/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.15548802]

Is racism hard coded into the DNA of every living creature?

[Anonymous No.15548811]

nobody likes niggers. not ants, nobody.

[Anonymqus No.15548818]

>>15548802
ants are literally communists

[Anonymous No.15548822]

>>15548802
In ants it works through pheromones. Every ant releases pheromones associated with their colony.

[Anonymous No.15548844]

>>15548818
No they are not. They are socialist. National Socialist to be precise.

[Anonymous No.15548882]

>>15548802
Yes, specially the ones that live under harsh darwinian conditions and struggle to survive.
They don't have time for irrational and emotional crap.You can't brainfuck such organisms into accepting apathy and self destruction, they will rip you apart before you even try.
If you as an individual think that prioritising your in-group's survival and triumph is le heckin Nazism (as in a bad/naughty thing) then it's already over for both (you and your in-group).
Also people that don't identify with an in-group aren't individualistic (or intelligent), forming functional groups and society is a sign of higher Intellectual capacity across. Such people are mostly dishonest and in rare cases retarded.

[Anonymous No.15548891]

The Nazism Question is one of the biggest IQ tests of our time, if you as individual think that the underlying purpose and thought behind Nazism is inherently bad, you are low IQ easily influenced emotional person and can't think critically or rationally, you probably don't even have an inner dialogue or deep thought about anything else either, in short you are a NPC.
I would like to add a disclaimer, I don't mean total fanboy tier allegiance to Hitler or any thing like that, I am talking about principles, there are endless objective criticisms of Hitler, his party etc.

[Anonymous No.15548916]

>>15548802
ethnocentric preference is the strongest predictor of long term reproductive success

[Anonymous No.15548919]

>>15548818
No, ants are drug addicts mass mind controlled by their mother

[Anonymous No.15548921]

>>15548882
>>15548891
>harsh darwinian conditions and struggle to survive.
So anyone who isn't a Nazi should, by Darwinian principles, be wiped out (by evolution/nature, of course not talking about genocide)? A species that abandons Hitlers ideas and accepts apathy and self destruction deserves, by natures evolutionary darwinian principles, to be replaced by those that don't? Just asking to make sure. Because I feel like that might not be the point you're trying to make.
>Also people that don't identify with an in-group aren't individualistic (or intelligent)
Is it possible to identify with a larger in-group than Hitler did? Is it possible to identify with the entire species as an in-group, or do you absolutely HAVE to limit yourself to people that Hitler limited himself to in order to be intelligent? Just making sure I understood you correctly. Because I feel like I might not have.

[Anonymous No.15548931]

>>15548802
There are certain truths which stand out so openly on the roadsides of life, as it were, that every passer-by may see them. Yet, because of their very obviousness, the general run of people disregard such truths or at least they do not make them the object of any conscious knowledge. People are so blind to some of the simplest facts in every-day life that they are highly surprised when somebody calls attention to what everybody ought to know. Examples of The Columbus Egg lie around us in hundreds of thousands; but observers like Columbus are rare.

Walking about in the garden of Nature, most men have the self-conceit to think that they know everything; yet almost all are blind to one of the outstanding principles that Nature employs in her work. This principle may be called the inner isolation which characterizes each and every living species on this earth.

Even a superficial glance is sufficient to show that all the innumerable forms in which the life-urge of Nature manifests itself are subject to a fundamental law—one may call it an iron law of Nature—which compels the various species to keep within the definite limits of their own life-forms when propagating and multiplying their kind. Each animal mates only with one of its own species. The titmouse cohabits only with the titmouse, the finch with the finch, the stork with the stork, the field-mouse with the field-mouse, the house-mouse with the house-mouse, the wolf with the she-wolf, etc.

[Anonymous No.15548932]

>>15548931
Deviations from this law take place only in exceptional circumstances. This happens especially under the compulsion of captivity, or when some other obstacle makes procreative intercourse impossible between individuals of the same species. But then Nature abhors such intercourse with all her might; and her protest is most clearly demonstrated by the fact that the hybrid is either sterile or the fecundity of its descendants is limited. In most cases hybrids and their progeny are denied the ordinary powers of resistance to disease or the natural means of defence against outer attack.

Such a dispensation of Nature is quite logical. Every crossing between two breeds which are not quite equal results in a product which holds an intermediate place between the levels of the two parents. This means that the offspring will indeed be superior to the parent which stands in the biologically lower order of being, but not so high as the higher parent. For this reason it must eventually succumb in any struggle against the higher species. Such mating contradicts the will of Nature towards the selective improvements of life in general. The favourable preliminary to this improvement is not to mate individuals of higher and lower orders of being but rather to allow the complete triumph of the higher order. The stronger must dominate and not mate with the weaker, which would signify the sacrifice of its own higher nature. Only the born weakling can look upon this principle as cruel, and if he does so it is merely because he is of a feebler nature and narrower mind; for if such a law did not direct the process of evolution then the higher development of organic life would not be conceivable at all.

[Anonymous No.15548933]

>>15548932
This urge for the maintenance of the unmixed breed, which is a phenomenon that prevails throughout the whole of the natural world, results not only in the sharply defined outward distinction between one species and another but also in the internal similarity of characteristic qualities which are peculiar to each breed or species. The fox remains always a fox, the goose remains a goose, and the tiger will retain the character of a tiger. The only difference that can exist within the species must be in the various degrees of structural strength and active power, in the intelligence, efficiency, endurance, etc., with which the individual specimens are endowed. It would be impossible to find a fox which has a kindly and protective disposition towards geese, just as no cat exists which has a friendly disposition towards mice.

That is why the struggle between the various species does not arise from a feeling of mutual antipathy but rather from hunger and love. In both cases Nature looks on calmly and is even pleased with what happens. The struggle for the daily livelihood leaves behind in the ruck everything that is weak or diseased or wavering; while the fight of the male to possess the female gives to the strongest the right, or at least, the possibility to propagate its kind. And this struggle is a means of furthering the health and powers of resistance in the species. Thus it is one of the causes underlying the process of development towards a higher quality of being.

[Anonymous No.15548938]

>>15548933
If the case were different the progressive process would cease, and even retrogression might set in. Since the inferior always outnumber the superior, the former would always increase more rapidly if they possessed the same capacities for survival and for the procreation of their kind; and the final consequence would be that the best in quality would be forced to recede into the background. Therefore a corrective measure in favour of the better quality must intervene. Nature supplies this by establishing rigorous conditions of life to which the weaker will have to submit and will thereby be numerically restricted; but even that portion which survives cannot indiscriminately multiply, for here a new and rigorous selection takes place, according to strength and health.

[Anonymous No.15548941]

>>15548938
If Nature does not wish that weaker individuals should mate with the stronger, she wishes even less that a superior race should intermingle with an inferior one; because in such a case all her efforts, throughout hundreds of thousands of years, to establish an evolutionary higher stage of being, may thus be rendered futile.

History furnishes us with innumerable instances that prove this law. It shows, with a startling clarity, that whenever Aryans have mingled their blood with that of an inferior race the result has been the downfall of the people who were the standard-bearers of a higher culture. In North America, where the population is prevalently Teutonic, and where those elements intermingled with the inferior race only to a very small degree, we have a quality of mankind and a civilization which are different from those of Central and South America. In these latter countries the immigrants—who mainly belonged to the Latin races—mated with the aborigines, sometimes to a very large extent indeed. In this case we have a clear and decisive example of the effect produced by the mixture of races. But in North America the Teutonic element, which has kept its racial stock pure and did not mix it with any other racial stock, has come to dominate the American Continent and will remain master of it as long as that element does not fall a victim to the habit of adulterating its blood.

In short, the results of miscegenation are always the following:

(a) The level of the superior race becomes lowered;

(b) physical and mental degeneration sets in, thus leading slowly but steadily towards a progressive drying up of the vital sap.

The act which brings about such a development is a sin against the will of the Eternal Creator. And as a sin this act will be avenged.

[Anonymous No.15548942]

>>15548941
Man's effort to build up something that contradicts the iron logic of Nature brings him into conflict with those principles to which he himself exclusively owes his own existence. By acting against the laws of Nature he prepares the way that leads to his ruin.

[Anonymous No.15548946]

Hope that answers your question, OP

[Anonymous No.15548948]

>>15548802
There was an interesting essay from chat GPT around release where it was a bit more insightful, it basically said that racism is just a word that we use for tribalism, and yes tribalism is very much the MO of every species, it's us against them.

[Anonymous No.15549032]

>>15548802
Fascists are bugmen, confirmed by /sci/

[Anonymous No.15549095]

>>15548802

Why do Niggers see EVERYTHING in terms of race? Literally EVERYTHING

[Anonymous No.15549459]

>>15548802
Racism as a thought crime is a communist meme, its the most natural thing in the world to favor your family and other relations over strangers. Failure to do so is a tipoff of mental illness

[Anonymous No.15549467]

>>15548916
This is true. The most successful mating strategy in nature is to mate with those of a similar phenotype since that phenotype has been successful in your given environment. The risk of less genetic diversity is outweighed by the fact that your phenotype has a long history of being 'succesful'.
>>15548802
Racism is hard-coded. Stereotypes allow us to make quick decisions and avoid processing overload. Having a natural inclination towards people with similar appearance allowed our ancestors to form cohesive societies before language emerged. It's one of the foundational human drives that birthed civilization.
That said, it's very human to try to overcome nature - including our own. Imagine if we could harness the intellectual power of every human. Our overall productivity would be maximized. This would require us to actively quell our natural tendencies, but the material benefit may be worth it if it means we can see a more rapid pace of technological advancement and our societies remain cohesive.

[Anonymous No.15549484]

>>15548818
>>15548844
this. communist parties have never established communism: they only did sosialism.

marx and lenin were pussies compared to bakunin.

[Anonymous No.15549512]

>>15548802
Yes, stay on reddit.

[Anonymous No.15549515]

>>15548941
>>15548942
>anthropomorphizing nature
Lmao pseuds

[Afro Saxon No.15549562]

>>15548802
>>15548811
>>15549095
Why you bring up Blacks when they didn't made or commented that thread?

[Anonymous No.15549567]

>>15549562
It's a conversation about racism, and blacks obviously are the main victim of it seeing as everyone else hates them

[Anonymous No.15549594]

>>15548802
Sometimes they fight, sometimes they cooperate
forexample Canines and Sapiens used to be hostile towards each other untill they got used to each other enough to become friendly dogs for humans, i dont see any reason why ants would only fight since their history is long

[Afro Saxon No.15549599]

>>15549567
But it has nothing to do with just Blacks it talks about racism in general.

[Anonymous No.15549811]

>>15549562
>Blacks
Don't you dare capitalize that shit. In this household we write ₕlacks to show the proper amount of respect.
>>15549567
>victim
that presumes they did nothing to deserve the treatment

[Anonymous No.15549981]

>>15548802
Sort of? You could apply the same logic to ethnicity too which arguably has more a more concrete basis and impact worldwide. Fuck, many of our current nations are the results of people fucking each other. Humans just love to fuck just as much as they love their tribalism. If there's any kind of interactions between two groups, there will be inevitable mixing. Whether that be war or trade. Tribalism going goes beyond race and it happened plenty of times in Europe, Asia, and Africa.

[Anonymous No.15549999]

>>15548802
no, humans have coexisted for a long time before race science became a thing
not to say that genocides and discrimination didn't happen, but it's not hard coded in us

[Anonymous No.15550003]

>>15548891
kill yourself

[Anonymous No.15550108]

well, if tigers tried to fuck hippos, and giraffes zebras, then no species would be propagated. Thus, a sense of self, which you call racism, is necessary for any species to continue.

[Anonymous No.15550264]

>>15550108
Humans can do it and have done it for a long time. The only urge as strong as or stronger than tribalism is the urge to fuck.

[Anonymous No.15550266]

Ants kill each other even if they're from the same race.
So basically they're communist and not national socialist

[Anonymous No.15550571]

>>15550264
scientists fuck dogs

[Anonymous No.15551038]

I love me some black hoodrats bruh. Yall don no where tha juice tha cream of the crop tha skin of tha fried chicken tha squeeze of tha watermelon be at nigga's shhhiiieeetttt!!!!
You be thinking that shit be at these fly ass latinx bitches? Nah dawg! I let yall in on a lil secret that real looking for daddy looking for a pimp ass hoe's can be found in tha hood. Yall nigga's be trippin fr fr bbc days are done goofed. These hoe's need a real straight nigga in they life you feel me? Its all about that aryanlicious ivory dick down these days. Hoe's need stability of a aryan kang showing them the game ya hear? Yo oompa loompa lil black dick can't satisfy a real melanated queen like a white power brother can. Every black slut deserves that creamy reparation of her massa

[Anonymous No.15551096]

>>15548802
>Is racism hard coded into the DNA of every living creature?
Yes, that's why people who try to believe they are not inherently racist, all become schizos, since it goes against their genetics.

[Anonymous No.15551109]

>>15548891
>be might-is-right ideology
>every nazi regime in history failed spectacularly
It doesn't matter what I personally think, social darwinism itself shows Nazism to be unfit for survival.

[Anonymous No.15551590]

>>15548802
Hopefully

[Anonymous No.15551794]

>>15549567
But anon everyone else is a victim of negro racism, that's why they hate them.

[Anonymous No.15551798]

>>15551096
Wasn't MLK basically just groomed into his position by jewish activists, they even wrote his thesis and speeches at the same time he was gangbanging members of his congregation?

[Anonymous No.15551799]

>>15548802

[Anonymous No.15551865]

>>15551109
Germany and Italy
>140 million people
>4.4 million square km of land
Britain, France, and Russia
>800 million people
>69 million square km of land

I dunno man. They punched above their weight for 6 years straight and directly caused the collapse of the British and French empires. They didn't win, but they didn't lose either. Also the Italians were useless, so the European theatre was literally Germany plus dead weight fighting against an enemy 10x more populous and 100x bigger.

[Anonymous No.15551932]

>>15551865
>but they didn't lose either
This is some boomer tier "we won in vietnam shit". Germany is still occupied and getting shafted by Washington DC to this very day.
The absolute fucking ground state of Wehraboos.

[Anonymous No.15551948]

>>15549567
being black is a very big experience indeed, imagine being hated by the world, at least i might aswell enjoy the hate

[Anonymous No.15552567]

>>15551798
Everything the schools and MSM say about MLK is a lie

[Anonymous No.15552807]

>nooooo!!!! racism is le bad!!!
>i know because i saw it on tv and in the mooooooovies