[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 216 KB, 1024x768, lem.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15619483 No.15619483 [Reply] [Original]

Is this the peak of human engineering ?

>> No.15619513

>>15619483
no

>> No.15619527

>>15619483
probably not

>> No.15619530

Of course. Nothing was ever successfully accomplished by the human race on the first try - except for the Moon landings.

>> No.15619537
File: 127 KB, 1024x1024, IMG_0567.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15619537

>tinfoil & duct tape absolute-piece-of-junk prop filmed in the foreground of a rear-projection set located in the desert
>peak of human engineering
Uh no.

>> No.15619541

>>15619537
>it look like ting i know
>it be like dat
Kys

>> No.15619588
File: 103 KB, 850x554, IMG_0878.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15619588

>>15619541
>he doesn’t know
Lol, lmao.
https://youtu.be/KpuKu3F0BvY

>> No.15619673

>>15619483
no its designed to be as flimsy as possible to fit within the saturn Vs payload limit

>> No.15619677

>>15619530
>Moon landings
>first try
you're delusional. it was apollo 11 not 1 for a reason

>> No.15619679

>>15619483
So far, yep

>> No.15619686
File: 158 KB, 640x586, Grumman LTA-1, 1st functional Lunar Module.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15619686

>>15619537
>tinfoil & duct tape absolute-piece-of-junk
>>15619673
>flimsy
why do retards say this? do they think what is on the outside is structure?

>> No.15619689

Yeah I guess, if those drone/UFO videos are legit then that would be significantly more impressive but it's probably fake

>> No.15619932

>>15619483
That would be Dassault Mirage IV Supersonic Strategic Bomber.

>> No.15619977

>>15619588
>just watch this 3,5 hour long schizo film if you want to know the truth
lol, lmao even

>> No.15620026
File: 265 KB, 1000x666, chimp_smile.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15620026

>>15619483
LMAO, morons believe they went to the moon on that cardboard spaceshit.

>> No.15620057

>>15620026
Does this depict your retard monkey self?

>> No.15620087

>>15619677
The first 10 weren't attempting to land retard.

>> No.15620127

>>15620087
So what? They were all practicing parts of the landing mission in one way or another.
Then Apollo 10 went almost all the way down, retiring as much risk as possible.
The implication of just doing it all right on the first try is as far from truth as you can get.

>> No.15620316

>>15620127
The first time they tried to land on the moon they succeeded. You're being a faggot because you can't handle being wrong.

>> No.15620346
File: 65 KB, 600x599, 47432548182_2eac44b638_z.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15620346

>>15620316
>Nothing was ever successfully accomplished by the human race on the first try - except for the Moon landings.
Is what I was responding to.
That is an entirely appropriate response. Cope about it conspiracy nigger.
You cannot handle the fact that it wasn't a fluke or a miracle, therefore impossible and fake but rather a result of hard work and meticulous preparation.

>> No.15620530

>>15620346
I'm nit denting that it took a lot of work and preparation. But the first time they tried to land they did. You're just a retard that is unable to understand what the word try means. Sorry.

>> No.15620651
File: 459 KB, 970x546, p4iGShChCarfbPviiyQYGC-970-80.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15620651

>>15619483
no, these things are.

>> No.15620673
File: 250 KB, 1280x720, capricorn_one_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15620673

>>15620316
It's not the landing on the first try that was most miraculous, but rather the return to the vehicle orbiting the moon on the first try.
A little too miraculous, obviously.

>> No.15620688

>>15619977
This isn't an argument.
And it's particularly unacceptable on /sci/.
Yeah, actually understanding things instead of taking them at face value (dogma) takes time.
And it goes without saying that someone who spent hundreds (thousands?) of hours picking apart an event in a meticulous 3.5 hour long documentary probably understands the event better than you do.

>> No.15620746

>>15619483
>duct tape, trash bags, and tinfoil

>> No.15620791

>>15620673
Apollo 11 wasn't the first try of that. Apollo 9 did it in LEO and Apollo 10 did it in lunar orbit. Gemini 8 performed the first successful space docking in 1966. It's always the people who deny the Apollo program that know the least about it

>> No.15620840

>>15620791
So you're saying they docked from the surface before they landed on the surface for the first time?

>> No.15620857

>>15620840
They aborted off the descent stage 8 miles over the moon and docked back with the CM on Apollo 10

>> No.15620864

>>15620791
Who os denying the Apollo program? You're a schizo. It's pretty simple, Apollo 11 was the first attempt to land on the moon. Apollo 11 successfully landed on the moon. How are you this retarded?

>> No.15620871
File: 2.50 MB, 4450x2962, 22586184811_f2424f3a1f_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15620871

>>15620746
Yes. Picrel James Webb

>> No.15620875

>>15620857
Apollo 10 didn't abort the landing, as they never intended to land.

>> No.15620883

>>15620864
Actually read the post you're responding to and the preceding one you absolute retard nigger.

>> No.15620891

>>15620875
They used the abort procedure is what I meant. Of course that was planned.

>> No.15620942
File: 830 KB, 1068x1044, mfw_i_go_to_the_moon.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15620942

>>15620864
>Apollo 11 successfully landed on the moon.
I wouldn't go THAT far.

>> No.15620981 [DELETED] 
File: 439 KB, 1080x1836, average space enjoyer.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15620981

>>15619483
>>15619686
>>15620346
>>15620871
The earth is flat and stationary with a dome. They are never ever leaving this enclosed plane alive, and neither are you sciencegoys.
CGI is all you get in this life and if you are vaxxed, I know many of you here are well boosted, then the Mars landings will be livestreamed straight into your vaxxed brain.
Also with the latest Neurolink brain processor you'll be able to watch multiple landings at the same time, with the same bitrate and no loss in quality experience.

>> No.15620996 [DELETED] 
File: 17 KB, 440x440, image_69581.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15620996

>>15620981
>This enrages the conspiracy nigger

>> No.15621102

>>15620883
I did retard. You're the one saying that Apollo 11 wasn't the first attempt to land on the moon and saying that people that disagree are conspiracy theorists. Kill yourself.

>> No.15621155

>>15621102
Nah you obviously didn't.
The guy >>15620673 said the most miraculous thing was the ascent and docking which another anon >>15620791 said was tried already on 10.
That guy obviously is insinuating that it was a conspiracy "a little too miraculous".
Maybe take meds?

>> No.15621194

>>15621155
How can docking from the surface be tried before landing on the surface?
Obviously it cannot be.
8 miles above the surface is not the same as from the surface.

>> No.15621210

>>15621194
>moving the goalposts
>docking from the Suffixe
he didnt say that. he said return to the vehicle orbiting the moon. refer to your psychiatrist

>> No.15621243
File: 162 KB, 1244x1108, lk_99_hoax_theories.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15621243

>>15621210
Reiterating my previous point is not moving the goalposts.
Docking a stationary surface object with an orbital object is not the same as docking an orbital object with an orbital object.
>refer to your psychiatrist
Ad hominem.
Not an argument, son.

>> No.15621248

>>15621155
Okay, I'm sorry, I am just retarded apparently.

>> No.15621249

>>15620981
>buzzword soup
here's your you now fuck off

>> No.15621270
File: 156 KB, 1080x1440, FmEVLQqXoAMWk3R.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15621270

>>15619483
That, ISS, LHC.. what else?

>> No.15621331

>>15621270
BBC

>> No.15621381

>>15621243
>that pic
bruh are you deadass retarded? There's literal photo and video evidence

>> No.15621849

>>15621331
That's peak of the chosen's engineering

>> No.15621876

>>15619530
I studied extensively for a test and passed it on the first try. I am literally perfection in your eyes, just phenomenal, unable to be equaled wow

>> No.15622737

>>15621381
Results that cannot be replicated are discarded.

>> No.15622903

>>15621243
>Docking a stationary surface object with an orbital object
Seriously? That is what you are going with?
You should really take a few minutes to proces what you type before hitting post.

>> No.15622932

>>15619686
Hope you're a bot too, otherwise this ground hog day discussion will be senseless.

>> No.15622936

>>15619483

jwst is pretty fricking cool

>> No.15622944

>>15620688
>And it's particularly unacceptable on /sci/.
Watching 3rd hand films because the poster is not able to make a single argument on has own. That's really /sci conform,

>> No.15622960
File: 65 KB, 1058x502, nasa_moon_return_2005.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15622960

>>15622903
That's not an argument.
In order for the Apollo experiment to be taken seriously by anyone with an IQ above room temperature, it must be replicated by an independent group just like any other experiment.

>> No.15622980

>>15619483
How you choose to rank various engineering achievements is an arbitrary choice. There is no objective measure.

>> No.15623354

>>15622944
poor retarded kiddo doesnt know what burden of proof is, you are the one that should prove the piece of shit from the OP which was tin foil thick go back to earth and cross the van allen radiation belts, the movie is a comperhensive summary of most of the problems, you could try to debunk a single argument made there, but we all know you're just a useless underage soi who couldnt do shit

>> No.15623361

>>15619686
how does something that is few millimeters thick survive van allen radiation belts?
how does a rocket landing on the moon not push up a single dust particle to land on the foil legs of the craft when they "arrived on the moon"?
>inb4 no direct reply

>> No.15623461

>>15622932
More true than you may realize.
Groundhog day is February 2nd, the 33rd day of the year.
>Sweet dreams are made of this, who am I to disagree...

>> No.15623746
File: 954 KB, 568x640, chadsmile.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15623746

>>15620057
LMAO, you are the kind of moron who would get his stupid face eaten after picking a fight with a fucking ape.

>> No.15624085
File: 294 KB, 2084x776, sci golems dreaming.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15624085

>>15619483
>>15619686
>>15619588
>>15620346
>>15620871
The earth is flat and stationary with a dome. They are never ever leaving this enclosed plane alive, and neither are you sciencegoys.
CGI is all you get in this life and if you are vaxxed, I know many of you here are well boosted, then the Mars landings will be livestreamed straight into your vaxxed brain.
Also with the latest Neurolink brain processor you'll be able to watch multiple landings at the same time, with the same bitrate and no loss in quality experience.

>> No.15624172
File: 69 KB, 1024x576, 1679075574936374.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15624172

>>15620026
conspiratard bros, I dont feel so good...

>> No.15624233

>>15623354
>you are the one that should prove the piece of shit from the OP
Guy please, if you're not a bot and above elementary you should be able to join a discussion with minimal preparation even a trace of responsibility and self-respect. If you were and had done the sabove you must! be found that you arguments are retarded beyond belief, 100 times refuted and useless. But i doubt you are able to do this so why do you post here and not in Disney forums?

>> No.15624246

>>15619483
>Is this the peak of human engineering ?
Was the peak of US (so stolen German) engineering.

>> No.15624249

>>15623746
monke confirmed

>> No.15625710
File: 2.35 MB, 3250x4333, Albert_Einstein_Head.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15625710

>>15619483
-IF you believe the story, then YES IT IS

IF not then No it ISN'T

>> No.15625786

>>15619483
At the time yes.

>> No.15626220

>>15619483
>doesn't boil water
No.

>> No.15626355
File: 3.77 MB, 477x536, 1672712434642093.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15626355

>>15619483
>we wyz
oh vey

>> No.15626387

>>15619483
It's the peak of CGI

>> No.15626394

not until quantum space propulsion systems arise

>> No.15626939
File: 912 KB, 2340x2364, AS15-87-11839HR.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15626939

>>15620026
>>15619686

>>15623361
>they were in the significantly thiccer command module not the LEM when they passed through the Van Allen belts at high speeds (minimal exposure)
>Apollo 15 did get some dust and also landed directly on their engine bell

>> No.15626948
File: 3.60 MB, 4096x4096, as15-86-11602~orig.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15626948

>>15626355
Rover camera

>> No.15626959
File: 175 KB, 800x517, page5-1016-full.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15626959

>>15619483
Peak of human achievement in space so far but not engineering, that would be this or ISS

>> No.15626965
File: 1.95 MB, 4078x3212, 47 - space shuttle - B.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15626965

>>15626959

>> No.15626970
File: 1.72 MB, 4071x3245, 46 - space shuttle - A.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15626970

>>15626965

>> No.15626974
File: 286 KB, 2253x1033, F15zkbTWYA0qX9k.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15626974

>>15626970

>> No.15626985

>>15620942
>mfw i got the moon and then go into 4 weeks quarantine immediately in a tiny airstream van

fix'd, imagine thinking he should be elated after that