/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.15489608]

Can a ridiculously intelligent person singlehandedly invent something that will revolutionize the world or is science/engineering too advanced in this day and age?

[Anonymous No.15489613]

>>15489608
>Can a ridiculously intelligent person singlehandedly invent something that will revolutionize the world
Yes

[Anonymous No.15489618]

>>15489608
If it’s actually pretty simple to create and it was overlooked or originally too expensive

[Cult of Passion No.15489620]

>>15489608
Yes but it can be used for evil/weaponry purposes and Id rather die with it in my head than hand it to demons.

[Anonymous No.15489650]

>>15489608
The truth is no. Although a single person can make really important discoveries, even the smartest man is very limited in terms of how much information he can acquire and process. This is why working in teams has become increasingly common, division of labour is more efficient.

[Anonymous No.15490655]

>>15489650
What is the upper limit to the information one man can have? How much of that information can be processed?

[Anonymous No.15490662]

>>15489608
not really. somebody will pick on that up on the way and will attach to you. by the time what you do is useful it's under a corporation worth billions.

[Anonymous No.15490913]

>>15489608
Pretty much all inventions were single person efforts (supported by earlier discoveries and apprentices doing tedious work).

[Anonymous No.15490916]

>>15489608
Only those who serve God can. Those who serve Lucifer like soientists can only leech off the works of servants of God.

[Anonymous No.15490932]

>>15489620
>Id
Kek

[Anonymous No.15490934]

>>15489608
Hopefully some kind of weapon to brutally torture and kill all the "elites" and their spawn.

[Anonymous No.15491055]

>>15489608
Yes. All things that change the world are very simple, fundamentally. But you need to have the intelligence to imagine how useful complexity can arise from it.

Simple idea: transistors and binary/boolean logic
Useful complexity that arises: computers, mobile phones, all digital electronics

Simple idea: activation function + gradient descent/back propogation
Useful complexity: ai

Simple idea: sell money with interest
Useful complexity: inevitably own everything in the world

[Anonymous No.15491057]

>>15489620
iktfb

[Anonymous No.15491070]

>>15489608
No, inventing is done with your brain not hands

[Anonymous No.15491078]

>>15489608
Yes, but moderns are dysgenic idiots who have to cope with the superiority of belle époque gigabrains by pretending that the cornucopia of important inventions put out by individual, extremely prolific geniuses were "low-hanging fruit".

[Anonymous No.15491241]

>>15489650
the smarts come from acquiring insights, all kinds of processing/acquiring can obviously be delegated to algorithms

[Anonymous No.15491289]

>>15489608
Inventions aren't a single person thing anymore. Its done by funding from large companies/schools/institutions, with groups of people focusing on a ways to path towards innovation. Then the company/schools/institutions sell that to another company or they directly turn those ideas into reality by innovating them at scale. Thats the modern day genius.

[Anonymous No.15491608]

>>15490655
That's a good question.

[Anonymous No.15491721]

>>15489650
>This is why working in teams has become increasingly common, division of labour is more efficient.
Explain if its possible to emulate a very smart person with a team of midwits. I hope theres some algorithm to achieve that, even if at a very low efficiency (say, you may need 10 100 IQ to emulate a 110 IQ person and 100 people to emulate a 120 IQ, and so on)

[Anonymous No.15491732]

>>15491289
those teams are almost always one smart guy that actually invents things while everyone else is a npc cog in the machine thats only input in the project is the paint job

look at Jim Keller, dude bounced around Apple, AMD, Intel and every time his architectures and projects are the best. Apple, Intel, and AMD are all literally so close in performance/watt because all of their current archs were touched by Jims hands

[Anonymous No.15491737]

>>15491732
I'm not denying there aren't mavericks leading the charge, but its lot more than that. Furthermore, there's a difference in genius level, there's genius idea guy and genius innovation guy. The former is easier than latter. While Jim Keller is a very smart dude and maybe considered the best in the industry, he's not the execution genius as he has no real show for that. Execution guys are top level stuff and with multiple track records. And thats the modern genius thats celebrated.

[Anonymous No.15491774]

>>15491289
>Inventions aren't a single person thing anymore
Nah they can be collaborative like bouncing ideas off each other for example, there is just ALOT of bullshit when money and credit are involved.

[Anonymous No.15491790]

>>15491721
Dunno, but it's probably beside the point. The thing about division of labour is that it allows people to specialize in its own thing. So while 10 midwits won't amount to a genius, a genius giving the midwit work to midwits will probably achieve more than if he was to do everything by himself. Even today, most innovative research is concentrated in a few companies and universities because of their RA armies under a few really smart guys.

[Anonymous No.15491887]

>>15489608
No. I've had professors tell me that this isn't the case point blank.

Even "simple" stuff like discovering plate tectonics requires large teams of people working for years and years. Sure you can point to the "person who discovered it", but it is ignorant to ignore all the contributions of everyone else.

How many legitimate scientific papers are written with just one author? I don't recall seeing any. Even the transformer model which kicked off the AI revolution was created by a team of people (Vaswani et al).

If you believe that someone can be a real life Tony Stark or Lex Luthor, you are watching too many movies and TV shows. People can't do crazy super science stuff.

Discoveries/inventions these days are too complex for the world to have another super-inventor or discoverer like Westinghouse or Einstein. For example, a single military submarine requires 35 million labor hours to design. That's almost 4000 years of work total (with computers!). Imagine how long it would take to design something like an Iron Man suit - Tony Stark would have to be immortal to design and built it singlehandedly!

Things are too complex for people to singlehandedly revolutionize the world anymore. That's why real scientists are specialized, and work in teams. It's also why technological progress is slowing down: it was easier to discover things back when we had discovered less. The low-hanging fruit has been picked, so people can't singlehandedly revolutionize the world anymore.

[Anonymous No.15491902]

>>15489608
With AI yes.

[Anonymous No.15492049]

>>15489608
Maybe if they're made through embryo editing

[Anonymous No.15492053]

>>15489608

[Anonymous No.15492065]

>>15489608
Yes but veto unlikely and would most likely come from a small group of people just through conversations

[Anonymous No.15492086]

>>15491790
>The thing about division of labour is that it allows people to specialize in its own thing. S
You cant divide thinking and learning across a team
You cant ask a team of 50 people to take each a single class in college so you collectively graduate after 1 semester

[Anonymous No.15492109]

>>15489608
That is the ONLY way that scientific advancements are made. I'm not talking about little iterative improvements on existing principles and processes. I'm referring to the great leaps forward made by true geniuses.
Real cutting-edge scientific and engineering advancements are not made in corporate laboratories. They're made by independently wealthy autists in a basement or garage.

[Anonymous No.15492111]

>>15491289
>t. never worked in a corporate lab
See >>15492109

[Anonymous No.15492148]

>>15489608
>Can a ridiculously intelligent person singlehandedly invent something that will revolutionize the world or is science/engineering too advanced in this day and age?
Yes.
Some people attribute the lack of invention to some kind of IQ decline, they're simply looking at the number of inventions over the centuries and seeing the number reduce. Most invention comes from incremental upgrades of already world changing tech, like electric lights for example.
The actual problem with invention is what device do you need?
So, it's not actually intelligence that is the problem in my opinion.

[Anonymous No.15492355]

>>15492053
fuck off foreners (former German nobility)
t. Newton

[Anonymous No.15493957]

>>15491887
>No. I've had professors tell me that this isn't the case point blank.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_de_Broglie
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_Josephson

[Anonymous No.15493983]

>>15491902
you could remove a lot of people you'd need to work with, with AI, you'd still need resources (specifically money). there's shit to buy so you can build various shit. of-course this depends on what exactly you want to do.
but AI can cut a lot of that shit noise you get when other people are involved.

[Anonymous No.15494021]

>>15489608
Who was that rich aristocrat guy who was all tutored and privately education and basically discovered electricity and all its laws before anyone else, but didn't give a shit about proving himself or peer review and didn't publish and most of it was lost until the laws of electricity were formalized later for the public by people like Maxwell, Faraday, and Ohm?

[Anonymous No.15494024]

>>15491289
let me guess, you believe in the low hanging fruit explanation for rate of invention creation slowing down

[Anonymous No.15494031]

>>15491887
issue is that it takes teams of smart people. You can't do the same with a thousand average intelligence guys. This means that if our genetic component of intelligence drops, we are headed for proportionally big trouble.

1880s IQ was about 15 points more than our current. That means where a modern school teacher has 115 points, one from the 1880s had 130. Huge difference.

[Anonymous No.15494040]

>>15489608
>Can a ridiculously intelligent person singlehandedly invent something that will revolutionize the world
Of course. I already have multiple times.

[Anonymous No.15494262]

>>15489608
If they did, they would be assassinated and their invention discredited and buried. See: all the people who allegedly invented water-based engines or ridiculously efficient carburetors who went on to have mysterious deaths.

[Anonymous No.15494264]

>>15494262
>allegedly invented water-based engines
bro water has a lower energy state than hydrogen and oxygen have separated. what exactly do you think you can get out of water, without energy input, and what would you be even left with?
you can't possibly not understand this and be here.

[Anonymous No.15494265]

yes

pic related

[Anonymous No.15494267]

yes

[Anonymous No.15494703]

>>15489608

Depends on what you call an invention. Simply coming up with an idea is not enough to call it 'yours'. And to properly flesh out an idea requires a full team of experts.
So yeah these anons are right >>15489650 >>15491289

[Anonymous No.15494740]

>>15489608
Yes. Try and find a ridiculously intelligent person though...

[Anonymous No.15494743]

>>15494031
>issue is that it takes teams of smart people. You can't do the same with a thousand average intelligence guys.
Is this true? Is there no way to organize teams to somehow mimic high intelligence beyond splitting work among many people?

[Anonymous No.15494949]

>>15494743
You need many people because the modern genius isn't just about "inventing" stuff, its about making these inventions become real and mass producing them at scale so that everyone can see your magic. Once it becomes ubiquitous, then it will seem mundane to everyone. Which is where the real magic lies. How someone can make a seemingly new invention into a mass produced mundane stuff and how fast they can make that happen.

[Anonymous No.15494958]

>>15489608
bitcoin

[Anonymous No.15495035]

>>15489608
Invent, yes. But to make in an actual innovation and not only a drawing in your sketchbook, for that you need other people (communication is whole other set of skills you need to have than those you need to master to actually invent something worthy. Thus it's natural to want a supporting person who believes in your success, be it a wife or a friend or even a parent, other investors want to see a working prototype first)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MrWiP23Tlwk

[Anonymous No.15495043]

>>15495035
well a person could opensource their invention. so they could theoretically invent something that could revolutionize the world, all by themselves.
take my advice: if it's something that big, you're better off opensourcing it and maybe write a book or something so you get out something out of it. the gazillion of cash you dream about come with strings that you have no clue about. and not so high chances as you might hope of becoming the next zucc. and that could delay your invention, by quite a lot, or maybe even completely bury it.

[Anonymous No.15495066]

>>15495043
Fair. I opensource a lot. I only moderately share the one big shot I want to have as my own next big thing.
I think we should have an idea-sharing service, where people can both share their inventions and find potential startups (my guess is people who like an idea will not want to cut off the mind which brought it to the world) here, see, another idea of something potentially multi-billion in ad revenue or I am clueless about monetization of these things.

[Anonymous No.15495081]

>>15494262
do people actually believe this

[Cult of Passion No.15495111]

>>15495081
I have received death threats about some of my works, mostly towards other people because threatening me wasnt very effdctive. If you "dont believe" this shit then youre a fucking nobody who thinks everyone is a nobody like them.

Not everyone is a lazy two-bit piece of shit that did nothing with their lives.

[Anonymous No.15495163]

>>15489608
Tell me how a single person can design and build something like Starship.

[Cult of Passion No.15495194]

>>15495163
Tesla didnt quarry the metal to build his devices. Your rationale leads to Obama saying "You used a road so your invention is mine."

Solving the equation to allow for it to happen is good enough in most cases.

[Anonymous No.15495223]

>>15495111
i dont believe you are an important person

[Cult of Passion No.15495242]

>>15495223
Oh course not, you think of yourself as a somebody and everyone else is like you; a loser, but since your feelings hold more value than other's you now inately feel superior while having nothing to show for it.

Youre a simple mind to calculate and reverse engineer. See the world before talking about it.

[Anonymous No.15495321]

>>15495242
I feel honored to share a board with someone so important that would spend some of their precious and priceless time on responding to me, a lowly and irrelevant poster. All I can say is... thank you. This is an emotional moment for me

[Cult of Passion No.15495325]

>>15495321
>spend some of their precious and priceless time on responding to me, a lowly and irrelevant poster
Youre writting your own destiny with your self denigration.

Humility stops being a virtue when your own virtue steps aside to the evil ways of this world.

[Anonymous No.15495330]

>>15495242
I don't believe you have seen the world, that is not the world, it is a computer generated image.

[Anonymous No.15495363]

>>15489608
>Can a ridiculously intelligent person singlehandedly invent something that will revolutionize the world
Yes, I can.
The question is whether the world deserves to receive my innovations. I'm thinking they'll just use them to cause even more problems.

[Anonymous No.15495374]

>>15490916
>Only those who serve God can. Those who serve Lucifer like soientists can only leech off the works of servants of God.
Based and truth-pilled!

[Anonymous No.15495459]

>>15495363
That is why you have to be in charge of them.
The question is whether you're capable of that mission.

[Anonymous No.15496561]

>>15489608
Can we say that haruhi-anon did a minor revolution?

[Anonymous No.15496570]

>>15489608
They can, but what is more likely to happen is that they do invent something and a company purchases the patent and sits on it for all eternity.

[Anonymous No.15496664]

>>15489608
I believe there are alternate mathematics which would be revolutionary to us and its only waiting to be discoevered by a sufficiently schizo person
Non midwits will say such a thing isnt possible but thats because they have fallen victim to their own intellect

[Jealous No.15496706]

>>15489608
>singlehandedly invent something that will revolutionize the world

[Anonymous No.15496768]

Yes. Picture related.

[Anonymous No.15496799]

>>15496768
> based aryan breeder
What did he invent?

[Anonymous No.15496824]

>>15494024
I believe it was mostly a cultural shift that slowed it down

[Anonymous No.15496836]

>>15491732
>Jim Keller,


>Jim Keller's wife, Bonnie,[29] is the sister of Canadian author and clinical psychologist Jordan Peterson.[30]

[Anonymous No.15496923]

>>15495081
Where do you think you are?

[Anonymous No.15496927]

>>15489608
What is crispr

[Anonymous No.15496928]

>>15496706
He's still at it

[Anonymous No.15496931]

>>15496799
Idk but he sure knows how to capitalize on basedence goys and brainless investors

[Anonymous No.15497180]

[Anonymous No.15497230]

>>15496570
>a company purchases the patent and sits on it for all eternity.
You know a patent normally only lasts 20 years? So if you don't use it, you lose control after 20 years. Also, patents are territorial and few apply for patent world wide, so there will be countries where it will ot be filed and terefore be used.
Last but not least, in many countries you are allowed to use patented technology for learning and experimentation as long as it is non-commercial.

[Anonymous No.15497241]

>>15497230
hahaha oh wow, a soience faggot with no experience or education presumes it knows how law works. how cute, and how completely unusual

[Anonymous No.15497248]

>>15497180
>me, a humble sci-fi reviewer
I have seen a lot of garbage but I cannot remember to have seen garbage with pomposity level this high.

[Anonymous No.15497251]

>>15497241
Oh, I like to think I have an idea how it works. Care to point out any problems?

[Anonymous No.15497266]

>>15497180
speaking of narcissism...

[Anonymous No.15497362]

>>15496836
What the fuck

[Cult of Passion No.15497370]

>>15497362
DOMINANCE. HEIRARCHY.

...now go back to your sullied penis, serf.

[Anonymous No.15497377]

>>15494031
>1880s IQ was about 15 points more than our current. That means where a modern school teacher has 115 points, one from the 1880s had 130. Huge difference.

Is that normalized though? The test to be smart in 1880 would be much easier, so with a modern IQ of 100 you'd get a much higher score.

[Anonymous No.15497382]

>>15489608
I don't know man. My experience is that insights and those tiny (or big) shifts in perspective or understanding is what shifts technological advancement.

The more people are present, and worse if they're relatively midwitted, then getting to a 'different' and novel perspective or something that's profound and deep gets more and more difficult, because one person puts something on the table, and then the next modifies it and this keeps going until the original idea or train of thought has totally faded.

It's like having different colored clay or playdoh, You cna have one color and make something of it, but the more colors you add, the more of a brown dab amalgamation it becomes.

A genius can moderate and guide their own thought process to get to that new piece of understanding or insight. If you have a true genius in a team of relatively dumber people, the dumber people overthrow the genius of single thoughts and comments.

TL;DR: let geniuses be geniuses and od their thing, don't disrupt it with 'let's be together' teamwork.

[Cult of Passion No.15497383]

>>15497377
I...actually would believe it to be correct. With mass media people can offload mental working to others and save themselves energy for bong rips and Rick and Morty, reddit, wiki, google...why think Mathematically when everyone has calculators in their pockets?

People watch Neill D. Tyson and believe themselves a partial Physicst...because Neill is the braincell to their body. Collective intelligence is cellular intelligence.

[Anonymous No.15497388]

>>15497383
So you're saying that in 1880 people were really smarter? It seems a bit odd to me. Okay, now I think about it, we used ot be smarter because we had to do everything ourselves with our own brains, but now we have all those tools.

Thing is, those tools keep dumb people dumb but allows them to do smart things that are above their paygrade which they normally wouldn't do, but would still be under the caliber real smart people operate. On the other hand, those tools make it easier for smart people to offload the busywork (who the fuck wants to manually calculate equations when you can put put it into a calculator) and rely on the outcomes and be faster in being smart. Meaning, they know what's happening under the hood of the tools so they're just using it to make their being smart faster.

[Cult of Passion No.15497439]

>>15497388
And instead of using that "free time" created by offloading mental work, they just sit back and enjoy nachos and Game of Thrones while feeling like the genius that created it.

Try to talk to people here about Number Theory and you'll get tons of pushback because "We learned that in elementary school." not realizing its far deeper of a concept that 1+1=2 "Arith-metic" (as Norman Wildberger would say).

[Anonymous No.15497552]

>>15497439
>And instead of using that "free time" created by offloading mental work, they just sit back and enjoy nachos and Game of Thrones while feeling like the genius that created it.

When you say this, are you talking about the genius or the midwit? Because when I said 'offload', I meant that the genius doesn't have to do the menial smart tasks anymore.

[Anonymous No.15497564]

>>15489608
They can't because anyone who upsets the system put in place by the jewish organized crime lords will be targeted and ultimately eliminated

[Cult of Passion No.15497573]

>>15497552
Midwits. Geniuses simply load on another task instead of creating free time for dumb shit like living hand to mouth and mindless entertainment.

>menial smart tasks
Oximoronic phrase, as soon as it can be done with a device its not "smart" anymore because idiots can do it too. Geniuses do what is hard, not what everyone else can do, because then they wouldnt be genius, they would be mediocre.

[Anonymous No.15497621]

>>15497564

Thank you Terry, it's good to see a real person comment here.

[Anonymous No.15498176]

>>15497377
The data from back then is just things that correlate strongly with g like reaction time.
https://sci-hub.se/10.1016/j.intell.2013.04.006

[Anonymous No.15498193]

>>15491887
He told you that because he knows your limitations. If you're talented you don't need someone to tell you what you can achieve

[Anonymous No.15498200]

Was completely unaware that looters, bandits and saboteurs were still a thing in this day and age.

[Anonymous No.15498226]

>>15496927
>What is crispr
Dick waving contest between Zhang, Doudna, and who knows who the fuck else at this point.

[Anonymous No.15498828]

>>15498193
When starting a project it helps not knowing how hard it will be. I have heard people say that if they knew how hard it was going to be, they would probably never have started.

[Cult of Passion No.15498837]

>>15498200
Land pirates.

[Anonymous No.15498845]

>>15489608
Probably not without getting help with all the red tape. You can’t even singlehandedly get a driver’s licence.

[Anonymous No.15498853]

>>15498845
>singlehandedly get a driver’s licence.

lame joke: Yeah, that's just negligence. You should be putting both of your hands on the steering wheel.

I'll let myself out.

[Anonymous No.15498926]

>>15498853
You are turning what I said into a joke. Maybe a poor choice of words. Maybe you’re patronising. Fun stuff though. Congratulations.

[Anonymous No.15498983]

>>15497230
>You know a patent normally only lasts 20 years?
>>ahaha oh wow, a soience faggot with no experience or education
Are you posting here to show a retardation formerly regarded impossibel?
What he writes is literally the base of the patent system. What has happened to this board that total idiots write here and thin theyre substance- and clueless gobbledygook has the slightes meaning? Too much clotshots?

[Anonymous No.15498989]

>>15489608
>singlehandedly
You'll need to be more specific. Sure, a single person can come up with a theory. But it takes a team of people to design/refine/make/test/sell it.

[Anonymous No.15498992]

>>15495194
>Solving the equation to allow for it to happen is good enough in most cases.

[Cult of Passion No.15499013]

>>15498992
>look at Jim Keller, dude bounced around Apple, AMD, Intel and every time his architectures and projects are the best. Apple, Intel, and AMD are all literally so close in performance/watt because all of their current archs were touched by Jims hands

If youre trying reinvent the wheel, signal systems, energy source, a new number (like I did with "Neo-Zero" (Polydimensional Non-Zero basesystem, you fucking noob)) then its going to be more than hard...its the HARDEST thing in Science, period, but incremental steps can be just as important, increasing efficiency 100%-1,000% in new designes, still pretty fucking goat. Multi-Threading for CPUs or Multi-Core, if we were still stuck with one core, one thread, they would have to be super beasts to get where we are now.

Didnt Feynman tour around Langley and other Military/Corporate sites fiddling with shit, making improvements?

AI and thrust vectoring combined for landing rockets from space.

Two tools combined to make something new possible. Ive done TONS of this shit, some of it was known about on the inside but "they" are watching for certain people to notice those two things openly known in the public can be combined and used for novel Physics/Science.

That shit was good enough. Meat+Fire=New shit. Didnt have to invent hunting or fire, 1+1=2D Plane, fuck your duces...

[Anonymous No.15499066]

Outside of extreme rarity this sort of person doesn't exist. Most of the stuff you could discover without a team and massive funding has also pretty much been covered. But I could see some group of like 200 people with a defense budget check (blank) make advancements to like fusion if it can work or like med-tech for quickly sealing wounds or identifying illness.

[Anonymous No.15499100]

>>15497564
One of the last humans with a soul. Godspeed Terry.

[Anonymous No.15499102]

>>15499013
So you agree with me that "solving the equation to allow for it to happen is good enough" is not remotely true. Even in your comment ("AI and thrust vectoring combined for landing rockets from space." -- assuming you mean AI in the non-technical sense), those equations have been solved for roughly 100 years in a general sense; controls is a relatively new field but its fundamental equations of motion haven't changed very much. They may use a fancy controls algorithm with gain scheduling, bringing in other signals than position/velocity/acceleration, you may use different materials and components. But the fundamentals are still the same since at least the 1950's if not earlier.

[Anonymous No.15499104]

basedjak party

[Anonymous No.15499316]

>>15489608
Imageboards were and are being used as a psychological weapon to prevent this

[Cult of Passion No.15499337]

>>15499102
>So you agree with me that "solving the equation to allow for it to happen is good enough" is not remotely true.
No. The Gate is locked to you...I turned the key then enjoyed a few weeks of smoking weed on the beach. Why labor mining coal to stoke my furnace to smelt my iron to fabicate my steel to machine into my part to complete my design to enjoy the years taken to do what the army ants can do instantly with meat-power called (You)?

Begone, go toil against nature...I have better things to do.

[Anonymous No.15499348]

>>15499337

[Cult of Passion No.15499352]

>>15499348
>checkmated
Well played.

An abacus and man-hours can do what suoer computers today can...if you have enough man-power to do it. Trajectory, all that math existed long ago, long forgotten and unrecorded by history, like Plimpton 322. Just because you have it now you act like you basically invented by proxy, its sickening.

Youre not what you think you are, kiddo.

[Anonymous No.15499358]

>>15489608
Cryptocurrency/Bitcoin
It's an overstatement to say it has revolutionized the world but it's a recent invention by presumably a single person and it has made a bit of an impact worldwide

[Anonymous No.15499380]

>>15495111
So what did you invent? Or is it so advanced that no one will be able to understand?

[Anonymous No.15499396]

>>15497573
What happens when you combine two geniuses? Einstein made progress on his theories once he learned the proper mathematics: manifolds + tensors.

Progress is not possible without advances in mathematics.

[Cult of Passion No.15499400]

>>15499013
>like I did with "Neo-Zero" (Polydimensional Non-Zero basesystem
>>15499380
As well as from what I can tell pioneered BioMathematics, Math emergent from inate Biology/Physics (the same vein all major Math is invented from, Nature).

Thats just one, I got a box of bullshit man...I forget about a lot of it because I just move on to new inventions/discoveries, Im not really interested in trying to describe Math that operates on an entirely different dimension to people who learned its "supposed to be this way".

[Cult of Passion No.15499405]

>>15499396
>What happens when you combine two geniuses?
This.
https://youtu.be/Y_jdkDpjqpk

Sauron doesnt share power, Frodo...

[Anonymous No.15499411]

>>15499400
What can you do with non-zero base system of numerals?

[Cult of Passion No.15499441]

>>15499411
Helped my calculate/structure Physics, how to "fully encompass infinity" like renormalization, perceive hyperdimensional objects, hard to describe because overlays numerous things and I havnt seen similar things.

Since the "infinity" was in there it helped me "encompass" side length 1, which helped with Guage Theory (before I even knew that name, I "made" something very similar). There is another Physics term I invented before discovering it was already a thing but I forgot it....Im a bit stoned right now, so...idc...

Quite a bit of my inventions turned out to already exist, Norman Wildberger had a numebr of them, was really relieving to see accredited professions mentioning the same stuff. Helped "prove" myself to myself since I have "peer" to compare my works with.

All my Physics works was waaay long ago so Im super rusty with it, I moved on to Biology/Theology/Pure Math ever since.

[Cult of Passion No.15499443]

>>15499411
>since I *didnt* have "peers" to compare my works with

[Anonymous No.15499456]

>>15499441
What have you figured out in pure math?

[Anonymous No.15499463]

>>15497388
It's not tools, at least not primarily. It's the fact that childhood mortality has declined enormously, from about 50% to next to nothing, which equals extremely heightened chances of survival of people with deleterious mutations and lower overall fitness. Moderns are the progeny of the dysgenic freaks who would have died under the age of 5.

[Cult of Passion No.15499474]

>>15499456
Number Theory pushed beyond sanity...Norman Wildberger would be dumbfounded. Reinvent Arithmatic, reinvent all numbers, the very concept of numeral/unit etc. Usually it came out similar but there were a couple times I came up with something very different and those were the ones I sought out.

Some of the things he would "just touch on" and never fully gripped and torqued it with full force. His works is already fringe...so I get why, but I started on the fringe...so I pushed it beyond comprehension.

Also, the reason Catagory Theory, Set Theory, is popular is because of me. I found it so simple and powerful at the same time. So easy to form coherent heirarchies of importantance, putting more fundemental base operations below higher and less total work altering operations. Very Physics-y (for me) if done Unidimensionally up, ordering it in emergent order based off of what alters from which and not the other way.

[Anonymous No.15499480]

>>15499474
You ever wonder why smoking weed makes people think they are geniuses and yet when asked to present evidence they have nothing to show for it other than bombastic babbling?

[Anonymous No.15499484]

>>15499480
>>15499474
For example, if I told you to tell me the main construction in the proof of presheaves and their reduction to colimits of representable functors what answer would you give?

[Cult of Passion No.15499489]

>>15499480
>when asked to present evidence they have nothing to show for it
I drop evidence constantly, dumbass....I smoke because I live on Planet Retard and its filled with (You)'s.

>>15499441
>>15499474

Good luck, your PhD wont help you with me if I lay out my most abstract shit,I would know...Ive attended thousands of hours of lectures.

[Cult of Passion No.15499500]

>>15499480
>bombastic babbling
IM STATING FACTS YOU FUCKING RETARD.

>>15499484
Thats a bunch of arbitrary and poorly defined words, I use MY defintions and MY axioms, NOT YOURS.

>hard to describe because overlays numerous things and I havnt seen similar things
I USE MY MATH THAT YOUR PROFESSORS CANNOT UNDERSTAND. YOURS IS TRASH TO ME.

Regards,
kys

[Anonymous No.15499507]

>>15499489
Ok but it obviously makes no difference and all you're doing is upping whatever chemicals in your brain make you think you're a genius by smoking weed. It's the same with anti-depressants, caffeine, and Adderall. It does not fundamentally change your intelligence. All it does is make you believe whatever you're thinking of right now is the best thing since sliced bread. This thread being obvious evidence of everything I just said.

You are overstimulated by your own retardation and think it is evidence of extraordinary cognitive ability.

[Anonymous No.15499512]

>>15499500
Weed also makes people overly emotional and aggressive. This thread again being proof of what I'm stating.

You should quit. Dial back on the stimulants in general and start addressing whatever trauma you are avoiding.

[Anonymous No.15499519]

>>15499500
The unified field equations are not nonsense. Each summand has a clear interpretation of you spend the time to understand the underlying mathematics.

It might not be accurate but it is nonetheless the best people have been able to come up with after millions of years of cognitive evolution

[Cult of Passion No.15499523]

>>15499507
>>15499512

Youre not a Psychologist, youre a midwit trying to feel "equal".

Kick rocks, dumbass...or join us in BioGeneral and lets talk my current research of Evolutionary Biology.

>>15499515

[Anonymous No.15499529]

>>15499463
>Moderns are the progeny of the dysgenic freaks who would have died under the age of 5.

I somehow don't doubt that, given what runs around these days. It makes sense that people in the 1880s would be smarter if you even got to live to the age where that mattered.

[Anonymous No.15499561]

>>15499523
You're not addressing the point I'm making. Stimulants like weed don't make you smarter, they just make you think you're smarter by making the persona sensorium more salient to whatever you're fixated on. You seem to be fixated on intelligence (like most people on this board) which ironically makes you no smarter than every other retard on this board.

So how about this. I propose a challenge. Learn enough category theory by posting on this board and work your way up to the proof of colimit representation of presheaves or limit representation of co-presheaves. If you can do this then you can continue shitting up the board while high.

If you are indeed as smart as you think you are the truth and veracity of what I've posted should be self evident to you.

[Cult of Passion No.15499576]

>>15499561
>You're not addressing the point I'm making. Stimulants like
Youre not a Psychiatrist, youre midwit trying to feel validated. Stop lying, stop larping, start being a somebody, kiddo.

Im gunna sip my brandy and listen to a historical account of Galileo's life, good night.

Over and out.

[Anonymous No.15499583]

>>15499529
People are getting dumber. The environment is polluted and food is of lower quality. The quality of the environment is directly correlated with quality of people and intelligence and as the quality of the environment declines so do the people that are constructed from its parts.

[Anonymous No.15500565]

>>15499583
>People are getting dumber.
The opposite is true. IQ test have to raise the 100, because it is supposed to be the average. And maybe such practice may cause you believe what you do, or maybe you're just wrong, because I never heard of them moving that point the other way. Though I have no idea if it is true that they do, I only read it. Yet anyway people inevitably becomes smarter because the world is more and more demanding in the matter of comprehension not stamina.
But I agree that environment should be protected, but then again ecology as a science is only a century old.

[Anonymous No.15500572]

>>15491055
>Simple idea: sell money with interest
>Useful complexity: inevitably own everything in the world
kek

[Anonymous No.15500628]

>>15494262
>water-based engines
In freshman year thermodynamics, our grumpy old professor taught us a mathematical proof explaining why water-based engines don't work. He told us it's because people kept e-mailing him asking about water-based engines. I would dig through my old college notes and prove to you that that shit's physically impossible (unless you enjoy receiving somewhere in the range of 2% output efficiency) but I don't want to waste my breath on someone who's too stupid to understand what's essentially a slightly harder version of high school physics.

[Anonymous No.15500660]

>>15489650
BACK TO YOUR HIDEY HOLE NAHIDA!!!

[Anonymous No.15500661]

>>15489608
Keep the dream alive, le high-IQ chud, but life is short, so you'll have to give up sitting around solving CAPTCHAs on 4chud.

[Anonymous No.15500662]

Uhg don’t you get it computernet, I’m the smart one, geeze you big dummy always getting that mixed up. Now let’s have a contest to who can grasp for smartest internet shitposter, I can prove this theorem because it’s so.

[Anonymous No.15501481]

>>15489608
Elon Musk is already doing that.

[Anonymous No.15501601]

>>15501481
>Musk
DEBUNKED
https://youtu.be/vYURUiOjZSw

[Anonymous No.15502687]

>>15501601
>DEBUNKED
No. The dude who made this video is obsessed with Musk.

[Anonymous No.15502833]

>>15490916
go back to /pol/ retard

[Anonymous No.15502914]

>>15492086
But you can get a team of 50 people to each specialize in something over several semesters, so that you have 50 specialists in just 8 semesters instead of one genius achieving 3 specializations max and wasting a decade

midwit

[Anonymous No.15503139]

>>15501601
It's too late for deb00nkers.
Starship is now such an important program for the US government that even if Musk goes bankrupt, we'll have it.