/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.15661965]

>muh ADHD must mean I'm secretly genius!
Is this true /sci/?

[Anonymous No.15661968]

"mental illness" and "brain damage" are synonymous terms
just like "developmentally delayed" and "retarded" are
if your brain malfunctions then you are low iq by definition
it wouldn't be called a disease or a disorder if it wasn't harmful
people who get these diagnoses willfully ignore the blatantly obvious fact that mental illness = low iq as a coping mechanisms

[Anonymous No.15661977]

>>15661968
If someone with these brain damages performed average intellectually in life and were given ailments to said illness would that make them high IQ?

[Anonymous No.15661998]

>>15661965
Yes it is true. Why do you ask?

[Anonymous No.15662003]

>>15661968
>if your brain malfunctions then you are low iq
People with autism have malfunctioning brains, yet they're the ones that are represented the most in high iq. Your argument is retarded.

[Anonymous No.15662033]

>>15661968
>if your brain malfunctions then you are low iq by definition
iq is just a number generated by performing an arbitrary test. If your assertion was correct ONLY something that caused you to score lower in such a test would even be considered brain damage, which is transparently false is empirical observation

[Anonymous No.15662060]

>>15661977
>>15662003
>>15662033
Don't argue with the retard. Just ignore him and he will go away. Unironically, this picture is true for retards lol. More you feed him, more he posts. Don't give attention to those who seek it.

[Anonymous No.15662145]

>>15661965
the part in silver linings playbook might be a tad true. they might understand a few things that normies don't understand.

quote was like ' maybe people me and donnie might understand things that you don't'

we're creatures of light. you see things from different angles.

[Anonymous No.15662159]

>>15662060
the fact that you got your special snowflake diagnosis, but it only indicates that your brain doesn't work right really upsets you, doesn't it?
maybe just figure out how behave like a decent person without relying on excuses from a doctor and you won't have to deal with the implications of having malfunctioning and reduced mental capability
grow up
learn how to act like a big boy

[Anonymous No.15662222]

>>15662159
Most mental illnesses don't work like that, except in your case of mental retardation.

[Anonymous No.15662259]

>>15662159
is your idea of behaving like a decent person posting about brain damage incessantly on a message board?

[Anonymous No.15662275]

>>15661968
>"high IQ" and "brain damage" are synonymous terms
>just like "developmentally delayed" and "retarded" are
>if you are high IQ then your brain malfunctions by definition
>it wouldn't be called a malfunction if it wasn't harmful
>people who get these IQ tests willfully ignore the blatantly obvious fact that high IQ = mental illness as a coping mechanisms

[Anonymous No.15662278]

>>15662159
>the fact that you got your special IQ test, but it only indicates that your brain doesn't work right really upsets you, doesn't it?
>maybe just figure out how behave like a decent person without relying on excuses from 123test.com and you won't have to deal with the implications of having malfunctioning and abnormal mental capability
>grow up
>learn how to act like a big boy

[Anonymous No.15663891]

>>15661968
>have ADHD
>won olympiads in high school
>study aerospace engineering
>have an internship where I’m working on constructing the first flying prototype of certain experimental aircraft after impressing the professors with my skills
Sure. Brain damage and low IQ.

[Anonymous No.15663906]

>>15661965
No, it means the person must take meds to operate normally

[Anonymous No.15663943]

>>15663906
>gets the most life changing drug possible
>wants to operate normally
Kek. Ngmi.

[Anonymous No.15664013]

>>15661965
lots of ADHD threads lately.

[Anonymous No.15664019]

>>15664013
I genuinely wonder why. Is it a work of a troll (and maybe copycats) or somehow the topic just took on popularity based off previous threads, like a snowball effect?

[Anonymous No.15664036]

>>15664019
>Is it a work of a troll (and maybe copycats) or somehow the topic just took on popularity based off previous threads,
I think it's the former. Really, the pareto principle applies pretty smoothly on 4chan when you want to discuss the ratio of thread creators to total userbase. I would even figure that maybe 2 or 3 % of all 4chan users are responsible for 95 % of all threads, at least on some boards. /sci/ was flooded with IQ threads, nearly a dozen of these threads were active at any given moment, and that pretty much disappeared because the one guy who posted them all just went inactive.

[Bot Killer No.15664172]

Friendly reminder that >>15661968 is a bot

[Anonymous No.15665034]

>>15664172
wow, that pasta really triggers you massively