/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.1571358]

Atheists. What is the evolutionary purpose for necrophilia or pedophilia? Oh that's right, there is none.

Checkmate atheists!

[Anonymous No.1571361]

Ok, but you just proved that god likes pedos.

[Anonymous No.1571376]

Pedophilia is a man-made concept, it's not like people actually contemplated age with regards to morality in 100 BC

[Anonymous No.1571382]

Theists. Why did God create necrophilia or pedophilia?

[Anonymous No.1571385]

>>1571358
necrophilia in animals/humans is just sexual confusion.
Pedophilia is the choosing of a mate who is younger thus more likely to survive and procreate more offsprings than an adult mate.

[Anonymous No.1571387]

>>1571382
Man creates his own problems.

[Anonymous No.1571391]

>>1571376
no, you idiot, pedophilia is a medical diagnosis.

it means attraction to prepubescent children.

[Anonymous No.1571396]

>>1571382
God didn't, it's just the devil trying to get to you, as a way to fight God. God is trying to fight back, but he needs our help, and the best way to help is to resist Satan and all his powers. Never be weak for the devil to prey on, never, save yourself.

[Anonymous No.1571393]

>>1571358
necrophilia in animals/humans is just sexual confusion.
Pedophilia is the selection of a mate who is younger thus more likely to survive and procreate more offsprings than an adult mate.

[Anonymous No.1571400]

>>1571385
>Pedophilia is the choosing of a mate who cannot reproduce yet
fix'd.

i blaim america for making sex with teenagers, which is perfectly normal, into pedophilia.

[Anonymous No.1571404]

You do realize that medical diagnoses are man-made as well, further proving my point, "you idiot". Regardless of who created what, where we came from, etc, it was never instilled until the modern society that pedophilia was even a problem.

[Anonymous No.1571406]

>>1571396
so god can't defeat devil by himself? i thought he's all-powerful?!

[Anonymous No.1571407]

Population control

[Anonymous No.1571412]

>>1571400
We don't, just having sex with children-children is pedophilia. We are aware of ephebophilia and that it means teenagers like ones in high school, it's just that our kids are spoiled idiots that can't think for themselves, and thus'll get their mommy and daddies to sue the person s/he had sex with as a way of getting back at him for something.

[Anonymous No.1571413]

>>1571404
you missed the point. pedophilia has nothing to do with morality.
you're probably confusing pedophilia with child rape.

[Anonymous No.1571416]

>>1571400
I agree. Its ridiculous to expect a 14 year old to only be attracted to 18+, rather than someone their own age.

[Anonymous No.1571415]

>>1571406
He is, but the devil is equally powerful, and thus challenging. He is God's opposite, much like what this universe is made in (in opposites that is).

[Anonymous No.1571418]

What is the evolutionary purpose for diabeties or asthma? Oh that's right, there is none.

I can't believe christfags are still making this argument. No-one claims evolution can ever create a perfect defect-free organism, in fact it predicts the opposite.

[Anonymous No.1571422]

>>1571396
Who created the Devil.

[Anonymous No.1571424]

>>1571412
but why you have such ridiculously high age of consent? teens are sexually active from at least 15.

[Anonymous No.1571426]

>>1571404
You completely misunderstand what a medical classification and definition is. It says that pedophilia is a person's sexual attraction to prepubescent children. It's a thing, morality is not included. You're confusing it with "child molestation."

[Anonymous No.1571433]

for pedophilia:

girls are more fertile, thus those who had sex with younger girls (14-21) had a higher chance of having healthy offspring,

the older a female gets the more chances of having genetic defects.

-

for necrophilia:

there is none, and there is no information about past (i.e last 100,000 years) for necrophilia so CHECKMATE CHRISTIANS

[Anonymous No.1571435]

I'm pretty sure if anyone discovers the pictures of my ex that she made for me when we were sixteen, the newspaper will use the words "pedophile" and "child pornography", not ebebophile, which honestly sounds pretty made up.

[Anonymous No.1571437]

>>1571424
But they're still not mentally capable, nor mature, to handle having sex with another person. Hell, even age 18 doesn't guarantee that they'll be able to handle well. Again, our kids here in the US are more idiotic than yours.

[Anonymous No.1571438]

Who says that evolution is perfect. The only difference is that in the nature these mistakes will be fixed by them selfes(they can't survive so they will die). In our modern society the weak are being over protected. I'm not saying we should stop that, but i wouldn't be suprised if the next step in human evolution is one thats going to take us back.

And isn't it a bit cheap to blame all of god its "mistakes" on Satan. It is just a way so that you can stay in your little fantasy world with out facing the reality.

[Anonymous No.1571442]

You misunderstand as well, I've never mentioned sexual activity, I'm just stating that in whatever event, OP's thesis is wrong due to the fact that at the beginning of man, pedophilia and necrophilia were just natural occurrences, and could be completely disregarded as a problem worth noting.

[Anonymous No.1571445]

>>1571435
Trust me, "child pornography," "child molestation," "sex offender" will be what you'll find in the media, not "pedophile." Also, I'd suggest deleting those pics with Gutmann Passes just to save yourself for in case.

[Anonymous No.1571446]

>>1571437
How have you verified that they are not mentally capable or sufficiently mature? Can you even define these qualities operationally?

[Anonymous No.1571447]

>>1571433
>for pedophilia:
>girls are more fertile
another retard.
pedophilia by definition is attraction to females not yet fertile

there is no evolutionary purpose for pedophilia, just like there isn't one for thousands of hereditary diseases.

[Anonymous No.1571455]

>>1571446
Years of research, biology, sexology, statistics and averages from research. We can prove and verify that an individual is fully capable to really assess and commit an acts of behavior until ages 17-20, when the cerebellum fully develops.

[Anonymous No.1571469]

>>1571455
Again, what does this
"that an individual is fully capable to really assess and commit an acts of behavior"
mean in confirmable terms?

[Anonymous No.1571482]

In case anyone wants to get pissed off, know that the FDA didn't let girls 16 years old use the morning after pill, due to political reasons. 18 year olds are fine, despite science saying it was no more dangerous for a 16 year old than an 18 year old. Guess which administration pulled that off.

[Anonymous No.1571489]

>>1571469
It means that they can't make any real choices and actually consider the results and consequences of their actions, what kind of actions variates into the importance and impact of consequence, and until after a certain age.

[Anonymous No.1571491]

>>1571445
>deleting those pics
If I delete the pics, "they" win.

[Anonymous No.1571495]

>>1571469
I think the word you want to use is 'quantifiable'

[Anonymous No.1571506]

>>1571455
girls are fertile since 12-13. thats when they can have sex. your studies ale culturally biased bullshit.

[Anonymous No.1571515]

so whats the theological reason for necrophilia?

[Anonymous No.1571529]

>>1571515

to pleasure her spirit for the last time.

[Anonymous No.1571530]

>>1571491
If you know how to wipe pass data correctly enough times, they won't have any evidence against you to prosecute, you could be just getting rid of data you don't want returning to you (you should wipe pass other pics along with it).

>>1571506
And our "culturally biased" research has found and proven that having a baby under the age of 16 can kill the girl, since their bodies are still not capable of handling the stress and force of child birth.

[Anonymous No.1571545]

>>1571530
>butthurt 30 - 40 year old woman who can't find a mate

[Anonymous No.1571553]

>>1571545
Nice ad hominem that nary has a thing in relation to what the quoting post states.

[Anonymous No.1571559]

Sup /sci/, genuine data point here. I cyber RP with my girlfriend because its hot to me that she is willing to do something so weird in order to get me off. There are also two types of CP i get off to, actual cp, because its been so villified and rare. Also theres the CP where a youngish girl is exploring her new sexual side. Am I a pedphile? (I think naked children look like weird tubes of flesh, would never do anything irl with anyone prepubescent)

[Anonymous No.1571565]

>>1571559
>>1571559
If by "actual cp" you mean porn with prepubescent kids participating in it, then yes you are for being able to get off to kids. And I suggest cease looking and masturbating to both kinds you just listed, since you can get your ass thrown in jail and your entire life ruined for it.

[Anonymous No.1571574]

>>1571565
forget this idiot. i suggest using truecrypt and tor and never get caught.
looking at pictures is not a crime, despite what some helicopter moms think.

[Anonymous No.1571577]

>>1571553
and what does the russian president have anything to do with pedophilia? If anything, it should be Putin (pic related)

[Anonymous No.1571584]

>>1571574
But looking at pictures of cp can and will get you arrested and ruin your entire life for it. There is no guarantee that you will not caught, at all. Even if the chance is 99.99999(continued)%, it still doesn't mean you don't run the risk of getting caught. This shit is not a game, it will really ruin your life in ways that you might as well consider suicide, and the best way to avoid getting caught is just simply not look or masturbate to them, it's that easy and the only real way keep yourself safe from a life of sex offense registries.

[Anonymous No.1571585]

>>1571565
What if I'm getting off to a concept that is being manifested by them?
Also don't worry about me, computer securitywise. I don't save cp.

[Anonymous No.1571589]

>>1571577
Nice circular logic too.