[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 244 KB, 1200x700, pillars_transformation_series_1200x700.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15558738 No.15558738 [Reply] [Original]

Why is this allowed? I spent my childhood believing in those colorful space pictures.

>> No.15558778
File: 400 KB, 1000x736, OrionNebula2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15558778

>>15558738
You know, some of that shit really is colorful. Here's a picture I took of the Orion Nebula through my own telescope.
I haven't fucked with the color.

>> No.15558816

>>15558738
Well that is kinda weird self own for being low IQ, you have eyes and can look up you know. More to the point I fail to see what the problem is. The color of space features has no bearing on life. Your knowledge on them won't be tested during your life nor will it have any impact anyhow. It's like complaining how a video game you have never played had a different color scheme in the 3rd level than you thought, simply asinine.

>> No.15558820

>>15558738
It helps demonstrate the form when you blast the contrast & colour like that. "We colourshifted and light adjusted the photo to look nicer" is never a fun disclaimer for kids either to be fair.

>> No.15558877 [DELETED] 

>>15558820
>thats not how it actually looks but its nicer to pretend anyway
that's not science

>> No.15558983
File: 9 KB, 259x195, images.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15558983

>>15558738
The spectral distribution is real, just wider than our lacking eyes
How false is the world you see if you put on thermal goggles? Those are usually only intensity based

>> No.15559030

>>15558778
how long did you have to expose the photo?

>> No.15559036

>>15558816
The sky color in Super Mario Bros was a unique color that was made with NTSC color decoding.
Therefor it appears slightly different on every CRT but most it importantly appears WRONG on new LCD TVs.

>> No.15559041

>>15558738
>Why is this allowed? I spent my childhood believing in those colorful space pictures
Then you are dumb af. Color doesn't exist, it is an subjective interpretation of a variation in wavelength.

>> No.15559042
File: 384 KB, 722x1199, 6be.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15559042

>>15558816
>Hey, why have the Elites constructed this false paradigm?

>WELLL WHY DO YOU CARE SWEATY? JUST DON'T THINK ABOUT IT AND NEVER QUESTION IT IN YOUR LIFE
>IT WON'T HURT YOU IF YOU JUST FUCKING BELIEVE THEM BLINDLY, YOU LOW IQ GORILLA-BRAINED CHUD

>> No.15559044
File: 1.43 MB, 4000x3000, IMG_20230127_003807.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15559044

>>15558778
Nice, I took this picture of the orion nebula with my phone through the eyepiece.
30 second exposure.

>> No.15559047

>>15559036
In other words crts were faulty by design and a certain color (that can be correctly displayed by lcd) were incorrectly displays by a crt monitor as some random shade of blue

>> No.15559123
File: 155 KB, 1041x1086, pillars_of_creation.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15559123

>>15558738
These are infrared measurements by the NIRCAM sensors. You color shift these according to each sensor wavelength and then compose these into a sngle image.

https://jwst-docs.stsci.edu/jwst-near-infrared-camera/nircam-instrumentation/nircam-filters

If you want a more realisic version you take Hubbe; that one uses measurements wthin our visible spectum.

These will always be post-worked on for the sake of selling a nice picture, like you would with any photographic work.

>> No.15559186

>>15558778
>>15559044
'Scopes apertures, please?

>> No.15559214

>>15558877
Pictures of space are not science, but I understand Redditors are generally confused about that.

>> No.15559339

>>15558738
>noo you're not allowed to gather information in different spectrums because I'm too retarded to understand them!!

>> No.15559417

>>15559042
>WHY ARENT THE PICTURES IN INFRARED AND RADIOWAVES?
Because you couldn't see shit then.

>> No.15559424

>>15558738
It isn't completely fake. They take several pictures with different filters, then use a different color for each when they put them together.

>> No.15559427

>>15558816
I can't see colors in the dark, only black and white. I think that nobody can.

>> No.15559429
File: 135 KB, 1000x850, 1689225904925.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15559429

>>15558738

>> No.15559431

>>15559047
NTSC had wide color gamut (similar to Adobe RGB). It had colors that can't be shown in sRGB.

>> No.15559434

>>15559041
>everything is subjective, so we can just tamper with all the evidence as much as we want

>> No.15559805

>>15559417

Therefore, could one not conclude that there is nothing there to see in the first place?

>> No.15559886

>>15559186
200mm f/5 >>15559044

>> No.15559898

>>15559805
Well, yes, there is "nothing to see" because infrareds and microwaves are not visible.

>> No.15559901

>>15559805
"Nothing to see" =/= "Nothing There."

>> No.15559902
File: 291 KB, 2370x1376, visual scientist.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15559902

>>15558738
https://youtu.be/UOLLMkAHHQI?t=2477

>> No.15559907
File: 322 KB, 1506x1068, 1686130325038616.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15559907

>>15559123
They are completely fake and gay CGI. Intelligence is feeding these former hollywood "artists" data which looks like this.

They are laughing at you science golems.

>> No.15559915

>>15559907
Gegi

>> No.15559918

>>15559907
YOU CANT ASK THIS OF ME. IT TOO HARD. I WANNA FIX IT FIRST. I KNOW HOW. I DID GET A SIGN ACROSS TODAY SO IT MIGHT OR MIGHT NOT BE GETTIN BETTAH. STOP DAT.

>> No.15559933

>>15558820
is the raw data accessible so that it could be reinterpreted

>> No.15559935

>>15559933
I don't think a majority of school age kids eyes light up at the thought of spreadsheets anon, you miss the point of that media; it's not meant to be perfectly accurate, that's years of school worth of knowledge, it's to be an approximation, and an interesting one for kids.

>> No.15559959
File: 1.63 MB, 3142x1694, Screenshot 2023-07-13 at 15.24.20.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15559959

>>15559933
https://mast.stsci.edu/portal/Mashup/Clients/Mast/Portal.html

Advanced Search
Filter on Mission: JWST; Instrument: NIRCAM/IMAGE; Proposal: 2739

That will give you the RAW image capture of JWST for the pillars of creation. Enjoy.

>> No.15559980
File: 222 KB, 3000x3000, 1623908559572.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15559980

>>15559935
https://youtu.be/UOLLMkAHHQI?t=2477
It's completely fake, outer space is a complete meme. All the information is out there but because of your mind-control you refuse to look into it and acknowledge the truth.

Turns out the golems prefer the sweet lies as opposed to the bitter truth.

>> No.15560007

Your image is misleading. Multiple monochrome images are merged into a colour image, just like how colour CCDs work.
>>15559935
The raw data is series of images.

>> No.15560008

>>15559980
Have you ever actually tried astrophotography yourself? Its quite achievable to confirm what the Pillars of Creation look like.

>> No.15560021

>>15559898
>>15559901

Sounds a lot like "new age" arguments to me.

>> No.15560148

>>15560008
Of course he hasn't.
He would rather watch a pastor on youtube tell him what's real or not than going outside and photograph the night sky for himself.
Ironic that he calls other people mind controlled golems.

>> No.15560172

>>15560021
Have you ever had an x-ray taken?

>> No.15560570
File: 678 KB, 1289x734, Screenshot.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15560570

>>15559907
>Eagle Nebula doesn't exist even though countless of amateur astronomers can photograph it from their backyard
Why are you denying reality?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TNRc50PFWZA

>> No.15561058
File: 1.01 MB, 4179x2899, orion_neb_v2_proc.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15561058

>>15558778
Here's my image of Orion, with some editing

>> No.15561079
File: 848 KB, 1885x2120, IMG_0185_ABE.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15561079

>>15561058
This is now an orion thread

>> No.15561084

>>15558738
NASA has "spent" Trillions of your taxpayer dollars. (pocketed) and continues to do so. They have to give the public something to ohhh and ahhh over, so it makes some pretty computer drawings.

>> No.15561087

>>15561084
Hey, NASA gave us Velcro, and for that alone they are OK in my book.

>> No.15561114

>>15561084
what percentage of the federal budget does nasa get?

>> No.15561127

>>15561114
however much it is, its far too much, nasa is a total waste, all the money goes to idiotic diversity hires these days

>> No.15561139

>>15558738
there's nothing wrong with it, you are just retarded

>> No.15561281

>>15559805
yes, just like when you close your eyes.

>> No.15562072

>>15561127
true, we should send the money to israel instead

>> No.15562100

>>15561127
Most of the money that goes to nasa goes back to research for secret services and weapons systems anyway.

>> No.15562124

>>15558738
Well pretty much all astrophotography of colorful nebulae is dishonestly enhanced by very long exposures + image stacking. While it does show what's "there", the reality is much dimmer and not anywhere near as pretty.