695x340, american psycho space ship lb.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>15718635
>The Fission Fragment Rocket Engine for Mars Fast Transit

>In this paper we discuss the advantages and challenges of utilizing Fission Fragment Rocket Engines (FFREs) to dramatically reduce transit time in space travel, for example, traveling to Mars. We discuss methods to decrease the size and weight of FFREs. These include utilizing metallic deuterides as moderators, driving the engines with electron beam bremsstrahlung, and operating the FFREs as subcritical assemblies, not as nuclear reactors. We discuss these and other new innovations based upon improved materials and technology that may be integrated into a revolutionary nuclear rocket technology.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.01441
paper has a brief outline of the aerogel FFRE that's getting some NIAC cash
https://www.nasa.gov/directorates/spacetech/niac/2023/Aerogel_Core_Fission_Fragment_Rocket_Engine

Anonymous Mon Sep 4 11:53:38 2023 No.15718696
File: 67 KB, 1016x911, 006232.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>15718675
> To address the urgent need for advanced propulsion solutions, we propose the development of a nuclear fission fragment rocket engine (FFRE) that is exponentially more propellent efficient than rocket engines currently used to power today's space vehicles and could achieve very high specific impulse (>100,000 sec) at high power density (>kW/kg). Current proposed designs for Fission Fragment Rocket Engines are prohibitively massive, have significant thermal constraints, or require implementing complex designs, such as dusty plasma levitation, which limits the near-term viability. We propose to develop a small prototype low-density nuclear reactor core and convert the nuclear energy stored in a fissile material into a high velocity rocket exhaust and electrical power for spacecraft payloads.

> The key improvements over previous concepts are: 1. Embed the fissile fuel particles in an ultra-low density aerogel matrix to achieve a critical mass assembly 2. Utilize recent breakthroughs in high field, high temperature superconducting magnets to constrain fission fragment trajectories between moderator elements to minimize reactor mass.

> The aerogel matrix and high magnetic field (B>20T) allows for fission fragments to escape the core while increasing conductive and radiative heat loss from the individual fuel particles. NIAC work will provide detailed mission analysis of fast transit to SGL for direct imaging and high-resolution spectroscopy of a habitable exoplanet at a distance of up to 100 light years. The FFRE propulsion system could provide delta-V to reach the SGL in less than 15yrs and provide the slowdown and maneuvering capability at SGL. The telescopes would act as a single pixel detector while traversing the Einstein Ring region, building an image of the exoplanet with enough resolution to see its surface features and signs of habitability.

Anonymous Mon Sep 4 11:55:56 2023 No.15718702
File: 140 KB, 1031x961, 006233.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fission-fragment_rocket

> Fission-fragment propulsion concept: a) fissionable filaments arranged in disks, b) revolving shaft, c) reactor core, d) fragments exhaust

> The fission-fragment rocket is a rocket engine design that directly harnesses hot nuclear fission products for thrust, as opposed to using a separate fluid as working mass. The design can, in theory, produce very high specific impulse while still being well within the abilities of current technologies.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 11:56:26 2023 No.15718704 >>15718696 >very high specific impulse (>100,000 sec) Pog

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 12:00:59 2023 No.15718712 File: 124 KB, 750x1000, flat,750x,075,f-pad,750x1000,f8f8f8.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15718696 >The FFRE propulsion system could provide delta-V to reach the SGL in less than 15yrs

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 12:03:45 2023 No.15718716 >>15718611 An axial compressor compresses air up to a pressure of 50 bar, what is now the temperature of the air?

Anonymous Mon Sep 4 12:04:03 2023 No.15718717
File: 19 KB, 660x295, access-gagraphic-2950882.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

If i threw a rock at the moon from the surface of the earth (or if i used a mass driver), how big is the area around the moon where the rock would get captured if it was going past earth escape velocity?

How fast would it need to go? It intuitively seems like it would be earth escape velocity minus the moons escape velocity (11 - 2.4)

Im trying to figure out what the real target size and energy requirements are for lunar mass driving if we wanted to colonize the place : )

Depending on how big the capture area is you might be able to just shoot blindly in the rough direction of the moon!

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 12:07:00 2023 No.15718719 >>15718644 reminder that these are true crabs and not bugs like some would like you to believe

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 12:08:46 2023 No.15718723 you guys ever mess with sats? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VcqAhdOfQH0

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 12:13:06 2023 No.15718726 >>15718719 Okay, thanks

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 12:16:59 2023 No.15718728 >>15718719 t. fake ocean crab

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 12:17:23 2023 No.15718729 File: 105 KB, 664x853, 006234.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] https://twitter.com/Alexphysics13/status/1698661431497932978

Anonymous Mon Sep 4 12:18:43 2023 No.15718730
File: 495 KB, 1920x1080, F5LZutbbQAA0RSv.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>15718729
https://twitter.com/Harry__Stranger/status/1698659418223894629

> At Blue Origin's Launch Complex 36, the Jarvis test tank has been removed from its test stand, and now seems to be back over at the production tents in the northwest corner of the complex. Tests of the smaller T/E seem to be continuing.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 12:19:41 2023 No.15718733 At this rate we can expect BO to conduct a successful orbital flight before SeX

Anonymous Mon Sep 4 12:19:46 2023 No.15718734
File: 40 KB, 675x380, Sir Edmund Hillary and Neil Armstrong at the North Pole.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>15718696
>The ionizing radiation properties of a fission fragment rocket engine concept are described in the context of a crewed Mars mission. This propulsion system could achieve very high specific impulse (>10 6 sec) at high power density (>kW/kg), utilizing micron-sized fissile fuel particles suspended in an aerogel matrix. The fission core is located within the bore of an electromagnet and external neutron moderator material. The low-density aerogel allows for radiative cooling of fuel particles while minimizing collisional losses with the fission fragments, leading to more efficient use of fissile fuel in producing thrust compared to previous concepts. This paper presents estimates of the steady state ionizing radiation equivalent dose to the astronaut crew from both external (e.g. galactic cosmic rays) and internal (reactor) sources. The spacecraft design includes a centrifugation concept where the transit habitation module rotates around the spacecraft center of mass, providing artificial gravity to the crew and separation distance to the nuclear core. We find that the fission fragment propulsion system combined with centrifugation could lead to reduced transit time, reduced equivalent radiation dose, and reduced risk of long-term exposure to micro-g environments. Such a high specific impulse propulsion system would enable other crewed fast transit, high delta-V interplanetary missions with payload mass fractions much greater than alternative propulsion architectures (chemical, solarelectric)
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frspt.2023.1197347/abstract

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 12:22:58 2023 No.15718740 fission fragment is a meme There is no need for expensive fancy high Isp + low thrust engines in the solar system The only useful fission anything is nuclear pulse propulsion from Earths surface Since people are too pussy for that, forget about it

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 12:25:53 2023 No.15718744 >>15718740 What if the fission products was < 7 days half life I think the chinaman would be okay with those odds

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 12:30:42 2023 No.15718753 >>15718733 SpaceX has conducted an orbital flight yesterday.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 12:37:23 2023 No.15718767 >>15718753 of the star ship ?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 12:38:52 2023 No.15718770 >>15718733 there is no indication whatsoever BO is close to launching anything Starship launch is like 2 weeks away

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 12:44:08 2023 No.15718777 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u2RfOcieAs4 the vibes from this video worth a watch

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 12:46:30 2023 No.15718780 >>15718767 Yes, did you miss that?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 12:46:42 2023 No.15718782 >>15718717 I think your first problem is finding a way to throw said rock upward at earth escape velocity. Or at least without removing the atmosphere first.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 12:50:14 2023 No.15718790 >>15718729 >SpaceX >builds a crew access arm >>15718730 >Below Orbit >still playing with water tanks >>15718733 I'm not sure we can even expect BO to conduct a successful orbital flight before Starship Block 2.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 12:52:56 2023 No.15718793 >>15718729 >Terran R pad infrastructure? Feels a bit soon for even early pad infrastructure, but good if they are. They're probably more focused on building out their Stennis site right now.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 12:54:10 2023 No.15718794 File: 221 KB, 705x280, cones.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] So SpaceX placed cones along the road, but since it's labor day the S25 rollout is most scheduled likely tomorrow.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 12:58:08 2023 No.15718804 File: 252 KB, 1920x1080, yes.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15718644 >>15718719 They look like lobsters

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 13:00:52 2023 No.15718810 File: 3.32 MB, 1992x1061, 1692526287632039.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15718777

Anonymous Mon Sep 4 13:03:24 2023 No.15718818
File: 110 KB, 753x821, spacecoach a.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>15718740
>There is no need for expensive fancy high Isp + low thrust engines in the solar system
If your only ambition is to go to Mars, yeah. For Ceres and beyond they beat chem rockets every time

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 13:10:06 2023 No.15718834 >>15718794 >labor day >don't show up to work Quirky Americans

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 13:11:32 2023 No.15718837 >>15718818 use shit as a propellant lmaaoo

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 13:14:00 2023 No.15718843 File: 244 KB, 1300x927, IMG_2402.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] billions must die

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 13:15:16 2023 No.15718845 >>15718843 look at this dysgenic dinosaur with weak bones and pitiful body mass what a loser

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 13:16:03 2023 No.15718848 File: 99 KB, 551x553, IMG_2403.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15718843 boca chica has fallen

Anonymous Mon Sep 4 13:21:24 2023 No.15718852

>>15718843
Is there actually a single rare species at boca chica? Some of these species are "rare" in the usa due to their ranges barely touching the USA or something, but then Mexico is full of them and the consvervation status is least concerned
So basically absolute fucking horseshit

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 13:26:55 2023 No.15718858 >>15718843 speaking of birbs would they fly faster on the moon?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 13:40:26 2023 No.15718863 File: 154 KB, 625x1034, 006235.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] https://www.space.com/european-space-agency-freedom-of-information

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 13:48:41 2023 No.15718874 >>15718863 https://twitter.com/TerezaPultarova/status/1698648861571506244 More info. ESA is above the law LMAO.

Anonymous Mon Sep 4 13:56:57 2023 No.15718886
File: 13 KB, 353x332, 1570562242965.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>15718643
Anybody?
Something happened this weekend about SpaceX and video streams, and I was busy this weekend so I apparently missed whatever it was. Is Elon really trying to limit it to only TwitX? Did Google do something he didn't like?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 13:57:40 2023 No.15718890 >>15718863 Would be based if ESA used this power to get shit done.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 14:01:06 2023 No.15718894 >>15718886 SpaceX will only be streaming on X from now on, not youtube

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 14:01:40 2023 No.15718898 >>15718886 official SpaceX streams are only on twitter/X now

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 14:02:22 2023 No.15718899 >>15718886 X is the everything app so everyone else is in direct competition.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 14:03:20 2023 No.15718901 >>15718894 >>15718898 >>15718899 still not creating an account

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 14:03:38 2023 No.15718903 I'm pretty stubborn and so far have refused to make a Twitter account of call the service "X"

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 14:03:44 2023 No.15718904 >>15718886 SpaceX will only be streaming on X from now on despite X's livestreaming not yet having reached parity with other platforms

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 14:04:43 2023 No.15718906 >>15718903 >>15718901 autism

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 14:05:59 2023 No.15718908 Well hopefully Everyday Astronaut will have YouTube coverage of the launch cause fuck twitter

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 14:07:38 2023 No.15718910 >>15718908 Multiple other Youtube channels have confirmed they will be like TLPN, NSF, SFN, etc so he will also probably cover it. For them it will probably be a massive boon, big influx of viewers who were looking for original page but cant find it,

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 14:08:31 2023 No.15718912 >>15718906 Yes.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 14:09:09 2023 No.15718915 SpaceX streams were the only ones that I could rely on for not being full of soi "like and subscribe and superchat and patreon and merch" faggotry.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 14:16:51 2023 No.15718922 >>15718777 could hobbyists build orbital rockets if they had a few hundred thousand dollars budget and regulations didn't stop them?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 14:19:26 2023 No.15718928 >>15718922 yes, easily with that sort of money regulations aren't nearly as bad as you think either you could go super jank and cheap and make some stupid 21 stage monstrosity too

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 14:20:49 2023 No.15718929 >>15718915 labpadre?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 14:24:04 2023 No.15718937 https://spacenews.com/indias-moon-lander-set-for-nighttime-as-solar-mission-soars/ >India’s Chandrayaan-3 lander and rover have been set to sleep for the onset of lunar night Adios

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 14:26:16 2023 No.15718944 >>15718929 Still going to be some recompressed horrors from a bad bitrate to begin with.

Anonymous Mon Sep 4 14:26:22 2023 No.15718945

>>15718908
He is. He's talking about doing it in 4K.
https://twitter.com/Erdayastronaut/status/1698498227719258593
>It’s sounding like upcoming SpaceX livestreams may no longer be streamed on YouTube. So it raises the question, if they’re not providing 4K footage, is it worth it for us to stream in 4K (assuming we can do so reliably)? Specifically the upcoming Starship launch.
>Kinda weird to think that until X provides a way to stream 4K on your TV’s / devices, we might be the only source of 4K feeds for launches (also sorry for the repost, added the poll)

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 14:30:04 2023 No.15718952 >>15718845 Okay but watch this shit https://youtu.be/30uQJcJNU3g?si=BbH_UFQ4xJwzgLhZ

Anonymous Mon Sep 4 14:31:34 2023 No.15718954

>>15718929
>labpadre?
But they don't do launch streams? I guess they would, there just haven't been many launches from BC yet. Lab Padre and Mauricio have almost no soi content in their BC videos.
But I care about Florida launches too. I was cringing at the SFN launch stream last night, and they aren't even the worst.
>>15718904
>despite X's livestreaming not yet having reached parity with other platforms
Elon autism. It would be better to attract viewers with quality to nudge them over rather than suddenly forcing it. Nobody likes to be yanked out of their habits.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 14:31:45 2023 No.15718955 File: 21 KB, 480x480, 1686425881995945.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Liquid hydrogen is unavoidable when it comes to spaceflight. Newspace shouldn't be afraid of it.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 14:33:00 2023 No.15718957 >>15718955 hydrogen is incompatible with reusability

Anonymous Mon Sep 4 14:34:31 2023 No.15718959
File: 70 KB, 640x480, 1348879833061.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>15718955
>hydroloxfag
It's a bitch to liquefy, a bitch to keep cold, low density, likes to walk through walls, and embrittlement. And it still needs solid boosters to get off the ground.
And most of it is made by cracking methane anyhow.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 14:35:55 2023 No.15718961 >>15718955 hydrolox sucks for first stages

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 14:37:48 2023 No.15718965 >>15718959 >And it still needs solid boosters to get off the ground look at the irreparable damage shuttle and shuttle derived vehicles have done to your brain hydrologgs shines as a high energy sustainer stage fuel

Anonymous Mon Sep 4 14:41:00 2023 No.15718973

>>15718965
>sustainer stage
Ahhh it seems you cannot think critically! Sustainer stage implies you are either a) expending your core stage (gay!)
or b) putting your sustainer stage in orbit and refueling it with a depot, in which case methalox wins over the use of hydrolox when you factor in density-impulse

Anonymous Mon Sep 4 14:41:46 2023 No.15718974
File: 159 KB, 781x550, 1643379708340.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>15718965
Look at the irreparable damage that the boosters did to Shittle when they got a little too cold. Seventy. Two. Seconds. Bitch.
Oh and it also needs to be insulated from the LOX tanks to keep the oxygen from freezing. Frozen oxygen be dangerous, yo. And it needs to be insulated from the spacecraft walls, too. No balloon tanks for you!
LH2 and supercooled kerosene get together with LOX just fine, total bros.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 14:42:35 2023 No.15718976 >>15718959 wow just like lox anyways hydrogen kinda sux unless someone figures out a magical way to densify it which would turn it god-tier

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 14:43:11 2023 No.15718977 >>15718954 Yeah I really wouldn't mind X only livestreams if it had all the features I've come to expect of youtube livestreaming+better bitrate & quality

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 14:44:17 2023 No.15718979 >>15718976 LOX doesn't need to be kept below 14K, that's a whole next level of cryo suck.

Anonymous Mon Sep 4 14:46:44 2023 No.15718981

>>15718977
First thing I care about is not needing another fucking internets account. I didn't want to use Twatter when it was new, and I still don't. I don't feel a need to tell the wnole world every time I take a crap. It's like the bastard child of blogging and forums.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 14:48:02 2023 No.15718982 >>15718981 I don't mind it now that I don't need a phone number to sign up anymore

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 14:48:47 2023 No.15718984 >>15718976 >anyways hydrogen kinda sux unless someone figures out a magical way to densify it which would turn it god-tier just use solid hydrogen

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 14:50:10 2023 No.15718986 >>15718984 Slush hydrogen

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 14:57:24 2023 No.15718994 >>15718928 You retard

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 15:00:01 2023 No.15718998 File: 136 KB, 578x422, 16.59.24.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15718794 However...

Anonymous Mon Sep 4 15:07:36 2023 No.15719005

>>15718979
It's just a few degrees of difference. What are the practical challenges in real life?

Both are equally easy to keep cryogenic in ONI which has a pretty cool thermodynamic simulation. But even though the underlying sim is realistic, for gameplay purposes the game has advanced materials with great thermal properties and devices that just magically delete heat ...

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 15:09:23 2023 No.15719008 File: 89 KB, 1591x1136, EZX9YWqVcAAc-N9.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] The modern internet is a fucking joke, anyone who supports copyright excess and online walled gardens is a fucking joke

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 15:09:39 2023 No.15719010 File: 15 KB, 464x401, Holmlid laser h drive.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15718984 Rydberg hydrogen

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 15:14:11 2023 No.15719017 >>15719005 >It's just a few degrees of difference die please

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 15:19:58 2023 No.15719034 >>15719008 >you aren't allowed to view thing because words on paper over here The internet used to be no-man's-land, now it's been settled by corpos and their goons.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 15:21:18 2023 No.15719038 >>15719034 much like the state of the modern cell phone, this is the fault of the normie.

Anonymous Mon Sep 4 15:21:20 2023 No.15719039

>>15718717
the delta v for a ballistic capture is going to essentially be the same as the delta v for getting a rocket to TLI. the only thing you're saving is the cost of lunar injection. for a mass driver from earth's surface, i'd guess you'd be substantially cutting down on your steering losses and somewhat cutting your gravity losses at the expense of increasing your drag losses. based on nothing other than playing kerbal RSS... i'd say somewhere around 8.7 km/s for earth orbit plus the 3.15 for TLI for 11.85 km/s.
>you might be able to just shoot blindly
if there's a specific orbit you want then that's definitely not going to work. trajectories that depend on n-body weirdness are necessarily extremely sensitive to initial conditions and you'd probably need a gun that's unrealistically precise to get one at all. but assuming you could, it'd still take some computing power to figure out the right trajectory.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 15:21:48 2023 No.15719040 File: 170 KB, 745x1094, 1619879525588.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15719005 >simulation >it works in muh vidya gaems kerbal please

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 15:24:28 2023 No.15719045 >>15718922 launcher startups can't come close to reaching orbit with less than a million dollars, and if you think the guys who work at those places aren't hobbyists you're kidding yourself

Anonymous Mon Sep 4 15:26:42 2023 No.15719050

>>15719034
there are still some outposts but they're not the same. the wild west of the internet is long over.
it was bound to happen. it's easier to make a facebook page for your group than a whole website. easier to make an X account than a blog. and as the internet grew it became a viable market for advertising. and corporations incentivized it to become sterile so as to not tarnish their brand.

Anonymous Mon Sep 4 15:28:46 2023 No.15719057
File: 3.16 MB, 1920x1080, 1681826077615391.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>15719040
Did you miss the part where I mentioned the game has scifi materials and it directly violates the first law of thermodynamics?
Of course it's perfectly realistic.

But just like KSP's thing is orbital mechanics simulation, ONI's thing is thermodynamic simulation. And the sim has impressive performance for running inside unity game. It's an external module written in lower level language--it had to be.

Anonymous Mon Sep 4 15:30:13 2023 No.15719061

>>15719045
all they need to do is embrace electric pump fed monoprop and making your own htp using this
you could get to orbit for whatever it takes to find a chemist crazy enough to make the htp

https://sci-hub.se/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(19980904)37:16%3C2217::AID-ANIE2217%3E3.0.CO;2-D

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 15:31:37 2023 No.15719065 >>15719045 getting to orbit != getting to a designated orbit with a commercially viable payload mass

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 15:32:35 2023 No.15719067 >>15719065 if you had a rocket with development + first unit costs that low it'd automatically be a commercially viable cubesat launcher

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 15:37:37 2023 No.15719077 >>15719067 nobody is paying you $500k to put their 50 gram satellite into a wonky elliptical orbit that decays in 2 weeks

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 15:37:42 2023 No.15719078 i think you guys are overblowing how scary htp is https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i06SnRCQN6U this doesn't look that bad at all

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 15:38:45 2023 No.15719082 File: 276 KB, 1841x899, 1603719987939.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15718957 >>15718959 >>15718961 >He hasn't taken the nuclear thermal pill

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 15:39:21 2023 No.15719086 HAPPENING

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 15:40:42 2023 No.15719088 >>15719086 what is

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 15:41:08 2023 No.15719090 >>15719088 Autobots rollout

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 15:42:50 2023 No.15719093 >>15719078 what's the lowest HTP percentage that's still viable rocket oxidizer?

Anonymous Mon Sep 4 15:44:00 2023 No.15719096

>>15718922
no
$50M seed fund is probably the absolute bare minimum for a one-off orbital rocket that barely gets 1kg into a random unstable orbit, if you want to build multiple or have proper orbit insertion or a larger payload then you'll need a *lot* more than 5 million, probably an entire order of magnitude

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 15:44:00 2023 No.15719097 >>15718843 Totally worth delaying mans return to the moon

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 15:44:28 2023 No.15719099 >>15719093 like 60 or 70, don't trust me though

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 15:45:13 2023 No.15719101 File: 29 KB, 500x565, (you).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15719097 >it's okay, if we destroy the planet daddy muskaroni will take me to live with him on the moon

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 15:45:35 2023 No.15719104 File: 15 KB, 320x242, thumbs up prime.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15719090

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 15:46:09 2023 No.15719106 File: 2.41 MB, 720x720, discostan.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15719082 >nuclear thermal

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 15:46:28 2023 No.15719108 >>15719101 >inconvenience a few birds >destroy the planet Totally the same thing false equivalence retard I'm not an Elon freak either

Anonymous Mon Sep 4 15:48:08 2023 No.15719110
File: 995 KB, 2048x1387, F3Lv8J0XoAcnPJz.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>15719108
Simple fact is human matters, human affairs, human progress and human civilization should take precedent above all especially when it concerns the new human frontier of space.

Deal with it.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 15:49:11 2023 No.15719112 File: 971 KB, 2800x2786, GPN-2000-001137.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15719110 *and by human I mean American

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 15:50:51 2023 No.15719114 required htp viewing https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LhEYaovWxl4

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 15:53:16 2023 No.15719118 >>15719077 people pay more than $500k for sounding rocket launches

Anonymous Mon Sep 4 15:55:33 2023 No.15719121

>our goal is millions of people living and working in space
>anyways here is our suborbital rocket. How about you bid on a seat and we'll go with whoever wants to pay the most ludicrous amount of money
>also it blew up and we are grounding it for a year, if not more
Who is running this shit

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 15:57:19 2023 No.15719124 File: 723 KB, 810x540, 1590453640511.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15719121 >Who is running this shit

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 15:57:53 2023 No.15719126 >>15719124 I would not (not) eat the lizard.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 16:00:35 2023 No.15719132 >>15719005 liquid hydrogen is so cold it will freeze oxygen

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 16:03:14 2023 No.15719133 File: 1.11 MB, 1563x1079, F5Lp4qhWIAAciNX.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Flat earthers looking at this like "why are the lines curved?"

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 16:05:24 2023 No.15719139 >>15719133 normies who accept spherical earth but don't understand orbital mechanics ask the same question

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 16:05:57 2023 No.15719141 >>15719139 That's hilarious

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 16:08:19 2023 No.15719144 >>15718955 shut the fuck up retard

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 16:08:37 2023 No.15719145 https://www.change.org/p/bring-back-spacex-live-streaming-on-youtube-for-all-space-enthusiasts? sign it

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 16:11:30 2023 No.15719153 >>15718965 >>15718973 sustainer stage implies side-mounted "booster" stage, traditionally solid fueled >>15719005 where did I leave that "popsci mush" image

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 16:12:44 2023 No.15719157 File: 34 KB, 656x372, isildur no.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15719145

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 16:13:35 2023 No.15719159 >>15719145 Go back

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 16:16:10 2023 No.15719166 QRD on the poo lander hop?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 16:20:38 2023 No.15719175 >>15719093 It probably varies depending on what you're using as fuel. HTP-RP1 seems like it'd have different characteristics from HTP-Hydrazine or HTP-Pentaborane.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 16:21:04 2023 No.15719176 File: 214 KB, 578x666, crumb mush pop sci.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15719153

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 16:23:38 2023 No.15719186 >>15719112 the Japanese count too sometimes when it's not too inconvenient

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 16:25:14 2023 No.15719192 >>15719166 it farted

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 16:27:33 2023 No.15719196 File: 1.63 MB, 3200x1600, Junocam Io.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 16:29:23 2023 No.15719198 File: 937 KB, 1920x1586, red-potato.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15719196

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 16:29:42 2023 No.15719199 File: 629 KB, 774x760, Galileo Io Feb 2000.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15719196

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 16:31:29 2023 No.15719203 >>15719196 Not so yellow anymore

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 16:33:09 2023 No.15719209 >>15719199 What the shit is that magma?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 16:33:43 2023 No.15719212 File: 494 KB, 500x283, 1359846727875.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15719196 >>15719198

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 16:38:04 2023 No.15719223 >>15718922 The laws of physics doesn't say it's impossible to do for so little money. So yes someone could do it.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 16:41:42 2023 No.15719227 >>15718644 >Kwajalein My Hearts of Iron days have paid off for once.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 16:41:44 2023 No.15719228 >>15719209 Lava, but yes

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 16:42:32 2023 No.15719231 >>15718740 >nuclear pulse propulsion >people are too pussy for that you're mistaken. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pulsed_nuclear_thermal_rocket

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 16:44:34 2023 No.15719237 >>15719228 I didn't realize there was surface-level molten rock anywhere in the solar system but Earth, that's rad.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 16:44:51 2023 No.15719239 >>15719228 I hate location dependent words! lava vs. magma meteor vs meteoroid vs meteorite planet vs moon

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 16:46:27 2023 No.15719241 File: 82 KB, 1057x1395, IMG_2409.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15719239 >planet vs moon

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 16:50:32 2023 No.15719248 >>15719008 It's fine. Copyright isn't actually enforceable. All this does is spawn platforms that don't give a shit and mirror the content.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 16:53:09 2023 No.15719254 >>15719101 YWNBAW

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 16:55:18 2023 No.15719258 IM BOREEEDDD WHENS THE NEXT LAUNCH FUCK

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 16:55:59 2023 No.15719262 >>15719258 NIPPON In two days

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 16:56:58 2023 No.15719264 >>15719199 WOW!

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 16:59:00 2023 No.15719267 >>15719262 Prolly gonna scruuub ugh

Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:01:23 2023 No.15719272

>>15719237
Yeeeeah buddy. If you want another interesting fact of the day—sort of counter intuitively, water ice is technically a mineral in geology. This is especially important in planetary geology, when you get past the asteroid belt and volatiles start behaving more like terrestrial structures as they form aggregate rocks and only exist in liquid form under similar conditions that form magma here in the inner solar system. When you hear about icy moons with cryovolcanism, water, in these instances, flows out like lava and cools on the surface into rocky ice.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:08:44 2023 No.15719282 File: 1.65 MB, 2400x1386, river-09-885098584.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15719272 Behold! Lava!

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:09:45 2023 No.15719283 File: 396 KB, 1200x900, grotto_water_cave_hungary_caves-1350368.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15719272 Behold! Magma!

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:11:03 2023 No.15719285 File: 99 KB, 636x778, jupiter io michael carroll space.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15719237 >>15719228 Its just gay ass liquid sulfur, Earth lava is way hotter

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:12:01 2023 No.15719289 >>15719108 >it's only inconveniencing a few heckin' birds Are you okay in the head? Your golemized ideology has already transformed a big chunk of this planet into a sewer and it just keeps going.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:13:18 2023 No.15719292 >>15719110 >Simple fact is human matters, human affairs, human progress and human civilization should take precedent above all Exactly, which is why your likes should be handled with legendary levels of nightmarish brutality.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:13:28 2023 No.15719294 >>15719289 Show me the areas of this planet dedicated for rocket launch activities that have been transformed into a sewer

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:14:01 2023 No.15719296 File: 739 KB, 161x120, chicken lock.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15719282 >>15719283 >behold, a man!

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:14:26 2023 No.15719297 >>15719294 >the mindless golem keeps looping over the rocket subroutine A literal bot.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:15:52 2023 No.15719301 >>15719297 >retard equating environmental damaging sites with rocket launch sites lol okay, looked at KSC lately?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:16:25 2023 No.15719303 >>15719289 Seething tranny. The planet is doing just fine. Maybe leave your hellhole left wing city once in a while?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:16:42 2023 No.15719305 File: 599 KB, 986x1523, KSC future.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15719301 Artist's rendition of KSC if even one more launch is allowed

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:17:30 2023 No.15719309 >>15719305 lmao

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:17:31 2023 No.15719310 >>15719292 Humans are superior in human moral hierarchy. If you cannot comprehend this you're a bugman.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:19:45 2023 No.15719320 >mars landing exclusively on X

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:20:13 2023 No.15719322 File: 134 KB, 1280x947, 1521469403153.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15719282 >>15719283

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:20:55 2023 No.15719323 >>15719320 ughhhh

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:22:13 2023 No.15719327 >>15719320 By that point it'll be 4k60 capable so it's great. The inconvenience is doing it before streaming is any good on twitter.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:23:48 2023 No.15719330 >>15719292 I'm mildly amused by existence of you and other permanently online Ted Kaczinski acolyte wannabees and I hope the irony is not lost on you but you really should stop posting cringe like this

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:24:29 2023 No.15719333 >>15719301 Please consult >>15719297

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:25:02 2023 No.15719334 >>15719301 You should read the environmental impact review for LC-39A sometime NASA points out that while rocket exhaust is currently completely unregulated by the EPA, it's byproducts are known pollutants

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:25:31 2023 No.15719337 >>15719310 >Humans are superior in human moral hierarchy That's what I'm saying. There is no moral quandary involved in your physical removal.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:25:40 2023 No.15719338 Was Apollo-Soyuz / Skylab part of the overall "Apollo" program?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:25:59 2023 No.15719340 File: 107 KB, 985x658, F4VRY4ZaUAAyHFc.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15719333 Suck my dick

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:27:07 2023 No.15719343 >>15719340 You will never go to space.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:27:19 2023 No.15719345 File: 1.02 MB, 1125x727, 054F7432-6DCC-418B-A24E-828C671DD10C.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] John Young in the late 70s

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:27:32 2023 No.15719346 File: 30 KB, 576x576, EYhMBmhWsAA1uj5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >15719337 Seething so immensely. Humans will launch an ever increasing number of rockets. Your crying will not be cared about.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:27:36 2023 No.15719347 >>15719327 I doubt it will ever happen, there's a reason why every youtube competitor is dead

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:28:20 2023 No.15719352 >>15719289 >third worlders turn their countries into sewers >we must import more of them and turn out countries into sewers as well

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:28:27 2023 No.15719353 >>15719241 >ifunny

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:28:42 2023 No.15719354 >>15719347 You're retarded

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:28:53 2023 No.15719355 >>15719145 No lol

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:29:12 2023 No.15719356 >>15719352 Take your meds, currynigger.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:29:14 2023 No.15719357 File: 1.72 MB, 2800x2779, AS17-134-20386.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15719343 I don't have to

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:30:40 2023 No.15719362 >>15719343 You have no place in this general posting garbage like that. Shame, anon.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:31:09 2023 No.15719364 >15719362 >responding to the schizo

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:32:27 2023 No.15719369 >>15719338 yeah

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:33:29 2023 No.15719370 >>15719362 Your general belongs on preddit, you deranged cuck fetishist.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:34:42 2023 No.15719371 >>15719338 I'd consider it more as part of AAP as opposed to Apollo proper

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:34:50 2023 No.15719374 File: 28 KB, 324x282, men in white-coats.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:36:16 2023 No.15719381 File: 1.41 MB, 3840x2160, Fj-WeTLXkAcAlAz.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Space is the place

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:37:28 2023 No.15719383 >>15719381 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2a7clqqbHZI

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:41:14 2023 No.15719393 >>15719145 >give you name and email address and sign up I'd rather just sign up to X and enjoy the streams

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:42:56 2023 No.15719399 >>15719393 you can just make it up they don't check

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:47:25 2023 No.15719409 Just to be super Clear

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:48:33 2023 No.15719410 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=djAw4q7LUFs >concrete problems SpaceX got 99 problems and they're all fondag

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:50:19 2023 No.15719418 File: 495 KB, 1647x1532, 1693849770156.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Am I retarded? How would 4 radiator panels offset by 90° each shine on each other at all???

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:51:30 2023 No.15719422 File: 499 KB, 1920x1080, footprint.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >mfw I just realized this is the footprint for the Starship Gigafactory godamn

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:51:36 2023 No.15719423 >>15719418 if you can see it then it can shine on u

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:52:09 2023 No.15719424 >>15719418 Each panel radiates in all directions, it's not a collimated beam you fucking moron

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:52:24 2023 No.15719425 >>15719418 because radiation isn't directed like that

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:52:31 2023 No.15719426 >>15719418 >anon forgets light is a wave

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:53:08 2023 No.15719427 >>15718894 >>15718898 Elon can go kill himself with that bullshit. Grifter faggot

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:56:49 2023 No.15719435 >>15719426 light is a sphere

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:58:59 2023 No.15719439 File: 103 KB, 486x657, newton outside is gay.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15719426 >light is a wave It is a corpuscule

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 18:00:39 2023 No.15719440 >>15719435 a spherical wave you could say

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 18:04:16 2023 No.15719446 >>15719334 that's because kerosene is nasty garbage, and solid rocket boosters are even worse hydrolox exhaust is hot enough to cause nitrites and nitrates to form, which are bad

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 18:05:49 2023 No.15719450 >>15719446 And none of it matters at all. The atmosphere is very large mixes quickly.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 18:11:53 2023 No.15719459 File: 273 KB, 1647x1600, 1693851078332.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15719426 Ok, and?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 18:11:56 2023 No.15719460 >advanced civilization >lacks the wheel >doesn't account for bacteria Were martians retarded in War of the Worlds??

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 18:13:46 2023 No.15719462 >>15719460 Yes many such cases. It's entirely due to authors having low iq and not being technical people.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 18:15:25 2023 No.15719464 >>15719459 You're still drawing the radiator panels as radiating in parallel to the panel. They are not. They are radiating spherically off of its surface.

Anonymous Mon Sep 4 18:15:53 2023 No.15719465

>>15719460
They didn't believe in vaccines
>>15719462
You should have an engineer be your guy to bounce ideas off of, if you're gonna write sci-fi. I think it'd be good to have someone around who can convincingly techno-babble an explanation for whatever random magic you need to happen in a story, or point out technical flaws that aren't obvious to you the writer.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 18:20:53 2023 No.15719475 >>15719460 A nice kino WotW video game would be well appreciated. Or some sort of new film adaptation. I don't care for the Spielberg one. The story itself is public domain

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 18:22:24 2023 No.15719478 File: 25 KB, 493x564, not loss.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15719459 I give you the benefit of the doubt

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 18:22:38 2023 No.15719480 File: 347 KB, 1647x1605, 1693851626836.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15719464 No this looks gay. Flat light for life. (((They))) want to convince you that light can be a sphere.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 18:22:49 2023 No.15719482 File: 40 KB, 2028x1704, something like this.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15719459

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 18:25:04 2023 No.15719483 >>15719482 It's not emanating directly from the body

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 18:25:29 2023 No.15719485 File: 19 KB, 2000x1999, the hidden properties of light.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15719482 actually its more like

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 18:26:30 2023 No.15719487 >>15719483 No but it is reflecting light and IR from one panel to the other

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 18:30:00 2023 No.15719496 File: 5 KB, 379x368, radiationpattern.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15719480 Something more like this, I'm afraid.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 18:31:01 2023 No.15719499 File: 26 KB, 2000x1999, idontrememberthepattern.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 18:31:20 2023 No.15719500 >>15719496 The net result is that you're radiating effectively half as much energy per unit surface area as you do using just two radiators.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 18:35:27 2023 No.15719503 3 radiators 120 degrees apart is the most efficient

Anonymous Mon Sep 4 18:37:34 2023 No.15719506

>SpaceX is prohibited to RTLS at their Vandenberg launch site for much of the year. The reason is that seals may be scared by the supersonic boom on landing, panic and trample their pups. The airforce base people tried to get this this prohibition removed and failed.

Anonymous Mon Sep 4 18:39:59 2023 No.15719512
File: 232 KB, 1725x975, Could be wrong idk I'm losing brain cells here.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>15719487
I'm afraid we are all retarded. I think this is right. The original anon raised a good point. And as >>15719503 said it's mathematically "best" to have three radiators that don't see eachother (although you could argue it could still be even more efficient to use four or more radiators that DO see eachother as long as your radiators are super efficient but this would require me to plug in math in excel and I don't want to do that right now)

Anonymous Mon Sep 4 18:40:47 2023 No.15719514
File: 1.06 MB, 3024x3187, IMG_5956.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>15719459
observe how, despite being at right angles to each other, the light bulb is illuminated by the other one.
radiators are light bulbs and any light from one lightbulb falling on anther lightbulb is not going into space where you want it.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 18:42:37 2023 No.15719521 It's not that easy in radiatortry

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 18:42:54 2023 No.15719522 The solution is no radiator, delete the part Hydrogen steamers only

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 18:44:46 2023 No.15719526 >>15719399 Thats what I did for X. Super easy to sign up too. The irony of the "petition" is lost on those retards

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 18:45:36 2023 No.15719528 I will never forgive Elon

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 18:46:29 2023 No.15719533 >>15719526 >give up convenience and force yourself onto this platform because elon needs to justify is $44 Billion impulse buy of twitter ok

Anonymous Mon Sep 4 18:52:06 2023 No.15719544

>>15719533
Youtube is dogshit and we all know it. We need to endure the growing pains of a new platform one way or another.
Is it retarded that elon wants to push twitter, of all fucking things, as this option? Yes. Is it retarded he wants to make twitter an everything app? Also yes. But we either go through the pains of choking out youtube now, or kick it down the road. Google is not going to get any better as a company and if it means having to watch SpaceX streams on “X” then fuck it I don’t care. I only watch from launch to booster landing anyways

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 18:52:19 2023 No.15719545 now is the Era of the Geologist the solar system is sterile and uninhabitable but full of interesting rocks

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 18:53:20 2023 No.15719548 >>15719506 Total Seal Death

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 18:53:34 2023 No.15719549 >>15719544 Google is a big investor in SpaceX, the rivalry is illusory

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 18:54:18 2023 No.15719552 >>15719545 Don't mind me just gonna put some topsoil over all those.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 18:55:48 2023 No.15719556 >>15719549 is it google or is it just Brin and Page individually

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 18:57:13 2023 No.15719563 >>15719549 I forgot about that it is so fucking over

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 18:57:27 2023 No.15719565 >>15719556 idunno

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 18:57:59 2023 No.15719566 >>15719533 >signing up for a petition is more convenient than making a twitter account

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 18:58:54 2023 No.15719567 >>15718611 So the debris field will be inside the blue area you say?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 18:59:21 2023 No.15719568 >>15719566 you may have the account but twitters video player is dogshit

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 18:59:22 2023 No.15719569 I'd like to order 25 yards of top soil for my lawn on mars and none of that cheap shit

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 18:59:35 2023 No.15719570 File: 33 KB, 900x634, future rocket fuel.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15718976 Combine it with some carbon to make it more stable and a bit of oxygen to give it that extra punch

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 18:59:53 2023 No.15719572 >>15719544 >Youtube is dogshit and we all know it >use without account >can join pending live stream to be alerted when it starts >rewind while live >can speed up playback to catch back to live >good quality Where is the dogshit.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 19:00:26 2023 No.15719576 >>15719567 Yes, after the hotstage fails due to the force of 3 raptor engines caving in the shield causing a massive explosion and loss of both vehicles

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 19:00:39 2023 No.15719577 File: 28 KB, 868x165, Orion.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] kind of a noob question but what programming language does Starship use?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 19:01:08 2023 No.15719578 >>15719145 >give you name and email address and sign up this is the whole reason I avoid Ex

Anonymous Mon Sep 4 19:02:59 2023 No.15719581

>>15719572
I'm not denying it has built up a shit load of quality-of-life features over the years, and I'm not arguing that X is better or could even match current YT any time soon (if ever)
But google sucks the big dick. Copyright spam, absolutely horrid relationships with content creators, automated strikes with no human-to-human resolution pathways, cryptoshit, ads have gotten way, way, WAY fucking worse if you are in bed and just want to watch some videos on mobile, account strikes for using adblockers recently...

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 19:03:56 2023 No.15719582 Odds on orbital test on October 5th, my birthday?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 19:04:23 2023 No.15719584 >>15719569 >25 yards you're literally missing two dimensions

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 19:05:43 2023 No.15719586 >>15719584 Maybe he meant square yards? Dunno about the depth though, an inch? A mile deep?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 19:07:57 2023 No.15719591 >>15719584 He has a yard he wants covered and wants enough to stop 24 of his neighbors from getting any

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 19:09:10 2023 No.15719595 File: 135 KB, 1200x792, October Sky.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15719582 Hello fellow 10/5 anon

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 19:10:04 2023 No.15719596 >>15719577 any big enterprise software project these days involves tons of different languages because they're all mostly abstracted off hardware and it's almost always better to go with expertise and comfort than with some theoretical best fit

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 19:10:11 2023 No.15719597 >>15719582 About the same as the odds for October 4th. Assuming you're talking about 2024, of course.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 19:10:16 2023 No.15719598 >>15719577 >all of our software is created using Matlab WTF lmao

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 19:11:12 2023 No.15719600 >>15719584 a yard is 3 foot cubic

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 19:12:57 2023 No.15719604 >>15719577 C++, C and MAYBE Ada in flight controls and MAYBE rust because they wanna try new things. Don't listen to this retard >>15719596 Flight software is not an "enterprise codebase"

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 19:15:50 2023 No.15719605 >>15718952 Wtf it broke out into perfect droid sounds lmfao

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 19:16:00 2023 No.15719606 >>15719604 there's more to it than the code that flaps the flaps and throttles the engines

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 19:17:06 2023 No.15719610 >>15719606 None of it runs on Starship. There is no crew cabin. There is only avionics all of which is programmed in the languages I mentioned.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 19:19:42 2023 No.15719615 >>15719485 nice >>15719570 good idea anon I think I'm going to go facilitate the evaporation of part of my personal stash

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 19:20:26 2023 No.15719617 >>15719282 Reminder that natural rivers meander and aren't straight

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 19:21:31 2023 No.15719621 >>15719598 These days it's model => auto generated C/C++ => binary instead of model => team of autists => hand optimized assembly => binary.

Anonymous Mon Sep 4 19:24:20 2023 No.15719629
File: 87 KB, 482x361, 1616785050618.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>15719581
>account strikes for using adblockers recently
Prove to me that they weren't watching those "add supported" movies with an ad blocker.
I hate that shit even more because they don't go away when I click on the "Recently Uploaded" filter button

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 19:24:30 2023 No.15719631 >>15719621 >team of autists creates optimized assembly program from autogenerated binary i can assure you this only happens at boeing. normal companies write c++ and compile it to a binary and its done. >inb4 he doesn't believe it

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 19:26:20 2023 No.15719634 >>15719606 nope, it literally is that simple, they have an Arduino and from it wires run to the servos that actuate the flaps.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 19:29:06 2023 No.15719638 >>15719621 >hand optimized assembly It's not the 60s anymore grandpa we have compilers and spare memory now

Anonymous Mon Sep 4 19:29:24 2023 No.15719639

>>15719631
>team of autists creates optimized assembly program from autogenerated binary
Reading comprehension isn't your strong suit, anon; the team of autists go from model to assembly on their own.
>inb4 he doesn't believe it
Model driven development makes it harder for human made errors to creep in after the model is validated; it is slowing taking over for control systems.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 19:29:36 2023 No.15719641 >>15718723 What a nerd that's amazing

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 19:29:41 2023 No.15719642 >>15719634 and a whole codebase at starbase that's constantly monitoring, analyzing, and sending information to it

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 19:30:35 2023 No.15719645 >>15719584 in landscaping parlance they generally just drop the "cubic" for sake of brevity

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 19:31:04 2023 No.15719647 >>15719642 >codebase at starbase he was asking about starship. i hate people who use the word enterprise so much.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 19:31:14 2023 No.15719648 >>15719577 Probably Rust. Also gb2r

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 19:37:26 2023 No.15719654 >>15719638 coding is the 60s was so much simpler

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 19:38:27 2023 No.15719659 >>15719654 Depends if you let the jew into your code or not. It can be equally simple or even simpler due to less constraints today.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 19:38:31 2023 No.15719660 >>15719647 pretending like starship is an isolated system doesn't help anybody understand anything stop being a loser and acknowledge the nuance to the situation that it needs to actually explain how a modern spaceship is driven by software

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 19:39:28 2023 No.15719663 >>15719659 >Depends if you let the jew into your code or not. How do I avoid letting the kike into my code? KISS???

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 19:41:36 2023 No.15719667 >>15719663 Yes but also if you got a stupid acronym for what you do when you write code you're already doing it wrong

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 19:43:29 2023 No.15719670 >>15719667 Please tell me how to keep the Jew out of my code. I want to keep my code clean at all costs

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 19:44:15 2023 No.15719671 >>15719670 Use punch cards. Punch the holes manually.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 19:46:35 2023 No.15719680 >>15719584 No I gave you everything you need to know

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 19:47:23 2023 No.15719682 >>15719670 Don't use emacs.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 19:47:51 2023 No.15719684 >/sfg/ talking about yards of topsoil, programming and what "multiple" means

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 19:49:46 2023 No.15719687 >>15719584 also convert into an SI based unit such a cubic kilometre

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 19:50:17 2023 No.15719689 >>15719684 >and what "multiple" means How could anyone get that wrong? it means more than two

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 19:50:44 2023 No.15719691 >>15719689 it means gequal two

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 19:58:05 2023 No.15719712 >>15718903 then don't watch the stream, its that simple

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 19:58:33 2023 No.15719714 Programmable topsoil

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 19:58:54 2023 No.15719715 >>15719228 *outer space lava

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 19:59:40 2023 No.15719717 single use code

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 20:01:03 2023 No.15719721 Am I retarded or is there no live chat for streams or spaces on X? I looked everywhere and can't find one.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 20:01:37 2023 No.15719724 >>15719721 the tweet responses are the live chat

Anonymous Mon Sep 4 20:02:00 2023 No.15719727
File: 74 KB, 600x300, i2p.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>15719034
>>15719050
[schizo-autism warning]
The real solution is to have one feet in darknet. Tor but also I2P because I2P supports torrents and comes with a torrent client. You can seed big spicy video files and host whatever website you want which link to those. You can host shit from your bedroom even, and nobody can take it down, especially if you're not the world's top pedoterrorist or something, and you follow basic opsec. Some copyright claim has no chance. I also maintain a list of darknet chans in case 4chan gets le heckin' cancelled.

Likewise on the payment front, have one feet in Monero. Unlike all other cryptocurrencies this one is actually private. This is battle tested on darknet drug markets and courts. The likes of Paypal, Gofundme, and Patreon can and do take stuff down regularly just because it's not pozzed enough. Non-Monero cryptos get tracked and your wallet can get flagged. Meanwhile nobody knows who paid what to what Monero address.

I run I2P and Monero nodes. It's nice to know if you're autistic enough you can totally contribute in a real way to running this whole BasedStack™ as I call it. Just that more people need to catch anal schizo-autism to care about all this. On the flip side, normies always choosing convenience over privacy is exactly why this will be safe from them.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 20:02:42 2023 No.15719730 >>15719712 Yeah I won't

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 20:04:02 2023 No.15719732 >>15719008 copyright and defamation/libel laws should be illegal

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 20:05:50 2023 No.15719735 >>15719727 >I also maintain a list of darknet chans in case 4chan gets le heckin' cancelled. care to share? Is nanochad still a thing?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 20:06:15 2023 No.15719738 >>15719717 That was essentially the Saturn V computer, it was pretty much all manually coded right?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 20:06:30 2023 No.15719739 >>15719732 Copyright is not enforceable in the limit. And it seems to converge fairly quickly. I can watch every movie for free without fear of prosecution no need to even torrent or other p2p just website in a country that doesn't care.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 20:16:11 2023 No.15719761 File: 95 KB, 872x866, arnold schizo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >To be super clear, I’m pro free speech, but against anti-Semitism of any kind https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1698750300474016250 what a bitch ass lmao

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 20:17:57 2023 No.15719768 File: 288 KB, 1200x764, 1644973022918.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] How far into testing Raptor 3 have they gotten?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 20:19:34 2023 No.15719771 >>15719768 Ask Elon

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 20:20:08 2023 No.15719772 >>15719739 for some reason it's enforceable in Germany.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 20:20:25 2023 No.15719773 >>15719761 Reas the replies, he said it because ADL is trying to shut the platform down lmao

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 20:21:33 2023 No.15719776 >>15719773 he wouldnt be saying anything is he wasnt afraid of then

Anonymous Mon Sep 4 20:24:03 2023 No.15719784
File: 1.22 MB, 1114x745, Pesquet peek.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>15719776
He is afraid, they are swaying advertisers to avoid the site to kill it kek. Maybe it's for the better. ADL can't stop SpaceX from going to Mars which is where his attention needs to be anyways

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 20:25:03 2023 No.15719786 File: 42 KB, 604x536, adl.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15719773

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 20:25:31 2023 No.15719788 File: 996 KB, 2376x1543, 1659627495570297.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15719761 He's free speech except when it comes to them

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 20:26:01 2023 No.15719790 >>15719786 OI VEY SHUT IT DOWN

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 20:26:57 2023 No.15719793 >>15719786 no way ADL is so powerful. They can bring down entire companies.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 20:27:10 2023 No.15719794 >>15719784 >ADL can't stop SpaceX from going to Mars

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 20:27:14 2023 No.15719795 >>15719773 >>15719776 >>15719784 They're obviously not gonna succeed. He could slim twitter down all the way until it runs on subscription money.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 20:30:46 2023 No.15719802 >>15719795 They can make phone calls to google and apple and have them removed from the app stores. Also isn’t twitter running on google host software?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 20:33:18 2023 No.15719806 >>15719802 Tim Apple and Elon has entered an uneasy alliance against

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 20:35:45 2023 No.15719809 >>15719802 >They can make phone calls to google and apple and have them removed from the app stores no lol

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 20:37:16 2023 No.15719811 File: 188 KB, 1082x960, HereIsWhyItWontWork.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15719795

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 20:41:23 2023 No.15719817 >>15718621 >>15718638 I can't fucking believe the twitter bullshit is going to ruin the historical records of SpaceX.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 20:43:43 2023 No.15719820 >>15719806 >Tim Apple lol I forgot about that

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 20:43:57 2023 No.15719821 >>15719811 Oh, it's not the Jewish owners and executives who have power. It's some rando head of the ADL who they will obey without question. News to me.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 20:45:30 2023 No.15719826 >>15719821 they're a close bunch and ADL unironically yields a lot of power

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 20:51:24 2023 No.15719833 Launch in 4 days, guys

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 20:53:43 2023 No.15719838 >>15719833 Next Spaceflight says it's gonna be suborbital

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 20:54:00 2023 No.15719840 File: 512 KB, 800x800, 254gsmakdf98asd.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15719833 two weeks

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 20:56:48 2023 No.15719846 >>15719370 Why the fuck are you even here you gay nigger faggot? Go back to x

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 20:58:39 2023 No.15719851 >>15719833 launch in 5-11 days

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 21:05:17 2023 No.15719859 File: 141 KB, 1267x755, 006240.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6m9Y47_BQjI

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 21:06:03 2023 No.15719860 Thank god we're finally back on topic

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 21:06:57 2023 No.15719861 >>15719851 is this an independent estimate?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 21:08:13 2023 No.15719862 >>15719833 NET October

Anonymous Mon Sep 4 21:09:13 2023 No.15719863
File: 103 KB, 1098x763, 006241.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

https://spacenews.com/esa-to-set-target-for-first-ariane-6-launch-after-upcoming-tests/

> WASHINGTON — The European Space Agency plans to set a target launch period for the first Ariane 6 in October, with the hopes that vehicle can finally take flight “not too late” into 2024.

> At a Sept. 4 briefing, officials from ESA and other partners on the Ariane 6 said they should be able to announce a range of dates for the rocket’s inaugural launch after a pair of static-fire tests of the rocket’s core stage and its Vulcain 2.1 engine on the launch pad in Kourou, French Guiana.

> The first of those tests, slated to last about four seconds, is scheduled for Sept. 5. That will be followed by a 470-second test on Oct. 3 that, if successful, will provide what ESA calls “flight-ready” qualification for the core stage.

> A final static-fire test of the upper stage is planned for this fall, again at Lampoldshausen, to test the performance of the stage in “degraded” conditions and other mission profiles. “I don’t think there will be a difficulty to make this test in due time,” Sion said, noting that the test was needed to demonstrate the reliability of the vehicle.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 21:14:30 2023 No.15719870 >>15719863 >starship is going to launch twice before ariane 6 launches once its over. i also think 3 starship launches total will happen in 2023, 8 in 2024

Anonymous Mon Sep 4 21:15:12 2023 No.15719872
File: 128 KB, 1135x780, 006242.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

https://spacenews.com/dod-satellites-in-low-earth-orbit-promise-more-connectivity-for-military-users/

> WASHINGTON — With its first 23 satellites in orbit, the U.S. Space Development Agency in the coming months will begin the demonstration phase of a data network in space designed to support military operations.

> SpaceX on Sept. 2 launched SDA’s second batch of satellites. The agency now has 19 communications satellites and four missile-tracking spacecraft in orbit. These make up the Tranche 0 portion of a projected network known as the Proliferated Warfighter Space Architecture.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 21:15:27 2023 No.15719873 >>15719863 >hopes that vehicle can finally take flight “not too late” into 2024. What do you think the odds are that it'll slip into 2025?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 21:16:55 2023 No.15719877 >>15719873 I think it will launch in 2024. Vulcan, similarly, has a good chance. I can’t say the same about New Glenn

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 21:17:17 2023 No.15719878 >>15719873 50-50 either it happens or doesnt

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 21:18:17 2023 No.15719885 >>15719859 >If I were a betting man and I wanted to answer the million dollar question of when will it launch >I would guess... September 25th

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 21:19:06 2023 No.15719886 >>15719821 yes they obey the head jew

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 21:19:14 2023 No.15719888 >>15719721 >no live chat for streams sounds based to me

Anonymous Mon Sep 4 21:19:20 2023 No.15719889
File: 72 KB, 1060x743, 006243.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

https://spacenews.com/chinese-scientist-proposes-solar-system-wide-resource-utilization-roadmap/

> HELSINKI — Chinese space scientists have outlined a tentative roadmap for establishing a space resources utilization network stretching into the outer reaches of the solar system.

> Wang Wei, a scientist affiliated to CASC, China’s main space contractor, and the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), is proposing a four-stage roadmap for a space resources utilization project which would, eventually, span the entire solar system by 2100.

> The initiative is titled Tiangong Kaiwu and takes its name from Ming Dynasty scientist Song Yingxing’s work, “The Exploitation of the Works of Nature.” It proposes developing strategic mineral resources, utilizing off-world water-ice for fuel, creating transport and supply nodes, and establishing a space resource development system.

> It envisions initially constructing water-ice resource development facilities on the moon. Water can be separated into hydrogen and oxygen and used as propellant. These capabilities would be used to expand to near-Earth asteroids, Mars, main-belt asteroids and the moons of Jupiter.

> The project would establish supply routes and chains using gravitationally balanced nodes at Earth-Moon Lagrange point 1, Sun-Earth L1 and L2, Ceres and Sun-Jupiter L1.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 21:21:29 2023 No.15719894 File: 113 KB, 633x906, 006244.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] https://www.space.com/chandrayaan-3-rover-lander-sleep-mode Chandrayan-3 going to sleep

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 21:22:17 2023 No.15719897 >>15719894 It will wake up

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 21:22:20 2023 No.15719898 >>15719889 They won’t do anything until someone else tries it first and learns all the hard R&D lessons for them. This is how the chink spirit of exploration functions

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 21:22:30 2023 No.15719899 File: 60 KB, 655x557, 006245.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15719894 https://twitter.com/isro/status/1698010732128764164?s=20

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 21:22:43 2023 No.15719900 S25's SPMT has arrived to move it to the OLM

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 21:23:13 2023 No.15719902 File: 141 KB, 637x647, 1527412913909.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15719811

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 21:23:31 2023 No.15719904 File: 127 KB, 663x878, 006246.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15719899 https://twitter.com/isro/status/1698618694795219401?s=20

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 21:23:41 2023 No.15719905 File: 389 KB, 1920x1080, snapshot.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 21:24:33 2023 No.15719908 File: 364 KB, 1589x1000, F5K0jq1bgAEGq0S.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15719904

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 21:24:57 2023 No.15719910 >>15719897 inshallah

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 21:25:36 2023 No.15719912 File: 368 KB, 1689x1044, F5K0jq7a8AAc86G.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15719908

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 21:27:20 2023 No.15719917 >>15719908 Jai hind mountains were moved mashallah

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 21:34:38 2023 No.15719931 File: 122 KB, 458x400, GoodMorningSir.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15719897

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 21:39:17 2023 No.15719937 >>15719910 >>15719917 wrong roleplay benchod bloody basterd

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 21:40:38 2023 No.15719940 >>15719937 I root for she, You arr the fucking

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 21:49:45 2023 No.15719954 >>15719894 Jesus fucking christ, I can already see all the good morning, sir posts.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 21:58:38 2023 No.15719966 >>15719917 I thought this was the first hop, but Surveyor 6 did it back in 1967 I REQUIRE MORE HOPS

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 22:16:48 2023 No.15719998 File: 38 KB, 640x437, Lunar Leaper 1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15719966

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 22:19:41 2023 No.15720005 what if they spun a wheel up to really fast then let it run across the moon how many miles would it run before it ran out of speed

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 22:19:53 2023 No.15720006 >>15719873 very low, the rocket is done

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 22:25:18 2023 No.15720016 >>15720005 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panjandrum https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1cyBcGDzQzI

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 22:26:07 2023 No.15720017 >>15720005 >a cosmologist tries to do physics Approximately a million years, give or take seven orders of magnitude

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 22:28:04 2023 No.15720021 >>15720006 And when was SLS this particular grade of "done?"

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 22:28:45 2023 No.15720022 >>15720005 How long would a Beyblade spin if you let 'er rip on the moon

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 22:32:07 2023 No.15720027 Rollout tonight according to Starship Gazer

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 22:36:00 2023 No.15720031 >>15719966 >probe does weird thing out of nowhere >"was it the first time?" >anon points out a random probe from decades ago did it before this is one of the moments I remember why I love this hobby

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 22:36:31 2023 No.15720032 so no star ship orbital test this year when next year, like march?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 22:36:48 2023 No.15720033 >>15720027 no closures yet though

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 22:38:45 2023 No.15720037 >>15720032 why is it not going orbital already?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 22:40:30 2023 No.15720041 >>15719584 You got soft hands boy

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 22:40:58 2023 No.15720042 >>15720037 because nothing is ready lol he's just driving mockups and prototypes around pretending its flight hardware

Anonymous Mon Sep 4 22:42:43 2023 No.15720045 [DELETED]

>the flashlight uses a shorter wavelength of light, an x-ray/gamma-ray, which is passively produced by a radioisotope. The innovative technology is the EmberCore" radioisotope being developed by Ultra Safe Nuclear Corporation (USNC) to enable lunar night survival by keeping lunar rovers and landers warm through the cold lunar night. By slightly modifying EmberCore the x-ray/gamma-ray flashlight can be produced which would have a beam strength orders of magnitude greater than what has been previously deployed in space. This intensity provides a significant source of light that will be able to travel over many kilometers, interact with the ground, and then bounce back towards a sensor.
https://www.nasa.gov/directorates/spacetech/niac/2023/EmberCore_Flashlight/
This is obviously some sort of anti-tardigrade deathray

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 22:42:46 2023 No.15720046 >>15720042 stop wasting time on 4chan and go work on new glenn, Bezos.

Anonymous Mon Sep 4 22:46:10 2023 No.15720052
File: 66 KB, 941x575, EmberCore Flashlight moon.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>the flashlight uses a shorter wavelength of light, an x-ray/gamma-ray, which is passively produced by a radioisotope. The innovative technology is the EmberCore" radioisotope being developed by Ultra Safe Nuclear Corporation (USNC) to enable lunar night survival by keeping lunar rovers and landers warm through the cold lunar night. By slightly modifying EmberCore the x-ray/gamma-ray flashlight can be produced which would have a beam strength orders of magnitude greater than what has been previously deployed in space. This intensity provides a significant source of light that will be able to travel over many kilometers, interact with the ground, and then bounce back towards a sensor.
https://www.nasa.gov/directorates/spacetech/niac/2023/EmberCore_Flashlight/
This is obviously some sort of anti-tardigrade deathray

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 22:55:34 2023 No.15720064 >rollout tonight >maybe stack tomorrow >marine notices >fcc approval >nasa airplane listed for flight >spacex boat in the area soon

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 22:56:47 2023 No.15720065 >>15720005 The absolute state of /sci/ poster intelligence.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 22:58:46 2023 No.15720070 >>15720064 Nooooooo they simply CANT launch+!!!!!!!!+++!!

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 22:59:36 2023 No.15720073 https://x.com/tlpn_official/status/1698832101876081115 Some anon that worked at the TLP showed his power level, which of you was it, come on now speak up.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 22:59:57 2023 No.15720074 >>15720042 lmao >he as expected

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 23:01:06 2023 No.15720079 File: 183 KB, 600x850, 1283283519351.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15719811 >>15719786 >>15719761 I wish there was some sort of Space flight general to put this all in, since its about spaces flight and all.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 23:01:52 2023 No.15720080 File: 3 KB, 193x145, IMG_2410.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] The hot stage ring will NOT collapse and destroy the entire pad

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 23:08:15 2023 No.15720087 >>15719908 >hop wait.... what?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 23:08:44 2023 No.15720088 >>15720080 There's no reason for it collapse anywhere near launch and liftoff

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 23:09:48 2023 No.15720090 >>15720073 Kek I wanna know what was said

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 23:09:57 2023 No.15720091 >>15719802 The app is literally just the website.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 23:11:23 2023 No.15720093 >>15720079 the only fights here are baseduz capsules vs female american astronauts

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 23:13:38 2023 No.15720096 File: 65 KB, 597x794, musk Falcon 5 Magic Dragon.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15720079 Spaceflight lives or dies by the actions and inactions of Elon Musk. No one else is remotely relevant.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 23:15:54 2023 No.15720101 She did not drill the hole She did not

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 23:20:42 2023 No.15720110 >>15720080 It took the can crusher with no discernible effect.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 23:21:41 2023 No.15720113 Anons who are reading, what stage do you think IFT-2 makes it to? Options are liftoff, Max-Q, MECO, Stage Sep., and Reentry (these are all that they perform successfully).

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 23:21:47 2023 No.15720114 File: 512 KB, 2560x1440, soon.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 23:22:56 2023 No.15720116 >>15720113 It'll be worse than IFT-1 if SN9 is anything to go by.

Anonymous Mon Sep 4 23:23:35 2023 No.15720117

>>15720113
I would like to say at least stage sep but we have no idea how the hot stage ring, or electric TVC raptors will fare.
And then hotstaging might go wrong and obliterate both vehicles.
And even if it works, it’s possible Ship 25 loses too many engines and crashes into the sea without reaching near-orbit

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 23:23:39 2023 No.15720118 File: 71 KB, 1080x1080, 1693869548578.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Good morning /sfg/

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 23:23:47 2023 No.15720119 >>15720113 The real sticking point will be staging, specifically whether they have the thrust balanced between stages so that Starship has proper ullage and Superheavy doesn't boink it.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 23:24:36 2023 No.15720121 >>15720116 SN9 almost made it to the end of the flight. This would be more akin to a re entry failure

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 23:24:42 2023 No.15720122 >>15720118 cunt

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 23:25:37 2023 No.15720125 >>15720119 I don’t know why they don’t just cut the engines after staging. Superheavys TWR will be super high even with 3 engines only due to being an empty can

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 23:26:22 2023 No.15720127 >>15720113 It will explode at re-entry

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 23:27:14 2023 No.15720129 >>15720125 >I don’t know why they don’t just cut the engines after staging Because #NeverStopThrusting #69 #420

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 23:27:18 2023 No.15720130 >>15720121 How can there be a reentry failure if they dont even plan for it to land safely? They wanted IFT-1 to break up on reentry and they want the same now. If anything that would be a success.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 23:28:03 2023 No.15720131 >>15720118 Abbo

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 23:28:05 2023 No.15720132 >>15720125 In theory it gives you about 10% improvement in performance, but since S25 isn't carrying anything... I don't really see the point.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 23:28:19 2023 No.15720134 >>15720127 Ok so you just think the mission will be a complete success then.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 23:28:56 2023 No.15720137 >>15720118 Aliens R Gay

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 23:29:01 2023 No.15720138 >>15720122 rude

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 23:30:59 2023 No.15720142 >>15720134 Complete success would be belly flopping on the water. So no.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 23:31:47 2023 No.15720144 >>15720113 Starship will survive reentry and crossrange to Kauai setting its forest ablaze.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 23:32:38 2023 No.15720147 >>15720142 Retard they plan for it to burn up on reentry IF THEY EVEN GET THERE. You think complete success is something they arent even aiming for.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 23:32:38 2023 No.15720146 >>15720125 >I don’t know why they don’t just cut the engines after staging. We don't know if they are going to leave engines on or reignite them for the boostback.

Anonymous Mon Sep 4 23:34:28 2023 No.15720153

>>15720113
Orbit

. The pressure of the raptors from the ship will rip apart the hot-stage structure. The booster will become useless.
The ship in the other hand , will reach orbital velocity flawlessly .
At reentry , the ship survives miraculously and it lands onto some poor coast guard patrol ship. SpaceX is grounded .

Mars is locked in forever

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 23:35:47 2023 No.15720157 >>15720147 They didn't plan for the last flight to get as far as it did, either. You never know if the tiles they currently have on will perform better than expected.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 23:38:08 2023 No.15720158 >>15720118 'Roo Kangaroo Cunt Dropbear

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 23:38:21 2023 No.15720159 >>15720144 Now that would be a blessing from god.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 23:38:51 2023 No.15720161 >>15720157 It will be unguided ballistic during reentry as per IFT-1 license. That will ensure it doesn't survive

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 23:39:05 2023 No.15720162 >>15720153 If the booster fucking detonated won’t that take out the ship too?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 23:40:43 2023 No.15720165 >>15719898 So fucking true lol, with a good hack and backdoor infil of the main space agencies and companies along the way

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 23:41:39 2023 No.15720166 >>15720162 Anon means the exhaust from the Raptors will rip open the top of the booster despite the shielding on the hot staging ring not that it will cause the booster, which will be mostly empty of methalox by this time, to explode.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 23:41:45 2023 No.15720167 >>15720153 Suborbit*

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 23:44:33 2023 No.15720170 They're prepping the bull for rollout

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 23:45:40 2023 No.15720172 >>15719595 Predigenous

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 23:47:03 2023 No.15720173 >>15720064 forgot >FTS brought to the booster

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 23:49:15 2023 No.15720174 File: 578 KB, 1179x1808, IMG_2412.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Reminder to never listen to doomers.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 23:50:17 2023 No.15720175 >>15720174 >sugar cold also why are you posting this

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 23:50:19 2023 No.15720176 >not using torque wrenches when attaching your spacecraft to the transporter >literally just giving her with the impact like you're building a shed

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 23:51:32 2023 No.15720178 >>15720113 RSO slips and presses the FTS button at T+4 seconds

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 23:52:14 2023 No.15720179 >>15720175 Youre not slick Zack. Im posting it because you fucking doomers are going to do the same song and dance for IFT-2 that you did for IFT-1 and Im making sure that /sfg/ wont fall for your tricks.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 23:53:01 2023 No.15720181 >>15720144 >>15720159 TOTAL CHICKEN DEATH (TCD)

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 23:56:25 2023 No.15720184 File: 94 KB, 800x507, 1682089198221925.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15720174 I still can't believe they recovered from THIS. Like HOLY SHIT

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 23:56:27 2023 No.15720185 >>15720176 maybe they're using a squirter (sex) washer

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 23:56:31 2023 No.15720186 Can someone make a Starship Cobson?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 23:56:51 2023 No.15720187 >>15720165 Kek precisely

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 23:56:55 2023 No.15720188 >>15720113 I'm worried that the rocket will not survive 1 hot staging just like how the pad didn't survive 1 take off like spacex had predicted.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 23:57:30 2023 No.15720189 >>15720186 >Cobson NAS coal

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 23:58:11 2023 No.15720190 >>15720174 you mean brown people

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 23:59:00 2023 No.15720192 >>15720188 >I'm worried Why?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 23:59:04 2023 No.15720193 >>15720174 so far he's right. starship hasnt launched again all year and time is running out

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 00:00:10 2023 No.15720194 File: 1.39 MB, 1179x1964, IMG_2414.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15720189 >actually calling cobson coal

Anonymous Tue Sep 5 00:00:35 2023 No.15720195

>>15720188
As long as SH raptors don’t shit the fucking bed (PLEEEEEASE) it will at least make it to stage sep, and I’m confident at that point SS can cleanly light up and try to separate. After that I don’t give a shit what happens. SH might fail to do a simulated landing bc of raptor problems on relight. SS might blow up on reentry. That would suck, yes. But if it fails the same way they last flight did then it’s gonna feel like absolutely zero progress was made

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 00:00:42 2023 No.15720196 >>15720179 stop twitterposting you fucking queer

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 00:01:30 2023 No.15720200 >>15720174 iirc he explain in a deep dive video after that that the damage wasn't as bad as he initially assumed or something

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 00:01:45 2023 No.15720202 any other space company/agency would have tested the hot staging ring with a static fire

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 00:04:43 2023 No.15720205 >>15720196 Rope immediatly you D&C discord troon, YWNBAW

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 00:06:37 2023 No.15720207 >>15720205 literal brainrot

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 00:11:59 2023 No.15720211 File: 226 KB, 468x345, 1633330170173.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Musk is doing it again

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 00:12:26 2023 No.15720213 >>15720211 Interesting article

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 00:13:29 2023 No.15720216 File: 572 KB, 4096x2304, F5NP49sWIAA-IFq.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] No way I didn't know Falcon 9 was this big wtf

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 00:18:06 2023 No.15720221 >>15720216 this does NOT paint SLS in a good light. the falcon vs starship one was reasonable for a medium lift vs super heavy lift vehicle comparison

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 00:21:20 2023 No.15720223 >>15720196 >tranny calls others queer

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 00:21:34 2023 No.15720224 File: 1.91 MB, 2382x4096, hs1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15720216 And Starship is even bigger.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 00:22:19 2023 No.15720225 >>15720224 well obviously that I know I just didn't know Flacon9 was so big

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 00:23:29 2023 No.15720227 File: 1.08 MB, 1920x1080, 02.23.06.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] getting ready

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 00:27:54 2023 No.15720234 File: 1.07 MB, 1170x1600, IMG_4394.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15720211 We’re never getting to Mars are we

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 00:29:38 2023 No.15720237 >>15720234 Sorry Vlad, but you arent.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 00:30:37 2023 No.15720238 >>15720234 shit wrong pic but topkek I forgot I had that in the vault

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 00:44:29 2023 No.15720252 File: 269 KB, 1036x1341, 1663715713682407.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] how long before some dronenigger does this too a telescope?

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 00:45:22 2023 No.15720254 >>15720252 ?

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 00:46:01 2023 No.15720255 File: 50 KB, 698x573, drone dropping.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15720252 The fire rises

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 00:47:05 2023 No.15720256 >>15720252 Enjoy the vacation, off topic troon

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 00:54:31 2023 No.15720271 >>15720256 drones fly and are in space its on topic

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 00:58:17 2023 No.15720277 >>15720252 >>15720255 The telescopes in hawaii are contentious. It probably would be worth the money to physically prevent something like this from happening

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 01:00:06 2023 No.15720278 >>15720277 how would you prevent it?

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 01:05:27 2023 No.15720285 >>15720252 I don’t know his motive but this is kinda funny lol

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 01:06:12 2023 No.15720287 >>15720278 simple drone jammer

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 01:13:54 2023 No.15720298 File: 73 KB, 522x739, 1959 Time magazine Boris Artzybasheff space moon.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15720287 Doesn't work on drones flying a pre programmed route

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 01:17:15 2023 No.15720305 >>15720184 reusable OFTs

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 01:17:51 2023 No.15720307 >>15720287 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gXjGto5-AvA doesn't work

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 01:21:03 2023 No.15720309 File: 1.18 MB, 1380x952, OD_on_K.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15719439 Sure thing Feynmann, how do corpuscles self interfere and diffract?

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 01:23:06 2023 No.15720312 File: 163 KB, 550x899, tripod2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15719475 There's some crazy bastards making one right now https://www.youtube.com/@waroftheworldsgame9026/videos

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 01:24:29 2023 No.15720314 >>15720298 >>15720307 GPS jamming.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 01:26:58 2023 No.15720318 >>15720271 >drones fly and are in space >its on topic they hated him because he told the truth

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 01:28:59 2023 No.15720320 File: 589 KB, 1179x1354, IMG_2415.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] ITS HAPPENING!! /sfg/ must prepare for the incoming onslaught of tourists.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 01:30:03 2023 No.15720321 >>15720314 doesn't work https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nrzs3dQ9exw

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 01:30:32 2023 No.15720322 >>15720309 Huygens was an opium addict - 'Its all, like, waves maaan'

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 01:33:53 2023 No.15720325 >>15720320 >incoming onslaught of tourists Yup and it started with (you) apparently

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 01:33:57 2023 No.15720326 >>15720320 I will be advertising /sfg/ on multiple other boards, as usual

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 01:34:55 2023 No.15720328 >>15720326 die

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 01:35:58 2023 No.15720329 >>15720321 CIWS systems.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 01:41:09 2023 No.15720338 File: 11 KB, 703x146, 1663038150743204.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15720329 doesn't work https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6w5apnkCZqo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J3WwtByvSI0

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 01:41:25 2023 No.15720339 File: 729 KB, 2560x1440, soon2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15720320 >>15720114

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 01:45:42 2023 No.15720341 >>15720339 https://youtu.be/yKhR8RFY6sQ

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 01:53:06 2023 No.15720355 File: 1.30 MB, 1920x1080, [1920x1080] vtime=[4_34_39], take=[2023-09-04 20.52.51].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] TOTAL BEETLE DEATH SMASH 'IM

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 02:01:16 2023 No.15720361 File: 17 KB, 400x400, 09d.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] What if the hot staging ring collapsing during stack

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 02:02:54 2023 No.15720362 No one is gonna let elon launch starship 3 times a month, let alone 3 times a day

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 02:03:39 2023 No.15720365 >>15719786 ADL seems to be going after him since he believes that George Soros is evil with the way he funds DAs in California or whatever, and that leap of logic somehow leads to antisemetic views or something.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 02:09:25 2023 No.15720371 >>15720174 >Reminder to never listen to ____ers.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 02:09:37 2023 No.15720372 File: 184 KB, 1487x1170, Bruno autism.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Okay literally WHAT THE FUCK did he mean by this

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 02:11:06 2023 No.15720374 >>15718965 >sustainer holy shit dude

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 02:13:25 2023 No.15720377 >>15718984 Still has shit density, 80 kg/cubic meter. 80 fuckin GRAMS per liter.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 02:13:42 2023 No.15720380 File: 367 KB, 1200x1542, 1531058882814.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15720372 >look at our rocket that we will never build

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 02:14:33 2023 No.15720382 >>15720372 vulcan is insanely big compared to starship. much higher energy too

Anonymous Tue Sep 5 02:16:39 2023 No.15720385

>All the launch streamers on YouTube got significantly increased viewer numbers for this launch compared to before
lel

>>15719581
YouTube is the worst video platform except for all the others.

>>15720113
I think it'll make it to MECO and at proper altitude and speed this time because if it doesn't they're really fucking up. After that I think stage sep is the highest likelihood for failure, whether due to something in the myriad of changes for hotstaging fucking up, the hotstaging ring simply being insufficient and leading to catastrophic failure, or not all Starship Raptors igniting because reliability still isn't there yet. If it somehow just works (possible but not as likely imo) I'd fully expect it to burn up on reentry.

>>15720372
Have to make Boing and Locksneed happy somehow, they won't give him money for proper reuse so he has to make BO-tier infographics to make it look like ULA isn't in a very precarious position

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 02:17:01 2023 No.15720387 >>15720372 Wait, is that supposed to be Vulcan? Why is there a tiny SS/SH next to a short F9?

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 02:17:09 2023 No.15720388 >>15720382 kek

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 02:17:46 2023 No.15720389 File: 21 KB, 916x689, 1684747160707582.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >spacex workers whooping at the sheriff

Anonymous Tue Sep 5 02:18:23 2023 No.15720391

>>15720372
>design a rocket to have very large first stage
>prove conclusively that doing a boostback burn would be inefficient for a rocket with such a big first stage
>conclude that your design is optimal
It makes perfect sense if you assume that the people who made this graph had nothing to do with the rocket's design and are contriving a post hoc explanation.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 02:18:35 2023 No.15720392 >>15720338 Air density

Anonymous Tue Sep 5 02:22:03 2023 No.15720395

>>15719005
Hydrogen requires so little energy to boil that the fucking mote of energy released as each molecule flips isospins or whatever is enough to boil off more than half of what you just condensed, even before you consider heat leaking in from outside.
Pipes and other things containing liquid hydrogen which get exposed to the atmosphere are so cold that the gasses in the air will start to condense out and even freeze, if they manage to become trapped in the rapidly forming water-frost buildup. Basically your rocket needs insulation and what you can't insulate is gonna have to deal with a fuckton of hydrogen bubbles building up inside as well as thick ice deposits outside.
Also hydrogen forms hydrides with most metals and alloys, and hydrides are universally brittle. These deposits form in microcracks and help spread them wider and deeper, embrittling the object. If that object is a turbine blade in your engine, your rocket explodes.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 02:22:59 2023 No.15720396 >>15720372 >Okay literally WHAT THE FUCK did he mean by this ULA bet on the wrong architecture so Tory has to lie and pretend Vulcan has a higher direct to GEO payload than Starship.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 02:23:50 2023 No.15720399 >>15720256 strong patrick tomlinson vibes

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 02:24:52 2023 No.15720403 >>15719133 It took me a very long time to finally intuitively understand how the path of an orbit would look on a standard flat map projection.

Anonymous Tue Sep 5 02:25:54 2023 No.15720404

>>15720385
>or not all Starship Raptors igniting because reliability still isn't there yet

None of the shutdowns during the static fires were due to issues with the Raptors themselves.

>b-but all those Raptors shut down during IFT-1

There was literally a fire in the engine section that you can see on Tim Dodd's 4k video.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 02:26:22 2023 No.15720406 >>15720403 Depends on inclination, it would basically be a straight line for anything launched from Kennedy on a 0 degree inclination... wait not sure cause Kennedy is not on the equator..

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 02:27:36 2023 No.15720408 >>15720395 >If that object is a turbine blade in your engine, your rocket explodes I wouldn't be surprised in the slightest if this was why New Shepard blew up a ago year as well as why it hasn't flown since.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 02:27:37 2023 No.15720409 >>15720372 Am I retarded? I don't even know how to read this "graph"

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 02:28:10 2023 No.15720411 >>15720372 >Make worlds largest rocket look tiny on cope infographic goddamn oldspace just launch some shit you lazy fucks

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 02:28:15 2023 No.15720412 >>15720409 Just goes to show the length and degree of mental gymnastics that went into making it

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 02:29:53 2023 No.15720414 >>15720372 I can't believe ULA already has a 150km tall rocket

Anonymous Tue Sep 5 02:30:22 2023 No.15720416

>>15720409
The people the graph is intended for aren't supposed to "interpret" it. They're just supposed to look at it and feel comforted and reassured that ULA is still on the right course. We're only being shown it because other people being seen while seeing it is also an important part of the presentation.

Our rather accurate and sarcastic commentary on it is not.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 02:30:42 2023 No.15720417 >>15720414 Hahahahah

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 02:35:20 2023 No.15720425 >>15720406 You can only really do a 0 degree inclination at the equator, trying to launch at a lower inclination than your latitude takes large amounts of delta V. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UIXiK41yl_w

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 02:37:23 2023 No.15720429 >>15720425 Wait so what was Skylabs inclination, same as Kennedy right

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 02:41:50 2023 No.15720431 ROLL OUT

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 02:43:17 2023 No.15720432 >>15720429 I'm pretty sure all of the Saturn launches went due east out of the cape into a 28 degree orbit.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 02:44:55 2023 No.15720433 >>15720409 it's a cope that shows that by staging higher and burning hydrogen in stage 2, its payload capacity doesn't drop off as quickly in higher orbits. this is true, but it is cope because vulcan is still obsolete before its first flight

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 02:49:58 2023 No.15720438 >>15720377 >Still has shit density, 80 kg/cubic meter. 80 fuckin GRAMS per liter. wow and here i thought solid hydrogen was good

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 02:50:12 2023 No.15720439 >>15720429 Skylab was put into a 50 degree orbit.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 02:50:53 2023 No.15720440 >>15720361 The design has been on the can crusher. It probably holds 2x of what's required for max acceleration.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 02:50:59 2023 No.15720442 >>15720372 god imagine if vulcan was that big AND expendable

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 02:51:24 2023 No.15720443 >>15720361 There is a good possibility, and if would be absolutely catastrophic.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 02:53:26 2023 No.15720444 >>15720372 >vulcan is nearly 300 meters tall

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 02:55:58 2023 No.15720447 >>15720443 >and if would be absolutely catastrophic it wouldn't do shit. an empty ship collapsing would do nothing to the olm

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 02:56:37 2023 No.15720448 >>15720439 why?

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 02:56:46 2023 No.15720449 >>15720433 burning hydrogen doesn't actually help with this, it only lets them use a smaller first stage to stage higher and faster

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 02:57:25 2023 No.15720450 does anyone have the blogpost from some space military blog about starships inclination change ability, it was something absurd like 70 degrees

Anonymous Tue Sep 5 02:59:23 2023 No.15720452

>>15720450
nvm found it
https://warontherocks.com/2021/06/physics-gets-a-vote-no-starcruisers-for-space-force/
>We are all for gaining refueling capabilities on-orbit, but for different reasons than one might think. Once the Space Force can have hundreds of millions of pounds of propellant in space waiting to refuel spacecraft, it will have the means to greatly improve freedom of movement and prolong the lifetime of satellites. But that will not make space operations analogous to air operations. Even Starship’s large delta-v budget is too small to enable it to match the orbit of many satellites. We calculated that if a fully loaded Starship is in an equatorial orbit (zero-degree inclination) at an altitude of 250 miles (400 kilometers), it would barely have enough delta-v to match the International Space Station’s orbit, at 51 degrees inclination. It definitely could not match satellites in sun-synchronous orbits, which have an inclination of about 98 degrees and are a common orbit for Earth observation satellites.

>Even Starship’s large delta-v budget is too small to enable it to match the orbit of many satellites. We calculated that if a fully loaded Starship is in an equatorial orbit (zero-degree inclination) at an altitude of 250 miles (400 kilometers), it would barely have enough delta-v to match the International Space Station’s orbit, at 51 degrees inclination
i mean 51 degrees is still pretty crazy right?

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 03:01:43 2023 No.15720455 >>15720452 easy, put depots at 2 or 3 different inclinations and 2 or 3 different altitudes

Anonymous Tue Sep 5 03:05:07 2023 No.15720458

>>15720452
>i mean 51 degrees is still pretty crazy right?
Yeah. It's like 2/3rds of what's needed to get to orbit, including air resistance/gravity losses. However it's obvious that being ready to launch at a moment's notice is better for this purpose than leaving stuff in orbit.

Anonymous Tue Sep 5 03:05:34 2023 No.15720460

>>15719285
Io's magma is likely much hotter than Earth's, as hot as the ancient komstite lava flows from Earth's past billions of rlyears ago. The hottest lava on Earth today barely reaches 1200 celsius, whereas Io's lava is modeled to be at least 1500 celsius, and perhaps over 1600 celsius.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 03:05:53 2023 No.15720462 >>15720326 And I will be advertising your mom on multiple ghettos, as per usual. This train is going to break multiple records.

Anonymous Tue Sep 5 03:06:16 2023 No.15720464

>>15720452
>>15720455
Yeah between Starship's raw inclination ability, and the ability to refill at depots, you can probably send any payload to any orbit you could ever think of. SS is going to be fucking insane. Even if Musk's "Mars city" doesn't even come close to happening, Starship will still be an asinine rocket capable of forever changing the industry

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 03:07:25 2023 No.15720467 >>15720460 I wonder if Io has an asthenosphere

Anonymous Tue Sep 5 03:10:01 2023 No.15720471

>>15720161
>the FTS will blow human-sized holes in the tank, that will ensure it doesn't survive
the gayce shittle was a fragile little snowflake because the hot structure was aluminim for mass autism; starship has already proven stainless is structurally far superior
broken or missing tiles causing loss of vehicle on reentry would actually surprise me more than finding out that the tiles aren't even needed for LEO reentry at all

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 03:10:15 2023 No.15720472 >>15719418 Things radiate in all directions, which means if you can draw a straight line from any point on the radiator to any point on the other radiator, the radiators can "see" each other and thus they are radiating heat onto each other, too.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 03:16:26 2023 No.15720478 >>15720448 Probably the same reason the ISS is at 51.6 degrees, so that the Soviets could get there from Baikonur. Going to higher inclinations than your latitude is fine, you just lose a bit of the boost from the Earth's spin.

Anonymous Tue Sep 5 03:16:48 2023 No.15720479

>>15719512
It's the inverse square law, and it only applies to pointlike sources. Linear sources follow the inverse law (twice as far, half the intensity), and planar sources don't drop off with distance.

Depending on how close to the meeting point of the radiators you are, the other radiator looks like either a linear or a transitionary linear/planar source.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 03:18:00 2023 No.15720482 >>15719584 you've never done concrete work, huh?

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 03:18:51 2023 No.15720484 >>15720478 Soviets never docked at Skylab, fuck I hate this stupid accommodating the Soviets/Russians crap that led to retarded US station inclinations, China has the right idea

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 03:20:02 2023 No.15720485 >>15719576 oh god youre right they never did the math on the force of the engines oh fuck

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 03:21:20 2023 No.15720487 >>15719600 27 cubic feet, not 3.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 03:21:52 2023 No.15720488 >>15720372 >peak altitude at 110km so how does dragon get to the ISS then? I seriously cannot even comprehend the number of extra chromosomes ULA infographic makers must have

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 03:23:02 2023 No.15720492 >>15720488 peakalty of the booster

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 03:24:09 2023 No.15720494 >>15720488 Seriously like what is the takeaway of this infogrpahic?! It's BO tier. Maybe even worse. At least BO shit has arguable speculation. This is just pure schizo

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 03:28:30 2023 No.15720498 File: 74 KB, 561x627, IMG_1848.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] WAGMI, thanks for stickin' around Starshipbros.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 03:29:00 2023 No.15720499 >>15720498 Starship Flight General

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 03:36:45 2023 No.15720510 stack this week and probably a few tests. no way they launch. we'll probably get destack next week then wait for faa.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 03:39:08 2023 No.15720512 >>15720510 elon here the faa is illegal and we will no longer follow their illegal laws

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 03:40:16 2023 No.15720515 what's everyone else up to? what happened with all those chinese launch companies? did they go bankrupt?

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 03:40:37 2023 No.15720517 >>15720512 hi elon. launch on 9/11 and crash starship into the launch tower

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 03:40:50 2023 No.15720518 >>15720433 >>15720372 What's funny is that even by this extremely contrived and useless metric they chose, Falcon 9/SS is still ~3x as good until GSO, where Vulcan is only 10% better. Even their own graph shows their rocket is shit

Anonymous Tue Sep 5 03:45:04 2023 No.15720527

>>15720409
the heights mentioned are just "height when the engines cut off" and "maximum height the booster coasts up to before falling".

Vulcan stages higher and goes higher so it's better or something I guess. The logic is pretty retarded, it's a total non-factor for LV performance. They are justifying their design architecture after the fact, basically.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 03:47:17 2023 No.15720531 File: 76 KB, 1486x354, PR.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] damnnit I lost my bfr critics collage. gotta go thorough my 723 screen grabs again.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 03:49:09 2023 No.15720535 >>15720467 They figure it has a magma ocean

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 03:51:31 2023 No.15720537 >>15720531 I've been waiting for you collagebro, hope things are well, sorry for your loss but by god don't ragequit

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 03:55:51 2023 No.15720540 File: 104 KB, 461x403, delusions.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15720531 "They won't do more than one static fire in a single day"

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 03:59:09 2023 No.15720544 >>15720484 >that led to retarded US station inclinations What is retarded about the inclination?

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 04:03:17 2023 No.15720548 File: 31 KB, 1335x256, 1668055974838605.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15720515 looks like one is launching today

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 04:09:10 2023 No.15720552 >>15720548 I pray they stream the next LM5 launch

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 04:14:34 2023 No.15720560 >birdapp arc has escalated into him getting into a jew naming fight with the ADL COOL He's going to get whacked over this if he keeps it up, why couldnt he just build the fucking rockets AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 04:16:08 2023 No.15720565 >>15720560 His rocket would be useless if NASA/US Gov demands only trans/homosexuals are to be on Mars colony. Which means, a dead colony.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 04:16:10 2023 No.15720566 >>15720548 Someone in Clear's chat mentioned that this might be getting streamed in wechat or something.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 04:16:12 2023 No.15720567 >>15720432 you are wrong

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 04:17:44 2023 No.15720571 File: 63 KB, 693x642, 1693698814276671.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15720498

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 04:21:00 2023 No.15720576 >>15720518 The graph is meant to placate oldspace milboomers who live on direct to GEO.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 04:28:01 2023 No.15720581 >>15720566 wechat is even worse than xitter

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 04:30:04 2023 No.15720586 File: 828 KB, 1442x1080, 1693594486978557.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15720571

Anonymous Tue Sep 5 04:47:31 2023 No.15720605
File: 50 KB, 850x601, c_c_code_geass_drawn_by_creayus__sample-e4cef641378b74f8901d4d45a8aa504c.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Theoretically speaking, what's the fastest we could get an interstellar probe going if we used today's technology and sent it up to orbit on a Starship or similarly capable heavy launch vehicle?
Let's say it's a 100 ton wet mass probe, and we wanted to send it to the Centauri system to see what's actually there - either a flyby or put it into orbit around Alpha Centauri - could it get there in 100 years or less?

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 04:49:28 2023 No.15720607 File: 34 KB, 640x640, xlarge_Mike_McCulloch.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15720605 >current technology y helo thar

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 04:56:04 2023 No.15720611 >>15720605 Uhhh our technology is dogshit and really using a fully refueled starship or a measly Atlas V wouldn’t make a damn difference. Just do something like breakthrough starshot

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 05:07:37 2023 No.15720618 >>15720605 >>15720611 >YEET train says hi

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 05:15:12 2023 No.15720621 File: 646 KB, 962x552, spxe.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] ITS OVER

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 05:17:18 2023 No.15720622 >>15720621 what happened?

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 05:18:52 2023 No.15720625 >>15720622 spmt died

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 05:19:20 2023 No.15720626 >>15720372 >LEO REFUELLING DOESNT EXIST >NO IT NEVER WILL EXIST uh oh...

Anonymous Tue Sep 5 05:19:54 2023 No.15720627

>>15720605
to get to proxima in 100 years it would need to be 700 times faster than voyager 1 (62 times faster than the parker probe), which seems doable
You could make the "launcher" really big and send it empty on a Starship, fuel it up with more Starships for a good start, but most of the speed would come from a lot of gravity assists

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 05:20:35 2023 No.15720629 >>15720605 just make a big space telescope instead if you wanna research near exoplanets at least you will see results in your lifetime

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 05:22:07 2023 No.15720632 >>15720625 Get a dozen stout oxen on site to pull it

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 05:25:21 2023 No.15720635 >>15720632 Keyed and amishpilled.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 05:49:35 2023 No.15720672 >>15719422 And that's just Phase 1

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 05:49:54 2023 No.15720673 >>15719544 Slurping on that Elon cock

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 05:55:09 2023 No.15720682 >>15720144 based honestly, fuck Hawaiians

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 06:00:05 2023 No.15720689 >>15720314 >T-minus 30 seconds >Guidance is internal what now?

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 06:14:39 2023 No.15720724 Have SPMTs been fixed?

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 06:17:58 2023 No.15720729 >>15720689 Gattling guns firing 10G magnum shells.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 06:20:57 2023 No.15720740 How many two more weeks until next Starship launch?

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 06:25:44 2023 No.15720747 >>15720372 Reminder that without a kickstage, Starship is irrelevant, and will only be launching Starlinks. The real shit happens BLEO.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 06:27:40 2023 No.15720749 >>15720740 We are IN the two week window now

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 06:28:58 2023 No.15720752 >>15720747 Orbital refuel, Tory

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 06:31:43 2023 No.15720757 >>15720747 No, the real shit happens in my ass

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 06:32:59 2023 No.15720759 >>15720724 S25 already at launchpad https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhJRzQsLZGg&ab_channel=NASASpaceflight

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 06:36:15 2023 No.15720764 >>15720759 they legally cant launch, they dont have faa permission

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 06:37:12 2023 No.15720766 File: 271 KB, 1920x1080, s25.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] So the question is will they lift it now or wait until the morning.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 06:41:20 2023 No.15720769 >>15720759 God damn theyre quick with it. Its already under the chopsticks? Jeez man so much quicker than IFT-1

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 06:42:04 2023 No.15720771 >>15718719 >true crabs They're not true crabs. They're closely related to the humble hermit crab which is also not a true crab but crayfish.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 06:53:02 2023 No.15720779 >>15720184 It looks like a missile strike or something ahaha

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 06:54:44 2023 No.15720783 >>15720766 Already between chopsticks indicates lift now. They probably want to do some preflight testing of how the hot stage ring holds up under the real deal.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 07:03:09 2023 No.15720794 >>15720766 wtf. theyre not allowed to lift it. elon musk is an antisemitic fraud. spacex is a retarded private company. arrest them

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 07:29:36 2023 No.15720819 Apparently Falcon 9 launches only cost SpaceX internally around 16m now

Anonymous Tue Sep 5 07:52:10 2023 No.15720833

>>15720372
Boosters like Vulcans lower stage that are high energy i.e. stage at higher altitudes/speeds will lose more performance compared to low energy/low altitude/low top speed staged boosters like the falcon 9

Probably aldo tries to say that LEO optimized reuseavle boosters will have smaller payloads towards deep space missions, but that is kind of irrelevant if it costs like 5x, space tugs and the like will be a reliable and ubiquitous thing soon

Its mostly massive cope, obviously you have to design the rocket from ground up for reuse and not use a "high energy" booster staging architecture

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 07:54:24 2023 No.15720834 >>15720372 It's just FUD bullshit, ignoring that the solids doing the lifting as training wheels are a stage that separates too.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 08:04:06 2023 No.15720838 >>15720747 Orbital refilling + spacetugs which are reusable as well and are developed by multiple separate companies

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 08:05:07 2023 No.15720839 >>15720819 Source?

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 08:06:12 2023 No.15720840 >>15720833 *Lose more efficency doing a boostback I mean as they have higher speed and thus need more propellant to slow down

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 08:14:22 2023 No.15720846 Alright how soon is the launch?

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 08:17:56 2023 No.15720850 >>15720846 Two weeks

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 08:49:27 2023 No.15720885 >scots sound different from english >white americans sound different from black americans >australians sound different from new zealanders i wonder what martian english will sound like

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 08:54:31 2023 No.15720894 >>15720885 Depends on what nation floods it the most.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 09:01:00 2023 No.15720906 File: 571 KB, 3200x1269, Lunar Landing Mission Profile.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15718611 They are laughing at you losers https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VglZ9a6CEcE

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 09:07:39 2023 No.15720918 File: 505 KB, 631x658, 1682290252351160.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15720839

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 09:14:32 2023 No.15720937 Man, Elon is going absolutely apeshit on twitter. Bro isn't going to see the year out at this rate.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 09:29:44 2023 No.15720973 >>15720937 the fate of all boomers who watch fox

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 09:32:25 2023 No.15720980 Can you imagine landing of the moon with the soviet lander back then ? You come down the stairs alone. Nobody nowhere near close to help you . An entire celestial body just for you

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 09:33:50 2023 No.15720984 >>15720973 The fuck are you even on about? Fox is full of ads to feed starving jews and whatnot.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 09:33:57 2023 No.15720985 >>15720937 seems pretty reasonable if you look at it objectively instead of thinking jews (or more specifically ADL, they are probably hiding behind jews in general to just drive their own pet policies) as a group should be beyond all criticism

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 09:36:15 2023 No.15720991 >>15720984 its too late for you anon

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 09:36:31 2023 No.15720992 >>15720985 >seems pretty reasonable if you look at it objectively Lol, lmao even.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 09:37:14 2023 No.15720994 Anybody played High Frontier 4 All?

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 09:38:14 2023 No.15720997 >>15720992 be specific, what is unreasonable? or better yet, stop talking about off topic shit

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 09:41:42 2023 No.15721003 >>15720997 >be specific, what is unreasonable Saying anything bad about any jew, worse yet a group of Jews is pretty much the worst crime possible in the current society.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 09:43:38 2023 No.15721006 Can we stop with the offtopic ? Im not here to hear bullshit politics

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 09:53:21 2023 No.15721029 Staging >>15721028 >>15721028 >>15721028

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 10:28:34 2023 No.15721081 >>15720338 retard, CIWS can intercept supersonic missiles

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 11:04:44 2023 No.15721148 >>15720906 Haha benis

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 11:53:13 2023 No.15721229 File: 567 KB, 2048x1350, 1663052172550977.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15720517

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 11:56:56 2023 No.15721236 >>15720627 be sure to wave as you go by it if you don't have a way to slow down when you get there

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 11:59:08 2023 No.15721240 >>15720764 faa will give permission, but it will not be revealed until the last moment, this is to dodge the greenfags and other suefags

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 12:01:56 2023 No.15721246 >>15720833 it is, of course, completely ignoring that you can just launch an entire Centaur upper stage with payload inside of Starship to LEO

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 14:44:31 2023 No.15721484 >>15720839 The fact they reuse boosters 16 times now.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 14:46:10 2023 No.15721488 >>15720985 >>15720997 Boomers literally think that and they exist on 4chan in heavy numbers after 2016

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]