LK-99

[Anonymous No.15630429]

https://twitter.com/andrewmccalip/status/1687405505604734978

Well looks like the rock floats

[Anonymous No.15630558]

heil himmler !

[Anonymous No.15630565]

>>15630429
WE ARE SO BAAAAAACK

[Anonymous No.15630603]

>>15630429
So can we confirm it's absolutely not ferromagnetism or diamagnetism? Is this the float?

[Anonymous No.15630609]

>>15630429
>it's always pinned at one point
>it always rotates in circles

yawn

[Anonymous No.15630624]

>>15630609
I think he's spinning the magnet underneath it

[Anonymous No.15630630]

>>15630609
>it stops when he stops the magnet
Oversisters...

[Anonymous No.15630632]

Yeah, I'm thinking we're back.

t. certified 156iq.

[Anonymous No.15630635]

>>15630624
new cope has dropped. Now that there is only one point of contact it becomes obvious that it is not pinned.

[Anonymous No.15630638]

I'm buying Vardaspace for this shit they have some smart cookies

[Anonymous No.15630643]

>>15630635
then how does it spin? It's inside a jar it's not touching the magnet at all

[Anonymous No.15630649]

W
E

ARE

B
A
C
K

SISTERS

[Anonymous No.15630657]

>>15630638
its private
they don't need pleb bucks, they're improving humanities future

[Anonymous No.15630661]

>>15630643
you don't even know how magnets work
>>15630657
you simply don't have enough money

[Anonymous No.15630667]

>>15630661
correct, and neither do you

[Anonymous No.15630672]

>>15630609
based cope overchad

[Anonymous No.15630674]

>>15630667

[Anonymous No.15630679]

seriously what the fuck is with this astroturf campaign, literally nobody accredited is hyped for this crappy paper

yet there are a million threads about it on 4chan across every board for no reason

21st century better bring a revolution in psychology because I'm really getting tired of people faking group think with proxynets

[Anonymous No.15630686]

>>15630679
you're the first person i'm blasting with my rail gun

[Anonymous No.15630689]

>>15630679
Crossboarders from /biz/ and /pol/. Also, outside 4chan, the biggest shills for this Korean scam are cryptocurrency fags.

[Anonymous No.15630691]

>>15630429
Spinning ahoge

[Anonymous No.15630693]

>>15630679
the accredited people are getting hyped in private with their bros, they don't need to go in public in order to find people who share their interests/hobbies or at the least understand why this could be big
by which I mean I am friends with smart people for some reason and they're quietly hyped in private, although they don't spend very long thinking about it and just get on with their lives while they wait

[Anonymous No.15630699]

>>15630679
>accredited
Lmao

[Anonymous No.15630950]

>>15630679

[Anonymous No.15630957]

>>15630679
It's just bots, probably from those betting sites that are spammed.

[Anonymous No.15631749]

>>15630950
first time this image made me kek

[Anonymous No.15631760]

>>15630689
You immediatly know something is a scam when cryptoniggers are astroturfing it and flooding discussion spaces.
Friendly reminder that no one on /biz/ or twitter ever got rich from crypto.

[Anonymous No.15631762]

>>15630429
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s1o88seNB-w
Interviewer with Andrew Mccalip

[Anonymous No.15631763]

You'll float too

[Anonymous No.15631765]

>>15630429
>>15630603
>>15630609
>>15630635
>>15630643
>>15630657
>>15630679
>>15630691
>>15631762
it's a little worm

[Anonymous No.15631771]

>>15631763
In a flying car, yes

[Anonymous No.15631777]

>>15630429
Isn't this evidence against Meissner? Shouldn't it be locked in a specific position?

[Anonymous No.15631790]

>>15631777
It is. As he rotates the magnet below it follows through, however the point of contact seems to be creating some kind of flux change that stabilizes the magnet. The key here is leaching stabilization. It's diamagnetism with an off balanced kilter.

[Anonymous No.15631798]

>>15631790
so basically, it's over.

[Anonymous No.15631804]

>>15631798
Unless you break it in half and make it float with the floaty bit, yes.

[Anonymous No.15631818]

>>15630635
Not. All. Superconductors. Flux pin. In fact most of them don't. Jesus christ I hate this board.

[Anonymous No.15631822]

>>15631798
It literally never even began

[Anonymous No.15631824]

>>15630429
>Well looks like the rock floats
>floats
>never loses contact with the floor

[Anonymous No.15631826]

Its literally over. The scientist on the paper just admitted it does have 0 resistance.

https://www.reddit.com/r/LK99/comments/15i2fga/kim_hyeon_tak_claims_that_he_already_offered_data/

This retard seems to have confused an insulator-metal transition for a superconductor.

[Anonymous No.15631831]

>>15631818
Me: What is the evidence this is a superconductor
You: IT MAGNETICALLY PINS! THAT MEANS IT MUST BE A SUPERCONDUCTOR!!!
Me: But it isn't pinned.
You: THAT DOESN'T MEAN IT ISN'T A SUPER CONDUCTOR!!!

[Anonymous No.15631841]

>>15631826
Fucking knew it.

[Anonymous No.15631858]

>>15631826
>>15631841
You are both retarded deranged animals

[Anonymous No.15631869]

>>15631858
The cope is too strong. Any real counterarguments?

[Anonymous No.15631872]

>>15631824
Name other stones that exhibit the same exact phenomenon. I'll wait.

[Anonymous No.15631886]

>>15631826
lmao

based old scientist trolling the internet

[Anonymous No.15631889]

>>15631872
Doesn't matter. Its not a superconductor. If the headline was "Korean team finds new rock that floats differently than other magnetic rocks", I would buy it. But the headline was "Korean team finds room temperature superconductor". And they didn't.

[Anonymous No.15631890]

>>15631826
I asked chatgpt to explain this interview and she said that material only acts as a superconductor in one dimension.
She further explained:

In the context of superconductivity, the term "one dimension" refers to the dimensionality of the superconducting behavior in the material. It means that the material exhibits superconductivity only along a specific direction or axis, rather than being superconducting in all three dimensions (length, width, and height) like conventional bulk superconductors.

[Anonymous No.15631900]

>>15631889
You can't, because there is nothing that can do this other than superconductors.

[Anonymous No.15631918]

>>15631900

[Anonymous No.15631956]

>>15630429
To verify that it's flux pinning and not just diamagnetism, couldn't you just increase the magnet power until it lifts off and see if it floats steadily vs repelling away? Should be possible to beat neodymium with an electromagnet and a car battery

[Anonymous No.15631988]

>>15631900
>23x graphite
>No videos of it floating like graphite
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VC3r9-OaWes

[Anonymous No.15631997]

>>15631988
Every single video from Diamagnetics show massive powerful magnets.

[Anonymous No.15632005]

Korean Wiki about LK 99
https://namu.wiki/w/LK-99

[Anonymous No.15632006]

[Anonymous No.15632007]

>>15631988
lmao look how teeny and thin that graphite is compared to four gigamagnets, yet it can float maybe half a millimeter?

[Anonymous No.15632020]

>>15631918
>>15632006
Do these help you cope with the impossible "superdiamagnetism with self aligning characteristics" explanation?

[Anonymous No.15632024]

>>15631997
How more powerful are the magnets than the ones the Koreans/Chinese/Americans used?

[Anonymous No.15632025]

>>15630429
Hey coffee twitter man did it. Im impressed, i was confidently saying he wouldn't accomplish anything a few days ago, clearly i was wrong.

[Anonymous No.15632032]

>>15632025
It might be the golden goose for his space company if it turns out these crystals are easier to make in their space labs

[Anonymous No.15632041]

>>15632020
You are coping

[Anonymous No.15632047]

>>15632025
That's not coffee twitter man. That's rocket science american.

[Anonymous No.15632058]

>>15632024
normal magnets, the magnets that you see in other videos of diamagnetics are neodymium magnets which are the most powerful permanent magnets, even in the linked video, the author puts wooden boards to prevent them from sticking, they are so strong that not even he himself could detach them or even the collision of two could break his fingers, neodymium magnets are dangerous, they are magnetic fields hundreds of times stronger against other ferromagnets.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neodymium

[Anonymous No.15632076]

>>15631918
>>15632006

[Anonymous No.15632082]

>>15631826
>and that when I actually measured it, the resistance was zero. So we didn't put it in the second paper. We didn't write it down because we knew it.
kek

[Anonymous No.15632085]

>>15631826
LMAO HE LITERALLY JUST ADMITS HE"S A FRAUD

[Anonymous No.15632088]

>>15630429
Meh, so small and not even really floating. They should try at least at 40C to see if it is worth to keep trying.

[Anonymous No.15632090]

Why was this submitted to arxiv instead of Nature?

[Anonymous No.15632096]

>>15632090
Nature reject it after a pajeet poisoned the water a year earlier

[Anonymous No.15632100]

>>15632090
nature rejected the paper due to inconsistencies and non verifiable information in the papers...

[Anonymous No.15632143]

>>15631826
Well,it's over i guess.

Nothing good ever happen

[Anonymous No.15632156]

>>15631826
Its finally over pft

[Anonymous No.15632160]

>NIGGAS FALLING FOR THE EARTH WORM TRICK
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA AND YOU CALL YOURSELF SCIENTISTS

[Anonymous No.15632189]

>>15631826
Did you even read rhe redditors replies? It's a 1D conductor

[Anonymous No.15632191]

https://m.twitch.tv/falconspacelabs

live stream of them cooking it

[Anonymous No.15632192]

>>15632189
Let them have this. This back phase lasted too long for them to handle.

[Anonymous No.15632199]

>>15632191
Again?
Guess I'll play cyberpunk for the next 3+ hours

[Anonymous No.15632202]

>>15631841
What do you think a “metal-insulator transition” means retard?

[Anonymous No.15632204]

>>15630679
>You're excited for something?
>Okay, and your credentials are...?

[Anonymous No.15632206]

>>15632199
a new team on it

[Anonymous No.15632213]

why is Elongated Muskrat not trying to cook a lk-99?

[Anonymous No.15632218]

>>15631826
For fuck sake, he acts surprused when hears the something called MIT materials exists. Fucking worthless gooks wasting everyone's time. Dumb fucking gooks should all be banned from making any scientific papers

[Anonymous No.15632241]

>facebook memes
>strongest diamagnet by several orders of magnitude
>muh flat bands therefore MIT!!!
Overtards are finished.

[Anonymous No.15632246]

>>15631826
nothing ever happens in this gay earth

[Anonymous No.15632257]

>>15632191
>>15632206
They're actually doing a pretty good job for nerdy scientist streamers.
I hope they succeed

[Anonymous No.15632262]

>>15630609
He's turning the magnet. At one point he tells the guy to stop and it freezes in place.

[Anonymous No.15632265]

>>15632257
it is great to be able to watch this. very exciting in a watching paint dry sort of way lol

[Anonymous No.15632273]

>>15631826
It's so fucking over

[Anonymous No.15632278]

>>15632265
Pretty much, yeah
I also don't have any idea what they're measuring atm. Came in a bit late

[Anonymous No.15632283]

>>15632278
I'm guessing it's resistance, but why is it cold? isn't it supposed to work at room temp?

[Anonymous No.15632284]

>>15632204
Unironically yes. What are your credentials? If you aren't an expert on this topic why do you even feel the needs to post and discuss it? You have no basis to analyses any of this. How can you ever tell if what you're reading is reliable or not? If someone came up and said "I have a magical rock that cures cancer", you would take that at face value and then get mad at anyone more knowledgeable than you saying you shouldn't believe it. You might as well be arguing if God is real, you can't know because you don't have the capacity to know.

[Anonymous No.15632285]

>>15630679
I came from/k/ because I need a 9,000 FPS rail slug that can blast through armored vehicles and a coil gun that sprays flechettes so fast that it's basically a flame thrower with 2,000 yard range.

[Anonymous No.15632290]

>>15630679
/a/, /v/, and /co/.

Here because I love scientific discoveries and shitposting.

[Anonymous No.15632292]

>>15632285
Based

[Anonymous No.15632293]

>>15632290
watch

https://m.twitch.tv/falconspacelabs

[Anonymous No.15632294]

It's over, isn't it.

[Anonymous No.15632299]

>>15630679
You failed shill.
We're back,

[Anonymous No.15632300]

>>15632191

>Dicking around with a superconductor
>Casually point out an undocumented fact about it having to be spinning in order for it to move towards the magnet while it's warming up.

Sounds like established university labs are way too rigid of an environment for proper discovery of interesting things.
Just let bunch of people play with the science toys and you'll know all kinds of the attributes about the materials soon enough.

[Anonymous No.15632302]

>>15632294
Yup over

[Anonymous No.15632303]

>>15632218
can we archive this now? I can't believe /sci/ was taking gook, chink, jeet and woman science seriously, seriously the lowest this board has ever been. Anons have turned into a bunch of baseded hypefaggots.

[Anonymous No.15632305]

>>15632294
It's over. No quantum shit for us.

[Anonymous No.15632309]

>>15632191
>>15632293
>mobile links
keep yourself safe

[Anonymous No.15632311]

>>15632284
Funny how this only applies to the excited people and not the doomers who propose even more impropable things like it being unexplainably the strongest diamagnet in the universe. You have a flat earther's idea of "reel skepticism".

[Anonymous No.15632320]

>>15632293
>open stream
>first thing said is "i've never actually played with superconductors before"
>close stream

[Anonymous No.15632324]

>>15632300
they are just waiting for the vac oven too cool down before they do the next step. the oven should be cool enough shortly.

[Anonymous No.15632328]

>>15632311
you don't understand, so basically one guy they appealed to authority had a knee-jerk reaction to dismiss it therefore the only position possible is to think its wrong. Also don't bother trying to replicate results because the science is settled.

[Anonymous No.15632331]

>>15632311
being an unusually strong diamagnet is a way more realistic claim than the world's first room temp superconductor that we currently have absolutely no theoretical reason to believe actually exists.

there's a reason no real institutions are investigating this, experts are not impressed at all by this unfinished, amateur as fuck paper. every "replication attempt" is some amateur student in a third rate lab with left over equipment, it's all nonsense, and anyone with any degree of expertise recognizes it as such

[Anonymous No.15632334]

>>15632331
what a dogmatic unscientific view lol

[Anonymous No.15632336]

>>15631826
>The question of whether the resistance of a superconducting state is zero or not was debated over 100 years ago. This is a debate that follows every time a superconducting phenomenon is discovered. I had already written in my first paper that there was a discontinuous "jump" and that when I actually measured it, the resistance was zero. So we didn't put it in the second paper. We didn't write it down because we knew it.
cringe

[Anonymous No.15632337]

>>15632331
>we currently have absolutely no theoretical reason to believe actually exists
Kek
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bogoliubov_transformation
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polaron#Polaron_theory

[Anonymous No.15632341]

>>15632285
Perhaps develop a way to withstand point blank sound barrier shattering first

[Anonymous No.15632343]

>>15632328
>guy claims to have magic cancer curing rock
>medical and physics experts say that's impossible and dismiss it
>"UHH YOURE JUST NOT BEING OPEN MINDED ENOUGH. ITS NOT SETTLED SCIENCE ANYTHING IS POSSIBLE IF YOU BELIEVE HARD ENOUGH WHY CANT ROCKS CURE CANCER? THIS CHINESE GUY IN HIS GARAGE SAYS ITS LEGIT TOO YOU ARE SO CLOSED MINDED"

[Anonymous No.15632345]

>>15632331
Argonne National Lab is a serious institution

[Anonymous No.15632346]

>>15630679
If this is real it will change the world like no technology before has. If it's real, we will have time machines in less than 10 years. Can you comprehend how huge that is?

[Anonymous No.15632347]

>>15632343
>guy claims to have magic cancer curing rock
isn't that literally happening right now? kek

[Anonymous No.15632349]

>>15632331

>unusually strong diamagnet
>a reason no real institutions are investigating this

Yeah let's not research or care about what's potentially the world's strongest diamagnetic materia by a wide margin, it probably has zero uses in anything after all.

[Anonymous No.15632356]

>>15632346
What the fuck am I gonna do with a time machine? What good can come of that?

[Anonymous No.15632357]

>>15632331
It's the several orders of magnitude stronger diamagnetism that has no theoretical reason.
>there's a reason no real institutions are investigating this
>literally hasn't been a week yet
>serious institutions aren't constantly posting about it on twitter therefore it isn't happening
Average overtard ADHD subhuman.

[Anonymous No.15632364]

>>15632293
pressurized spray can on a fucking gazillion degrees oven. great

[Anonymous No.15632366]

So if this things claim to fame is how it's simple to produce from cheap materials, how come some big dick western institution hasn't already tried it? Cost or time can't be an issue. Instead we only see chinks and some Twitter randos. It's over. In fact it has never even begun.

[Anonymous No.15632368]

>>15632346
Is there some actual theory/hypothesis that time machines can in fact become real?

[Anonymous No.15632371]

>>15632334
No, it's an unscientific view to dismiss a hundred years of repeated and verified research and theoretical understanding to try and shoehorn in your magic rock.

>>15632337
None of this can explain this finding. Try harder, grasp at more straws.

>>15632345
Forcing a reputable lab to waste time debunking nonsense is unfortunate. And when they turn up nothing, none of you will believe it anyway.

>>15632347
Yes, and that's why I don't believe it. You probably believe the guys in Greece who try to sell you "ancient artifacts" on the streets for $10

>>15632349
You can study that but study it as what it is, not as a miracle God rock

[Anonymous No.15632373]

>>15632368
No. Had it been true, we'd be messing with timelines like there's no tomorrow. Besides, have you seen a time traveler anywhere yet?

[Anonymous No.15632375]

>>15632366
ur supposed to put the "Its over" part in a reply to your post, not the post itself

[Anonymous No.15632376]

>>15632364 me
and topside looks like venting area. part of it is covered by some paper sheets. what the fuck lol

[Anonymous No.15632377]

>>15632368
Causality violations are only possible on the quantum scale.

[Anonymous No.15632378]

>>15632331
Hold on nigger hold on

An unusual diamagnet is also something that there's no theoretical reason to believe it actually exists. That's what makes it unusual. There's probably tons of hypotheses for both anyway.

Furthermore

What is the realistic difference between an unusually strong diamagnet and an unusually high temperature superconductor?

You can't rule either of them out. We just haven't found any yet. There's no theory that they can't exist either. Not accusing you, but don't confuse the utility to humanity with the claim being extraordinary.

[Anonymous No.15632381]

>>15632377
So you are saying...

[Anonymous No.15632385]

>>15632346
>time machine
lol how does superconductivity relate to time travel

[Anonymous No.15632386]

>>15632371
https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.01135
Two recent preprints in physics archive (arXiv) have called the attention as they claim experimental evidence that a Cu-substituted apatite material (called LK-99) exhibits superconductivity at room temperature and pressure. If this proves to be true, LK-99 will be the holy grail of superconductors. In this work, we used Density-Functional Theory calculations to elucidate some key features of the electronic structure of LK-99. Although some aspects of our calculations are preliminary, we found that: i) in the ground state of the material the ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic configurations are practically degenerated, ii) the material is metallic, iii) the Cu atoms seem to be hosts in the lattice with not covalent bonds to other atoms and supporting almost flat bands around the Fermi level, and iv) the electron-phonon coupling of these flat bands seems to be dramatically large.
>the electron-phonon coupling of these flat bands seems to be dramatically large.

[Anonymous No.15632389]

>>15632371
lol keep telling yourself mass replying coper. You are a disgusting entity of stagnation against people doing actual science.

[Anonymous No.15632394]

we are so back bois

[Anonymous No.15632396]

>>15632371
>gets btfo for being a narrow minded retard
>mass replies in an attempt to save face
Lamo cry more fag

[Anonymous No.15632398]

>>15632364
>>15632376
they said that spray can handle temps of 3000C

[Anonymous No.15632399]

>>15632385
its a well poisoner. Its like feds throwing in flat-earthers into a group.

[Anonymous No.15632400]

>>15632394
>the wiggling that will define a generation

[Anonymous No.15632402]

>>15632394
thats just a mexican jumping bean

[Anonymous No.15632403]

>>15632378
What is the realistic difference between an unusually strong diamagnet and an unusually high temperature superconductor?
Superconductors are perfect diamagnets.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diamagnetism

[Anonymous No.15632405]

>>15632371
>Forcing a reputable lab to waste time debunking nonsense is unfortunate. And when they turn up nothing, none of you will believe it anyway
goalpost moved

[Anonymous No.15632407]

REAL SCIENTISTS DON'T TRY TO TEST ANYTHING.ONLY TEST WHAT IS KNOWN! WE KNOW EVERYTHING. THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED. ANYTHING THAT MIGHT GO AGAINST IT IS NOT WORTH INVESTIGATING.

[Anonymous No.15632416]

>getting this mad from getting deb00000nked
oof, lmao. It’s over. Let that sink in.

[Anonymous No.15632418]

>>15631890
Why the fuck is gook moot not doing anything about bots like this guy? Jesus fucking christ you can see the actual bot fucking up

[Anonymous No.15632423]

>>15632416
Great Scott, did you leak from /v/ or some other shit hole board? Please go back and never come back. The illiterates we got here are taking up enough oxygen as it is.

[Anonymous No.15632425]

>>15632343
your analogy is retarded and a contradiction of reality. Even if you think its doubtful if they have some evidence its worth investigating on the chance it could be big. Especially if its relatively cheap and simple to replicate.

[Anonymous No.15632428]

>>15631826
we're so fucking back

[Anonymous No.15632434]

>>15631826
>0 resistance
Yay superconductor!

[Anonymous No.15632440]

>>15632386
Dramatically large =/= Superconductive. Unique properties are not superconductivity. You are all working backwards in the most unscientific way. You are looking for evidence to support your conclusion, not building a conclusion from evidence.

>>15632396
>has no real reply
>"cry more fag"

>>15632405
Am I wrong? I specifically said that it's all third rate students with left over equipment. And also, it's 100% true that you won't believe it if they turn up nothing.

>>15632407
Real scientists don't waste their time on every frauds magical rock. Real archaeologist dont waste their time on every "mystical artifact" from street scammers. Real phsycians don't waste their time on every Snake Oil Pill. We use theory to inform our decision on where to look.

[Anonymous No.15632448]

>>15632440
>it's 100% true that you won't believe it if they turn up nothing.
>if they turn up nothing
Which won't happen lmao, we are so fucking back overfag get lost

[Anonymous No.15632459]

>>15632218
i think he knows quite a bit about MIT materials
http://scieng.net/sisatoron/6852?page=307

[Anonymous No.15632462]

>>15632440
>Real scientists don't waste their time on every frauds magical rock.
translation:
>hurdurr everything I think might go against what I already believe is a scam.
a completely unscientific point of view. That's not science that's appeal to status quo.

>Real phsycians don't waste their time on every Snake Oil Pill. We use theory to inform our decision on where to look.
you aren't one, you're a neet on 4chan with just a high school diploma at most. And its very evident.

[Anonymous No.15632473]

>>15630679
let me guess you took the genetic therapy, more than once even, right?

[Anonymous No.15632474]

>>15632341
Like earmuffs?

[Anonymous No.15632477]

>>15632440
>not building a conclusion from evidence.
An alternate theory of superconductors, considering the use of cooper pairs as a special case electron-electron, can use lattice phonon-electron, the theory is based on very reputable Russian and Polish researchers, between 1958 to 1959 and the publication of the book in 1970, it just happened that everybody preferred to look for cooper pairs as the only way to superconductors.

That is why the theory that explains the LK-99 has more basis than believing that it was just an invention of another professor or a coincidence of mixing materials.

Given this theory, the evidence is the LK-99 material, now the conclusion is missing, it is shameful that a theory of superconductivity was dismissed for decades without proposing flaws or even using Nikolay Bogolyubov's own work on this theory in other areas of science.

[Anonymous No.15632481]

>>15631826
Is this a good thng or bad thing for whether lk99 is really a superconductor?

[Anonymous No.15632482]

>>15632462
>it's an unscientific view to dismiss an obvious fraud as an obvious fraud
>science must take every magic rock claim seriously because all evidence and theory before is irrelevant in the face of one new claim
>all claims have equal legitimacy regardless of the evidence for and against those claims
you are supremely retarded. please leave this board

[Anonymous No.15632488]

>>15632482
>you are supremely retarded. please leave this board
>>it's an unscientific view to dismiss an obvious fraud as an obvious fraud
>its an obvious fraud because I said its an obvious fraud!!!!
please move to canada and go through the legal procedures to end your life.

[Anonymous No.15632489]

>>15631890
So it can't work with alternate current?

[Anonymous No.15632490]

>>15631826
>>15631841
>>15632085
>>15632143
>>15632156
>>15632160
>>15632202
>>15632218
>>15632246
>>15632241
>>15632294
Don't trust the ai-auto generated interview lol. The translations are so bad.

I can't believe you guys don't think he can't tell the difference between MIT and a superconductor. In the original interview, he clearly states for his reason why this has to be a superconductor and not a MIT.

In Korean forums, even people who were calling the team scammers are having second thoughts now.

In the interview, he also states his reason for the "crude" quality of the interview

[Anonymous No.15632491]

>>15632489
No superconductor can, AC fucks them up

[Anonymous No.15632494]

>>15632481
He's saying that their instruments can't detect 0 resistance, too much noise. But that other facets of lk-99 indicate that it's a super conductor. Idk how true any of that is.

[Anonymous No.15632500]

>>15632494
isn't it more about the impurities than their instruments? they would need a very pure sample to actually measure 0 resistance

[Anonymous No.15632509]

>>15632490
sorry "crude" quality of the papers I mean

[Anonymous No.15632512]

>>15632490
That's what I thought. Goes to show this place isn't full of weebs anymore if people are taking google translations of east asian languages at face value.

[Anonymous No.15632513]

"The notion that tiny invisible creatures could cause illness is preposterous. The medical community should ignore this delusion and focus on more realistic theories"

[Anonymous No.15632517]

>>15632477
>Given this theory, the evidence is the LK-99 material, now the conclusion is missing
Yes the conclusion is missing, which is something that everyone else is missing. And the evidence is incredibly weak and doesn't point at superconductivity, only at weird magnetic properties. The evidence isn't even there to say that this theory of Superconductivity works, must less that LK99 works because of it. Again, don't work backwards. Build the evidence, then draw conclusions from it. Don't desperately grasp at anything that can help justify you're predetermined conclusion

>>15632488
If you cannot tell why it is an obvious fraud, you probably require a caretaker and maybe a specialized helmet for day to day activity. I can't help children too retarded to not take candy from strangers in vans.

[Anonymous No.15632516]

>>15632343
you are anti science and should be inprisioned

[Anonymous No.15632518]

>>15632491
>it fucks them over
>that means we'll have to remake the entire electric grid
>my third world shithole can't even achieve proper coverage
It's over for me bois

[Anonymous No.15632520]

>>15632285
>furthermore it also has the ability to spatially lock themselves in free space relative to a surface whi

that's cool and all but what the fuck is that even supposed to mean, fucking esl scifi is the worst

[Anonymous No.15632521]

>>15632490
These anons are clearly not familiar with how asian languages get machine translated. Due to differences in subject dropping and word order and whatnot an English translation can often say the exact opposite of what was actually written. The question with MIT materials seems particularly butchered.

[Anonymous No.15632522]

>>15632191
>verified accounts only chat
pussies

[Anonymous No.15632525]

>>15632518
Teach yourself to code and get a green card. You'll have to stay chained to an American corporation for 10 years before you qualify for permanent residency or citizenship, but at least you'll be able to go to the hoverboard park with us.

[Anonymous No.15632526]

>>15632517
>If you cannot tell why it is an obvious fraud, you probably require a caretaker and maybe a specialized helmet for day to day activity. I can't help children too retarded to not take candy from strangers in vans.
>uhh its fraud okay?! IT JUST IS!
>why?
>BECAUSE, YOU TELL ME WHY IT ISN'T
very scientific. Now please, move to canada and go through the legal procedure for euthanasia.

[Anonymous No.15632532]

>>15632482
Please explain how having previously accepted models for super conductivity support the claim in every simulation that has been published about LK99 is making "all evidence and theory before is irrelevant in the face of one new claim"?
You won't because you are a coward bitch that tiptoes around arguments

[Anonymous No.15632536]

>>15632525
Is it that easy? I already do some coding by modding a few games, sometimes even without any documentation.

[Anonymous No.15632539]

Who's excited to get their very own Gauss rifle?

[Anonymous No.15632542]

>>15632378
I love how the very fact that this mystery compound is even diamagnetic in the first fucking place is, scientifically, reason enough to look at it more closely.

Isn't there some anecdote about how the best science starts with "huh, that's weird..."?

[Anonymous No.15632544]

>>15632517

[Anonymous No.15632546]

>>15632542
SHUT THE FUCK UP RETARD
YOU HAVE SPAMMED THIS ENOUGH

[Anonymous No.15632548]

>>15632539
rape kyoko

[Anonymous No.15632550]

>>15632539
more of a levitating thrusting dildo guy myself

[Anonymous No.15632551]

>>15632536
It's not THAT easy. But it's a path. Tech companies are more willing than most to sponsor a green card.

[Anonymous No.15632552]

>>15632546
>s-stop bringing this up

[Anonymous No.15632554]

>>15632546
That was my first fucking post today nigger sit down and take your schizo meds at the appropriate schedule

[Anonymous No.15632555]

>>15632539
Let's not get too excited. This is an interesting theory and material. While I have my doubts I am of the opinion if that this doesn't end up working we might have some new concepts to try with material science.


>>15632542
Right! I mean worst case scenario in my opinion is that we end up getting some new ideas. >>15632513
I like this considering what has been said in this thread repeatedly.

[Anonymous No.15632557]

any news about KN-92 supercocksucktor?

[Anonymous No.15632558]

>new material shows characteristics that neither can be explained and are part of the characteristics that a superconductor has
>"NOOOOO YOU CAN'T EXAMINE THIS MORE, IT'S A WASTE OF TIME AND UNSCIENTIFIC"
What the fuck is this crab bucket mentality? According to the "current models" the thing shouldn't even display any of those characteristics, that's enough to prove that the model is incorrect.

Do scientists just "assume" that they know everything they don't know?

[Anonymous No.15632567]

>>15632522
a historic livestream gets shut down because of some troll from /pol/ lol

[Anonymous No.15632569]

>>15632558
Remember that some people put money on this. Things are looking good so it's bad for people who bet "no".

[Anonymous No.15632570]

>>15632558
>Do scientists just "assume" that they know everything they don't know?
Academia has always consisted of 80% people who think they know everything and 20% people actually trying to innovate.

[Anonymous No.15632574]

>>15632570
That ratio might be optimistic

[Anonymous No.15632575]

will this help my AI waifu

[Anonymous No.15632578]

>>15632513
Leeuwenhoek didn't make claims beyond what he had observed. He didn't see animalcules and say "These possess magical properties ", he simply reported his findings. He didn't work backwards, and these tiny creatures were in line with the already popular miasma theory of disease hence why such a connection could be made.

>>15632516
>this guy over there claims he's Jesus, I have to believe him on his face because there's no way to prejudge the validity of anything or any claim
that's the level of science you're on

>>15632526
Again, caretaker please. If you don't understand why someone claiming their magic rock violates and contradicts previously validated research is likely fraud, please seek help.

>>15632532
We don't have evidence that those "previously accepted" models apply here. We don't have evidence that LK99 exhibits anything more than dismagnetism. We don't have evidence that proves it's structure. We don't have ANYTHING that gives us the conclusion of superconductivity. We have people claiming superconductivity, then working backwards to try and support this conclusion. STOP APPROACHING THIS BACKWARDS

[Anonymous No.15632580]

>>15632558
"Science advances one funeral at a time"

Look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck's_principle..
Remember the doctors who refused to believe the germ theory?

It's always been this way. It's just that now we get to see it realtime because of twitter or X or whatever it is called now

[Anonymous No.15632583]

>>15632558
probably the same as when they leave a negative peer review to try to bury the work of their competitors. academia is broken.

[Anonymous No.15632588]

Do we have any idea as to why it only acts funny with the sulfur present?

[Anonymous No.15632597]

>>15632558
>Do scientists just "assume" that they know everything they don't know?

Yeah, pretty much. I used to like such physicists as Smoke deGrasse Tyson, but his weirdly hard-line approach to science is counterintuitively institutional, and he is unfortunately an influencer.

I think his absolute distaste of religion has tainted his imagination, and that sort of thinking is just kind of baked into modern academia, at least in the US sphere.

>>15632555
Most people don't understand the scientific method, let alone materials science. I'm huffing some quality hopium with this compound, but I'm also utterly fascinated by what it could be. Even if this turns out to be absolutely nothing like what we think, it's proving itself to be something, and there's no way to tell what might come of it yet.

There was a video on twitter posted of some homebrew scientist demonstrating the diamagnetic effect - it's proof of something, which is notable in its own right.

[Anonymous No.15632599]

>>15632558
You can examine it more, that's all well and good. But don't expect respectable researchers to waste their time on every wild, nonsense claim. And don't put the buggy before the horse. We do not have the evidence to make the conclusion of superconductivity. We have weak evidence of weird magnetic properties. Scientists don't assume they know everything, but they can assume that something that smells like a scam, looks like a scam, talks like scam, is a scam.

[Anonymous No.15632604]

>>15632578
Again, you make no scientific arguments and cannot back your statement as to why its not even worth investigating.

So, please again look into the legal procedures on Canada on euthanasia.

[Anonymous No.15632610]

Magnetchads won
Electriclosers lost

[Anonymous No.15632618]

is it a scam

[Anonymous No.15632623]

>>15632618
what do you think???

[Anonymous No.15632624]

>>15632618
is anybody asking for money?

[Anonymous No.15632626]

I can't tell which way things are actually leaning anymore

[Anonymous No.15632630]

>>15632626
Nobody knows. It's best we wait it out and check later for more tests.

[Anonymous No.15632634]

>>15632626
as it should be. We are in super-positioned over, back and every possible state in between. Until its proven or not.

[Anonymous No.15632646]

>>15632588
sulfur is used to summon demons, it's demonic, we are in the DOOM timeline

[Anonymous No.15632662]

>>15632575
ye

[Anonymous No.15632742]

>>>15632685
this being a "scam" is very unlikely and is worth investigating. To the pseudo-scientists, this does not mean I think it even works I just think its worth checking out.

[Anonymous No.15632828]

>>15632742
This
Is fucking sketchy, but there are enought proofs making it worth investigating, and there is also the initial korean drama of the desperate fired doc leaking the works bc he really thinks is real and worth a nobel

[Anonymous No.15632852]

Buy monero

[Anonymous No.15632874]

>>15630609
>>15630635
>>15631824
>>15632610
It's a 1 Dimensional superconductor and only exhibits magnetic field rejection when the magnetic flux is perpendicular to superconductor Pathways this explains why no matter how strong the diamagnetic effect is it won't lift its tail from the ground, it will lift itself upright until the ever increasing magnetic flux permeability caused by aligning it's superconductor Pathways results in enough dead weight it can no longer lift itself, resulting in a slant.

[Anonymous No.15632894]

>>15632874
Based paint infographics

[Anonymous No.15632954]

>>15632874
Put that on a pendulum and you have yourself a piston they’re big boy. Makes sense sort of.

[Anonymous No.15633030]

based

[Anonymous No.15633033]

>>15632874
based

[Anonymous No.15633040]

IS there any hint of a precedent for one-dimension/axis diamagnet in physics?

This shit keeps getting weirder. I wish it WAS an outright hoax at this point.

[Anonymous No.15633048]

>>15630679
> I let others make up MY mind!
And the worst thing about that is that you think it makes you smart or intelligent.

[Anonymous No.15633053]

>>15633040
Yes. a one dimensional superconductor

[Anonymous No.15633059]

>>15632557
KWAB

[Anonymous No.15633094]

>>15632284
>If you aren't an expert on this topic why do you even feel the needs to post and discuss it?
So you're telling me that you've never had a conversation with other people about something that you're interested in while not having a degree in the subject? This basic social interaction is just a completely foreign concept to you?

I'd ask if you're on the spectrum, but I'm pretty sure that even autistic people understand this one.

[Anonymous No.15633124]

>>15632874
I don't think this is right. The Meisner effect arises because of eddy currents, which are currents that go round and round in a loop. But a loop needs two dimensions.

[Anonymous No.15633135]

>>15633124
To add to this
1d superconductor - no meisner at all
2d superconductor - 1d meisner in the direction perpendicular to the superconducting ones.
3d superconductor - full meisner

[Anonymous No.15633151]

>rips bong
so what if
>hacking cough
what if they took the LK99 and like
>blows nose
put it into one of those magnetic induction heater coil things
would it melt the lead? or the superconductor? would that refine it somehow?
>swigs bottle, exhales
cuz really is it even the whole nugget that matters? this whole "cook until golden brown" shit seems really imprecise

[Anonymous No.15633163]

>>15633124
>>15633135
Wouldn't the expulsion of the magnetic field still occur if you have a series of 1d superconductors?

It would occur in a direction perpendicular to the superconducting pathway.

[Anonymous No.15633203]

>>15633124
Perhaps a Eddy current can form around only a handful of atoms within the superconducting pathway but the other direction doesn't allow for Eddy currents, regardless of the exact mechanism the reason of how, Eddy currents Form when the magnetic field is in one particular angle of incidence to the superconducting pathways but not when in the other

[Anonymous No.15633304]

>>15633163
>>15633203
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eddy_current
Look at the pics from that article and think about them. Basically the rings form around the field lines of the magnet and create an opposite field. That's how the field is expelled.

[Anonymous No.15633344]

>>15633203
Actually.. the more I think about this.. I suppose it could be like that. Not so sure though.

[Anonymous No.15633368]

>>15632284
>What are your credentials
I have a physics degree from an accredited university and have passed multiple classes on both electromagnetism and solid state physics. Why do pseuds subscribe to the false dichotomy of layman/expert? You can be educated on a subject without holding a gorillion PhDs and an h-index of infinity.

[Anonymous No.15633446]

>>15633344
>>15633304
>>15633203
Basically Eddy currents are loops of current flow and are at right angles from the Field lines of the magnetic field,when the superconducting pathways are parallel to the magnetic field lines the cross section of the conductive path is like 1-3 atoms and that may be below a critical threshold for an Eddie but when the magnetic field lines are perpendicular to the superconducting pathways the cross section is enough atoms for an eddy current to form hence allowing a Meissner effect in one direction but not the other, the material is in effect a laminated core and the "laminations"are atom wide wires so Small they allow Eddie currents in only a range of angle of incidences

[Anonymous No.15633450]

>>15632474
Earmuffs won't protect your body from the shockwave

[Anonymous No.15633464]

>>15632525
>but at least you'll be able to go to the hoverboard park with us
The US will unironically be one of the worst places to get hover boards and hover bikes. Unless you live in the suburbs, american cities are not designed with pedestrian or bike paths in mind. Almost any other country with developed cities in the 1st, 2nd, or 3rd world will have a better infrastructure for hover vehicles than the USA.

[Anonymous No.15633465]

>>15630429
INTERVIEW WITH ANDREW MCCHADLIP
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s1o88seNB-w
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s1o88seNB-w
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s1o88seNB-w

[Anonymous No.15633485]

>>15633465
painfully awkward

>how do you spell your company name? varda?
>am i saying it right? ok cool
>3 minutes later
>varda with sponsorship from this fund with whom i have a vested interest is working on this yay!

i wish nerds had better journalists available

[Anonymous No.15633512]

>>15633485
sovl

[Anonymous No.15633540]

>>15632539
Me. I want to fling tungsten cored steel darts at 18,500 fps.

[Anonymous No.15633559]

>>15632368
I suppose you could time travel into the future by reaching close to light speed

[Anonymous No.15633742]

>>15632558
scientists are just a bunch of scifi writers that hope that if they publish 2000 papers that one of them will guess things right so they can pretend to be smart

[Anonymous No.15633785]

>>15631818
so there is absolutely no evidence that this is a superconductor? got it

[Anonymous No.15634054]

>>15633540
>breaks every bone in body
Now what?

[Anonymous No.15634064]

>>15634054
nah I just have a projectile firing the other way to negate recoil

[Anonymous No.15634087]

>>15630429
looks like a little worm

[Anonymous No.15634428]

>>15632285
Only what you see pal

[Anonymous No.15634945]

>>15630679
>literally nobody accredited
vaxxed and boosted

[Anonymous No.15634954]

when am i getting my floating graphics card

[Anonymous No.15635506]

>>15632520
I guess it works like a tripod that you can turn on and off.

[Anonymous No.15637886]

>>15632490
we're so back!

[Anonymous No.15639646]

>>15632852
buy QRL if you want qauntum protection

[Anonymous No.15639709]

>>15630429
Why does anyone give a shit about it floating?! Does it have zero resistance or not? This is literally the only important thing and nobody has tested it?

[Anonymous No.15640088]

People keep saying this is gamechanging
Why does superconductivity change the paradigm? I'm not familiar with the practical applications beyond having no loss transmitting electricity

[Anonymous No.15640120]

>>15640088
1. Means you can pack your circuit board design as densely as you want and not have to think about heat dissipation to stop your circuits burning out the instant you put any power through it meaning all electrical devices shrink by a factor of like 5
2. Quantum computers are as easy to install in anything as a CPU
3. Nuclear fusion becomes energy positive as the energy you used to expend on the superconductor cooling system can now be harvested in output

[Anonymous No.15640130]

>>15640088
A superconducting ring is the perfect battery.

[Anonymous No.15640140]

>>15640120
>Means you can pack your circuit board design as densely as you want
stop it with this bullshit. I am tired of hearing this shit. it does SHIT for power dissipation of most devices. FUCKING ZERO! nothing, nada, fuck all.
all consumer devices we use get hot because of CPU processing which gets hot because of the gates of its transistors. there's no fucking ubiquitous device that will directly be helped to stay cool by just using RTSC "on the pcb" you absolute fucking dimwits. stop fucking mentioning heat reduction from CPUs, and transistors and shit like that you fucking buffoons. you don't understand shit, you're just parroting other moron's idiocies, just because it "sounds right" to your retarded brain.

[Anonymous No.15640142]

>>15634054
wait 6 months for the bones to heal
THEN DO IT AGAIN YAHOO

[Anonymous No.15640145]

>>15640140
>not buying next gen superconducting cpus
Brb overclocking my cpu to 99petahertz

[Anonymous No.15640151]

>>15640088
SMES batteries that can charge and discharge almost instantly and never degrade
Electric motors with 10x torque density and power density
Generators become more efficient
Frictionless bearings
Fusion becomes much easier
Portable coilguns
Celebrities can wear floating rainbow dildos that orbit their bodies

[Anonymous No.15640159]

>>15640151
this is probably a stupid idea but couldn't you hypothetically make rotors that are only attached with magnetic fields (I'm sure there's a better term for this) using superconductors?

[Anonymous No.15640168]

>>15640159
Magnetic bearings already exist, they just use electromagnets and thus require power.

[Anonymous No.15640172]

>>15640130
But will it be useful? Doesn't this LK99 stuff have a low max current and therefore won't be able to store much energy?

[Anonymous No.15640175]

>>15640168
we've even made them with high temp superconductors, just to see the results!
One of the first major successful uses of a RTSC is supermagnetic bearings, along with massive improvements to electric motors and generators. They would be simply /amazing/

[Anonymous No.15640176]

you can levitate superconductors on other superconductors.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5f17VLp9Co

[Anonymous No.15640188]

>>15640172
from what I understand its due to the rough nature of the material. Imagine the material is made of blocks that work like a two way cable would, and each block in this material in its current state is in a random orientation. If just one block is the wrong orientation in a circuit that block pathway isn't super conductive. There needs to be some way to make the material consistent. Ideally I think the material's structure should resemble muscle fibers.

[Anonymous No.15640190]

>>15640176
RTSC can turn everything into magnet land.

[Anonymous No.15640205]

>>15640172
people say this but nobody can explain why. the confusion comes from the initial paper which showed ~250mA at room temperature for the sample they had. nobody knows how many "1D superconductive channels" they tapped with their probes, how wide a single channel is. they just got 250mA for the rock they measured, that's extremely vague.
>>15640188
I think of it like many optical fibers packed together.

[Anonymous No.15641244]

why didn't walter white just make a superconductor?

[Barkun's Cum Rag No.15641248]

>>15641244
R u mad rn x

[Anonymous No.15641279]

>>15641244
It's hard to tell, but it takes place in north america.

[Anonymous No.15641292]

>>15630429
So a few days ago, somebody on Twitter asked him if they were to cut off the part that touched the magnet, would the entire thing hover, and he said "yes". Did he ever show this? Or is it impossible, because one part must always touch the magnet?

[Anonymous No.15642026]

>>15632403
Only type 1 superconductors are perfect and they are all low temperature.

[Anonymous No.15642065]

>>15640140
Where the heat come from in wires?
That's right its the resistance and current interacting. What are traces on a board or the components in a CPU but tiny wires? Obviously not every part can be replaced with superconductors but any part that can will decrease the waste heat.

[Anonymous No.15642071]

>>15640140
t. big heatsink

[Anonymous No.15642136]

>>15630429
LK99 is sadly probably not a solution but based on simulations, it does seem to be in the right direction for the miracle Super Conductor. This is still positive even though it is looking more likely that it is not exactly a superconductor. Something to keep in mind too is that most of the authors didn't want to publish it at this time as there are issues with the findings at this time.

Again, this could very well be a major step in the right direction and it got a WHOLE LOT of people interested in physics and electromagnetism.

[Anonymous No.15642183]

>>15642065
Try and research something before shitting with your brain, ICs are shit at interfacing with poorly compatible materials and fabs are sluggish at best to adopt new tech. It's gonna be a revolution in almost everything but chips, for a long while

[Anonymous No.15642202]

>>15630429
why are these samples so small

[Anonymous No.15642207]

https://twitter.com/Alien_Scientist/status/1688589569590018051

We never left!

[Anonymous No.15642211]

>no updates aside from the fake videos thing
What's going on? How long until we get some news? I don't even care if it's real or not anymore

[Anonymous No.15642224]

>>15642211
>I don't care
>but tell me

[Anonymous No.15642226]

>>15642211
>I don't even care if it's real or not anymore
then why ask?

[Anonymous No.15642261]

>>15642207

Very nice and it's white men doing it.
Good of them to have that spec of ferromagnetic shit in there too to show the difference.
>It's diamagnetic

I guess it really comes down to whether this is superconductive or a giga powerful diamagnet.
Can't wait to see some tests.
And even if the tests show it to be a shit conductor, it still doesn't say much because clearly this process needs to be refined a lot and who knows what changes happen when you tweak the ingredients and baking time etc..

[Anonymous No.15642275]

Why the fuck is this "research" done over on Musk's personal 4chan and not in real scientific journals?

[Anonymous No.15642292]

>>15630689
It's twitterfags coming here. From the same circles as that chinese tron fong who along with others have been hyping this over there.

[Anonymous No.15642303]

>>15642207
will they be able to improve on this? ie optimize the process and turn it into products?

[Anonymous No.15642313]

>>15630429
>behaves like iron shavings when near a magnet
Uuuuh bros?

[Anonymous No.15642329]

>>15642313
Yes
https://twitter.com/VanGennepD/status/1687885524067893248

[Anonymous No.15642341]

>>15642207
>alien scientist X-files research
Backbros… where is MIT? Why are randos and schizos the only ones replicating?

[Anonymous No.15642359]

>>15633450
>>15632341
All rifles worth their salt break the sound barrier, it's literally no big deal. You have no clue what you're talking about.

[Anonymous No.15642366]

>>15632331
>Argonne National Labs are amateur students
Lmao, you stick out like a sore thumb.

[Anonymous No.15642370]

>>15642136
>it got a whole lot of people interested in superconductors
Who the fuck cares?

[Anonymous No.15642377]

Riddle me this. Aren't superconductors by definition supposed to have, you know, /zero/ resistance?

[Anonymous No.15642394]

>>15642303
dramatic room for improvement because we're literally at
"common rocks shouldn't make funny rock, but do" stage. The way everyone has been getting "replications" suggests we don't even know how we're making it- it's just showing up in some of the attempts.

[Anonymous No.15642400]

>>15642313
see >>15642207

[Anonymous No.15642412]

Folks need heroes, chief - to give em hope.

[Anonymous No.15642422]

>>15642183
Notice how chips were only half of that post.

[Anonymous No.15642456]

>>15631841
"it still has a way way resistance than copper"

[Anonymous No.15642504]

>>15642303
the original gook team and everyone else just crush and dump random shit into an oven to get mystery rocks, so of course we know jackshit about how to actually make what we are after (the superconductivity or diamagnetic properties). Basically playing alchemy which is why most samples utterly fail, others have wildly inconsistent properties with the original paper and others get only a nugget out of a pile of metallic dogshit that appears to be LK-99

[Anonymous No.15642510]

backbros, it is so over.

[Anonymous No.15642544]

>>15642510
good meme but they're already working on making more samples to give for testing

[Anonymous No.15642550]

>>15642544
They say they are doing it to keep up the grift/appearance. In 2 more weeks there will be other excuses why they can not deliver them

[Anonymous No.15642554]

>>15642544
lmao

[Anonymous No.15642589]

>>15642377
>But [we’ve already shown] the jump and zero resistance via actual measurements in the first paper [Ed: in Korean], so we didn’t feel to include them in the second paper [Ed: the first one in arXiv]. There has been enormous requests for samples all around the world, and we have no time to spare, let alone showing what we already know again.
https://hackmd.io/@sanxiyn/seize-interview
https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/landing/article.kci?arti_id=ART002955269#none

[Anonymous No.15642593]

>>15642504
kinda like we know how gravity exists, without knowing how gravity actually works?

[Anonymous No.15642636]

>>15632284
>mfw I can't discuss a new movie im interested in because I don't have phd in cinematography

[Anonymous No.15642650]

>>15630429
Can someone qrd on LK-99 and why is a big deal?

[Anonymous No.15642661]

>>15642589
how did they make the thin film? do they have more than one manufacturing process?

[Anonymous No.15642675]

>>15642504
The biggest red flag to me is that they gave incomplete instructions for synthesis and they won't elaborate further on why everybody is failing.

[Anonymous No.15642687]

>>15642675
prolly because they have a patent and they didn't want in the first place for people to find out the recipe.

[Anonymous No.15642752]

>>15642687
Then why publish the paper? And don't tell me they were forced to, because they were clearly going to publish one later when they were finished.

[Anonymous No.15642802]

>>15642752
Nobel?
does coca cola have their recipe in their papers/patent?

[Anonymous No.15642804]

>>15642802

[Anonymous No.15642805]

>>15642752
because some untrustworthy member of the team got greedy and published first, wanting all the credit

[Anonymous No.15642874]

Time's up monkeys

[Anonymous No.15642883]

>>15642874
you could unironically charge that with a superconductive USB-C cable.

[Anonymous No.15642927]

>>15642650
kys

[Anonymous No.15643398]

>>15642065
You're talking about replacing the components that produce 1% of the heat. 99% of the heat will still be their because transistors are semiconductors that cannot be replaced by superconductors.

[Anonymous No.15643404]

>>15642805
>And don't tell me they were forced to, because they were clearly going to publish one later when they were finished.

[Anonymous No.15643745]

>>15643398
I am talking about replacing copper with something like this. Same thing happened decades ago when copper replaced aluminum.

[Anonymous No.15643750]

>>15643745
https://www.ibm.com/ibm/history/ibm100/us/en/icons/copperchip/
Of course I forgot the link

[Anonymous No.15643776]

>>15643745
>>15643750
https://spectrum.ieee.org/new-superconductor-microprocessor-yields-a-substantial-boost-in-efficiency
Sorry to post so much just cant stop dunking

[Anonymous No.15643888]

>muh josephson gaymer wet dream retardation again

[Anonymous No.15644189]

>>15643888
Who said gaming? This is about power dissipation and efficiency. Stop moving those goal posts.

[Anonymous No.15644693]

Over-bros, we are so back!

[Anonymous No.15645283]

>>15642359
I own multiple air rifles that break the sound barrier, which I'm not sure how that's possible but I'm not going to worry about it