[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 360 KB, 1405x868, mc301.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15534089 No.15534089 [Reply] [Original]

This started off after I saw a documentary on Bob Lazar. Hear me out.
He stated that what these ufos ran on was element 115. Now, it's been a lot of years and we know of 115's (aka Moscovium) properties.
It's half life is so short it would be unusable for anything. So for idle curiosity I thought I'd look up if there was any stable-ish isotopes.
Fell down the rabbit hole called particle physics and I think it may be possible to have more or less semi-stable neutron heavy isotopes of heavier elements.
That being said, I don't think it's currently possible to make these, unless we could smash 3 particles together simultaneously.

Thoughts?

>> No.15534092
File: 471 KB, 1682x968, KTUY.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15534092

KTUY Graph

>> No.15535319

>>15534089
>Bob Lazar

>> No.15535655

>>15534089
Bob Lazar called it Element 115, but actually, if he was telling the truth.
Then they misidentified it as Element 115 and it was actually an isotope of Element 116.

On the isle of stability projections, element 116 should have a much more isle stable isotope, than 115 physically even could.
So unless there is an additional emergent property of 115 that we don't know about, then it is highly likely he was actually referring to samples of a 116 isotope.

>> No.15535662

>>15535655
>uhm, ackshyully it was uh... The next one!
>Mhm! Not that one, yep!
>What do you mean it wasn't the next one? I MEANT the one AFTER THAT!

>> No.15535681

>>15535655
Why specifically 116? 114 also has more isotopes that can be in the stable range

>> No.15536928
File: 61 KB, 940x1024, 1636133539217.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15536928

>>15534089
>unless we could smash 3 particles together simultaneously.
Maybe blow up a bunch of nukes on the moon and sift all the dirt? Like you'd need thousands of nukes but i think its doable

>> No.15536998

>>15534089
So smart people I was taking to my friend about traps for smart people and this is an example. It's like the 1≠.9… threads. >>15535319 might be higher or lower IQ but he did the reasonable thing.