/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.15406911]

Have there been any studies on the difference between vaxxies and non-vaxxies psychically and psychologically? Especially T levels? (aside from the Milgram experiment of course). It seems like it would be a really interesting topic to study. The results probably won't get approved by (((per review))) of course but I am sure there are ways to get it to the public now that twitter is no longer a massive brainwashing psyop controlled platform

[Anonymous No.15407034]

>>15406911
Studies have shown that higher T levels make men more socially conservative. That implies by correlation that men who refused the vax, being largely socially conservative, have higher T and are thus healthier.

[Anonymous No.15407126]

>>15406911
lots of studies

http://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/the-safe-and-effective-narrative
100 leading indicators of death

http://pdfhost.io/v/cMuQdMFP5_novaxx5txt_Notepad
get the pdf zoom 200% clik links read learn

NO REFUNDS

[Anonymous No.15407133]

Black people had a high antivax rate, but it could have been cultural. Aren't they supposed to be high t?

[Anonymous No.15407141]

>>15406911
For similar reasons to OP image, I wouldn't marry a woman with a tattoo. Not only do they look disgusting, it shows she's not capable of making good rational choices. Obviously being fat, using drugs, etc are other indicators.
>>15407133
Pretty sure it's because after the Tuskegee experiments, they have no reason at all to trust the system.

[Anonymous No.15407152]

>women preferring sociopaths
color me surprised

[Anonymous No.15407159]

>>15407141
>Pretty sure it's because after the Tuskegee experiments, they have no reason at all to trust the system.
You give blacks too much forward thinking credit and logic.
It's just blacks are lazy and also don't like white peepo (government) telling them what they have to do.
Blacks had the highest rate of vaccination during early 2021, but once the government started saying they "have to" get it, they were like, "fuck yalls!".

If the "vaccine" was illegal, blacks would be 100% jabbed.

[Anonymous No.15407176]

>>15407152
>Spends a year shaming others into conforming with government rules simply because you can
Yep, you're totally not the sociopath

[Anonymous No.15407183]

>>15407133
lol, anti-vaxxers are the intellectual peers of niggers

[Anonymous No.15407188]

>>15407183
It's the midwit mountain meme. Black people are too stupid to be tricked into going against their interests, and white antivaxers are smart enough to know why it's wrong.

[Anonymous No.15407190]

>>15407183
>niggers
those are called economically disadvantaged americans chudcel

[Anonymous No.15407285]

>>15407190
We call them "scholars" now

[Anonymous No.15407329]

>>15407176
YOU DON'T HAVE PERMISSION TO LEAVE YOUR HOME COVID DENIER!

[Anonymous No.15408826]

She looks like a whore who's into old men for money and BBC for seggs

[Anonymous No.15408901]

>>15407126
Do your research

[Anonymous No.15409093]

>>15406911
>Have there been any studies on the difference between vaxxies and non-vaxxies psychically and psychologically?
Plenty. I am going to assume by "non-vaxxies" you mean an explicitly stated disposition only.

Some example literature, plenty exists but I've a text limit.
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1076015/full
https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Psychological-Roots-of-Anti-Vaccination-A-Hornsey-Harris/5bfd8a8a961df4c33656e379a2306283538580cc
https://dc.ewu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1346&context=theses
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12144-
019-0147-1
Anti-vaccination types on average are as follows cognitively,
- Think they know more than professionals while knowing less than average person.
- Have very low intellectual humility combined with very low intellectual ability OR relevant domain knowledge
- Extremely low trust in and lack of interest in obtaining information from scientific sources
- High in conspiratorial thinking and unsurprisingly high prevalence of cluster A personality disorders
- High psychological reactance (degree of upset and spite to perceived restrictions on freedoms)
- High prevalence of magical thinking e.g. superstitiously asserting causation from temporal relatedness (coincidence) and analogical associations alone.
- High degrees of cynicism and corresponding willingness to engage in manipulation
Pathology,
The strongest correlations are with conspiratorial beliefs, and unsurprisingly rates of cluster A personality disorders are far higher than random chance.
There are multiple distinct subgroups. Accounting for cluster A disorders, the remainder aligns with narcissistic personality disorder. Delusions of ability, high reactance, manipulativeness, social cynicism, etc.

In case any honest person wonders why antivaxxers lie so much, it's a combination of social cynicism and prevalence of NPD. Cynical beliefs about general dishonesty ergo higher acceptance of personal dishonesty.

[Anonymous No.15409122]

>>15409093
Nicely done.
Would hire.

[Anonymous No.15409226]

>>15407034
this guy's mad he can't get pussy lol

[Anonymous No.15409390]

>>15406911
feet

[bodhi No.15409496]

>>15409093
No question you consume copious amounts of soi and possess very low T levels

[Anonymous No.15409520]

>>15409093
Surely, these studies weren't conducted with a political agenda in mind to paint those unwilling as all of the points you've stated.

I bet there was no conflict of interest here. Kek, go gobble a cock faggots.

[Anonymous No.15409527]

>>15409093
gj _b

[Anonymous No.15409593]

>>15407133
The blacks learned a long time ago that injections from the government do not, in fact, give one superpowers. Historically, it gave them HIV and syphillus. It's a shame the other races have yet to learn something so obvious.

[Anonymous No.15409595]

>>15408826
>projecting your troon fetishes on an animu forum

[Anonymous No.15409903]

>>15406911
my antivaxer wife

[Anonymous No.15409908]

>>15406911
how can we test this if vaxxxers died 2 weeks ago?

[Anonymous No.15409925]

>>15409093
>here are some completely objective studies
>in addition
>accumulation and throbbing of metastases right from my fingers
well, you were wrong about everything.
>covid is going to kill us all
nope
>covid is deadly for all age groups
nope
>masks help
nope
>lockdowns help
nope
>covid substandard vaccine is safe and effective
nope
>covid substandard vaccine prevent infection
nope
>2 masks help
nope
>3 masks help
nope
>the variant is more deadly than the original strain
nope
>IF ALL THE PEOPLE IN THE WORLD GET VACCINATED WE CAN STOP THE CORONA VIRUS
nope

you were wrong about every single aspect, every single statement, every fraction of basic scientific adjustment.
the raucous recitation of the neurotic mob clearly showed from what material it is made of,
you fucking "people" are the retaliation of sick establishment you brought us intellectual destruction, systematic elimination of common sense, you deserve the most painful death imaginable.
melt in hell you sack of shit

[Anonymous No.15409979]

>>15409925
>>15409527
>>15409520
>>15409496
>>15409122
Ladies, please, don't everyone try to ride my throbbing cock so hard all at the same time. You need not exhaustively demonstrate every single point to be absolutely correct so desperately.

[Anonymous No.15410081]

>Anonymous 05/03/23(Tue)07:44:01 No.15409979▶
>>15409925 (You)
>>15409527
>>15409520
>>15409496
>>15409122
File: lel.gif (905 KB, 500x349)
>hrobbing need not single the be every same not everyone point cock to cock be desperately. exhaustively every please, need so demonstrate at be correct every don't please, exhaustively need hard don't point Ladies, cock my to everyone exhaustively cock correct absolutely desperately. correct throbbing same be at need correct hard please

[Anonymous No.15410206]

>>15409925
lol chud got absolutely btfo, has to resort to impotent seething

[bodhi No.15410219]

>>15409979
>his retort is to post double the serving of copious amounts of soi and low T

[Anonymous No.15410250]

>>15409925
all of those measures actually do work if you're not retarded. so you and your ilk are essentially self fulfilling prophets

[Anonymous No.15410257]

>>15406911
Built for bbc

[Anonymous No.15410267]

>>15409520
Let me guess, but if a study draws conclusions that agree with your politics then there was no bias whatsoever. Could you perhaps give evidence that there was a conflict of interest or are you going to keep making baseless claims?

[Anonymous No.15410285]

>>15409925
If only people were willing to cooperate maybe a few more lockdowns, more boosters we could mitigate Covid and saved more lives. you should thank people who trust Science and took the Vaccine because they probably saved yours.
If only people were willing to cooperate maybe a few more lockdowns, more boosters we could mitigate Covid and saved more lives. you should thank people who trust Science and took the Vaccine because they probably saved yours.

[Anonymous No.15410288]

>>15410285
Only 2 more weeks to flatten the curve.

[Anonymous No.15410311]

>>15409925
>>covid is going to kill us all
Nobody said this
>>covid is deadly for all age groups
It is, although fatality rate is negligible in children and increases with age
>>masks help
They do
>>lockdowns help
Correct
>>covid substandard vaccine is safe and effective
It is
>>covid substandard vaccine prevent infection
It significantly reduces the risk of infection, not elimitate it completely.
>>the variant is more deadly than the original strain
depends which variant you're talking about but this is true for some of them
>>IF ALL THE PEOPLE IN THE WORLD GET VACCINATED WE CAN STOP THE CORONA VIRUS
Correct, via herd immunity. Look we're already seeing how well it worked out in the present!

Are you finished having your mental breakdown? That post seems to have mindbroken you pretty hard

[Anonymous No.15410318]

>>15410311
>Are you finished having your mental breakdown? That post seems to have mindbroken you pretty hard
I wrote it. I've been fucking dying laughing watching him sperg. Or them sperg. Doesn't matter really. Kind of hold the faint hope it's someone trolling and lampooning antivaxxers by some kind of performance satire.

[Anonymous No.15410327]

>>15410311
>Are you finished having your mental breakdown? That post seems to have mindbroken you pretty hard
I'm not the one you're replying to, I wrote the thing they're losing their fucking minds over. I've been fucking dying laughing watching him sperg. Or them sperg. Doesn't matter really. Kind of hold the faint hope it's someone trolling and lampooning antivaxxers by some kind of performance satire.

[Anonymous No.15410328]

lmao @ the vaxxcels seething ITT because women know they are cucks and wont have sex with him

[Anonymous No.15410332]

>>15410311
>>15410327
These posts have to be satire lol

[Anonymous No.15410333]

>>15410311
>significantly reduces the risk of infection
lol
lmao
look the efficacy after 9 months
look how it declines with age

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35189624/
Effectiveness of mRNA-1273 against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron and Delta variants
Tseng et al
two-dose VE against Omicron infection at 14-90 days was 44.0% (95% confidence interval, 35.1-51.6%) but declined quickly.

[Anonymous No.15410345]

>>15409925
Based.

[VIRUSES DON'T EXIST No.15410554]

>>15406911
yet another schizo thread.

[Anonymous No.15410555]

>>15409226
Dilate.

[Anonymous No.15410621]

>>15410250
No, they didn't. Covid ran its course on its own

[Anonymous No.15410799]

>>15410267
The problem is that these conclusions are so vitriolic and nasty that it's laughable and clearly biased without shame. You seem like a horrible person.

[Anonymous No.15410829]

>>15407133

Strangely, almost no one in Africa and black countries like Haiti got COVID.

And almost no one there got the Vaxx.

All adding to the mystery of this massive NWO conspiracy.

[Anonymous No.15410846]

>>15407141
>Pretty sure it's because after the Tuskegee experiments
NIGGERS HAD NO IDEA WHAT THE TUSKEGEE EXPERIMENTS WERE BEFORE WHITE PEOPLE STARTED USING IT TO JUSTIFY WHY BLACK PEOPLE WERENT GETTING VACCINATED.

[Anonymous No.15410885]

>>15406911
Negatively correlated when ignoring factors like race. Positively correlated when factoring that out.
>>15410829
You’re about as retarded as a Haitian. People die in Haiti all the time, it’s not like they are capable of figuring out why.

[Anonymous No.15410902]

>>15406911
Yet all your decision making is based on the english language which make you an outsourcing little bitch too since you didn't invent the english language on your own.

[Anonymous No.15411806]

>>15409925
well done lad, to hell with this germophobe freak

[VIRUSES DON'T EXIST No.15411993]

>>15410885
> People die in Haiti all the time
emphasis misplacement. it's everywhere all the time, all people die everywhere, all animals.

[VIRUSES DON'T EXIST No.15411996]

>>15410621
> covid ran
mass propaganda hysteria, yes.

[Anonymous No.15412033]

>>15407159
>Blacks had the highest rate of vaccination during early 2021, but once the government started saying they "have to" get it, they were like, "fuck yalls!".
>If the "vaccine" was illegal, blacks would be 100% jabbed.
Good heuristic

[Anonymous No.15412266]

>>15409093
>Anti-vaccination types on average are as follows cognitively,
Does the AVERAGE antivaxer believe in each and every point on that list?

>- High degrees of cynicism and corresponding willingness to engage in manipulation
Does manipulation follow from cynicism, or is this a rather peculiar definition? Plenty of people I know are cynical about what the government says but do not engage in manipulation themselves.

>>15409093
>In case any honest person wonders why antivaxxers lie so much
I would be more concerned about a huge fraction of the population being painted with such broad brushes. This looks like a "them vs us" mentality. What happened to te live and let live approach?

[Anonymous No.15412319]

>>15409093
>- Think they know more than professionals while knowing less than average person.
Would you say the WHO represented the professionals here?

[Anonymous No.15412366]

>>15412266
>Does the AVERAGE antivaxer believe in each and every point on that list?
I have no idea how that question made sense to you. Of course not. On average ecologically, at least for relevant research I've seen about it since covid made everyone all too aware of it. For multivariate regressions and the like those are usually the most significant associations I know of. At least for when explicit anti-vaccination beliefs as a principled matter, and it can be rather difficult finding research properly defining terms.
>Does manipulation follow from cynicism, or is this a rather peculiar definition?
Thought it followed from narcissism that I was referring to social/interpersonal cynicism. Ideas on and treatment of people, expectations of people, etc. As you mentioned, yes, political cynicism is a distinct and separable feature of other subpopulations too. So the correlations have very different strengths dependent on direction.
>I would be more concerned about a huge fraction of the population being painted with such broad brushes. This looks like a "them vs us" mentality. What happened to te live and let live approach?
I am letting them live. I'm just answering OP's question balancing brevity with my idea of average associations about vocally explicit anti-vaxxers. I have no idea how anyone passed primary school not understanding this but "Far higher odds than normal" for something like NPD and schizophrenia does not mean "therefore all of them". Nonetheless it can drive some pretty harsh extremes. Fun stuff but very few people are interested in research on /sci/

[Anonymous No.15412403]

>>15412319
>Would you say the WHO represented the professionals here?
There is similar research for many other kinds of anti-science groups, such as young earth creationists. There, too, biologists knew most on average while anti-science creationists knew least. Worth pointing out we need not rely on a knowledge test association either. If I recall correctly I think numeracy, as a cognitive measure, has a non-linear relationship that's quite strong below some threshold.

Anyway it shouldn't matter as the end result is a "no shit" truism. Those worst at reasoning and things important in science are most likely to be anti-science. Water is wet.

[Anonymous No.15412412]

>>15412403
>Those worst at reasoning and things important in science are most likely to be anti-science.
This would imply that they lack the skills to derive correct conclusions through induction, when in reality it appears that they derive correct conclusions more than the people who belong to scientific disciplines. Why is that?

[Anonymous No.15412424]

>>15412412
>This would imply that they lack the skills to derive correct conclusions through induction
It does. They're terrible at it.
>when in reality it appears that they derive correct conclusions more than the people who belong to scientific disciplines. Why is that?
Should I tell him? Should I? Or will he realize on his own?

[Anonymous No.15412426]

>>15412424
Is it true what the authorities say and antivaxers were just right by accident, or did they derive their correct conclusion about the vax through a correct heuristic?

[bodhi No.15412433]

>>15412424
Imagine being this stupid while wanking your own dick at how smart you think you are top kek

[Anonymous No.15412440]

so when are vaxxies going to get their 8th booster or whatever theyre at now? the arcterus variant is here and its going to permanently blind you and make you break out in monkeypox!!! youre not a science denying antivaxxer chud are you?!?? get the fucking vaccine now!!!

[Anonymous No.15412443]

>>15412440
Are they actually claiming it will make you blind?

[VIRUSES DON'T EXIST No.15412447]

reminder: "vaccinated" is subjective. objective is "injected" or "jabbed"

[Anonymous No.15412449]

>>15412443

>>15412447
shut the fuck up shill

[Anonymous No.15412454]

>>15412449
Blood clotting huh? So are they trying to pass off massive clotting from the jab as a symptom of this new mystery covid?

[Anonymous No.15412455]

theyre still pissed that they couldnt get to kids

[VIRUSES DON'T EXIST No.15412477]

>>15412449
> no arguments, only seething and propaganda picture
as always

[Anonymous No.15412490]

>>15412477
careful, youre straying off your script now

[VIRUSES DON'T EXIST No.15412503]

>>15412490
(you)

[Anonymous No.15412506]

lmao

[Anonymous No.15412524]

>>15412440
Trust the science chud

[bodhi No.15412533]

>>15412503
VDE was a glownigger kike all along?

[Anonymous No.15413071]

>>15406911
This bitch clearly has a screw loose, or a couple. I don't understand why antivaxxers would want someone who's clearly off their rocker representing them, oh wait...

[bodhi No.15413088]

>>15413071
>OMG OMG IF YOU WONT LET THE GOVERNMENT FORCE YOU TO TAKE AN EXPERIMENTAL INJECTION FOR THE FLU YOU ARE CRAZY REEEEEEEEEE
You are the one who clearly belongs in a padded room fucking nut case

[bodhi No.15413102]

This is the one beautoful thing the plandemic did, it showed normies that people like this exist >>15413071. People you cant reason with who are just batshit fucking crazy and want to attack you because you arent crazy. No amount of warnings or Milgrem experiment results would make it hit home to them just how deranged and retarded most people are quite like seeing you deranged NPC psychos in action in real time and watching it finally dawn them
>wait, hold on, these motherfuckers really are retarded, deranged and dangerous and we need to do something about them before they destroy us all