/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.15562354]

What's going to happen when most of North America becomes uninhabitable?

[Anonymous No.15562356]

America will suddenly find an excuse to invade Canada where the amount of livable, arable land will massively increase rather than decrease.

[Anonymous No.15562373]

>>15562356
No, the "arable" land that becomes available in Canada will be a rocky and unproductive wasteland that will be expensive to bring into production.

[Anonymous No.15562374]

what's the best case scenario if yellowstone enters the chat?

[Anonymous No.15562377]

>>15562373
the canadian shield isn't just one big rock you know.

[Anonymous No.15562415]

>omg its hot in july!
>this never happened before!!
>how will ppl survive hot weather in july?
this kind of low effort trolling should be banned if /sci/ is to remain a high iq board

[Anonymous No.15562553]

>>15562377
No, it's a bunch of little rocks covered in unproductive dirt.

[Anonymous No.15562558]

>>15562415
This. Complaining about summer weather is childish behavior.

[Anonymous No.15562559]

>>15562553
HA! HAHAHA!

[Anonymous No.15562564]

>>15562559
Import some of it and try to grow anything on it

[Anonymous No.15562566]

>>15562415
>>this never happened before!!
Actually we just broke the record for hottest day ever several times last week. You're unironically right, this never happened before.

[Anonymous No.15562567]

>>15562553
and here I thought it was mostly covered in highly active boreal forest that will inevitably continue burning down as it gets hotter and dryer, leaving even more fertile ash behind

[Anonymous No.15562572]

[Anonymous No.15562576]

>>15562572
>125°F is a normal summer

[Anonymous No.15562577]

>>15562566
True, for a very limited definition of 'ever'.

[Anonymous No.15562578]

>>15562576
"Heat index forecast" lol

[Anonymous No.15562580]

>>15562576
>The heat index was developed in 1979 by Robert G. Steadman. Like the wind chill index, the heat index contains assumptions about the human body mass and height, clothing, amount of physical activity, individual heat tolerance, sunlight and ultraviolet radiation exposure, and the wind speed. Significant deviations from these will result in heat index values which do not accurately reflect the perceived temperature.

[Anonymous No.15562591]

>>15562564
I live here and study geochemistry dumbfuck, the entire middle of the country is incredibly fertile soil for plants like grasses and longer lived trees, just because the soil isn't being raped for basedbean and corn oil doesn't mean it's not plantable. Go talk about something you won't embarrass yourself about.

[Anonymous No.15562594]

>>15562553
Isn't that only true of the older right half? Parts of the country are still volcanically active.

[Anonymous No.15562595]

>>15562577
100,000 years.

[Anonymous No.15562596]

>>15562591
>Go talk about something you won't embarrass yourself about.
That's impossible for him to do, because Global Warmism only tricks people with sub-80 IQs.

[Anonymous No.15562599]

>>15562595
It's not even the hottest it's been in the last 100 years lol. Did people just forget the worldwide drought and famine of the 1930s?

[Anonymous No.15562603]

>>15562595
Did you mean 100.00?

[Anonymous No.15562639]

>>15562354
I don't know. I really wish they would do something about the nigger menace too.

[Anonymous No.15562651]

>>15562567
You are incorrect.

[Anonymous No.15562655]

>>15562599
>>15562603
No.

[Anonymous No.15562658]

>>15562591
Sure, kid.

[Anonymous No.15562660]

>>15562599
NASA wrote that out of the historical record
>Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.

[Anonymous No.15562666]

>>15562655

[Anonymous No.15562675]

>>15562660
Source for these two plots?

[Anonymous No.15562782]

>>15562675
they both come from nasa

[Anonymous No.15564061]

>>15562655
Can I see the sensor data from 90,000 years ago you are comparing it to?

[Anonymous No.15564113]

>>15562782
That's not a source. Provide a reference where I can actually find it. The name and date of a publication would allow me to find it. Or a URL. Or a DOI. Any instruction or information that brings me toward finding the plots in their original context would Be considered a source. Remember failing that term paper because you wrote "source: google"?

[Anonymous No.15564116]

>>15564061
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-are-past-temperatures/

[Anonymous No.15564127]

>>15564116
So where is all this 90,000 year old ice in the North America OP pictured where they would be getting ice cores that go back 90,000 years?

[Anonymous No.15564221]

>>15562354
You cant predict the future

[Anonymous No.15564235]

>>15564127
Greenland is in North America, but also the claim in >>15562655 was about global temperatures. You can reconstruct global averages from ice cores and other archives: https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/products/paleoclimatology
>Paleoclimatology data are derived from natural sources such as tree rings, ice cores, corals, stalagmites, and ocean and lake sediments.

[Anonymous No.15564240]

>>15564116
By counting the density in defrozen mammoth coprolites. Estimated margin of error=1000%

[Anonymous No.15564247]

>>15564240
>defrozen
Is that how you say it in Russian? Were all of your colleagues who spoke English killed in Ukraine?

[Anonymous No.15564254]

>>15564247
lets just say its not an exact science, and by not exact i mean completely random

[Anonymous No.15564265]

>>15564254
You can say that. It will show your ignorance and stupidity in case this wasn't clear from your grammar, but you can surely say that. It'd also be wrong.

[Anonymous No.15565021]

>>15564235
But how do you prove that those are accurate about past temperatures? What's the control? One of the big problems that had to be covered up in Climategate was that the tree ring and ice core data they used didn't track with measured records, meaning that their pre-historical data was false.

[Anonymous No.15565072]

>>15564235
And what are the error bars on those reconstructions? By how many orders of magnitude are they larger than the claimed "warming" trend?

[Anonymous No.15565083]

>>15564265
You cant determine what the temperature was anywhere on earth 90.000 years ago, or even 100 years ago.
None of the techniques used are scientific, they are just based on untested theories

[Anonymous No.15565159]

>>15562354
We turn the AC on and stay inside until Fall

[Anonymous No.15565162]

>>15562655
>63F is the hottest temperature in history
what is he trying to say?

[Anonymous No.15565163]

>>15562354
Georgia here. It's just another summer.

[Anonymous No.15565165]

>>15562354
somethings letting in more sunlight

[Anonymous No.15565169]

>>15565083
I love these comments that are short, make a wildly wrong claim without proof or nothing. I think it's highly efficient psy-op. It's quick to refute, but a hundred times quicker to compose. "Feet are not real and no scientist has ever proven the existence of feet" is a claim of that calibre. Id like to ask who pays for you, but your whole selling point is that you don't really engage. You shit on the floor and that's it.

[Anonymous No.15565174]

>>15562675
>>15562660
The reason why it "changes" is because the 2000 graph was made in 2000 when the year hadn't finished. The plot gets higher because it got hotter in the remainder of the year. It's all just smoke and mirrors using unfinalized graphs.

[Anonymous No.15565177]

>>15565174
*1999 graph
Notice how the 99 graph doesn't have a red line for the current year, because the year wasn't over yet and thus you couldn't compare a 5 year average. Fucking retard keeps posting the gif.

[Anonymous No.15565197]

>>15562354
they stop the HAARP arrays and take all the land for themselves

[Anonymous No.15565200]

>>15562580
>takes into account human body mass and individual heat tolerance
>everyone is obese
>obese people can't tolerate heat
>"um, scientifically, it will feel like 150 F°" (to these fat fucks)
>omit the "feels like" on your scary graphic with lots of red everywhere
>wala

[Anonymous No.15565214]

>>15562572
>don't look up, bro

[Anonymous No.15565221]

>>15565214
>its just like my hollywood movie

[Anonymous No.15565227]

>>15565169
Your post boils down to "he's wrong and I could prove it but I don't feel like it". You sound like a lifetime smoker who declares they can stop smoking anytime they want but just don't want to.

[Anonymous No.15565235]

>>15562354
well maybe if they stop weather modification this would stop happening, but no they want to create a “climate crisis”

[Anonymous No.15565394]

>>15565235
People asked about that in this thread >15562360 but for some reason nobody wants to answer.

[Anonymous No.15565396]

>>15565235
People asked about that in this thread >>15562360 but for some reason nobody wants to answer.

[Anonymous No.15565403]

>>15562354
These temperatures look perfectly normal across the country for July going as far back as I can remember. The only difference is they shifted the color of the scale to make it look a lot more red than it did 20+ years ago.

[Anonymous No.15565405]

>>15565403
They did this in Germany and in the UK as well to frighten people. Every year they make the summer graphics scarier and scarier even though temperatures are lower.

[Anonymous No.15565406]

>>15562576
>heat INDEX
That's just how hot it FEELS. Do you also look at the "feels like" temperature in the winter and declare we're entering a new ice age?

[Anonymous No.15565407]

>>15565406
Since the heat index is scaled to an assumption about average national BMI, as the population gets fatter the heat index rises.

[Anonymous No.15565410]

>>15565407
>the heat index is scaled to an assumption about average national BMI
Holy shit, what a fucking joke.

[Anonymous No.15565412]

>>15565410
See >>15562580

[Anonymous No.15565423]

>LA
>113
>Phoenix
>115

Why do people live there again?

[Anonymous No.15565425]

>>15565423
Phoenix is in an extremely fertile part of the state (a dry river valley) which was reclaimed from the desert by irrigation. Los Angeles is the same way but for unknown reasons the Federal Government paved over the entire Los Angeles River in concrete in the 50s, making it into a scorching wasteland that flushes all its water out to sea.