/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.15649662]

Science confirms once again that the Covid vax was completely ineffective.

[Anonymous No.15649667]

>>15649662
I can verify: I died and am currently in Hell.

[Anonymous No.15649672]

>>15649662
But that's false. The vaxx was very effective for its intended purpose (depopulation).

[Jealous No.15649680]

[Anonymous No.15649691]

The amount of doctors absolutely terrified of being called out and seen as evil is hilarious

Humans would rather double, no, TRIPLE down, than admit they were wrong/horrible.

[Jealous No.15649699]

>>15649691
>Humans would rather double, no, TRIPLE down, than admit they were wrong/horrible.

[Anonymous No.15649849]

>>15649691
such is the sad existence of the oversocialized. everything revolves around their appearances and how the group perceives them.

[Anonymous No.15649858]

fellow retard dumbfuck checking in for this thread. how are my fellow retards today? still dumber than a diseased cow? seems so!

[Anonymous No.15650272]

>>15649849

[Anonymous No.15651017]

>>15649858
kek you are so fucking mad
funny as hell

[Barkun No.15651021]

>>15651017
Get off mah sci

[Anonymous No.15651040]

>>15649662
>Science confirms once again that the Covid vax was completely ineffective.
Well, that depends on what it was actually intended to do.

[Anonymous No.15651058]

>>15651021
hahaha no can do

[Anonymous No.15651073]

>>15649662
>Vaccines are effective
>Refuses to elaborate further
>Leaves

[Anonymous No.15651182]

>>15649662
Overly-specific and retarded question to which the answer can only be "no". No study will ever cover all "medically undesirable events". If the government would have said yes, then schizos like Beckamp would be like "well, did it control for athletes foot? That's certainly medically undesirable. Why did you say you have numbers when you cannot show how many vaxxies got athletes foot?"

Not sure if the guy is disingenuous and asks this way on purpose to get the reply he wants or if he's genuinely stupid.

[Anonymous No.15651196]

>>15651182
>Overly-specific question
i would partly agree but
>No study will ever cover all "medically undesirable events".
>all "medically undesirable events"
>all
this wasn't even written in the question, why are you making shit up?

[Anonymous No.15651247]

>>15651196
>insgesamt unter weniger medizinisch unerwünschten Ereignissen litten
That covers all medically unwanted events. And it doesn't make any distinction regarding severity, just the number (weniger means fewer here). By saying "medizinisch unerwünschte Ereignisse" the question covers all benign, yet "unerwünscht" adverse effects like a flush at the injection site plus everything not necessarily related to the vaccine. Which is fair, because some things like a sore muscle might obviously be related to the vaccine, but one should consider everything.
However, existing studies only consider severe events, for which hospitalisation could be a proxy. By saying "unerwünschte medizinische Ereignisse" instead of hospitalisation, the person who asked made sure that no one has the numbers.

[Anonymous No.15651315]

>>15649662
Biggest joke was requiring terminally ill patients to take the vax but still deny visits from family.

[Anonymous No.15651596]

>>15651247
>insgesamt unter weniger medizinisch unerwünschten Ereignissen litten
That covers all medically unwanted events.
>By saying "unerwünschte medizinische Ereignisse" instead of hospitalisation, the person who asked made sure that no one has the numbers.
oh i get you
and i would agree but he specifically asked for numbers from studies about the vaccine, such studies do include monitoring for mild adverse reactions where no medical intervention is needed

more proof of the absolute clusterfuck the vaccine rollout was but nothing else really, a longwinded "source?"

[Anonymous No.15651740]

>>15651596
>such studies do include monitoring for mild adverse reactions where no medical intervention is needed
Correct. This is why it's guaranteed that the answer to his question will be "we don't have such numbers".

[Anonymous No.15652498]

>>15649662
>completely ineffective.
$9 trillion in profits for pfizer

[Anonymous No.15652608]

>>15649662
That's not what it says, illiterate mongoloid. It says that there's no evidence that the vaccine has fewer side effects than a placebo. If you can't figure out why the question asked was stupid then you ought to be sterilized.

[Anonymous No.15653527]

>>15652608
you seem to be experiencing emotional distress

[Anonymous No.15653533]

anons on 4chan reached this conclusion 2 years ago with secondary data

maybe the scientists should go kill themselves

[Anonymous No.15654746]

>>15651182
If a mayor risk of morbidity would be covid, then subsequently the only result of deploying the vaccine is: Morbidity goes down, because one large factor got eliminated.
Its now about "how" its about is there any noticable positive impact of the coof vaccine.

Because there is one problem: If someone is vaxxed there is a bias to protect the Status quo, which leads to make vaxxed people never be able to be diagnosed with the coof unless their Booster is due.

These people with the same clinical symptoms as with the coof would be declared as: Regular pneumonia, flu, cold, rsv etc, because they simply exclude the possibility of coof beeing the cause based on circumstancial evidence.

This bias leads to errors.
Same for all diseases.
And if the goal is the "ONE HEALTH" as stated by the WHO, then "ONE HEALTH" should increase after this product is deployed.
Sadly it appears that the people got worse after the deployment of the coof vax, and while they did this they aditionally deployed more other vaxxes and tricked the people to take them.
And it does not look good for "ONE HEALTH".
But since people only fear the label that a disease have and not even the clinical symptoms it is easy for the powers that shouldn't be to relable it.
This can lead to a self fulfilling prophecy.
>oh its not the coof because he vaxxed
>even though it looks the same it must be the Flu this time
>oh that unvaxxed undermensch has a wierd food, muhst be the covid.

[Anonymous No.15654796]

>>15649672
Vaccine is likely a control test.
The manmade virus is likely a breeding ground for depopulation.

Ultimately, it will get worse and worse as the WEF controlled gov ups their game for depopulation. So its either us or them, they control the institutions right now.

[Anonymous No.15654843]

>>15649662

It must be exhausting being around people this scientifically and bureaucratically illiterate.

The answer to that question could be nothing but "No".

[Anonymous No.15654886]

>>15654796
The trump administration pushed the vaccine. Is trump now WEF-controlled?

[Anonymous No.15654950]

>>15654886
He was manipulated, so yes he was. Soon as he tried to go against them, they threw him out. And how he's facing prison sentence for going against the swamp.

[Anonymous No.15654956]

>>15654950
Isn't he facing a prison sentence for stealing classified information and inciting a coup attempt?

[Anonymous No.15654991]

>>15654956
No. Presidents can declassify what they want.

On the other hand vice presidents do not have that authority, for which Biden was found to have a treasure trove of documents that was being paraded around for his Chinese/Ukranian business deals.

And insurrection? LMAO. Have you actually watched the video? There are hundreds of FBI/CIA inside the protest group that was egging them. On top of that, the police were kind enough to escort them around all over the buildings, even opening the doors around the capitol and leading them where they went. The ones that instigate the violence is likely a Fed.

[Anonymous No.15655001]

>>15654950
>He was manipulated, so yes he was.

That's what happens when you let a total illiterate into office.
He has to rely on advisers and "experts".
Trump literally knew shit fuck all, about anything about history, civics, medicine, biology, infrastructure, military, space etc. etc.

Which is why his government was so monumentally ineffective.

Did he get anything done at all besides pardoning a few Jews and rappers?

[Anonymous No.15655049]

>>15655001
Current one is a controlled asset too, but he's senile and doesn't even know what he's doing.

Many such cases in the office. IMO anyone over 70 should retire.

[Anonymous No.15655431]

>>15655049

[Anonymous No.15655763]

>>15649849
Everything went wrong ever since women gained rights.

[Anonymous No.15656693]

>>15655049
people who've committed so many crimes that they'd go directly to prison if they weren't in charge of the fbi can never retire.

[Anonymous No.15656720]

apart from the data showing that countries with highest vax compliance had lowest excess mortality?

[Anonymous No.15656729]

>>15656720

[Anonymous No.15657061]

>>15649691
its strange how they can it every time and the great majority just nods along in the same tone as all the foreign wars we are involved in or the fake support in Ukraine all bullshit but nope we will quadruple down and claim to fight for the very thing our leaders destroy back at home.

[Anonymous No.15657200]

>>15650272
My brother is autistic(rainman tier) and is a giga-leftie because he literally cannot tell when hes being lied to, he thinks late night comics are telling people the truth about everything because theres a group laugh after every "joke". Little does he know that, for starters, it's a recorded laugh track not even real humans. Aside from that the nuance of state propaganda is far outsids of his innocent reach.

He is a rainman type of genius though, 1 in a million for sure.

[Anonymous No.15657209]

>>15656720
>>15656729
Now show HIV/AIDS prevelance and other comorbidity of those 3 specific awful places to live

[Anonymous No.15658247]

>>15657200
he sounds like a moron

[Anonymous No.15659466]

>>15655001
>>>/pol/

[Anonymous No.15659847]

>>15657200
how come you don't try to fill him in on whats what?

[Anonymous No.15659928]

>>15654746
The fuck is restless Anal syndrom?!

[Anonymous No.15661287]

>>15657209
show HIV/AIDS prevelance in New York, San Francisco and Los Angeles

[Anonymous No.15662442]

>>15661287

[Anonymous No.15664236]

>>15649662
vaccines can't work against nonexistent viral epidemics

[Anonymous No.15664251]

>>15659928
The walking farts?

[Anonymous No.15665151]

>>15651040
total vaxxxie death

[Anonymous No.15665219]

>>15649662
Everybody who is not a moron knew that. Not normies of course, those bastards were created to serve and obey, so is only natural they got vaxxed.

[Anonymous No.15666748]

only low iqs fell for the vax scam

[Anonymous No.15666758]

that's not what the data shows

[Anonymous No.15667994]

>>15665151
Kill vaxxxies. Behead vaxxxies. Roundhouse kick a vaxxxie into the concrete. Slam dunk a vaxxxie baby into the trashcan. Crucify filthy vaxxxies. Defecate in a vaxxxie's food. Launch vaxxxies into the sun. Stir fry vaxxxies in a wok. Toss vaxxxies into active volcanoes. Urinate into a vaxxxie's gas tank. Judo throw vaxxxies into a wood chipper. Twist vaxxxies heads off. Report vaxxxies to the IRS. Karate chop vaxxxies in half. Curb stomp pregnant vaxxxies. Trap vaxxxies in quicksand. Crush vaxxxies in the trash compactor. Liquefy vaxxxies in a vat of acid. Eat vaxxxies. Dissect vaxxxies. Exterminate vaxxxies in the gas chamber. Stomp vaxxxie skulls with steel toed boots. Cremate vaxxxies in the oven. Lobotomize vaxxxies. Mandatory abortions for vaxxxies. Grind vaxxxie fetuses in the garbage disposal. Drown vaxxxies in fried chicken grease. Vaporize vaxxxies with a ray gun. Kick old vaxxxies down the stairs. Feed vaxxxies to alligators. Slice vaxxxies with a katana.

[Anonymous No.15668044]

>>15649699
Take your meds, tooker.

[Anonymous No.15668046]

>>15662442
/thread

[Anonymous No.15669273]

>>15667994
vaxxxie holocaust, best day of my life

[Anonymous No.15669323]

>>15656720
>regions with more storcks have a higher smoubt of births than regions with less storcks.

[Anonymous No.15669961]

>>15666748
how do vaxxxies respond to this?

[Anonymous No.15669971]

>>15650272
>he thinks he’s immune

[Anonymous No.15670823]

>>15656720
since when is loosely compiling population wide data considered scientific?
all you had to do was a double blind study if you wanted people to believe you lol

[Anonymous No.15670879]

>>15649662
in other news:
Science confirms the sky is blue

[Anonymous No.15671239]

>>15669961
stupidly

[Anonymous No.15671251]

>>15649672
Where's the billions of dead again?

[Anonymous No.15671291]

>>15659928
>restless anal syndrome
>1 case

[Anonymous No.15671305]

>>15650272
I can't defend myself physically (without a gun) and I only filter things through my own judgement. What others think only determines my opinion about them and nothing else.

[Anonymous No.15671325]

Vaccines worked

[Anonymous No.15671763]

According to the talmud, jews are supposed to test their experimental medications of the goyims

[Anonymous No.15671966]

>>15649662
it baited so many normies to continue their normal lives during a pandemic

[Anonymous No.15672492]

the death rate for vaxxxies only continues to increase

[Anonymous No.15673612]

>>15672492
>the death rate for vaxxxies only continues to increase

[Anonymous No.15674953]

>>15649691
>Humans would rather double, no, TRIPLE down, than admit they were wrong/horrible.
Thats only atheists
Christians know how to confess sins, ask for forgiveness and admit they aren't infallible gods.

[Anonymous No.15676559]

>>15671251
The vaxxx is a "slow kill" drug, it kills by a variety of methods and does it not too rapidly so as not to spook the herd. Myocarditis takes on average about 5 years to kill a person

[Anonymous No.15677413]

>>15668044
Stop your big pharma spam, you piece of shit.

[Anonymous No.15677422]

>>15676559
True and real. I have being telling everyone those fuckers in power want to depopulate the planet but morons don't care and instead they keep their woke degenerate ways.

[Anonymous No.15678224]

>>15677422
you're not happy about the npc holocaust?

[Anonymous No.15679563]

>>15676559
the fact that it kills by a plethora of different methods also suggests that the ultimate cause of doesn't all come from one source, even though it does

[Anonymous No.15680564]

>>15679563
As long as it kills the vaxxxies, thats what counts. I don't care if they know why they died as long as they're dead

[Anonymous No.15682251]

>>15649662
Does that mean that the government never did any studies on if the vax worked or that they did do studies and the studies show that the vax doesn't work?

[Anonymous No.15683704]

>>15649662
>>15682251
>TRANSLATION:
>Q: Does the federal government have figures from placebo-controlled, randomized and blinded
>scientific studies that provide statistically significant evidence that subjects treated with the
>substance BNT162b2 (so-called "Comirnaty-COVID-19 vaccine* from "BioNTech/Pfizer") have
>I overall suffered from fewer medically undesirable events as subjects who received the placebo
>(saline solution), and if so, what are they and what is the date of the most recent analysis of the
>numbers, at which time the criteria of placebo-controlled, randomized and blinded were still

>A: No, the federal government does not have such figures.

Tough to say exactly what they mean, any native German speakers here who can clarify the translation?

[Anonymous No.15684242]

[Anonymous No.15684259]

>>15649662
>was completely ineffective.
I wouldn't say that, it has maimed and killed plenty of people already.

>>15680564
You sound like a big pharma shill who doesn't want anyone held accountable false flagging.

[Anonymous No.15685658]

[Anonymous No.15685754]

>>15682251

[Anonymous No.15686752]

>>15684242
pure coincidence

[Anonymous No.15687155]

>>15676559
>just 5 more years

[Anonymous No.15687176]

>>15682251
>>15683704
Native German-speaker here. Your translation is pretty bad desu.
>I overall suffered from fewer medically undesirable events
The guy who asked didn't ask about himself.
The gist is right though. The question is about numbers for the "overall number of medically unwanted events" and the government doesn't have that number. Now, that isn't surprising, as that question implies ANY unwanted events. Phrasing a question like this will result in a "no" no matter who you at and about what substance. We don't have figures about ALL unwanted events caused by asbestos. We have figures about lung cancer and they're enough to avoid it. We don't have figures about ALL unwanted events caused by broccoli, but the most important ones are covered: it doesn't cause cancer etc. That's enough for most people to eat broccoli.

[Anonymous No.15687202]

>>15687176
>Now, that isn't surprising, as that question implies ANY unwanted events. Phrasing a question like this will result in a "no" no matter who you at and about what substance.
You're full of shit. If the Bundesregierung had access to a study that compared vaccinees to non-vaccinees and tracked all the participants' visits to a doctor or hospital the response would have been affirmative.

[Anonymous No.15687209]

Are people who still argue with militant vaxcattle shills? Are they trying to combat the gradual dehumanization and segregation of militant vaxcattle from discussions and general society by pretending Pfizer drones can/should be reasoned with?

[Anonymus No.15687264]

>>15687209
>be me
>notice i can trap dumbass animals in a cage
>yum
god punishes me for this

WTF?

[Anonymous No.15687405]

>>15687202
>If the Bundesregierung had access to a study that compared vaccinees to non-vaccinees and tracked all the participants' visits to a doctor or hospital the response would have been affirmative.
Only if the question was about visits to doctors to hospitals. Not every medizinisch unerwünschter Effect makes people see a doctor. On both ends actually. If your teeth become slightly more yellow, that's unerwünscht but you won't visit a doctor. Neither would you if you dropped dead.
Why didn't the politician ask about doctor visits or hospitalisation? It feels like he didn't even want "yes" for an answer.

[Anonymous No.15687476]

>>15649662
According to Steve Kirsch the vaxx has a fatality rate of 1 in 1000. Whilst not quite the 'depopulation agenda' /pol/ goes on about it's still pretty concerning. Under normal circumstances, a vaccine which has a fatalty rate of 1 in 100,000 would be considered too dangerous for a mass vaccination campaign, so what exactly happened? Why was the vaxx ever approved?

[Anonymous No.15688243]

>>15687405
>It feels like he didn't even want "yes" for an answer.
Not at all, you're just maliciously interpreting the question in the worst possible way to excuse the fact that the necessary studies were either not done or not publicised.

[Anonymous No.15688530]

>>15687176
Retard.
You're a government bureaucrat aren't you. None of what you're implying is what he asked.
The government does have some of these numbers and he's asking for all of them. He's not asking for every unwanted event even when they haven't been measured. He's asking for all proof that the government knows of.
The government shows none because they don't have any. You garbage shill.

Now you'll autistically screech about 'ingesamt' and how it means 'all together' so he clearly must have meant EVERY possible unwanted event even those that have not been measured.
You're an autistic retard with an autistic grasp of communication and language. You've only read the grammar of the letter and entirely missed the semantic.
You're either a shill or a robot. Kill yourself

[Anonymous No.15689442]

>>15687476
>the vaxx has a fatality rate of 1 in 1000
thats just the immediate fatality rate, not the long term, nobody knows what the long term rate is because it hasn't been long enough

[Anonymous No.15689456]

>>15687476
>a vaccine which has a fatalty rate of 1 in 100,000 would be considered too dangerous for a mass vaccination campaign
How would you find that out without a mass vaccination campaign?
> 1 in 1,000
I find that number extremely hard to believe. Wouldn't that be something like 300,000 deaths in the US? Especially in groups that aren't old and sick, this would be quite noticeable.

[Anonymous No.15689476]

>>15688530
>None of what you're implying is what he asked.
>The government does have some of these numbers and he's asking for all of them.
If I ask you "do you know all prime numbers", you might start rambling about the ones you do know. That's not how the government works. The government is like a literal sperg. The only true answer is "no." Calling someone a government bureaucrat because they're better at understanding how government bureaucrats is the most retarded move here. You weaponise your ignorance.
>He's not asking for every unwanted event even when they haven't been measured.
Do you speak German? He's asking about "weniger medizinisch unerwünschten Ereignissen" - fewer events. Now, this does not limit those events to a certain severity or something. He's asking about a comparison of absolute numbers of two maximally vague numbers. That politician is either a complete idiot and one of those 22-year olds that just got into parliament, or he's maliciously exploiting the autism of German bureaucrats.
>so he clearly must have meant EVERY possible unwanted event even those that have not been measured.
I don't give a fuck what he meant, it's about what he asked. Don't blame the spergs for asking the questions that are asked and not trying to interpret what the guy might have meant. Blame the guy for asking shitty questions. Especially since such questions allow structures like "does the government have these numbers? If not, what is the next closest thing the government has used to make its decision. Why does the government find that thing satisfactory?" This would give the government the chance to embarrass themselves. The answer might be "no we don't have these numbers, but we have a study with 14 participants and they were all didn't get ass cancer". Then you could have your scandal about small sample sizes, not checking for heart attacks and whatnot. Why didn't he ask his question in such a way?

[Anonymous No.15689486]

>>15689476
Looked him up. The guy's is a fucking lawyer. Don't even think that any comma in his question is accidental. He's also been elected in different local parliaments before, he knows what he's doing. I mean it's good for him, but brainlets shouldn't defend him like "oh yeah his question was vague and shitty but they should be nice and answer what he probably wanted to say"

[Anonymous No.15690370]

>>15689442
things like SV40 means that the vax will take years to kill most of it's victims

[Anonymous No.15690728]

>>15690370
The only thing that convinced me not to take it wasn't any propaganda piece or politics. I remember back to the bird flu when a school friend of mine turned out braindead from the shot.

I have no issues taking vaccines that's been in use for 30 years, but without knowing the long term effects you're just playing Russian roulette, and you can cope with that as you see fit.

[Anonymous No.15691938]

Covid wasn't the first fake pandemic
https://www.forbes.com/2010/03/10/swine-flu-world-health-organization-pandemic-opinions-contributors-henry-i-miller.html

[Anonymous No.15692951]

>>15671763
strange coincidence that the guy who runs pfizer is both jewish and unvaccinated

[Anonymous No.15694116]

Is there any way to reverse the effect of the vaccine?

[Anonymous No.15695615]

>>15694116
stop being gay and start lifting weights is your best bet

[Anonymous No.15695711]

>>15690728
>I have no issues taking vaccines that's been in use for 30 years

[Anonymous No.15697125]

>>15695711
Theres no guarantee that you're getting a shot thats the same at the 30 year old vaccine. If globohomo wanted to add poison to a 30 year old vaccine, they'd just do that and use their dominance of the courts, regulatory bodies and media to cover it up

[Anonymous No.15697874]

Am I legit going to have problems if I have unprotected sex with a vaxxed woman?

[Anonymous No.15698347]

>>15697874
yes, for a myriad of reasons

[Anonymous No.15699955]

>>15697874
why would anyone even bother with an infertile woman?

[Anonymous No.15699965]

>>15649662
This isn't true. It gave everyone the excuse they needed to end the lockdowns.

[Anonymous No.15700973]

>>15699955
If her father has a lot of money

[Anonymous No.15702442]

>>15649672
>depopulation
sterilizing people so they can work but not breed, which is what the arabs did to their slaves, doesn't cause immediate depopulation.

[Anonymous No.15703464]

>>15702442
sterilizing the vaxxxies was good, preventing midwits from breeding is a noble goal

[Anonymous No.15703614]

[Anonymous No.15704307]

>>15695615
This.
Develop your musculature.
It is key in proper immunological function.

[Anonymous No.15704320]

>>15649691
cognitive dissonance is going to be the end of us all

[Anonymous No.15705488]

>>15649691

[Anonymous No.15706711]

>>15704307
physically fit ppl don't get sick

[Anonymous No.15707669]

>>15690728
>bird flu
another nonexistent viral epidemic
https://www.forbes.com/2010/03/10/swine-flu-world-health-organization-pandemic-opinions-contributors-henry-i-miller.html

[Anonymous No.15709167]

>>15707669
They use their media influence to get people to believe in imaginary epidemics which then they generate massive profits from

[Anonymous No.15710351]

>>15649691
>The amount of doctors absolutely terrified of
losing their oversized salaries

[Anonymous No.15711729]

Vaxxies got tricked by the covid scam because they are low IQ

[Anonymous No.15712899]

>>15711729
high iq ppl don't get tricked so easily

[Anonymous No.15714443]

>>15649662
can't make a vaccine for a nonexistent viral epidemic

[Anonymous No.15715496]

>>15711729
They wanted it to be real, so they chose to believe the propaganda

[Anonymous No.15716076]

COVID-19 mRNA vaccines contain excessive amounts of bacterial DNA: evidence and implications

By Michael Palmer, MD and Jonathan Gilthorpe, PhD

Long article with 42 references.
facebook com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid02dpAJebUmRC53jwAsgYByZtqQHeTZEM7nqZpwGHVbEyoNvBkTACU4mNnk3tn8k8Vil&id=100073669924228&mibextid=Nif5oz

[Anonymous No.15716097]

The Leaked Department Of Defense Transcripts by Major Joseph Murphy, 2022

US Marine, Major Joseph Murphy, penned a document BEFORE the CoV-2 Pandemic was known and within the document, among other things, he states the US government KNOWS Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine are, in their words, "ANTIDOTES" to COVID-19.

academia edu/75244821/The_Leaked_Department_Of_Defense_Transcripts_by_Major_Joseph_Murphy

[Anonymous No.15716100]

>>15716097
independent.academia edu/Prager/

[Anonymous No.15716123]

UK Child Deaths Increase 1,599% After Pfizer Rollout
by Jeff Prager
www academia edu/88648818/UK_Child_Deaths_Increase_1_599_After_Pfizer_Rollout

[Anonymous No.15717020]

>>15716123
nice job science
wtg

[Anonymous No.15718095]

>>15716123
>child mortality back to 1700s levels
nice job science, way to go

[Anonymous No.15718481]

>>15683704
>native German speakers here
Translation is ok, but it is a typical political procedure. One member of the opposition asks a intimidating question and the answer blocks it. The government has no study because the do not research and made no request to their institutes which had to do than. The answer implies that they don't want to know it.

[bodhi No.15718528]

>>15671251
In the graveyards retard, you'll be there too on two more weeks maximum

[Anonymous No.15718530]

>>15671251
>Where's the billions of dead again?
Hell is full and so they walk among us.

[Anonymous No.15718578]

>>15678224
I'm not.
I hope most of those who didn't boost will survive.

[Anonymous No.15719489]

>>15678224
If the NPCs all die then I won't higher IQ than everyone anymore, I'll just be average

[Anonymous No.15720559]

>>15719489
good point
however kills smart people is extremely challenging, how would you trick a bunch of people who aren't stupid enough to suicidally volunteer for a experimental injection into kysing?

[Anonymous No.15721958]

>>15720559
>how would you trick a bunch of people who are stupid enough to suicidally volunteer for a experimental injection into kysing?
by telling them "only smart people are volunteering for this experimental injection"

[Anonymous No.15721970]

>>15649672
If I was an evil ruler of mankind I would make the vax protective then roll out a second virus that wiped out everyone who refused to get it. Why would they want to be left with mostly dissidents?

[Anonymous No.15723047]

>>15687476
>the vaxx has a fatality rate of 1 in 1000
1 in 1000 so far, the long term effects are still unknown

[Anonymous No.15723051]

>>15723047
How/why do people believe such nonsense? Where are the mass graves? 300,000 people suddenly dying in the US must be clearly noticeable.

[Anonymous No.15723100]

>>15723051
>300,000 people suddenly dying in the US must be clearly noticeable.
why?
over 20x that amount of illegal immigrants during the same period of time isn't noticeable

[Anonymous No.15723116]

Isn't it illegal in your country to state facts?
You may as well be spreading the myth that there were no masturbation machines at Dachau, no swimming pools or orchestras at Auschwitz, and no roller coasters delivering bodies into shower rooms and fire pits at Treblinka.
Racist.

[Anonymous No.15723144]

>>15671251
We're still waiting for our winter of severe illness and death, but at least we can sleep at night confident that we'll wake up in the morning and not have to worry about potentially causing 10 years of permanent damage through scaring to our hearts

[Anonymous No.15723171]

>>15649662
no new material shill bros? Damn that sucks with the election inching ever closer and the only mass deaths being the rusgoy male population

[Anonymous No.15723181]

>>15723100
bot alert

[Anonymous No.15723238]

>>15723051
>How/why do people believe such nonsense? Where are the mass graves? 300,000 people suddenly dying in the US must be clearly noticeable.
Proof? Golem skeptoidism is a legit mental illness.

[Anonymous No.15723240]

>>15723100
Take your meds.

[Anonymous No.15723247]

>>15723240
Proof of your delusional skeptoid cliche? Why would it be noticable? Take your meds.

[Anonymous No.15723256]

>>15723247
> Why would it be noticable?
Where are all the dead? Where‘s the overmortality? What’s the timeframe that you’d expect people to die from the vaccine?

[Anonymous No.15723263]

>>15723051
Retard, none of them died from the vaxx.
They died from a plethora of causes, from steroid use, to eating boiled eggs, to shaking duvets, to not eating boiled eggs, to sedentary lifestyle, to smoking, to sleeping in their bed...

Deagel's 2015 forecast was -70% depopulation by 2025.
7% per annum per injection, public announcement of making the vaxx annual like the flu vaccine, gotta say 2025 still seems a little tight despite the obvious superexponential curve coming.

[Anonymous No.15723265]

>>15723263
>Deagel's 2015 forecast was -70% depopulation by 2025.
What does that have to do with the vaccine? Also, he’s not on track with his prediction, is he?

[Anonymous No.15723270]

>>15723256
>Where are all the dead?
In the graveyard.

>Where‘s the overmortality?
Getting constantly reframed as being caused by vigorous duvet-shaking. Still waiting for proof of your regurgitated skeptoid cliche. Why would you notice if one in a thousand died?

[Anonymous No.15723273]

>>15723265
Yeah, it'll probably be closer to -30% by 2025.
For -70% we'll probably need 2026.
Still, as long as you goylem filth all get genocided, it's all good.

[Anonymous No.15723281]

>>15649667
>I died
As are most republican health specialists

[Anonymous No.15723286]

>>15649691
>Humans would rather double, no, TRIPLE down, than admit they were wrong/horrible.
Yes thats usually the case for people in power, and doctors see themselves as in power, even if they are just puppets for pharma and gov regulations.

[Anonymous No.15723287]

>>15723273
Looking at the population of the US, only 80% to go to reach the 70%.

[Anonymous No.15723292]

>>15656720
>Hey guys, look! A correlation, I'm doing le science!
Go back to your I fucking love science facebook posts please.

[Anonymous No.15723301]

>>15687476
1 in 1000 is bad considering its similar to covid death rate.

[Anonymous No.15723354]

>>15723301
1 in 1000 is also completely made up.

[Anonymous No.15723356]

>>15723292
Look, even more correlation.

[Anonymous No.15723370]

>>15723356
>source: CDC
LOL! What's next, quote the Pfizer board of investors?

[Anonymous No.15724332]

>>15723370
surprisingly high density of people who come to 4chan to shill government propaganda

[Anonymous No.15724380]

>>15656720
>>15723356
I test it on a more reliable dataset it shows opposite results
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/excess-mortality-p-scores-average-baseline?time=2022-06-19..latest&country=BGR~RUS~SRB~PER~MEX~ITA~HUN~BRA~USA~ESP~PRT~ZAF~BEL~DEU~FRA~IRL~CAN~NOR~JPN~SWE~SGP~AUS~KOR~DNK~NZL

[Anonymous No.15724407]

>>15724380
>a more reliable dataset
You're comparing vastly different demographics in those different countries. Your dataset is orders of magnitude less suited for this test than >>15723356

[Anonymous No.15724413]

>>15723370
Other countries observe the same. And Pfizer is an American company, not a Swiss one.

[Anonymous No.15724424]

>>15724407
i shouldn't have targeted the other one its not even related to a none covid excess mortality and probably fake anyway.
>unvaccinated death: anyone who died and had covid, doesn't matter if they died from cancer or a car accident
>vaccinated death: anything but covid, anything but the vaccine

[Anonymous No.15725238]

>>15656720
I can tell off the bat this is bullshit due to the fact that Norway is ranked lower than Sweden.

[Anonymous No.15725247]

>>15725238
Also Denmark

LOL

[Anonymous No.15725270]

>>15724413
>And Pfizer is an American company, not a Swiss one.
Pfizer is jewish

[Anonymous No.15725595]

>>15725270
The CEO is still unvaxxed